Page 2 of 25
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:16 pm
by spenser
this is pathetic. we're going to lose by 30 today
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:16 pm
by xhadow
spenser wrote:this is pathetic. we're going to lose by 30 today
well we haven't seen how the O looks yet... lets try to keep the faith
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:17 pm
by TincoSkin
lets come right back and make this first quarter one to remember!! hail!!
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:17 pm
by grampi
Why is it when a team needs to get back on track, they're always able to do it against the Redskins?
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:17 pm
by spenser
xhadow wrote:spenser wrote:this is pathetic. we're going to lose by 30 today
well we haven't seen how the O looks yet... lets try to keep the faith
Im trying dude, im actually a positive guy, but i can totally see a 3 and out coming up...
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:18 pm
by xhadow
spenser wrote:xhadow wrote:spenser wrote:this is pathetic. we're going to lose by 30 today
well we haven't seen how the O looks yet... lets try to keep the faith
Im trying dude, im actually a positive guy, but i can totally see a 3 and out coming up...
Me too, I did say try!
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:18 pm
by grampi
spenser wrote:xhadow wrote:spenser wrote:this is pathetic. we're going to lose by 30 today
well we haven't seen how the O looks yet... lets try to keep the faith
Im trying dude, im actually a positive guy, but i can totally see a 3 and out coming up...
Me too.
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:19 pm
by grampi
This is one of those games the Skins are supposed to win, but won't.
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:19 pm
by spenser
All i know is im going to be so pissed if we dont even TRY to unleash campbell
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:20 pm
by RayNAustin
This defensive scheme worked so well against New England, we decided to use it today also.
I just don't get this team anymore. 20 yards off the line? They were 40 off the line!
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:20 pm
by Texas Hog
who are we worried about beating us deep? pathetic start
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:20 pm
by dlc
This looks nothing like a defensive strategy that GW has ever implemented. How did he go from the highest blitzing defense to a completely vanilla one? Gibbs took his balls. We play scared.
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:20 pm
by xhadow
at least portis came to play
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:22 pm
by grampi
Why isn't GW using the same defensive strategy he used in the first game? IT worked.
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:22 pm
by xhadow
Cambell looks like he has happy feet... now I am truly concerned... but at least he got the ball out
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:23 pm
by 1niksder
grampi wrote:Why isn't GW using the same defensive strategy he used in the first game? IT worked.
Why didn't you read and follow the PM you just received?
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:23 pm
by xhadow
grampi wrote:Why isn't GW using the same defensive strategy he used in the first game? IT worked.
Because as it was previously say he wanted to repeat the performance we had against the Pats
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:24 pm
by TincoSkin
go for it
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:24 pm
by grampi
Just what we need...a punt :0(
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:24 pm
by xhadow
go for it geeez
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:24 pm
by TincoSkin
go for it
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:24 pm
by grampi
Come on D, let's see a 3 and out!
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:25 pm
by xhadow
no killer instinct, you can't mange a game when you let the opposing team score and we only punt.
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:25 pm
by TincoSkin
lets go D
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:26 pm
by grampi
1niksder wrote:grampi wrote:Why isn't GW using the same defensive strategy he used in the first game? IT worked.
Why didn't you read and follow the PM you just received?
Sorry, won't happen again.