Irn-Bru wrote:
It's because he is the object of blame and criticism from many, which both irritates people who don't agree with all of the criticism and instigates arguments when those two positions meet on a message board.
See, I neithr blame nor applaud him. The fact is, I'm not really passionate either way about him. He hasn't done anything to make me believe that he's better than Moss or ARE.
Please point out the "praise and credit" that he's receiving. Most of the supporters of Lloyd in this debate are basically arguing that he needs a chance to play. Is it praise and credit to say "why aren't we playing him more? He might be able to contribute!" If that's praise, then it should be obvious why at least some people feel that way, however much others like to see Lloyd as the reason this team has problems.
Okay, I may have overstated the "praise and credit" part of what I said. The fact is that he
does get on the field. He was the number 2 reciever behind Moss last year and started as the number 3 this year, and has slid down the chart. I have to believe that is due to something the coaches are seeing in him during practices. Perhaps the trouble is with him getting open, I don't know, but I can't recall a broadcaster, TV or otherwise, pointing out that Lloyd was ever "wide open".
It's ridiculous to think that if he was a great receiver, then the coaches would play him?

You seem to indicate that you know something I don't here. I'll admit I don't know everything, and that one of my weaker spots is that I come across like I do. I did typo and meant to say "
wouldn't play him".
I don't see many people saying that he is a great receiver. 100% of the debate that I'm observing is over whether or not he should be getting a shot to contribute each Sunday. I don't think anyone will dispute that his career with the Redskins has been anything but disappointing and subpar in production.
That's just it. He
is getting a shot each Sunday. Listen to Sonny Sam, and Not-Frank on the radio. They report everytime he's in there when they describe the packages. He may only get in there a few times a game, but he does get in there.
I can't say whether it's Jason's fault for not throwing to him (Brunell didn't throw to him very often either), the coaches fault for the route that he has to run, or his inability to get open (as I said, I don't hear about him getting wide open). It could be all three, but I'm going to side with the people that work with him all week as to where he belongs on the depth chart.