Page 2 of 2

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:55 pm
by Deadskins
die cowboys die wrote:
aswas71788 wrote:Brady has only played the Redsins on other time. I think it was in 2006. He lost. The Redskins are the only team in the NFL that Brady has not beaten. Hope that remains true Monday.


it was in 2003, under the illustrious leader steve spurrier (though we did have the #1 ranked offense at that point in the season... shows how much early season stats mean). brady threw 3 INTs. ifeanyi ohalate knocked down a brady attempt on 4th down to seal the game.


eerily familiar-- the skins had a 17 point second half lead (20-3) and let it dwindle down to 20-17 with 2 minutes left, thus requiring the 4th down stop.

The last minute stop was only necessary because the zebras tried to screw us once again. Laveranues Coles made a 1st down catch about 5 yards from the sidelines, made three or four steps in bounds and then had the ball come out of his hands as he hit the ground out of bounds.
The refs ruled it a sideline catch which requires that the receiver maintain possession even after going out of bounds. The problem was that it was not a sideline catch. it wasn't like he was struggling to get his feet down in bounds. He ran out of bounds after making the catch. It was a totally bogus call that we managed to overcome anyway.

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 4:32 pm
by die cowboys die
JSPB22 wrote:
die cowboys die wrote:
aswas71788 wrote:Brady has only played the Redsins on other time. I think it was in 2006. He lost. The Redskins are the only team in the NFL that Brady has not beaten. Hope that remains true Monday.


it was in 2003, under the illustrious leader steve spurrier (though we did have the #1 ranked offense at that point in the season... shows how much early season stats mean). brady threw 3 INTs. ifeanyi ohalate knocked down a brady attempt on 4th down to seal the game.


eerily familiar-- the skins had a 17 point second half lead (20-3) and let it dwindle down to 20-17 with 2 minutes left, thus requiring the 4th down stop.

The last minute stop was only necessary because the zebras tried to screw us once again. Laveranues Coles made a 1st down catch about 5 yards from the sidelines, made three or four steps in bounds and then had the ball come out of his hands as he hit the ground out of bounds.
The refs ruled it a sideline catch which requires that the receiver maintain possession even after going out of bounds. The problem was that it was not a sideline catch. it wasn't like he was struggling to get his feet down in bounds. He ran out of bounds after making the catch. It was a totally bogus call that we managed to overcome anyway.


yeah, i remember that play...we picked up a 1st down on that throw to the left to coles, but got called for a false start or holding or some crud. so we ran the same play again and it worked again, and the refs completely blew the call. i don't think any of the refs' incompetence infuriates me more than the times when it's blatantly clear that they literally don't understand the rules, or the specific applications of them. it's one thing to miss a call, but when it's because you are basing it on the wrong application of a rule, you can't even claim to be attempting to do your job!

i'm just saying it's eerie that we had that big lead and didn't score again while it slowly eroded.

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:09 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
Looks like we need the Fun N' Gun back to beat the Patriots. We're doomed!!! :shock:

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:19 pm
by GSPODS
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
Fios wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Fios wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Desmond Howard wrote:He sounded genuinely worried about his defense. I think he know his team is not as unstoppable as the media is making it out to be. He has beat the type of team he created with the type of team we have now.


Brady has trouble with the Redskins. I don't think he's ever won a game against the Redskins.


Come on. He's played against the Skins ONCE.


Call me biased but I'll take any advantage the Redskins have this weekend.

Not biased. Grasping at straws, perhaps? :wink:


Don't bring me into this


Just because I think you write well does not mean I'll be grasping at your straw, ever. Rest assured you are perfectly safe with me.

Methinks thou dost protest too much.


That makes one hell of a lot of sense. Quote a homosexual author to reiterate the statements of two heterosexuals discussing pizza toppings and attractive women.


Actually there isn't a great deal of evidence, other than how one might interpret the sonnets, to suggest he was homosexual. There are those who believe the sonnets were commissioned by a wealthy family to convince their son of his "greatness" via flattery so he would not marry below his station. Which isn't to say it's false but it's speculative, at best.


No worries, guys, JSPB22 meant to post this:

Methinks thou dost post too much.


:lol:


How nice. Methinks thou doth remain unredeemed. :evil:

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:44 pm
by hailskins666
GSPODS wrote:
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
Fios wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Fios wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Desmond Howard wrote:He sounded genuinely worried about his defense. I think he know his team is not as unstoppable as the media is making it out to be. He has beat the type of team he created with the type of team we have now.


Brady has trouble with the Redskins. I don't think he's ever won a game against the Redskins.


Come on. He's played against the Skins ONCE.


Call me biased but I'll take any advantage the Redskins have this weekend.

Not biased. Grasping at straws, perhaps? :wink:


Don't bring me into this


Just because I think you write well does not mean I'll be grasping at your straw, ever. Rest assured you are perfectly safe with me.

Methinks thou dost protest too much.


That makes one hell of a lot of sense. Quote a homosexual author to reiterate the statements of two heterosexuals discussing pizza toppings and attractive women.


Actually there isn't a great deal of evidence, other than how one might interpret the sonnets, to suggest he was homosexual. There are those who believe the sonnets were commissioned by a wealthy family to convince their son of his "greatness" via flattery so he would not marry below his station. Which isn't to say it's false but it's speculative, at best.


No worries, guys, JSPB22 meant to post this:

Methinks thou dost post too much.


:lol:


How nice. Methinks thou doth remain unredeemed. :evil:
i just quoted this because i wanted to see exactly how small that quote box in the center will get.

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:49 pm
by GSPODS
hailskins666 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
Fios wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Fios wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Desmond Howard wrote:He sounded genuinely worried about his defense. I think he know his team is not as unstoppable as the media is making it out to be. He has beat the type of team he created with the type of team we have now.


Brady has trouble with the Redskins. I don't think he's ever won a game against the Redskins.


Come on. He's played against the Skins ONCE.


Call me biased but I'll take any advantage the Redskins have this weekend.

Not biased. Grasping at straws, perhaps? :wink:


Don't bring me into this


Just because I think you write well does not mean I'll be grasping at your straw, ever. Rest assured you are perfectly safe with me.

Methinks thou dost protest too much.


That makes one hell of a lot of sense. Quote a homosexual author to reiterate the statements of two heterosexuals discussing pizza toppings and attractive women.


Actually there isn't a great deal of evidence, other than how one might interpret the sonnets, to suggest he was homosexual. There are those who believe the sonnets were commissioned by a wealthy family to convince their son of his "greatness" via flattery so he would not marry below his station. Which isn't to say it's false but it's speculative, at best.


No worries, guys, JSPB22 meant to post this:

Methinks thou dost post too much.


:lol:


How nice. Methinks thou doth remain unredeemed. :evil:
i just quoted this because i wanted to see exactly how small that quote box in the center will get.


Almost as small as the minds of some members. :twisted:

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:49 pm
by Deadskins
hailskins666 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
Fios wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Fios wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Desmond Howard wrote:He sounded genuinely worried about his defense. I think he know his team is not as unstoppable as the media is making it out to be. He has beat the type of team he created with the type of team we have now.


Brady has trouble with the Redskins. I don't think he's ever won a game against the Redskins.


Come on. He's played against the Skins ONCE.


Call me biased but I'll take any advantage the Redskins have this weekend.

Not biased. Grasping at straws, perhaps? :wink:


Don't bring me into this


Just because I think you write well does not mean I'll be grasping at your straw, ever. Rest assured you are perfectly safe with me.

Methinks thou dost protest too much.


That makes one hell of a lot of sense. Quote a homosexual author to reiterate the statements of two heterosexuals discussing pizza toppings and attractive women.


Actually there isn't a great deal of evidence, other than how one might interpret the sonnets, to suggest he was homosexual. There are those who believe the sonnets were commissioned by a wealthy family to convince their son of his "greatness" via flattery so he would not marry below his station. Which isn't to say it's false but it's speculative, at best.


No worries, guys, JSPB22 meant to post this:

Methinks thou dost post too much.


:lol:


How nice. Methinks thou doth remain unredeemed. :evil:
i just quoted this because i wanted to see exactly how small that quote box in the center will get.

Pretty small, I bet.

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:50 pm
by ChrisHanburger
hailskins666 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
Fios wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Fios wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Desmond Howard wrote:He sounded genuinely worried about his defense. I think he know his team is not as unstoppable as the media is making it out to be. He has beat the type of team he created with the type of team we have now.


Brady has trouble with the Redskins. I don't think he's ever won a game against the Redskins.


Come on. He's played against the Skins ONCE.


Call me biased but I'll take any advantage the Redskins have this weekend.

Not biased. Grasping at straws, perhaps? :wink:


Don't bring me into this


Just because I think you write well does not mean I'll be grasping at your straw, ever. Rest assured you are perfectly safe with me.

Methinks thou dost protest too much.


That makes one hell of a lot of sense. Quote a homosexual author to reiterate the statements of two heterosexuals discussing pizza toppings and attractive women.


Actually there isn't a great deal of evidence, other than how one might interpret the sonnets, to suggest he was homosexual. There are those who believe the sonnets were commissioned by a wealthy family to convince their son of his "greatness" via flattery so he would not marry below his station. Which isn't to say it's false but it's speculative, at best.


No worries, guys, JSPB22 meant to post this:

Methinks thou dost post too much.


:lol:


How nice. Methinks thou doth remain unredeemed. :evil:
i just quoted this because i wanted to see exactly how small that quote box in the center will get.


If you stare at it long enough, :shock: it feels like your falling into it....

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:52 pm
by GSPODS
ChrisHanburger wrote:
hailskins666 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
Fios wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Fios wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Desmond Howard wrote:He sounded genuinely worried about his defense. I think he know his team is not as unstoppable as the media is making it out to be. He has beat the type of team he created with the type of team we have now.


Brady has trouble with the Redskins. I don't think he's ever won a game against the Redskins.


Come on. He's played against the Skins ONCE.


Call me biased but I'll take any advantage the Redskins have this weekend.

Not biased. Grasping at straws, perhaps? :wink:


Don't bring me into this


Just because I think you write well does not mean I'll be grasping at your straw, ever. Rest assured you are perfectly safe with me.

Methinks thou dost protest too much.


That makes one hell of a lot of sense. Quote a homosexual author to reiterate the statements of two heterosexuals discussing pizza toppings and attractive women.


Actually there isn't a great deal of evidence, other than how one might interpret the sonnets, to suggest he was homosexual. There are those who believe the sonnets were commissioned by a wealthy family to convince their son of his "greatness" via flattery so he would not marry below his station. Which isn't to say it's false but it's speculative, at best.


No worries, guys, JSPB22 meant to post this:

Methinks thou dost post too much.


:lol:


How nice. Methinks thou doth remain unredeemed. :evil:
i just quoted this because i wanted to see exactly how small that quote box in the center will get.


If you stare at it long enough, :shock: it feels like your falling into it....


:twisted: Before I fall into any holes, what does she look like? :twisted:

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:01 pm
by Deadskins
GSPODS wrote:
ChrisHanburger wrote:
hailskins666 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
Fios wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Fios wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Desmond Howard wrote:He sounded genuinely worried about his defense. I think he know his team is not as unstoppable as the media is making it out to be. He has beat the type of team he created with the type of team we have now.


Brady has trouble with the Redskins. I don't think he's ever won a game against the Redskins.


Come on. He's played against the Skins ONCE.


Call me biased but I'll take any advantage the Redskins have this weekend.

Not biased. Grasping at straws, perhaps? :wink:


Don't bring me into this


Just because I think you write well does not mean I'll be grasping at your straw, ever. Rest assured you are perfectly safe with me.

Methinks thou dost protest too much.


That makes one hell of a lot of sense. Quote a homosexual author to reiterate the statements of two heterosexuals discussing pizza toppings and attractive women.


Actually there isn't a great deal of evidence, other than how one might interpret the sonnets, to suggest he was homosexual. There are those who believe the sonnets were commissioned by a wealthy family to convince their son of his "greatness" via flattery so he would not marry below his station. Which isn't to say it's false but it's speculative, at best.


No worries, guys, JSPB22 meant to post this:

Methinks thou dost post too much.


:lol:


How nice. Methinks thou doth remain unredeemed. :evil:
i just quoted this because i wanted to see exactly how small that quote box in the center will get.


If you stare at it long enough, :shock: it feels like your falling into it....


:twisted: Before I fall into any holes, what does she look like? :twisted:

Stop trying to send my thread to smack!

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:52 pm
by hailskins666
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
ChrisHanburger wrote:
hailskins666 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
Fios wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Fios wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Desmond Howard wrote:He sounded genuinely worried about his defense. I think he know his team is not as unstoppable as the media is making it out to be. He has beat the type of team he created with the type of team we have now.


Brady has trouble with the Redskins. I don't think he's ever won a game against the Redskins.


Come on. He's played against the Skins ONCE.


Call me biased but I'll take any advantage the Redskins have this weekend.

Not biased. Grasping at straws, perhaps? :wink:


Don't bring me into this


Just because I think you write well does not mean I'll be grasping at your straw, ever. Rest assured you are perfectly safe with me.

Methinks thou dost protest too much.


That makes one hell of a lot of sense. Quote a homosexual author to reiterate the statements of two heterosexuals discussing pizza toppings and attractive women.


Actually there isn't a great deal of evidence, other than how one might interpret the sonnets, to suggest he was homosexual. There are those who believe the sonnets were commissioned by a wealthy family to convince their son of his "greatness" via flattery so he would not marry below his station. Which isn't to say it's false but it's speculative, at best.


No worries, guys, JSPB22 meant to post this:

Methinks thou dost post too much.


:lol:


How nice. Methinks thou doth remain unredeemed. :evil:
i just quoted this because i wanted to see exactly how small that quote box in the center will get.


If you stare at it long enough, :shock: it feels like your falling into it....


:twisted: Before I fall into any holes, what does she look like? :twisted:

Stop trying to send my thread to smack!
i think i'm dizzy

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 8:21 pm
by Deadskins
hailskins666 wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
ChrisHanburger wrote:
hailskins666 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
Fios wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Fios wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Desmond Howard wrote:He sounded genuinely worried about his defense. I think he know his team is not as unstoppable as the media is making it out to be. He has beat the type of team he created with the type of team we have now.


Brady has trouble with the Redskins. I don't think he's ever won a game against the Redskins.


Come on. He's played against the Skins ONCE.


Call me biased but I'll take any advantage the Redskins have this weekend.

Not biased. Grasping at straws, perhaps? :wink:


Don't bring me into this


Just because I think you write well does not mean I'll be grasping at your straw, ever. Rest assured you are perfectly safe with me.

Methinks thou dost protest too much.


That makes one hell of a lot of sense. Quote a homosexual author to reiterate the statements of two heterosexuals discussing pizza toppings and attractive women.


Actually there isn't a great deal of evidence, other than how one might interpret the sonnets, to suggest he was homosexual. There are those who believe the sonnets were commissioned by a wealthy family to convince their son of his "greatness" via flattery so he would not marry below his station. Which isn't to say it's false but it's speculative, at best.


No worries, guys, JSPB22 meant to post this:

Methinks thou dost post too much.


:lol:


How nice. Methinks thou doth remain unredeemed. :evil:
i just quoted this because i wanted to see exactly how small that quote box in the center will get.


If you stare at it long enough, :shock: it feels like your falling into it....


:twisted: Before I fall into any holes, what does she look like? :twisted:

Stop trying to send my thread to smack!
i think i'm dizzy
I know you are.

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 12:35 am
by TincoSkin
i know you are but what am i, i know you are but what am i

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 9:15 am
by BnGhog
JSPB22 wrote:
hailskins666 wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
ChrisHanburger wrote:
hailskins666 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
Fios wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Fios wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Desmond Howard wrote:He sounded genuinely worried about his defense. I think he know his team is not as unstoppable as the media is making it out to be. He has beat the type of team he created with the type of team we have now.


Brady has trouble with the Redskins. I don't think he's ever won a game against the Redskins.


Come on. He's played against the Skins ONCE.


Call me biased but I'll take any advantage the Redskins have this weekend.

Not biased. Grasping at straws, perhaps? :wink:


Don't bring me into this


Just because I think you write well does not mean I'll be grasping at your straw, ever. Rest assured you are perfectly safe with me.

Methinks thou dost protest too much.


That makes one hell of a lot of sense. Quote a homosexual author to reiterate the statements of two heterosexuals discussing pizza toppings and attractive women.


Actually there isn't a great deal of evidence, other than how one might interpret the sonnets, to suggest he was homosexual. There are those who believe the sonnets were commissioned by a wealthy family to convince their son of his "greatness" via flattery so he would not marry below his station. Which isn't to say it's false but it's speculative, at best.


No worries, guys, JSPB22 meant to post this:

Methinks thou dost post too much.


:lol:


How nice. Methinks thou doth remain unredeemed. :evil:
i just quoted this because i wanted to see exactly how small that quote box in the center will get.


If you stare at it long enough, :shock: it feels like your falling into it....


:twisted: Before I fall into any holes, what does she look like? :twisted:

Stop trying to send my thread to smack!
i think i'm dizzy
I know you are.


I just had to do it one more time.

Its getting skinny and long like my.. Oh we don't want to send the to smack.

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 9:23 am
by Countertrey
BnGhog wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
hailskins666 wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
ChrisHanburger wrote:
hailskins666 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
Fios wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Fios wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Desmond Howard wrote:He sounded genuinely worried about his defense. I think he know his team is not as unstoppable as the media is making it out to be. He has beat the type of team he created with the type of team we have now.


Brady has trouble with the Redskins. I don't think he's ever won a game against the Redskins.


Come on. He's played against the Skins ONCE.


Call me biased but I'll take any advantage the Redskins have this weekend.

Not biased. Grasping at straws, perhaps? :wink:


Don't bring me into this


Just because I think you write well does not mean I'll be grasping at your straw, ever. Rest assured you are perfectly safe with me.

Methinks thou dost protest too much.


That makes one hell of a lot of sense. Quote a homosexual author to reiterate the statements of two heterosexuals discussing pizza toppings and attractive women.


Actually there isn't a great deal of evidence, other than how one might interpret the sonnets, to suggest he was homosexual. There are those who believe the sonnets were commissioned by a wealthy family to convince their son of his "greatness" via flattery so he would not marry below his station. Which isn't to say it's false but it's speculative, at best.


No worries, guys, JSPB22 meant to post this:

Methinks thou dost post too much.


:lol:


How nice. Methinks thou doth remain unredeemed. :evil:
i just quoted this because i wanted to see exactly how small that quote box in the center will get.


If you stare at it long enough, :shock: it feels like your falling into it....


:twisted: Before I fall into any holes, what does she look like? :twisted:

Stop trying to send my thread to smack!
i think i'm dizzy
I know you are.


I just had to do it one more time.

Its getting skinny and long like my.. Oh we don't want to send the to smack.


If you concentrate, you can see Jesus, right to the left of center!

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 9:25 am
by GSPODS
Countertrey wrote:
BnGhog wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
hailskins666 wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
ChrisHanburger wrote:
hailskins666 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
Fios wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Fios wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Desmond Howard wrote:He sounded genuinely worried about his defense. I think he know his team is not as unstoppable as the media is making it out to be. He has beat the type of team he created with the type of team we have now.


Brady has trouble with the Redskins. I don't think he's ever won a game against the Redskins.


Come on. He's played against the Skins ONCE.


Call me biased but I'll take any advantage the Redskins have this weekend.

Not biased. Grasping at straws, perhaps? :wink:


Don't bring me into this


Just because I think you write well does not mean I'll be grasping at your straw, ever. Rest assured you are perfectly safe with me.

Methinks thou dost protest too much.


That makes one hell of a lot of sense. Quote a homosexual author to reiterate the statements of two heterosexuals discussing pizza toppings and attractive women.


Actually there isn't a great deal of evidence, other than how one might interpret the sonnets, to suggest he was homosexual. There are those who believe the sonnets were commissioned by a wealthy family to convince their son of his "greatness" via flattery so he would not marry below his station. Which isn't to say it's false but it's speculative, at best.


No worries, guys, JSPB22 meant to post this:

Methinks thou dost post too much.


:lol:


How nice. Methinks thou doth remain unredeemed. :evil:
i just quoted this because i wanted to see exactly how small that quote box in the center will get.


If you stare at it long enough, :shock: it feels like your falling into it....


:twisted: Before I fall into any holes, what does she look like? :twisted:

Stop trying to send my thread to smack!
i think i'm dizzy
I know you are.


I just had to do it one more time.

Its getting skinny and long like my.. Oh we don't want to send the to smack.


If you concentrate, you can see Jesus, right to the left of center!


That isn't Jesus. That's HailSkins666. :twisted:

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 9:43 am
by ChrisHanburger
I wonder if gravity is getting stronger in the center?

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 9:44 am
by ChrisHanburger
GSPODS wrote:
Countertrey wrote:
BnGhog wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
hailskins666 wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
ChrisHanburger wrote:
hailskins666 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
Fios wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Fios wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Desmond Howard wrote:He sounded genuinely worried about his defense. I think he know his team is not as unstoppable as the media is making it out to be. He has beat the type of team he created with the type of team we have now.


Brady has trouble with the Redskins. I don't think he's ever won a game against the Redskins.


Come on. He's played against the Skins ONCE.


Call me biased but I'll take any advantage the Redskins have this weekend.

Not biased. Grasping at straws, perhaps? :wink:


Don't bring me into this


Just because I think you write well does not mean I'll be grasping at your straw, ever. Rest assured you are perfectly safe with me.

Methinks thou dost protest too much.


That makes one hell of a lot of sense. Quote a homosexual author to reiterate the statements of two heterosexuals discussing pizza toppings and attractive women.


Actually there isn't a great deal of evidence, other than how one might interpret the sonnets, to suggest he was homosexual. There are those who believe the sonnets were commissioned by a wealthy family to convince their son of his "greatness" via flattery so he would not marry below his station. Which isn't to say it's false but it's speculative, at best.


No worries, guys, JSPB22 meant to post this:

Methinks thou dost post too much.


:lol:


How nice. Methinks thou doth remain unredeemed. :evil:
i just quoted this because i wanted to see exactly how small that quote box in the center will get.


If you stare at it long enough, :shock: it feels like your falling into it....


:twisted: Before I fall into any holes, what does she look like? :twisted:

Stop trying to send my thread to smack!
i think i'm dizzy
I know you are.


I just had to do it one more time.

Its getting skinny and long like my.. Oh we don't want to send the to smack.


If you concentrate, you can see Jesus, right to the left of center!


That isn't Jesus. That's HailSkins666. :twisted:


forgot to quote..... :oops:

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 9:53 am
by langleyparkjoe
Desmond Howard wrote:Honestly with sure tackling we could throw a wrench into the offensive machine that is the Pats offense.


SOMEONE SAID SURE TACKLING? WELL, THAT LEAVES OUT CARLOS ROGERS.. HE'LL PROBABLY BUMP RANDY MOSS AND THEN WATCH HIM RUN THE LENGTH OF THE FIELD ON US... I CAN'T STAND THAT DUDE.

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 9:55 am
by GSPODS
ChrisHanburger wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Countertrey wrote:
BnGhog wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
hailskins666 wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
ChrisHanburger wrote:
hailskins666 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
Fios wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Fios wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Desmond Howard wrote:He sounded genuinely worried about his defense. I think he know his team is not as unstoppable as the media is making it out to be. He has beat the type of team he created with the type of team we have now.


Brady has trouble with the Redskins. I don't think he's ever won a game against the Redskins.


Come on. He's played against the Skins ONCE.


Call me biased but I'll take any advantage the Redskins have this weekend.

Not biased. Grasping at straws, perhaps? :wink:


Don't bring me into this


Just because I think you write well does not mean I'll be grasping at your straw, ever. Rest assured you are perfectly safe with me.

Methinks thou dost protest too much.


That makes one hell of a lot of sense. Quote a homosexual author to reiterate the statements of two heterosexuals discussing pizza toppings and attractive women.


Actually there isn't a great deal of evidence, other than how one might interpret the sonnets, to suggest he was homosexual. There are those who believe the sonnets were commissioned by a wealthy family to convince their son of his "greatness" via flattery so he would not marry below his station. Which isn't to say it's false but it's speculative, at best.


No worries, guys, JSPB22 meant to post this:

Methinks thou dost post too much.


:lol:


How nice. Methinks thou doth remain unredeemed. :evil:
i just quoted this because i wanted to see exactly how small that quote box in the center will get.


If you stare at it long enough, :shock: it feels like your falling into it....


:twisted: Before I fall into any holes, what does she look like? :twisted:

Stop trying to send my thread to smack!
i think i'm dizzy
I know you are.


I just had to do it one more time.

Its getting skinny and long like my.. Oh we don't want to send the to smack.


If you concentrate, you can see Jesus, right to the left of center!


That isn't Jesus. That's HailSkins666. :twisted:


forgot to quote..... :oops:


I hope doing this doesn't make the entire forum lock-up or crash. :oops:

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 9:55 am
by Fios
langleyparkjoe wrote:
Desmond Howard wrote:Honestly with sure tackling we could throw a wrench into the offensive machine that is the Pats offense.


SOMEONE SAID SURE TACKLING? WELL, THAT LEAVES OUT CARLOS ROGERS.. HE'LL PROBABLY BUMP RANDY MOSS AND THEN WATCH HIM RUN THE LENGTH OF THE FIELD ON US... I CAN'T STAND THAT DUDE.


Turn off caps lock, it's so much easier to read

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 9:56 am
by Fios
I also think the quote joke has run its course, it's making it difficult to get through this thread and, I'm guilty of it too, but we've gone far enough off-topic.

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 10:30 am
by langleyparkjoe
Hey Fios, sorry bout that one brutha..lol

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 10:38 am
by Fios
langleyparkjoe wrote:Hey Fios, sorry bout that one brutha..lol


No apology necessary, more of a house-cleaning tip :D

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 10:57 am
by SKINFAN
Fios wrote:
langleyparkjoe wrote:
Desmond Howard wrote:Honestly with sure tackling we could throw a wrench into the offensive machine that is the Pats offense.


SOMEONE SAID SURE TACKLING? WELL, THAT LEAVES OUT CARLOS ROGERS.. HE'LL PROBABLY BUMP RANDY MOSS AND THEN WATCH HIM RUN THE LENGTH OF THE FIELD ON US... I CAN'T STAND THAT DUDE.


Turn off caps lock, it's so much easier to read


Whoa, I wouldn't go taht far, "los has done pretty good with tackling, most of his probs were positioning, but if you look back some of his hits are Sean Tayloresque... Not to mention he actually caught one INT, LoL, I just watched that game again on DVR, the whole sidelines were saying "he actually caughtone!" you don't have to hear it you can read their lips. If that team (on Lions game) shows up, I can see the pats losing and losing big.