Page 2 of 2

Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:57 am
by KazooSkinsFan
GSPODS wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Countertrey wrote:
In the end, there is no solution to some problems, like this one, except being vigilant.


That SHOULD be the function of the Federal Courts... but, we know how that rolls... :cry:


The Federal Courts can't be expected to wipe their own rear ends. I'd prefer they don't write yet another law that does not affect them directly. We have more than enough of those already, like that healthcare thing.


I think he meant the courts should be vigilant in applying the Constitution, particularly the 9th and 10th amendments. If I could go back to the founding fathers and convince them to change one thing in the Constitution it would be to make the 9th and 10th amendments the 1st and 2nd.


I'm quite certain you are correct about the meaning. However, I stand by my original post. The Federal Courts can't be expected to wipe their butts. After all, there is nothing in the Constitution which grants them the right to use toilet paper, and therefore that right is granted to the States.


I think the 3 of us are in violent agreement.

Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:00 am
by GSPODS
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
Countertrey wrote:
In the end, there is no solution to some problems, like this one, except being vigilant.


That SHOULD be the function of the Federal Courts... but, we know how that rolls... :cry:


The Federal Courts can't be expected to wipe their own rear ends. I'd prefer they don't write yet another law that does not affect them directly. We have more than enough of those already, like that healthcare thing.


I think he meant the courts should be vigilant in applying the Constitution, particularly the 9th and 10th amendments. If I could go back to the founding fathers and convince them to change one thing in the Constitution it would be to make the 9th and 10th amendments the 1st and 2nd.


I'm quite certain you are correct about the meaning. However, I stand by my original post. The Federal Courts can't be expected to wipe their butts. After all, there is nothing in the Constitution which grants them the right to use toilet paper, and therefore that right is granted to the States.


I think the 3 of us are in violent agreement.


From the category of "Things You Never Thought Would Happen" ...
Three members of this forum are in agreement. :lol:
I'll mark this occasion in the anals :P of history.