The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Here is Farve's stats on NFL.com by field position. Looks like Farve sucks with bad field position, and Gibbs loves to play field position.



Field Position Att Comp Pct Yds Avg Lng TD Int 1st 1st% 20+ Sck Rate
Opp 19-1 - by Yard Line 29 16 55.2 108 3.7 16 6 0 11 37.9 0 3 103.2

Opp 49-20 - by Yard Line 65 45 69.2 520 8.0 41 2 3 23 35.4 5 4 84.1

Own 1-20 - by Yard Line 22 14 63.6 165 7.5 36 0 1 6 27.3 2 0 67.4

Own 21-50 - by Yard Line 94 66 70.2 734 7.8 57 1 0 30 31.9 10 2 96.7




Here is his stats by point situation they are in. Looks like to me the closer the game the worse he plays.


Point Situation Att Comp Pct Yds Avg Lng TD Int 1st 1st% 20+ Sck Rate
Ahead 91 64 70.3 679 7.5 46 4 2 32 35.2 7 2 97.3

Ahead by 1-8 Points 85 61 71.8 657 7.7 46 4 0 30 35.3 7 2 109.8

Ahead by 9-16 Points 6 3 50.0 22 3.7 8 0 2 2 33.3 0 0 19.4

Behind 58 42 72.4 450 7.8 57 3 1 22 37.9 5 4 104.8

Behind by 9-16 Points 58 42 72.4 450 7.8 57 3 1 22 37.9 5 4 104.8

Tied 61 35 57.4 398 6.5 46 2 1 16 26.2 5 3 81.2



Here's one you many find interesting. Stats at Home vs Away.
He don't have a home field advantage

Home/Away Att Comp Pct Yds Avg Lng TD Int 1st 1st% 20+ Sck Rate
Home Games 127 80 63.0 897 7.1 57 4 3 36 28.3 11 7 84.7

Road Games 83 61 73.5 630 7.6 46 5 1 34 41.0 6 2 110.0




Just thought I'd share.

Detroit, by virtue of Mike Martz's arrogance, fell into the trap of trying to force their style of play on us no matter what. Gregg Williams was prepared for it and even in the third quarter when the Lions appeared to make same adjustments never wavered from his approach.

I'm pretty sure that Green Bay isn't going to make that same mistake. I could see them trying to establish the run game early to force us out of our two deep and three deep zone coverages and get the safeties to play closer to the line of scrimmage.

So far teams haven't really challenged us on the ground, and it's going to be interesting to see how our defense holds up should Green Bay try to take that route.

Statiscally this game should favor our defense. Unbalanced teams haven't had much success against us and the Packers ground game appears to leave a lot to be desired.

On offense I like Moss being matched up with Harris. For all the hype that he's been getting since departing the Eagles he still has a propensity to draw holding and interference penalties and a healthy Santana could really get him in trouble.

VetSkinsFan wrote:From the commentators I saw last week, Detriot had one main attack, which was easily foiled by adjusting safeties. Does Green Bay have the same easily recognized passing game?

One main diff. Between Lions and GB is the guy throwing the ball. Kitna is good, but he can't even be compared to Favre.... That's the thing that makes this match up interesting. The defense has showed that it can play a perfect game, and Favre has shown he too can make something out of nothing, something has to give. I still say have our Rookie safety introduce himself to #4.

SKINFAN wrote:

VetSkinsFan wrote:From the commentators I saw last week, Detriot had one main attack, which was easily foiled by adjusting safeties. Does Green Bay have the same easily recognized passing game?

One main diff. Between Lions and GB is the guy throwing the ball. Kitna is good, but he can't even be compared to Favre.... That's the thing that makes this match up interesting. The defense has showed that it can play a perfect game, and Favre has shown he too can make something out of nothing, something has to give. I still say have our Rookie safety introduce himself to #4.

I will agree somewhat but Favre has a tendancy to be erratic at times as evident in the Bears game. Brett throws a hard ball and I hope that our CBs and S's can hold on to them when they catch them. And I mean catch them because he will throw a pick or two against on Sunday. Especially if we take away the slant patterns that he loves to throw to.

Favre's accuracy has never been his strong suit so if we get pressure on him and lock down the slant and timing routes, I think that we are good.....

BnGhog wrote:Here is Farve's stats on NFL.com by field position. Looks like Farve sucks with bad field position, and Gibbs loves to play field position.



Field Position Att Comp Pct Yds Avg Lng TD Int 1st 1st% 20+ Sck Rate
Opp 19-1 - by Yard Line 29 16 55.2 108 3.7 16 6 0 11 37.9 0 3 103.2

Opp 49-20 - by Yard Line 65 45 69.2 520 8.0 41 2 3 23 35.4 5 4 84.1

Own 1-20 - by Yard Line 22 14 63.6 165 7.5 36 0 1 6 27.3 2 0 67.4

Own 21-50 - by Yard Line 94 66 70.2 734 7.8 57 1 0 30 31.9 10 2 96.7




Here is his stats by point situation they are in. Looks like to me the closer the game the worse he plays.


Point Situation Att Comp Pct Yds Avg Lng TD Int 1st 1st% 20+ Sck Rate
Ahead 91 64 70.3 679 7.5 46 4 2 32 35.2 7 2 97.3

Ahead by 1-8 Points 85 61 71.8 657 7.7 46 4 0 30 35.3 7 2 109.8

Ahead by 9-16 Points 6 3 50.0 22 3.7 8 0 2 2 33.3 0 0 19.4

Behind 58 42 72.4 450 7.8 57 3 1 22 37.9 5 4 104.8

Behind by 9-16 Points 58 42 72.4 450 7.8 57 3 1 22 37.9 5 4 104.8

Tied 61 35 57.4 398 6.5 46 2 1 16 26.2 5 3 81.2



Here's one you many find interesting. Stats at Home vs Away.
He don't have a home field advantage

Home/Away Att Comp Pct Yds Avg Lng TD Int 1st 1st% 20+ Sck Rate
Home Games 127 80 63.0 897 7.1 57 4 3 36 28.3 11 7 84.7

Road Games 83 61 73.5 630 7.6 46 5 1 34 41.0 6 2 110.0




Just thought I'd share.

Man, I'm sure that's useful info, but without the columns being lined up, it's not an easy read. Rather than port it into an Excel spreadsheet, perhaps you could provide links to the site so we can see it formatted. .

JSPB22 wrote:

Man, I'm sure that's useful info, but without the columns being lined up, it's not an easy read. Rather than port it into an Excel spreadsheet, perhaps you could provide links to the site so we can see it formatted. .[/quote]

Yeah, I know, sorry. Didn't know how to do it any other way and I don't know where I can host files.

But, you can still get the tell the QB rate its the last and will pretty much sum it up.