Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 5:12 pm
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:NikiH wrote:Perhaps you should be more concerned with spelling a full word then with personel decisions.
People in glass houses...
The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
So is Brandon Lloyd officially done?
Page 2 of 3
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:42 pm
Gibbs on his radio show today said that Lloyd is the #4 receiver now. He has to be the most expensive #4 in the history of the NFL.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:39 am
I say that there is no way to positively know that someone will gel with their environment. BLloyd is a prime example. He may go somewhere and do wonderful things, but I honestly believe that it won't be here. We need to cut our losses (and BLloyd) and move on. He's young enough to still succeed somewhere, let him.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:48 am
The team should just buy him a plasma TV and make him inactive for the rest of the season. That way, he can focus on his rap and journalism career, and still watch the team play on Sundays. 
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:32 pm
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:The team should just buy him a plasma TV and make him inactive for the rest of the season. That way, he can focus on his rap and journalism career, and still watch the team play on Sundays.
LMAO classic...
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:25 pm
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:NikiH wrote:Perhaps you should be more concerned with spelling a full word then with personel decisions.
People in glass houses...
Yeah, not even close. I at least attempted to spell the word. Don't you have better things to do then to run around hijacking threads? I was pretty sure that part of 'your' religion preached that one should not be judgmental and one should not place oneself above others but all of your posts tend to do both on a regular basis lately.
I was just joking with Hard Dawg. I don't agree with the harsh criticism most are posting here but I don't like picking apart anyone that is a Redskin that way.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:32 pm
NikiH wrote:Don't you have better things to do then to run around hijacking threads? I was pretty sure that part of 'your' religion preached that one should not be judgmental and one should not place oneself above others but you tend to do both on a regular basis lately.
I'm guessing these are rhetorical questions ...
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:02 pm
Play nice, kids... or move it to smack.
Attack the post, not the poster.
Thanks.
Attack the post, not the poster.
Thanks.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:07 pm
GSPODS wrote:I was pretty sure that part of 'your' religion preached that one should not be judgmental and one should not place oneself above others
Not me, I'm for judging people and looking down on them. Insulting the poor too. What fun is being educated and well off if you can't look down your nose at people! Shudder, what a thought, it wouldn't mean anything then!
Just a thought, carry on.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:37 pm
KazooSkinsFan wrote:GSPODS wrote:I was pretty sure that part of 'your' religion preached that one should not be judgmental and one should not place oneself above others
Not me, I'm for judging people and looking down on them. Insulting the poor too. What fun is being educated and well off if you can't look down your nose at people! Shudder, what a thought, it wouldn't mean anything then!
Just a thought, carry on.
Stunningly remarkable how you attributed the above quote to me. You should be advised the above quote was originally written by NikiH. It helps to know whose point one is attacking. A valid point was made in the quote, however, the quote was not mine.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:39 pm
You messed up the quote function, go back and look at the post, it looks as though the quote was yoursGSPODS wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:GSPODS wrote:I was pretty sure that part of 'your' religion preached that one should not be judgmental and one should not place oneself above others
Not me, I'm for judging people and looking down on them. Insulting the poor too. What fun is being educated and well off if you can't look down your nose at people! Shudder, what a thought, it wouldn't mean anything then!
Just a thought, carry on.
Stunningly remarkable how you attributed the above quote to me. You should be advised the above quote was originally written by NikiH. It helps to know whose point one is attacking. A valid point was made in the quote, however, the quote was not mine.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:16 am
Lloyd deserves a shot. He should at least be thrown to about five times.
Randle El has the number 2 spot and is a good one, only gripe I have with Randle El is he cant break a tackle to save his life.
I am hoping Lloyd can become our possesion reciever. I know he can break tackles when he catches the ball. Problem is Campbell never throws him the ball. I would like to see Lloyd going through the middle for some tough catches it might prove to Campbell and the Staff that he is valuable to this team. I am hoping for a breakout game from him. Even so I like him as a human being anyhow. Give Lloyd a chance!!
Randle El has the number 2 spot and is a good one, only gripe I have with Randle El is he cant break a tackle to save his life.
I am hoping Lloyd can become our possesion reciever. I know he can break tackles when he catches the ball. Problem is Campbell never throws him the ball. I would like to see Lloyd going through the middle for some tough catches it might prove to Campbell and the Staff that he is valuable to this team. I am hoping for a breakout game from him. Even so I like him as a human being anyhow. Give Lloyd a chance!!
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 7:09 am
Just so there is no more confusion....
Nuff is short for Enough.
P.S. We are supposed to be critical of our team and provide both positive and negative feedback. Just in case your wondering.....thats called being a FAN!
Til we meet again!
Oops UNTIL we meet again!
Nuff is short for Enough.
P.S. We are supposed to be critical of our team and provide both positive and negative feedback. Just in case your wondering.....thats called being a FAN!
Til we meet again!
Oops UNTIL we meet again!
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:20 pm
I just heard that the Redskins have signed McCardell.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:24 pm
For Brandon's sake, let's hope that means Reche Cladwell hasn't looked good, and HE's the one being bumped by Keenan.
Where'd you hear this?
Where'd you hear this?
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:26 pm
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:For Brandon's sake, let's hope that means Reche Cladwell hasn't looked good, and HE's the one being bumped by Keenan.
They went into the season with six so nothings really changed
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:Where'd you hear this?
Sportstalk 980
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:28 pm
Oh, okay. So the "Clad-well" fellow I spoke about is safe as well?1niksder wrote:REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:For Brandon's sake, let's hope that means Reche Cladwell hasn't looked good, and HE's the one being bumped by Keenan.
They went into the season with six so nothings really changedREDEEMEDSKIN wrote:Where'd you hear this?
Sportstalk 980
Brandon needs to step up NOW, if he intends to ever get outta the dog house.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:30 pm
uh, um, things have changed, mainly one thing.... lloyds position on the depth chart.1niksder wrote:They went into the season with six so nothings really changed
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:31 pm
hailskins666 wrote:uh, um, things have changed, mainly one thing.... lloyds position on the depth chart.1niksder wrote:They went into the season with six so nothings really changed
Hasn't he always been the 5th WR in 4 receiver sets?
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:34 pm
1niksder wrote:hailskins666 wrote:uh, um, things have changed, mainly one thing.... lloyds position on the depth chart.1niksder wrote:They went into the season with six so nothings really changed
Hasn't he always been the 5th WR in 4 receiver sets?
I think you are correct. Chris
ey is usually the 4th wide receiver.Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 3:18 pm
1niksder wrote:I just heard that the Redskins have signed McCardell.
I don't see this anywhere on the web. Do you have a link?
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 3:49 pm
yupchagee wrote:1niksder wrote:I just heard that the Redskins have signed McCardell.
I don't see this anywhere on the web. Do you have a link?
Don't have a link and 980 is the only place I'm hearing it.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 4:40 pm
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 4:48 pm
UPDATE (4:11 p.m.): A team source said today that McCardell has not signed -- contrary to a radio report -- but is scheduled to be at Redskin Park next week for a work out.
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:34 am
Clinton Portis wrote:"When Brandon Lloyd want to be a dominant player, he can do that," Portis said. "It's just getting the coaches to buy into that and him proving it that he gonna do it on a consistent play after play, that he gonna do whatever they ask of him. And the sooner he can get on the field, the better we'll be."