The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

I guess the Lewis Carroll Reference was lost.

JSPB22 wrote:

SCSkinsFan wrote:Can anyone describe what it's like to be Hatted on?

Mad-hatted on, maybe, but hatted on?

Means people are now getting jealous and say we are going to be a bad team.

SCSkinsFan wrote:Can anyone describe what it's like to be Hatted on?

This is Fios



This is Fios after being hatted on.

As you can tell Trey was really hatting because he didn't leave room for the straw

Hope this helps

JSPB22 wrote:I guess the Lewis Carroll reference was lost.

Thanks for the explanation, guys. Where'd I be without you?

1nik weren't talkin' at you, no need to get upset

P.S. Trey's ability with Photoshop scares me on a certain level

I do not care what other teams say about us. I do not care what the media says about us. We have not done anything to earn anyone's respect, so we cannot complain. I don't respect any of last year's teams with losing records. Do you?

The Redskins must prove to everyone that they are a good team. That means that they have to start winning -- consistently -- against good teams -- and on the road. Sunday we beat a bad team -- barely -- at home. I'll take the win, but it is way to early to be complaining about a lack of respect.

As i've seen numerous times, we're going to have our hands full the 2nd half of the season. We need to run crazy this first half because the end it going to be an uphill battle.

Now let me get this straight - before the game, Miami was going to be a test for us because they were a top rated defense (in 2006) against both the running game and against the pass. Now that we have played them and won they are suddenly not a very good defense

The Eagles lost that game from what I saw - the Packers are not as good defensively as Miami - Going to be an interesting game on Monday and we have a decent chance - I will also be watching the girls playing in Miami on Sunday - the Gints and Pukes had no defense last Sunday.

Fios wrote:
P.S. Trey's ability with Photoshop scares me on a certain level

Agreed, in a BTP sort of way

Fios wrote:1nik weren't talkin' at you, no need to get upset

P.S. Trey's ability with Photoshop scares me on a certain level

Photoshop MY BUTT! Those are honest to goodness candids, taken just as you were leaving the Ravens game at home against Pittsburgh last year... game! (I hired a guy who usually works for the Patriots...)









Fear is a healthy thing, BTW...

Great. Now he has to wonder if you're a stalker ...

Countertrey wrote:Photoshop MY BUTT!

Thanks for the suggestion, but I think we'll all pass on that one. Photoshop can work wonders, but even it has its limits!!

Mursilis wrote:

Countertrey wrote:Photoshop MY BUTT!

Thanks for the suggestion, but I think we'll all pass on that one. Photoshop can work wonders, but even it has its limits!!

It's moot, anyway... my arms aren't quite long enough.

Countertrey wrote:Photoshop MY BUTT!

They are some things that even Photoshop can't fix or improve!

Countertrey wrote:

Fios wrote:1nik weren't talkin' at you, no need to get upset

P.S. Trey's ability with Photoshop scares me on a certain level

Photoshop MY BUTT! Those are honest to goodness candids, taken just as you were leaving the Ravens game at home against Pittsburgh last year... game! (I hired a guy who usually works for the Patriots...)









Fear is a healthy thing, BTW...

Blasphemy! The last time I was in the general vicinity of said stadium I spit on it, I grew up in Cleveland, I still feel bad for the Browns. I wouldn't pay to watch either one of those teams unless the Redskins were playing them.

Fios wrote:
Blasphemy! The last time I was in the general vicinity of said stadium I spit on it, I grew up in Cleveland, I still feel bad for the Browns. I wouldn't pay to watch either one of those teams unless the Redskins were playing them.

I imagine that it could have been a cup that looked like you... (not my intention to be cuppist. I mean, just look at a sleeve of dixiecups, and tell me you can tell one from the other....) I withdraw my blaspheme, sir...


On the other hand, I have this informant... a very hot little french fry box... who swears that is your blush...

JSPB22 wrote:I guess the Lewis Carroll Reference was lost.

No, not really. I guess I'll just go ask Alice. You think she'll know?

por-tiz2skins wrote:

JSPB22 wrote:

SCSkinsFan wrote:Can anyone describe what it's like to be Hatted on?

Mad-hatted on, maybe, but hatted on?

Means people are now getting jealous and say we are going to be a bad team.

Oh, you mean "Hating" on us? Now we have it.

SkinsJock wrote: Now let me get this straight - before the game, Miami was going to be a test for us because they were a top rated defense (in 2006) against both the running game and against the pass. Now that we have played them and won they are suddenly not a very good defense

Yup, you got it. The Dolphins were a 6-10 team last year that finished with a whimper. Now they have a new coach who has never coached in the NFL before, and who played his first game on the road. Sunday's game was a game that we were supposed to win -- and supposed to win easily.

I'll take the win just like any ither win -- but let's put things in perspective. On Sunday a 5-11 team beat a 6-10 team. Nothing to get excited about. The league is not supposed to start respecting the Redskins after a game like that. I am still hopeful, but let's be honest: The Redskins still haven't proven anything, and have not done anything to earn the league's respect.

Snout wrote: The Dolphins were a 6-10 team last year that finished with a whimper. Now they have a new coach who has never coached in the NFL before, and who played his first game on the road. Sunday's game was a game that we were supposed to win -- and supposed to win easily.

I'm sorry - I thought we were only "favored" to win (by some) by 3.5 points - maybe there were some others who thought we would win "easily", but I, and many others thought it might be a close game given a couple of defensive guys named Taylor and Thomas plus a defense that was "favored" to hinder our offense, being that we looked like we were going to have a tough time running the ball I believe we had about 200 yards on the ground against last year's top 5 defense against the run

We certainly did not show anything (aside from a "few" yards rushing !!!) but in today's NFL we managed to win which is something that a bunch of teams have not done yet and 1 team in our division that is favored to be a better team than we are this year has given up 80 points in 2 games.

We are not as good as we look but we seem to be not as bad as we are "rated" by a lot of so called experts - some of whom probably thought we were favored to beat Miami "easily"

SCSkinsFan wrote:

JSPB22 wrote:I guess the Lewis Carroll Reference was lost.

No, not really. I guess I'll just go ask Alice. You think she'll know?

I believe that you can find Alice at her restaurant ...

The Cowboys offense has looked impressive, but they gave up 20 pts to a rather pathetic Dolphins Offensive which threw 4 ints. I attribute those pics to Trent Green being old, not the quality of the Dallas seconday, who gave up 35 pts to the G-men.