The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Posted: **Thu May 17, 2007 10:00 pm**

Chris Luva Luva wrote:OL:
Giants = Skins > Philly > Dallas

The Eagles probably have the NFL's best O-Line. Our line can't touch their's.

To be quite honest, I'd take their O-Line coach right now over Joe Bugel. History and tradition got us the #6 overall pick.

Posted: **Thu May 17, 2007 10:31 pm**

Chris Luva Luva wrote:I'm just judging from last year, and yes I know most of the yards were cus of Tiki's effort.

Lets not jump the gun just yet because we have a huge question mark at LG. We're all thinking the best but nobody knows how thats going to work until Sept...

Actually, no. I think we have the 2nd best.

I think the Eagles line is the best, then ours, then Dallas (though they still have holes, like Flozell at LT), and then the Giants.

Posted: **Thu May 17, 2007 10:49 pm**

Last year's performance and last year's results have no bearing at all on any team's results this year.

Posted: **Fri May 18, 2007 12:15 am**

PulpExposure wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:OL:
Giants = Skins > Philly > Dallas

I can't believe you'd put that. The Giants don't even have a LT anymore; they're moving an average guard (David Diehl) to play LT. I don't know if I can think of a situation where someone goes G->LT.

Imho, their offensive line is the weakest in the NFC East.

Todd Wade? TE to guard to replace dock?

Posted: **Fri May 18, 2007 12:18 am**

welch wrote:It is not an issue of "can the Redskins beat the Giants/Cowboys/Eagles/Cards [just feeling nostalgic]"?

The Redskins will beat them all. And win the NFC East.

The stats don't mean much. The evaluations of individual players don't mean much. The matchups and comparisons don't mean much.

The Redskins will have superior toughness. Joe Gibbs demands it. He softly, with self-deprecation, told us last season that the team had gotten too far away from "Redskin football". Then he taught some offense to Al Saunders, and the Redskins running game began to beat down every team they faced.

It will continue.

matchups mean EVERYTHING...you can't put our dline last year against everyone...that equals matchups...same with our db's...wr's have matchups...OL has matchups...

i don't get what you are saying by matchups are nothing (or don't mean much)

Posted: **Fri May 18, 2007 12:19 am**

wonker wrote:Wow. People on this board have lost their mind.

Let's all come back to reality.

wonker

lost their mind...you started the thread am i right? and you said things that seem quite unreal

Posted: **Fri May 18, 2007 12:21 am**

Smithian wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:OL:
Giants = Skins > Philly > Dallas
The Eagles probably have the NFL's best O-Line. Our line can't touch their's.

To be quite honest, I'd take their O-Line coach right now over Joe Bugel. History and tradition got us the #6 overall pick.

our defenense got us the 6th overall pick...offense was somewhat fine...i don't think allowing 19 sacks and having a back-up rb in betts rushing for over 1000 yards is bad...

please explain...i know philly's oline is good but to say that much?

Posted: **Fri May 18, 2007 9:03 am**

steve09ru wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:OL:
Giants = Skins > Philly > Dallas

I can't believe you'd put that. The Giants don't even have a LT anymore; they're moving an average guard (David Diehl) to play LT. I don't know if I can think of a situation where someone goes G->LT.

Imho, their offensive line is the weakest in the NFC East.

Todd Wade? TE to guard to replace dock?

Todd Wade is a career RT. He's never even played TE. What are you talking about??

It's easier to make the T->G transition than the G->T transition, especially to LT, the toughest line position to play.

And Dockery was either our 4th or 5th best offensive lineman last year. It's not like he's irreplaceable.

Posted: **Fri May 18, 2007 10:39 am**

PulpExposure wrote:
steve09ru wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:OL:
Giants = Skins > Philly > Dallas

I can't believe you'd put that. The Giants don't even have a LT anymore; they're moving an average guard (David Diehl) to play LT. I don't know if I can think of a situation where someone goes G->LT.

Imho, their offensive line is the weakest in the NFC East.

Todd Wade? TE to guard to replace dock?

Todd Wade is a career RT. He's never even played TE. What are you talking about??

It's easier to make the T->G transition than the G->T transition, especially to LT, the toughest line position to play.

And Dockery was either our 4th or 5th best offensive lineman last year. It's not like he's irreplaceable.

haha yeah i just realized that (got a lil drunk last night)...thinking of todd yoder...but still wade is a tackle trying to play guard and hasn't played but 10-11 games in 2 years