Page 2 of 2

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:28 am
by bobbie brewskie
my point is that he will never understand, haha.

what happens when Jansen retires and that 10 mil. that is spread over 5 years has to come say in 2 years? so youve paid off 4 mil of it, but since he retires you have to pay him the signing bonus since its guranteed and he gets 6 million. thats why i think yall will hit a wall, this extensive carrying out of contracts will lead to yall paying guys when they arent even playing for you.

we will see though, im fine with yall just making it under the cap year after year and being the kings of free agency, yall never go anywhere in the regular season.

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:36 am
by 1niksder
bobbie brewskie wrote:my point is that he will never understand, haha.

what happens when Jansen retires and that 10 mil. that is spread over 5 years has to come say in 2 years? so youve paid off 4 mil of it, but since he retires you have to pay him the signing bonus since its guranteed and he gets 6 million. thats why i think yall will hit a wall, this extensive carrying out of contracts will lead to yall paying guys when they arent even playing for you.

That's not how it works... He gets his money upfront (today, now, before the pen hits the table :lol: ). So once he is gone it's just bookkeeping (has you know we are very good at that) moving cap numbers around will equal more money for the player right now with a promise of more down the road (that they know they won't see). We traded L. Coles to NY for Moss and gave him a mega deal to boot (the bulk of that is history). That wall must lead up to a glass ceiling

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:45 am
by bobbie brewskie
1niksder wrote:
bobbie brewskie wrote:my point is that he will never understand, haha.

what happens when Jansen retires and that 10 mil. that is spread over 5 years has to come say in 2 years? so youve paid off 4 mil of it, but since he retires you have to pay him the signing bonus since its guranteed and he gets 6 million. thats why i think yall will hit a wall, this extensive carrying out of contracts will lead to yall paying guys when they arent even playing for you.

That's not how it works... He gets his money upfront (today, now, before the pen hits the table :lol: ). So once he is gone it's just bookkeeping (has you know we are very good at that) moving cap numbers around will equal more money for the player right now with a promise of more down the road (that they know they won't see). We traded L. Coles to NY for Moss and gave him a mega deal to boot (the bulk of that is history). That wall must lead up to a glass ceiling


you guys are some tricky See-you-en-Tees. one day, you guys will get screwed over, its bound to happen. im gonna wait til after this off-season to speak of cap with yall again, maybe Snyder will put down the controller and turn off his x-box. your system is still flawed, because you cannot keep very many players for a long period of time, or atleast i havent seen a guy in a redskins jersey for his entire career in a while.

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:50 am
by 1niksder
bobbie brewskie wrote:you guys are some tricky See-you-en-Tees. one day, you guys will get screwed over, its bound to happen. im gonna wait til after this off-season to speak of cap with yall again, maybe Snyder will put down the controller and turn off his x-box. your system is still flawed, because you cannot keep very many players for a long period of time, or atleast i havent seen a guy in a redskins jersey for his entire career in a while.

Gibbs has only been back 3 years.
Cartwright... drafted a Redskin
Betts .... drafted a Redskin
Jansen ... Drafted a Redskin
DOck will be re-signed he was drafted aredskin.


We'll See

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 3:03 am
by HEROHAMO
bobbie brewskie wrote:
1niksder wrote:
bobbie brewskie wrote:my point is that he will never understand, haha.

what happens when Jansen retires and that 10 mil. that is spread over 5 years has to come say in 2 years? so youve paid off 4 mil of it, but since he retires you have to pay him the signing bonus since its guranteed and he gets 6 million. thats why i think yall will hit a wall, this extensive carrying out of contracts will lead to yall paying guys when they arent even playing for you.

That's not how it works... He gets his money upfront (today, now, before the pen hits the table :lol: ). So once he is gone it's just bookkeeping (has you know we are very good at that) moving cap numbers around will equal more money for the player right now with a promise of more down the road (that they know they won't see). We traded L. Coles to NY for Moss and gave him a mega deal to boot (the bulk of that is history). That wall must lead up to a glass ceiling


you guys are some tricky See-you-en-Tees. one day, you guys will get screwed over, its bound to happen. im gonna wait til after this off-season to speak of cap with yall again, maybe Snyder will put down the controller and turn off his x-box. your system is still flawed, because you cannot keep very many players for a long period of time, or atleast i havent seen a guy in a redskins jersey for his entire career in a while.
Not many players stay in one uniform in this day in age. Unless they are franchise players seems like every other player follows the Money.

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 5:50 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
The answer is 6 years, 70 million dollars.


The question: How much will the Redskins pay (insert asante samuel or lance briggs or adalius thomas or nate clements)?

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 10:15 pm
by PulpExposure
bobbie brewskie wrote:yall never go anywhere in the regular season.


Since the 1999 season, the Skins and Cowboys have each been to the playoffs 2 times. The Skins have won 2 playoff games, the Cowboys haven't won one single playoff game.
During that time, the Skins have gone a sorry 59-69.

The Cowboys?

57-71.

Your team has been even worse than ours. And that's pathetic.

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:51 am
by unter13
PulpExposure wrote:
bobbie brewskie wrote:yall never go anywhere in the regular season.


Since the 1999 season, the Skins and Cowboys have each been to the playoffs 2 times. The Skins have won 2 playoff games, the Cowboys haven't won one single playoff game.
During that time, the Skins have gone a sorry 59-69.

The Cowboys?

57-71.

Your team has been even worse than ours. And that's pathetic.


Damn Bobbie you got smoked.

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:08 pm
by Houligan26
You hear that silence, I think you shut bobby up. We should hoist pulp on our shoulders and carry him off the field.

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 2:18 pm
by Irn-Bru
PulpExposure wrote:
bobbie brewskie wrote:yall never go anywhere in the regular season.


Since the 1999 season, the Skins and Cowboys have each been to the playoffs 2 times. The Skins have won 2 playoff games, the Cowboys haven't won one single playoff game.
During that time, the Skins have gone a sorry 59-69.

The Cowboys?

57-71.

Your team has been even worse than ours. And that's pathetic.



ROTFALMAO

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 3:53 pm
by UK Skins Fan
:-$
At this point, a tumbleweed emoticon would be useful...

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 4:15 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
Dang Bobby, you got him shut you down like that? You gon let this man send you to your room Bobby? Bobby?

Disgraceful.... :lol:

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:07 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
PulpExposure wrote:
bobbie brewskie wrote:yall never go anywhere in the regular season.


Since the 1999 season, the Skins and Cowboys have each been to the playoffs 2 times. The Skins have won 2 playoff games, the Cowboys haven't won one single playoff game.
During that time, the Skins have gone a sorry 59-69.

The Cowboys?

57-71.

Your team has been even worse than ours. And that's pathetic.



I apologize guys but this post deserved to be quoted and this thread bumped again. Please remeber this post verbatim so that when a retarded puke think it's the mid-90's still, you can correct him. :lol:

Pulp. :rock: