Page 2 of 2

Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
by 1niksder
34andcounting wrote:THANK YOU BILL PARCELL, THE MOVE IN WHICH YOU PUT ROME IN AT QB OPENTHE EYE OF JOE GIBB FINALLY.JASON WILL START ON 11/5.REDSKINS FOR LIFE.

Gotta link?

Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:30 am
by unter13
Gibbs4Life wrote:Can someone in DC get Mark a motorcycle?

Find out who sold Ben Rothlesburger his!



I love it :lol:

Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:01 am
by JansenFan
1niksder wrote:
34andcounting wrote:THANK YOU BILL PARCELL, THE MOVE IN WHICH YOU PUT ROME IN AT QB OPENTHE EYE OF JOE GIBB FINALLY.JASON WILL START ON 11/5.REDSKINS FOR LIFE.

Gotta link?


Brutal. Phenomenal. TO will get.................the............ball. Rack 'em.

Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 11:53 am
by Philly is an Armpit
Gibbs4Life wrote:Can someone in DC get Mark a motorcycle?

Find out who sold Ben Rothlesburger his!


ROTFALMAO

Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:03 pm
by old-timer
Gibbs4Life wrote:Can someone in DC get Mark a motorcycle?

Find out who sold Ben Rothlesburger his!


While I do believe that the time arrived long ago to give JC a chance, I don't think anyone should be wishingfor any player to get injured.

Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:13 pm
by SkinsChic
I think if the cowpies keep Romo in we'll see Campbell on the 5th !

Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:45 pm
by frankcal20
I don't see Cambell starting until later in the season, if at all. I think that Gibbs will stick with Brunell as long as he is health. He did it before. Why would he change now? In Gibbs eyes, a 75% Brunell is better than a 100% 2nd year player.

Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:43 pm
by Snout
I expect to see Campbell sooner than later.

Stubborn as Gibbs is, he knows how important fan support is to the team. He knows that if the team gets booed off the field at home he will need to make a change. The truth is that the fans have a big say in this.

Last year's decision to bench Ramsey in game 1 did not go over well with fans, but Gibbs got away with it because it was early in season and Brunell showed he could be competitive.

This year the team is not competitive. The decision to stick with Brunell is not popular. If the team does not win with Brunell, the fans will revolt. And if the fans revolt, we will see Campbell.

If Brunell starts against the Cowboys and the Redskins lose the game, Campbell will start the following week. Guaranteed.

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 3:39 pm
by I remember the good
old-timer wrote:
Gibbs4Life wrote:Can someone in DC get Mark a motorcycle?

Find out who sold Ben Rothlesburger his!


While I do believe that the time arrived long ago to give JC a chance, I don't think anyone should be wishingfor any player to get injured.
Well Brunell has injured this whole team by his sorry excuse for play. He simply isn't a starter anymore and the sooner Gibbs and Boonell realize this the better off the whole team will be.

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 3:56 pm
by ClintonHill
Skinsfan55 wrote:No substitute for experience eh? Isn't that what the Brunell Boosters say?


there are brunell boosters? ](*,)

Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:03 pm
by Hooligan
ClintonHill wrote:there are brunell boosters? ](*,)


Yeah, I think those are shots you get so you don't lose strength in your arm and your ability to make decisions.

I could be wrong :wink:

Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 5:32 pm
by BernieSki
ESPN: Whispers from around the NFL - Pro Football Weekly


Although the Redskins said they gave backup QB Jason Campbell two days' worth of snaps with the first team because of Mark Brunell's sore ribs, we hear Campbell could be named the starter if the Redskins don't win both of their next two games, against the Cowboys and Eagles.

Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 5:47 pm
by SkinsChic
I like Brunell...but I do think if we lose to the Cowpies...we should put him in and let him play the rest of the year.

Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 6:53 pm
by forskins
SkinsChic wrote:I think if the cowpies keep Romo in we'll see Campbell on the 5th !


There isn't an "If" any more about Romo, he's the guy over there now.

Brunnel or Campbell, it doesn't help the poor secondary play.