Page 2 of 3

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 2:28 am
by tcwest10
...as he did in his 49er days.

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 8:22 am
by UK Skins Fan
DESkins wrote:Gibbs was always known for pulling a few "gems" out in the later rounds of the draft. Part of that may have been that in the early days of his first tenure, he had Bobby Beathard as a GM, and he had the ability to take players, hide them away for a few years and develop them, something that is not practical under today's salary cap conditions. There weren't that many trades (that I remember, but I'm getting old, my memory ain't what it was) that really made an impact, but the ones that I remember were Jim Lachey, Jumpy Geathers, Wilbur Marshall, and I seem to recall we traded for Matt Millen, although some of the other old-timers could correct me on any of those. Drafts, though, largely gave us the Hogs, Jacoby, Butz, Bostic, Grimm & Co. They also gave us a few unheralded tight ends that worked out pretty well, Donny Warren, Neil Olkiewicz, and let's never forget Art Monk!!! So I think it's fair to say that the draft has been more of a strength for Joe. Of course there have been busts, but any coach is going to have those. It's just that the busts were more recent, and thus a lot fresher in folks' minds. Part of that might have come from a change in the GM, when Beathard left and Charlie Casserly came in.


Well, I guess you'd have to say that the trades for Gerald Riggs, Ernest Byner, RC Thielemann were quite successful too. Dave Butz was a trade rather than a draft pick as well, but was long time before Gibbs came to town. Can't remember whether Geathers was a trade or a Plan B free agent, but Jacoby was an undrafted free agent rather than a draft pick.(Boss will no doubt thump me if I'm wrong on that one!). I think Bostic was a free agent too.

The point is that Gibbs' teams used to be built in a balanced way, with a real mix of draft picks and free agents, with a limited number of trades thrown in. But, a very large part of the roster used to come from free agents and other team's cast offs. In theory, with only seven rounds in the draft, it should be a lot easier these days to pick up undrafted gems, but we seem to struggle to do so. A decent professional GM would surely help, but I guess that won't happen all the time that Cerrato is in town. But that's another topic that has already been done to death.

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 11:55 am
by SKINZ_DOMIN8
Gibbs has lost it. I seem to remember him saying on countless times how your team STARTS with its line play. Defensive line specifically. All the blame starts on him. You don't draft an hback/te/receiver like Cooley when you could have drafted defensive line.

Look at Chicago. They are playing great. Why? SOLELY BECAUSE OF THEIR DEFENSIVE LINE.

It just makes no sense to me.

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 11:57 am
by SKINZ_DOMIN8
air_hog wrote:
weneedcharlesmann wrote:I agree that tight end is a need, but our highest draft pick, whatever it ends up being, has gotta be a d-end.


See, I agree that DE is definately our biggest need, but I like feel that at about midway through the 2nd round, there won't be anymore dominant DE (and I guarentee you Kiwi or Mario Williams won't be there unless they get injured)

So when we are put in that position, I say we draft for best overall talent at a needed spot, and I believe right about that time is where the dominant TE will get drafted.

Put it this way, there will be about 5 dominant DLinemen in the draft, but they will all be gone by the 2nd round. And therre will be about 2-3 dominant TE in the draft, who should start to get picked at about our selection. So I say get 1 Stud TE and 1 OK DE instead of getting 1 OK Pass rusher and 1 OK TE...


I love your "give up" philosophy :roll: . Yeah 1 more draft we don't get a defensive lineman then we will be in worse shape, if that's possible, next year.

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 2:02 pm
by 1niksder
UK Skins Fan wrote:The point is that Gibbs' teams used to built in a balanced way, with a real mix of draft picks and free agents, with a limited number of trades thrown in. But, a very large part of the roster used to come from free agents and other team's cast offs. In theory, with only seven rounds in the draft, it should be a lot easier these days to pick up undrafted gems, but we seem to struggle to do so. A decent professional GM would surely help, but I guess that won't happen all the time that Cerrato is in town. But that's another topic that has already been done to death.


Gibbs is trying to fill needs on the team and is working with a handicap. If a GM were brought in he would work for Gibbs because of the numorus titles he carries. This means the handicap would still be there. That handicap is the one and only Mr. Vinny C.

Cerrato has "the Danny's" ear and is basically in charge of identifying talent or at least that's his job description.
Gibbs runs the Scouting department but Vinny has input in the end. There's the handicap. He should be sent back to ESPN where "the Danny" found him and let's see what happens without that slot being filled.

I wouldn't mind "the Danny" bringing in a GM but it wouldn't work with Cerrato still laying there at his feet.
If Gibbs had to manage a team with a salary cap that wasn't around the last time he coached I think he good do it in no time. To manage the team with a salary cap that is on the brink of purgatory with the guys that sent it in that direction in the first place is going to take some time.

Gibbs has brought in a higher quality free agent at manageable cost each year of the past two off seasons. No one is perfect and some didn't work out like
Barrows but others have paid big dividends already like Griffin, Salave'a and Washington. He has drafted well even if some refuse to admit it. Sean Taylor speaks for himself so I'll leave it at that, Cooley was a steel (no other way to put it) look at every TE drafted before him, even if he doesn't play the position - that's where he played going into the draft. Carlos will get his 1st start on Sunday after soaking up the scheme for most of the season. Jason Campbell is on course.

As far as trades go they'll always be debatable. Gibbs has made some in his 2nd tour Portis for Champ, Moss for Coles and (Chicken Little's favorite) the picks to get Campbell

During all of this turnover (because there are only so many roster spots) Gibbs has let go of players that didn't fit what he wanted to do, gave other the opportunity to fit in, not overpaid players to get them to stay and manage to get control of the Cap.

How far along could we be if we had a GM? I don't know but I can't help but think we'd be further down the road if Vinny C. weren't up there in "the Danny's" office

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 2:36 pm
by thaiphoon
I agree about Vinny C... but not necessarily about the latest drafts... what player have we drafted after the 3rd round in the past 2 years that has made an impact? Other teams are finding these late round gems...we aren't? Why ?? In the 80's when we went without a 1rst rounder almost every year b/c we traded it away we were able to offset that loss with finding late round gems and free agents who became HoF'ers. What has happened since then ??

BTW- does anyone remember that we were the ones who drafted Keenan McCardell with a late round pick ??

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 2:39 pm
by UK Skins Fan
Can't remember how we got him, but yes, I do remember that we had him and let him go. Oops.

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 8:06 pm
by 1niksder
thaiphoon wrote:I agree about Vinny C... but not necessarily about the latest drafts... what player have we drafted after the 3rd round in the past 2 years that has made an impact? Other teams are finding these late round gems...we aren't? Why ??


OK you got me there I can only name Cooley from the third round or later over the last two years, since other teams are finding these late round gems - Name two teams that have 3rd round picks or later that they drafted over the last 2 years that are producing. If you can't put two on the same team then maybe you should re explain your post.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 3:39 am
by air_hog
I think this upcomming draft, we should draft for depth and not neccessarilly for starters.

Considering we have no 1st rounder, we probably won't find an Impact Player in the mid/late 2nd round so I say we draft for depth. Now that doesn't mean that we sould get crappy players who will be backups their whole career, just get depth.

I think our weakest positions are
OL
DE
CB
WR/TE

After watching the UCS/UCLA game today I think we should trader up for the #1 spot and draft Bush... :lol:

But seriously, I think Dominique Byrd is a better choice than Mercedes Lewis, for us at least. Lewis is like 6-6 and more of recieving TE where as Byrd is thick and more of a blocker who can catch pretty good anyways.

Again I think we should go after Tom Malone, the USC Punter, so we can lock up a solid punter for the next 10 yrs. or so.

Then we should draft DE, OL, CB, and WR for our remaing picks, while picking the best player at his position.

And I know Domihate will come in here and say how dumb I am for not wanting a DE with our first pick, but all the good DE's go in the top 15 so with our pick there will be only mediocore DE, who will be similar to our current DE's. But plus, I honestly think Chris Clemons is a Dwight Freeney JR in the making.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 4:08 am
by SkinzCanes
When it comes to finding gems in the late rounds we are terrible. I just took a cursory look at recent drafts and here is a list of some of the players that teams netted in the 3rd round or later:

Brian Westbrook
Randy McMichael
Najeh Davenport
Cato June
Robert Mathis
Dominkc Davis
Nate Burleson
Ricky Manning, Jr.
Chris Simms
Quentin Griffen
Asante Samuel
Brandon Lloyd
Jason Witten
Jared Allen
Nathan Vashes
Matt Schaub
Nate Kaeding

Now here is a list of our 3rd round or later picks since 2000:
Chris Cooley
Jim Molinaro
Mark Wilson
Gibran Hamdan
Derrick Dockery
Rashaad Bauman
Cliff Russell
Reggie Colman
Robert Royal
Andre Lott
Jeff Grau
Gregg Scott
Rocke Cartwright
Sage Rosenfels
Mario Monds
Darnerian McCants
Lloyd Harrison
Michael Moore
Quincy Sanders
Todd Husak
Ethan Howell
Delbert Cowsette

Of this group Cooley, Dockery, and Rock are the only ones that have made any sort of real contribution to the team and Cooley and Dockery were both drafted in the 3rd round. So our only signifcant player that was drafted after the 3rd round in the past six years was Rock. Can't get any worse than that in the draft.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 10:28 am
by Warmother
When it comes to the draft the team will usually take the best available player. If you draft a DE because you need a DE and pass on a great TE who rates out higher you could end up being upset. So if the highest rated player on the teams draft board is a DE you take him.

If the Skin's don't get a #1, and Vernon Davis is there. I would love for the Redskin's to draft him. He's built like a tank. He catches everything thrown his way, is hard to bring down, he can block and he has good speed. Maryland would sometimes line him up split-out. The guy is a great FOOTBALL player you can never have to many of those.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 3:25 pm
by thaiphoon
Thanks Skins_Canes. I knew someone would be able to put a list together before I coudl get to it.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 3:47 pm
by 1niksder
thaiphoon wrote:Thanks Skins_Canes. I knew someone would be able to put a list together before I coudl get to it.

That's a nice list S_C put together... but you said

thaiphoon wrote:what player have we drafted after the 3rd round in the past 2 years that has made an impact? Other teams are finding these late round gems...we aren't? Why

Most of the guys on that list have been in the league well over two years. In fact that is why Rock and DD were not included with Cooley. Based on your time frame limitations of being drafted after the 3rd round in the past 2 years Cooley still stands alone on. If a thrid rounder would even count.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 5:02 pm
by thaiphoon
Splitting hairs I see. I'm only stating last 2 years since Gibbs has been here. But we can take it further and include the time that Cerrato and even while Danny has been here if you'd like. My point is that we have not done well in the later rounds in a long time.

BTW - Cooley was drafted in the 3rd round. Dockery was drafted in the 3rd in 2003 (inside my 2 year limit). Please name a player taken in the past 2 years (2003 draft counts also) that was taken after the 3rd round that is making an impact on our team.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:02 pm
by 1niksder
thaiphoon wrote:Splitting hairs I see. I'm only stating last 2 years since Gibbs has been here. But we can take it further and include the time that Cerrato and even while Danny has been here if you'd like. My point is that we have not done well in the later rounds in a long time.

BTW - Cooley was drafted in the 3rd round. Dockery was drafted in the 3rd in 2003 (inside my 2 year limit). Please name a player taken in the past 2 years (2003 draft counts also) that was taken after the 3rd round that is making an impact on our team.

My point was that you are grouping Gibbs in with "the Danny" and his lap dog. Prior to the last two years is on them not Gibbs.
In his 2 offseasons here Gibbs has produced Cooley, ghotten more out of Cartwright than SOS and Double D still has a way to go in my book.
But what he has done with his later round picks can't be measured yet it's his 2nd year so some are rookie still trying to be invited back next year and last year is the only other year we have to look at.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:30 pm
by thaiphoon
I have to lump Gibbs in with the other two since he is part of the organization. My larger point is that we are not picking up quality players later on like we once used to... it has grown into a chronic problem year after year and so far Gibbs' presence has not exorcised it. And while you might still have the jury out on DD I do not... still DD was a 3rd rounder, I don't consider 3rd round a "late round" pick.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:35 pm
by SkinsFanInHawai'i
When did we get Antonio Pierce?

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:37 pm
by tcwest10
SkinsFanInHawai'i wrote:When did we get Antonio Pierce?


Oh, about four weeks ago.
Oh, wait. That's when he got us. :)

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:42 pm
by thaiphoon
When did we get Antonio Pierce


FA ... we started him one year and then we let him go via FA ... can't count him as a pickup when you use him for one year and showcase him and then let him go. In fact it makes our record of getting late round gems worse when we actually let them slip through our fingers.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:50 pm
by SkinsFanInHawai'i
Oh I thought we drafted him and let him sit a few years.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:55 pm
by thaiphoon
We signed him and let him site ... then we started him for one year. He made an impact for that year only ... but is no longer on our roster. Hmmm...

Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 4:30 am
by Chris Luva Luva
Peirce will be back, they always come back eventually.

Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 7:42 am
by Snout
thaiphoon wrote:I have to lump Gibbs in with the other two since he is part of the organization. My larger point is that we are not picking up quality players later on like we once used to... it has grown into a chronic problem year after year and so far Gibbs' presence has not exorcised it. And while you might still have the jury out on DD I do not... still DD was a 3rd rounder, I don't consider 3rd round a "late round" pick.


I think the team in recent years has too many high priced stars and not enough mid-grade players (above average and affordable) to provide adequate depth. My fear is that to fill the glaring need on the DL, the team will go out and overpay for a superstar who may or may not turn out to be worth the money. Rather than try to find one high-profile guy who will come in and have 15 sacks, I would rather have three get-the-job-done guys who will each have 5 and will be able to back each other up if someone gets hurt. The best acquisitions are the guys we get cheap (whether in the draft or otherwise) who exceed expectations.

Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 2:33 pm
by SkinsFanInHawai'i
I too thought there was a glaring need for a DE, but after reading the fan chat with Coach Blache maybe there isn't.

a few quotes

Coach Blache--- The past two off seasons, we've heard a lot about Philip Daniels and his talents and contributions to the defense, but it's not the sort of thing that shows up to the casual fan at first glance. You've worked with him both in Chicago and now here with the 'Skins: What would you say are Philip's greatest assets as a player and what does he bring to this defense?

Greg Blache wrote:
He’s got a few. First of all, he’s a strong strong run player. He’s probably one of the best run-stopping defensive ends in the league. He and Renaldo Wynn as a tandem, I don’t know of anyone who’s got 2 guys as good as we do. And as far as putting pressure, I think those guys do a good job of putting pressure – its not flashy pressure, its not selfish out on the edge real wide where people can fit inside running the football – I think that’s one of the things that fans don’t realize, some of the guys that we quote call ‘pass rushers’ post numbers, but they aren’t as effective stopping the run, they aren’t as effective fitting in the system, stunting inside so blitzes can come outside of them, or dropping into the zones in the zone blitzes. Phillips the total player. He’s strong against the run, he gives us a good push on the pass rush, he’s good in his pass coverage. He’s one of the guys that’s an unsung hero. That’s one of the things that I say about he and Renaldo Wynn – they’re like the engine in a Mercedes. You don’t see the glitter, you don’t see the spinners, you don’t see the outside – but they’re what makes it run. Just go outside and look at your pretty car. The thing that makes it run is not the prettiness that they see, it’s the foundation, it’s the motor inside. And I think that’s what I think Phillip Daniels has been for us here like he was in Chicago, he’s part of that motor, he’s part of who we are that make us run.


Coach Blache,
Since the defensive line lacks a pass rusher and teams in the NFL have now figured out how to stop the blitzes are you going to start using blitzes you don't use a lot or come up with your own blitzes? Something that the teams haven't seen a lot of on tape.

Greg Blache wrote:The one thing that happens is, we’re always evolving, we’re always rotating things. I think that one thing, the last couple of weeks we’ve had some plays that all of a sudden people are saying ‘Oh!’ – this panic thing. But like I say – we’re still #1 in the NFL in completion percentage and nobody knows about it. The fact that we’re capable of stopping people. We played a real good offense last week, and they had 16 points. That’s much more than we want, but at the same time, other teams have good players too and they’re going to challenge at times. We’re going to continue to rotate things and continue do the things we are capable of doing. There’s no question, the more people study us, the more they look at what we’re doing. I don’t know who this great pass rusher is that people thinks the answer.

Dwight Freeney or John Abraham?

Dwight Freeney, and no disrespect to him, but he’s in a system where they don’t play the run. They just go up field. And he also plays on turf. If you ever looked at Indianapolis football, they play a totally different system than we do. I don’t know what John Abraham’s numbers are, I think John’s an excellent football player, but those guys would not necessarily fit into our system to do all the things we want them to do. I think the one thing you have to understand, I don’t think you can take a Corvette motor and put it in an SUV. People see all this flash and glitter and they think that’s the ultimate answer. And its not. If that were the answer the Colts would’ve won the Super Bowl already.

Dwight Freeney’s been there the last couple years. So I don’t think that’s the ultimate answer. We live in a glitter society, we get all caught up in the glitter. Glitter is not necessarily going to be the answer for you. Sometimes we get caught up in the numbers and the flash. I kind of giggle sometimes when I look at the Pro Bowl list and see some of the guys who go because they have 16 sacks. And their team lets them go because they don’t play the run. We’re going to stop the run. We’re going to make you throw the football, then we’re going to go after you and we’re going to try and pressure you. I’m certain, people on the outside listening to the sportscasters say ‘you don’t have enough pressure’, ‘you don’t have this or the other’ – I don’t buy that. I’ve been around this business 18 years. I believe in my people and what they’re doing. I respect everybody else and I understand how they get inundated with sports talk shows and NFL stuff. It’s like the parent whose child’s a heart surgeon, and they’re complaining because they’re not a brain surgeon. We’re heart surgeons. We may not be brain surgeons, but love us just the same.


How concerned are you about the lack of pressure our front four seems to be generating?

Greg Blache wrote:You know what? That’s another ‘perception as opposed to reality’ thing. Actually, right now, we’re #1 in the NFL in completion percentage against us. We don’t have great sack numbers. But out of everyone in the NFL, we have the lowest completion percentage bar no one else in the league. We live in an age where people like to see drama, they want fast and flashy. We’re not fast and flashy, but we’re efficient.


I also understand he is probably go to praise his players and not bash them, but maybe this team isn't even looking for that Dwight Freeney type DE?

Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 4:07 pm
by UK Skins Fan
Hmmmmmmmm. :-k Interesting. I can understand what Blache is saying, and he clearly knows a hell of a lot more than me. But there surely isn't any argument that we need more push from the d-line? If we could get more pressure up front, it would give Williams so much more flexibility in coverages. The D would be impossible to play against.

Maybe they'll be looking at defensive tackle rather than end, as we've already seen what effect Griffin has on the pass rush.