Should Ramsey have been put in?

Washington Football Game Day discussions for 2003, 2004, and 2005
Brandon777
*********
*********
Posts: 1185
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:23 pm
Location: Fayetteville, NC

Post by Brandon777 »

Geez, over the last month I forgot Ramsey was on the team. Amazing what one bad game does.
Let us all gather around and drink the Cooley-Aid of the Redskins.
Steve Spurrier III
----------
----------
Posts: 2167
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2004 1:48 am

Re: Should Ramsey have been put in?

Post by Steve Spurrier III »

Uaintready wrote:...if anything we shold have put Campbell to get him some more experience.


As long as the Redskins plan on making a playoff run in 2005, Ramsey has to be the guy getting the mop-up snaps. If Brunell goes down, Ramsey is going to be the guy stepping in, and he has to be the guy we keep sharp.
I'm bored, I'm broke, and I'm back.
Scooter
scooter
scooter
Posts: 1085
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 9:58 am
Location: NM
Contact:

Post by Scooter »

I was surprised to see him, in light of everything that's gone on. Brunell doesn't play well with leg injuries. Ramsey might have been given a spoonfull of confidence - he'll need it. The Skins O-line is going to get any QB injured at this rate. We might need all three guys at QB.
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

The Hogster wrote:looked like we gave up by taking out the entire team.

We did give up. We even took a knee rather that try to put points on the board at the end of the game. I think Joe just wanted it to end, and get the hell out of there.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
Locked