Page 2 of 3

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 12:26 pm
by Brandon777
Actually, I heard that the autopsy showed that she didn't have an eating disorder or a heart attack. To me that raises more questions about what happened the night she collapsed, because the general thought through the years was that she did have a heart attack or eating disorder.

I also find it quite disturbing that Terri's co-worker had a conversation with her shortly before she collapsed. She claims that Terri cried at work and wanted to leave her husband. Also, Terri's brother was with her a few hours before she collapsed and said she appeared perfectly healthy. 26 yr old people with no history of medical problems just don't collapse and die or fall into comas for no reason.

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 12:34 pm
by cvillehog
washingtonpost.com wrote:The autopsy by a medical examiner in Florida, released Wednesday, showed irreversible brain damage, consistent with a persistent vegetative state.

"The diagnosis they made is exactly right. It's the pathology, I'll respect that. I think it's time to move on," [Senate Majority Leader] Frist said on CBS' "The Early Show."


CBS\AP wrote:The long-awaited report Wednesday found Schiavo's brain had shrunk to about half the normal size for a woman her age when she died March 31 after her feeding tube was disconnected. The autopsy also determined she was blind.

Bob and Mary Schindler disputed the results, insisting their daughter interacted with them and tried to speak.

"She wouldn't recognize anybody's face, wouldn't recognize anyone's voice. wouldn't respond to stimuli in anything but a reflexive way," Dr. Douglas Miller, a neuropathologist, told CBS News. "They were seeing what they wanted to see, which is common and unfortunate in situations like this. It was just not possible."

The findings vindicated Schiavo's husband in his long and vitriolic battle with his in-laws that engulfed the courts, Congress and the White House and divided the country. Michael Schiavo and court-appointed doctors have said she had no hope of recovery. She died at age 41.

[...]

The autopsy also found no evidence that Terri Schiavo was strangled or otherwise abused before her sudden 1990 collapse — countering allegations by the Schindlers that she was abused by her husband.

Yet medical examiners could not say for certain what caused the collapse, long thought to have been brought on by an eating disorder.

[...]

The autopsy included 274 external and internal body images and an exhaustive review of Schiavo's medical records, police reports and social services agency records.

Pinellas-Pasco Medical Examiner Dr. Jon Thogmartin said that the autopsy produced no conclusion on what triggered the temporary heart stoppage that caused her collapse and brain damage. He said there was no evidence of drug use, though he cautioned that Schiavo was not tested in 1990 for every conceivable substance that could have been in her blood.

He said there was no proof she suffered from an eating disorder such as bulimia, which can disrupt the body chemistry with lethal effect. The main piece of evidence cited for an eating disorder — the low levels of potassium in her blood in 1990 — could have been caused by the emergency treatment she received at the time, Thogmartin said.

While she had lost more than 100 pounds since high school, Schiavo never confessed to an eating disorder, she did not take diet pills and no one had witnessed her purging food, the medical examiner said.

He discounted the possibility that she had overdosed on caffeine from drinking large amounts of tea in an effort to keep her weight down.

In addition, the autopsy found no traces of morphine in her system at her death, although she had been given two doses in the days before she died. The Schindlers had contended that morphine might have been used to speed their daughter's death.


Chicago Tribune wrote:Terri Schiavo, whose life and death were at the heart of a dispute that turned a private tragedy into a national spectacle, was blind and brain-damaged, but she was not beaten, strangled or otherwise abused before she collapsed in 1990, according to the results of an autopsy released Wednesday.

[...]

The autopsy showed no support for any of the many allegations the Schindlers or their supporters had raised against their son-in-law. Over the years, they suggested Michael Schiavo strangled or beat his wife the day she collapsed. As evidence, they pointed to a bone scan taken a year later that showed she had suffered a fracture.

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 1:34 pm
by Gibbs' Hog
Brandon777 wrote:Actually, I heard that the autopsy showed that she didn't have an eating disorder or a heart attack.



The autopsy showed that she did not have a heart attack. It was inconclusive as to whether she had an eating disorder or not.

So your comment about "perfectly healthy people not collapsing suddenly," could be off. She might have had an eating disorder, which led to her collapse.

Here is what the autopsy proved:

1) Her brain had sufficient damage, and was about half the size of a normal brain.
2) There were no signs of physical abuse.
3) She was blind.
4) She was in a persistant vegitative state.


The problem is, they don't know why she collapsed, and they probably will never know.

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 1:57 pm
by cvillehog
Gibbs' Hog wrote:The autopsy showed that she did not have a heart attack. It was inconclusive as to whether she had an eating disorder or not.


The stories I quoted above say that the autopsy "found no evidence" of an eating disorder. I believe that means something closer to "did not have" than to "inconclusive."

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 3:28 pm
by crazyhorse1
Brandon777 wrote:Nothing surprising. Everyone knew she was severely brain-damaged. Her husband (which I don't understand how he could have still been considered a husband, since he was living with another woman and had kids) is a piece of garbage.

Anyways, even if the autopsy showed evidence of her being aware, I highly doubt they would say that to the public. That would be devastating.


Conspiracy theory? Come on. Give it up. Terry was in a vegetative state, not conscious and felt no pain, as well as beyond recovery. There were no villains there. Her husband accepted the reality of the situation and got on with his life. So should her parents. I hope they are able to. I think it's a tragedy that they've been so supported in their delusion by a well-meaning but like-wise deluded public.

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 3:52 pm
by Gibbs' Hog
cvillehog wrote:
Gibbs' Hog wrote:The autopsy showed that she did not have a heart attack. It was inconclusive as to whether she had an eating disorder or not.


The stories I quoted above say that the autopsy "found no evidence" of an eating disorder. I believe that means something closer to "did not have" than to "inconclusive."



It can't mean "did not have" as opposed to "inconclusive."

She had a potassium inbalance when she was first brought to the hospital. It is a common sign of an eating disorder, but it does not mean she had one.

The autopsy did not prove she had an eating disorder.
The autopsy did not prove she didn't have an eating disorder.

Medical examiners originally stipulated that an autopsy would likely not prove anything with relation to an eating disorder.

All that said, no one can prove she had an eating disorder or not. Only herself, her husband, her family, and/or her friends could know for sure. And based on all the reports, if she did have a disorder, she kept it to herself.

Since no one can prove it one way or another, it is inconclusive. That's all I was trying to say.

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:33 pm
by cvillehog
Gibbs' Hog wrote:
cvillehog wrote:
Gibbs' Hog wrote:The autopsy showed that she did not have a heart attack. It was inconclusive as to whether she had an eating disorder or not.


The stories I quoted above say that the autopsy "found no evidence" of an eating disorder. I believe that means something closer to "did not have" than to "inconclusive."



It can't mean "did not have" as opposed to "inconclusive."

She had a potassium inbalance when she was first brought to the hospital. It is a common sign of an eating disorder, but it does not mean she had one.

The autopsy did not prove she had an eating disorder.
The autopsy did not prove she didn't have an eating disorder.

Medical examiners originally stipulated that an autopsy would likely not prove anything with relation to an eating disorder.

All that said, no one can prove she had an eating disorder or not. Only herself, her husband, her family, and/or her friends could know for sure. And based on all the reports, if she did have a disorder, she kept it to herself.

Since no one can prove it one way or another, it is inconclusive. That's all I was trying to say.


Well, you and I mostly agree, but are having trouble agreeing on the exact verbiage. Let's leave it to the doctor who performed the autopsy, as sumarised in the article snipit I posted above:
Pinellas-Pasco Medical Examiner Dr. Jon Thogmartin said that the autopsy produced no conclusion on what triggered the temporary heart stoppage that caused her collapse and brain damage. He said there was no evidence of drug use, though he cautioned that Schiavo was not tested in 1990 for every conceivable substance that could have been in her blood.

He said there was no proof she suffered from an eating disorder such as bulimia, which can disrupt the body chemistry with lethal effect. The main piece of evidence cited for an eating disorder — the low levels of potassium in her blood in 1990 — could have been caused by the emergency treatment she received at the time, Thogmartin said.

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:49 pm
by joebagadonuts
looks like jeb bush is still looking for anwers...

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. --Gov. Jeb Bush said Friday that a prosecutor has agreed to investigate why Terri Schiavo collapsed 15 years ago, citing an alleged gap in time from when her husband found her and called 911.



http://www.boston.com/news/nation/artic ... _911_call/

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:11 pm
by Gibbs' Hog
cvillehog wrote:
Pinellas-Pasco Medical Examiner Dr. Jon Thogmartin said that the autopsy produced no conclusion on what triggered the temporary heart stoppage that caused her collapse and brain damage. He said there was no evidence of drug use, though he cautioned that Schiavo was not tested in 1990 for every conceivable substance that could have been in her blood.

He said there was no proof she suffered from an eating disorder such as bulimia, which can disrupt the body chemistry with lethal effect. The main piece of evidence cited for an eating disorder — the low levels of potassium in her blood in 1990 — could have been caused by the emergency treatment she received at the time, Thogmartin said.



I see where you're coming from with the whole "no proof" thing. It just looks to me like there were a lot of "no evidence," "no conclusion," and "could have been"s which suggest to me that no one knows for sure.

If they did, the medical examiner would probably say something like, "...evidence found during the autopsy report indicates that there is no possible way Terri Shiavo could have suffered from an eating disorder."

My 2 cents

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:19 pm
by cvillehog
Gibbs' Hog wrote:
cvillehog wrote:
Pinellas-Pasco Medical Examiner Dr. Jon Thogmartin said that the autopsy produced no conclusion on what triggered the temporary heart stoppage that caused her collapse and brain damage. He said there was no evidence of drug use, though he cautioned that Schiavo was not tested in 1990 for every conceivable substance that could have been in her blood.

He said there was no proof she suffered from an eating disorder such as bulimia, which can disrupt the body chemistry with lethal effect. The main piece of evidence cited for an eating disorder — the low levels of potassium in her blood in 1990 — could have been caused by the emergency treatment she received at the time, Thogmartin said.



I see where you're coming from with the whole "no proof" thing. It just looks to me like there were a lot of "no evidence," "no conclusion," and "could have been"s which suggest to me that no one knows for sure.

If they did, the medical examiner would probably say something like, "...evidence found during the autopsy report indicates that there is no possible way Terri Shiavo could have suffered from an eating disorder."

My 2 cents


I hear you, but in my (albeit limited) experience, doctors don't say things like "no possible way" very often. They say this is likely, or this is unlikely, or there is no evidence, etc.

Anyway, although he can't say for sure what caused her collapse, the doctor seems reasonably certain that an eating disorder did not play a role.

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:29 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
Anyway, although he can't say for sure what caused her collapse, the doctor seems reasonably certain that an eating disorder did not play a role.


Actually, the whole "eating disorder" reasoning was fabricated by Mr. Schiavo when in order to present his malpractice case "for Terri". I read that in an article this morning, which I'll post in a minute.

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:40 pm
by cvillehog
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
Anyway, although he can't say for sure what caused her collapse, the doctor seems reasonably certain that an eating disorder did not play a role.


Actually, the whole "eating disorder" reasoning was fabricated by Mr. Schiavo when in order to present his malpractice case "for Terri". I read that in an article this morning, which I'll post in a minute.


Actually, the whole "eating disorder" reasoning came about becaue of extremely low levels of potassium in her system.

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:44 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
Friday, June 17, 2005
Autopsy suggests
Schiavo cognizant

Analyst: 'It's possible Terri was aware of everything being done to her'

© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com

Challenging the assumptions of many analysts and news reports, an attorney who specializes in medical ethics cases points out the autopsy report of Terri Schiavo indicates the brain-injured woman might have been cognizant of her surroundings as her family insisted.

Jerri Lynn Ward of Austin, Texas, notes the report released Wednesday in the high-profile case states: "The frontal temporal and temporal poles and insular-cortex demonstrated relative preservation."

"What this tells us is that her cortex retained function and that her brain was more normal in the area that controls higher-level thinking," said Ward, who has weighed in on the case in her weblog and in an interview with "Joseph Farah's WorldNetDaily RadioActive" show.



The autopsy results on the 41-year-old brain-damaged woman were made public more than two months after her death ended a decade-long legal battle that brought in Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, Congress and President Bush.

Schiavo died March 31, nearly two weeks after the feeding tube that had kept her alive was removed under a court order obtained by her husband, Michael Schiavo. Her parents, Bob and Mary Schindler, said they were willing to care for their daughter, insisting she had a strong will to live.

Experts supporting Michael Schiavo -- contending Terri Schiavo's brain cortex essentially was missing and filled with fluid -- concluded she was in a persistent vegetative state. The Schindlers, arguing that their daughter recognized and responded to family members, produced neurologists who diagnosed her as "minimally conscious."

Pinellas-Pasco medical examiner Jon Thogmartin, speaking at a news conference Wednesday, said the damage to Terri Schiavo's brain was "irreversible, and no amount of therapy or treatment would have regenerated the massive loss of neurons."

But Ward, pointing to the autopsy report, notes the brain's frontal lobe plays a part in impulse control, judgment, language, memory, motor function, problem solving, sexual behavior, socialization and spontaneity.

"It is very possible that she remained cognizant of sounds and other things without being able to communicate," Ward said. "It's possible Terri was aware of everything being done to her -- yet could do little to make people aware that she was there."

Ward pointed out that major damage to Schiavo's brain was shown to be toward the back -- the areas that affect motor skills.


So the question remains, says Ward, was Terri Schiavo still a thinking, aware human being?


It's a big article, with other interesting points. Read the rest here.

Here's the tidbit on the eating disorder issue.

Conversely, the report found no evidence to support the theory espoused by Michael Schiavo and his attorneys for 15 years, that the collapse in February 1990 was caused by an eating disorder.

That assertion was the basis of malpractice suits in 1992 that resulted in a settlements totaling more than $1 million.

The autopsy report said no one had ever witnessed Schiavo bingeing and purging, and family members said she had a big meal the evening prior to her collapse and was not in a position to covertly purge the meal.


I admit, my earlier inference that Mr. Schiavo led her to develop an eating disorder was incorrect, as it now appears that it was not even true :oops:. However, if indeed Mr. Schiavo made it up, it calls into question his character and in fact makes him at least a little bit creepy. He was able to convince a court of law that Terri had an eating disorder. COuld he have also convinced them that she "told" him to pull the plug? :?:

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:55 pm
by cvillehog
Once again we are getting determinations on her state from people who did not examine her. When will this end?

Also, what is the point of trying massage information into something that you can drawn inferences about Mr. Schiavo's character?

What is it that you are looking for? Vindication for hateful words against the husband?

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:11 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
Not at all cville. His actions speak louder than any of my words about him ever could.

However, I brought up the article because you keep talking matter-of-factly about the prevous article/s you posted. It sounds like you believe they are the end all to the conversation, when they aren't. Just thought you might want a different view.

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:17 pm
by cvillehog
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:Not at all cville. His actions speak louder than any of my words about him ever could.

However, I brought up the article because you keep talking matter-of-factly about the prevous article/s you posted. It sounds like you believe they are the end all to the conversation, when they aren't. Just thought you might want a different view.


I am suspicious of veiws from "analysts" who have not actually examined the primary data, but instead are mining reports for rallying cries. Also, the stories I quoted above are from respected and responsible news sorces. I don't know what WorldNetDaily.com is.

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:18 pm
by General Failure
It's a website, silly. Also, I'm still of the opinion that she was a robot.

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:32 pm
by Gibbs' Hog
Wait a minute...


Challenging the assumptions of many analysts and news reports, an attorney who specializes in medical ethics cases points out the autopsy report of Terri Schiavo indicates the brain-injured woman might have been cognizant of her surroundings as her family insisted.

Jerri Lynn Ward of Austin, Texas, notes the report released Wednesday in the high-profile case states: "The frontal temporal and temporal poles and insular-cortex demonstrated relative preservation."

"What this tells us is that her cortex retained function and that her brain was more normal in the area that controls higher-level thinking," said Ward, who has weighed in on the case in her weblog and in an interview with "Joseph Farah's WorldNetDaily RadioActive" show.



Are you telling me that a LAWYER "analyzed" the medical examiner's autopsy report, and determined, on her own, that Shiavo was not totally brain-dead? Because she specializes in medical ethics cases, this lawyer has the credentials to challenge all the other NEUROSURGEONS' assertion that she could not recognize her relatives' actions, words, etc.??????

This is bs. People can disagree on whether she was aware of anything or not, but we should discount everyone's opinion except the qualified doctors who actually examined her. Based on everything I've read about this case, only about 10% of the [directly involved] doctors have challenged the fact that she was not responsive in any way. ALL of those doctors (and the "specialist" lawyers) have been employed directly from the parents and siblings. To my knowledge, every other doctor who examined her has contended that she was not aware of her surroundings. Those doctors include ones employed by the husband, but I believe that many of them were not sought out by either party.

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:34 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
cvillehog wrote:...the stories I quoted above are from respected and responsible news sorces


Oh yeah, CBS. I forgot. :roll:

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:52 pm
by cvillehog
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
cvillehog wrote:...the stories I quoted above are from respected and responsible news sorces


Oh yeah, CBS. I forgot. :roll:


Whatever, man. Who are you to disparage CBS? Coming on here spouting this BS you found on some web site.

Also, that was a CBS/AP report. You have something against the Associate Press now?

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:04 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
Also, that was a CBS/AP report. You have something against the Associate Press now?


Yes, and I think I'm the very first person to EVER have something against "the media".:roll:

BTW - You're not a journalist, are you? If so, my bad. Y'all are all professionals, in my book! :up:

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:18 pm
by cvillehog
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:BTW - You're not a journalist, are you?


No. Not at this time. But cross your fingers...

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:19 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
cvillehog wrote:
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:BTW - You're not a journalist, are you?


No. Not at this time. But cross your fingers...


Best wishes! :up:

Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 5:28 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
A picture of the grave marker for Mrs. Schiavo.

Image

Michael Schiavo finding yet another way to tick people off.

Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 5:37 pm
by cvillehog
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:A picture of the grave marker for Mrs. Schiavo.

Michael Schiavo finding yet another way to tick people off.


My first thought seeing that was, "where's 'and Daughter'" (which you normally see on markers of people who preced thier parents in death. Second thought was, "why would he put all that on her marker?"

Should we start the countdown until the announcement of book deals from all sides of this issue?

That seems to be the latest thing these days, when you are involved in a controversy -- like the runaway bride, or W. Mark Felt's family.