Page 2 of 2
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:20 am
by crazyhorse1
I don't like MJ's singing or dancing or looks or probable habits, but you've got to prove guilt in the U.S. Wasn't done.
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:24 am
by 1niksder
SkinsChic wrote:Maybe the Jury's and Defense attorney's should send their kids to Neverland to Sleep with Michael if they believe he is NOT GUILTY !
The Jury members with kids that have been in the press have said they wouldn't let their kids anywhere near Neverland or MJ.
They have also said they believe Micheal did something but the DA didn't prove it
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:52 pm
by redskindave
Disagree
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 9:48 am
by Gibbs' Hog
1niksder wrote:They have also said they believe Micheal did something but the DA didn't prove it
What some of them have said is that they believe he is guilty of something, just not what was presented in the case. A past incident, perhaps. Either way, the man is a whack job, and he probably needs to relocate to Europe or something - the rest of the world LOVES that guy.
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 10:54 am
by REDEEMEDSKIN
Gibbs' Hog wrote:Either way, the man is a whack job, and he probably needs to relocate to Europe or something
Are you suggesting a "EuroNeverland Ranch"?
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 3:14 pm
by Gibbs' Hog
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:Gibbs' Hog wrote:Either way, the man is a whack job, and he probably needs to relocate to Europe or something
Are you suggesting a "EuroNeverland Ranch"?
Sure! It's gotta be more successful than 'Euro Disneyland.'
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 11:53 am
by John Manfreda
I think he did it, but in a legal situation he is innocent because there is too much doubt. Remember it has to be without a reasonable doubt. I personally think he did it, but in this case there was too much doubt. So I would have voted him innocent. I know it sounds wierd, but that is the law.
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:49 pm
by JPFair
I personally think he did it, but in this case there was too much doubt. So I would have voted him innocent. I know it sounds wierd, but that is the law.
Actually, and I hate to make it sound like I'm nitpicking, but you don't vote him "innocent". You vote him "guilty" or "NOT guilty".