Page 2 of 2
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 11:55 pm
by welch
If he does play I hope he plays well. If we all ridicule the guy what do think that will accomplish?
Gibbs made the choice. It’s too early to be criticizing the head coach. I’m hoping that Gibbs makes more good decisions then bad.
Absolutely right.
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 12:21 am
by batman2k5
Mr Brunell is going to look really good, holding a clip board this season. But he is a pricey back up or maybe even #3 QB. Gosh signing him was a mistake
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 7:25 am
by SkinsLaVar
batman2k5 wrote:Mr Brunell is going to look really good, holding a clip board this season. But he is a pricey back up or maybe even #3 QB. Gosh signing him was a mistake
lol....at least he thinks he's good...
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 9:42 am
by fredp45
Brunnel has a very very reasonable salary for this year, he redid it to save us cap space. The thing that hurts us with him is his bonus.
With good protection, a good running game and guys getting open, he'll be a fine backup. Let's put it this way -- if he comes into the game, I'm rooting for him...
In his day, he was one of the top QBs. For those of you who will say, he isn't in his day -- well, either is Kurt Warner, Brett Favre, etc...
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 12:03 pm
by batman2k5
Back up ??????????????????/
I dont even think he could be a 3rd qb with the cardinals, did you see him play last year he is terrible.
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 2:07 pm
by JPM36
Do you have any idea how difficult it is to make the Hall of Fame?
The guy had like 4-5 good years. He has 0% chance. He won't even be considered.
He is awful at this point. This is Ramsey's job to lose but if we're out of playoff contention in November/December I think we'll see Jason Campbell, who is the QB of the Redskins future.
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 2:56 pm
by fredp45
batman --
I saw him play last year and it was horrible, no question. BUT, also saw an offense that didn't click - at all. Losing Jansen in preseason and having a 40 year old RT replace him, having an average Center, having WR's that didn't get open didn't help. I think with our current line, Portis year 2, our new faster WR's,
ey year 2, Gibbs and his ability to adapt-- we'll be much better. Brunnel will be okay as our backup. I know, that's hard to believe but I do think it's true.
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 3:00 pm
by 1niksder
fredp45 wrote:batman --
I saw him play last year and it was horrible, no question. BUT, also saw an offense that didn't click - at all. Losing Jansen in preseason and having a 40 year old RT replace him, having an average Center, having WR's that didn't get open didn't help. I think with our current line, Portis year 2, our new faster WR's,
ey year 2, Gibbs and his ability to adapt-- we'll be much better. Brunnel will be okay as our backup. I know, that's hard to believe but I do think it's true.
I don't know who you are or what you did with Fred.... but welcome to the site
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 4:46 pm
by fredp45
1niksder -- I don't understand this comment...
"I don't know who you are or what you did with Fred.... but welcome to the site"
Help me out...
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 5:10 pm
by hailskins666
crazyhorse1 wrote:SKINZ_DOMIN8 wrote:Laugh all you want at Brunell and yes he sucked last year. But he is going into the Hall of Fame while everyone's mancrush Ramsey can't even throw one deep pass.
Think about that.
I'm surprized you don't remember Ramsey throwing deep passes when Spurrier called for them. Maybe you don't remember because you were born yesterday, or just a dumbass.
crazyhorse, take the insults to smack. please and thank you.
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 5:12 pm
by SkinsLaVar
hey what's up BTP?