Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 6:38 pm
Not to mention, Brett Favre was not a first round pick...wonker.
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
wonker wrote:The Hogster wrote:wonker wrote:This is just silly. It's basic statistics that the 1st round picks are inherently better than later roungs. It's irrefutable. Furhter, the draft is much more important than before because of the cap. You need, as a team, to have a constant source of cheaper talent.
wonker
I hope you are kidding. Irrefutable?
Statistics? There is no science to the draft. It is common sense that if you have a first round draft pick, you will have a greater liklihood of selecting the player that you have rated as one of the top 32 players. That is obvious. The problem is that the ratings of the players are often innaccurate.
It is ridiculous to think that that team with the most 1st rounders will be the best teams to a mathematic certainty.
I guess Rod Gardner, David Terrell and Charles Rogers, Desmond Howard, Micheal Westbrook etc are better than Terrell Owens, Hines Ward, Mushin Muhammad, Joe Horn, who were drafted in the 4th, 6th, 2nd, and 5th rounds respectively.
This is exactly my point, it's easy to find the exception to the norm But in the end statistics win. Look at the best at each position:
QB: Manning, McNabb, Farve, Brady, Vick. The overwhelming percentage is from the first round.
RB: James, Alexander, Priest, Dillon, Jamal Lewis. Same thing.
This goes on for EVERY position. Of course you can find the exceptions like Brady, and Owens. But for the overwhelmng part the best players are drafted higher.
wonker
Of course you can find the exceptions like Brady, and Owens. But for the overwhelmng part the best players are drafted higher.