Page 2 of 2

Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 10:39 pm
by General Failure
And a fine job he did last year in the NFCCG. Thanks, but I'd rather see Freeman come back if Reid decides Tooth and Mouth aren't getting it done.

Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 10:43 pm
by Redskin in Canada
General Failure wrote:And a fine job he did last year in the NFCCG. Thanks, but I'd rather see Freeman come back if Reid decides Tooth and Mouth aren't getting it done.
So, who is going to be this year's scapegoat?

Coming back to the topic of the thread, I am convinced Patrick Ramsey and our receivers are in much better shape than D. McNabb and his receivers right now.

Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 11:29 pm
by gundo
first, to stay on topic, because Ramsey is now the starter, will he hold out for a new contract in '05? remember, he held out as a rookie.

second, this Skins team is not the Iggles of '04....there is not just 1 or 2 needs that overwhelm all others. therefore, the Skins should continue to draft the best player available in the first three rounds and then make "need" picks thereafter.

Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 11:33 pm
by 1niksder
gundo wrote:first, to stay on topic, because Ramsey is now the starter, will he hold out for a new contract in '05? remember, he held out as a rookie.


He's under contract through 06 and he knows if he holdout he won't be the starter

Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 11:36 pm
by gundo
what, Brunell will be the starter instead?

if I were his agent, I'd be calling Danny Boy

Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 11:41 pm
by 1niksder
Hopefully Brunell will never EVER start another game for the Skins

Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 11:41 pm
by General Failure
Hypothetically speaking, if Ramsey were to hold out and I were the coach I'd give Powder Hasselbeck a shot.

Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 12:50 am
by Raised2BeARedskin
This is great news...Patrick is showing solid consistency in the last few weeks. I'm very impressed with him, I really believe Gibbs can bring out the gold in him. Can't wait!

Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 2:13 am
by John Manfreda
BringThePain! wrote:
John Manfreda wrote:Even if Coles is a no.1 we still need another reciever. I know Gardner has had one good game but he will vanish next week. He is too inconsistent and we need another reciever capable of being a starter.


Why isn't McCants, Thrash or Jacobs capable of being a starter?

Thrash I went to school in Eastern Pa. he is not a starter. Jacobs is stupid and lakadasical. He hasn't done anything since he has got here. Mcants is a good no.3 but he is too slow. He only makes plays on the third and fourth corner.

Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 2:22 am
by BringThePain!
John Manfreda wrote:
BringThePain! wrote:Why isn't McCants, Thrash or Jacobs capable of being a starter?

Thrash I went to school in Eastern Pa. he is not a starter. Jacobs is stupid and lakadasical. He hasn't done anything since he has got here. Mcants is a good no.3 but he is too slow. He only makes plays on the third and fourth corner.


very insightful good answers.... I'll take your word for it..... :|

Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 10:11 am
by darkwing99
we must draft mike wiliams or an offensive lineman in the first round.Prefferably mike williams in the first round.we must also find a way to get Antonio Perkins CB from oklahoma as a good 3rd Cb and a Kick returner.
I believe the DE and DT in this 2005 draft Do not deserve to be picked in the first round.WE should take a DE late in the 4th rounds.

Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 10:12 am
by JansenFan
Man, not Ramsey. I was hoping we could trade him and the rest of our draft picks to Dallas for Vinnie T.

Oh well, maybe Jeff George will come back.

Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 10:40 am
by genuswine hoglover
I think one of the biggest needs right now is a big back. We have sucked at short yardage situations this year. That is also one of our weaknesses in the red zone. We had several chances with one yard and goal to go in the SF game and it has been happening all year all over the field.

The good news is that I don't believe it will be very difficult or expensive to find such a back, either in the draft or via FA.

Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 12:09 pm
by Deadskins
genuswine hoglover wrote:I think one of the biggest needs right now is a big back. We have sucked at short yardage situations this year. That is also one of our weaknesses in the red zone. We had several chances with one yard and goal to go in the SF game and it has been happening all year all over the field.

The good news is that I don't believe it will be very difficult or expensive to find such a back, either in the draft or via FA.

We should be using Cooley as the short yardage back.

Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 12:13 pm
by Scottskins
Our RB is not the reason why we aren't scoring in the redzone. It's the predictability of the plays in the redzone...

Gibbs is getting less predictable throughout games and in the redzone the more games he coaches. Next season, he'll be back to the offensive guru that he is. Portis will be fine at the goalline ;-)

Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 1:04 pm
by tnathan
JSPB22 wrote:We should be using Cooley as the short yardage back.


I agree, i've been saying this too. Any idea why we haven't been?

Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 1:13 pm
by Deadskins
None at all. The H-back is supposed to be a hybrid TE and FB, but Gibbs only seems to use him as a TE.

FB

Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 1:52 pm
by LALUVAH
Drafting a big running back might be the solution at FB next year. Cooley is too good a receiving threat to use him in the backfield. We might even be able to get an aging vet on the cheap to fill in as our short yardage back a-la Dorsey Levens in Philly.

Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 3:57 pm
by genuswine hoglover
Scottskins wrote:Our RB is not the reason why we aren't scoring in the redzone. It's the predictability of the plays in the redzone...


I want a back that can get that tough yard even when everyone knows where it is going. Look, there are only so many holes in the middle of the line, its going to be somewhat predictable. A guy has to make an extra yard after the hit. We need a guy like Gerald Riggs. When he was with the Redskins, 3rd and 1, 3rd and goal, that's all he did. And everyone knew where he was going to go.

Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:15 pm
by Redskin in Canada
genuswine hoglover wrote:I want a back that can get that tough yard even when everyone knows where it is going.
You better go and get him a dominant OL. How about a few Hogs? :wink:

Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:24 pm
by RedskinsRule56
Chris Luva Luva and others how can you not say we need a WR better then Gardner?? Look at our offense it so horrible!!! WE need a big play WR, a Center and big Fullback! If we had a half way decent offense we would have 9-10 wins this year! Every game its the same story offense cant do jack, the defense has to make all the plays and set up great field position for the offense! Its just ridiculous! Yes I agree Ramsey is playing better but we are still missing things on Offense! With Jansen back next year that should really help out Potis!

Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:25 pm
by RedskinsRule56
Chris Luva Luva and others how can you not say we need a WR better then Gardner?? Look at our offense it so horrible!!! WE need a big play WR, a Center and big Fullback! If we had a half way decent offense we would have 9-10 wins this year! Every game its the same story offense cant do jack, the defense has to make all the plays and set up great field position for the offense! Its just ridiculous! Yes I agree Ramsey is playing better but we are still missing pieces on Offense!