markshark84 wrote:hitmandm wrote:Kirk will not get extended. He is too inconsistent to get a contract. Kirk is Gruden's guy so what does that tell you about Gruden. He's likely gone. And RG3 is on the roster.
I don't think that will be the case, but ok. It also appears that Kirk is Scot's guy too. Regardless, it seems like you are very confident in this. I'll make a note of it for future use.....
hitmandm wrote:Gruden was brought in explicitly to fix RG3. After getting the contract and saying the right things, Gruden double crossed ownership by the third preseason game of his first year and started the anti-RG3 movement that he was hired to prevent.
So RGIII's play had nothing to do with the "anti-RGIII movement". Nothing? His 2 straight years of bottom 3 QBR didn't have anything to do with the "anti" movement???? What about the fact a -- as you say -- backup is playing significantly and unquestionably better than RGIII has since his 2012 year.
And Gruden "double crossed" ownership? Gruden was brought in to win games, not to (as you indirectly say) babysit RGIII. If a HC doesn't think a player will produce, you move on. That is what coaching is all about. This isn't grade school football. RGIII isn't the coaches son (although he is the owners little pet, so you actually may have a point there).
hitmandm wrote: Reports said that Snyder called Gruden's agent saying that his client is stealing money.
Link please. Otherwise, it just makes you look like a bitter RGIII fan (and therefore anti-Gruden since he won't play RGIII --- just because, since there is actually no factual or logical reason to play RGIII based on his post-2012 production).
hitmandm wrote:If Gruden was in favor with the top of Redskin football, his guy would get extended.
Sound confident. No chance Kirk would structure a deal right now and neither would the skins. That would happen in the offseason. Also, who gets a deal has MUCH more to do with the GM. It has very little to do with the HC.
hitmandm wrote:Teams want QBs and they would take a shot on RG3 if he rearranges his contract.
What are you saying? That teams would trade for RGIII now if he'd restructure his deal? Reports have been that there is no interest in RGIII. If a team came and told RGIII that he'd be the starter if he restructured his deal, he'd be a fool not to do it. So, logic causes me to think he hasn't been approached with a similar deal.
hitmandm wrote:Because he knows that Gruden is fired and Cosuins is just a backup. RG3 is Snyder's guy and Gruden betrayed Snyder and therefore has no trust from ownership.
I had said I see your point in this regard. And again, if that is the case, the organization is as F---ed up as it has ever been.
And the fact RGIII is Snyder's guy -- an owner that has literally taken a hot steaming dump on this franchises' history --- says alot.
hitmandm wrote:And don't think Scott will save Gruden and Cosuins. Scott has been here less than a year. Scott isn't stupid to think he can run roughshot over an NFL owner.
I think you are underestimating the resolve Scot has in himself. I personally think he is not going to bend over to Danny like a little b!#$%. He understands that the only consistency Danny has in the NFL is failure. He also knows that if he fails here, his career as an NFL FO exec is over. If it were me in that position, I would rather be fired than go against something I thought would make my franchise successful. I wouldn't give 2 craps what my idiotic owner's opinion was on the HC or QB. I'd do what I thought was best. If it got me fired, oh well. I think (or more so HOPE) Scot is the same way.
