Burgundy&Wha? wrote:This Iggles offense is making our D look good on this series.
and that has been hard to do this season.
but seriously, glad to see the defense keeping the other O off the field
Burgundy&Wha? wrote:This Iggles offense is making our D look good on this series.
capitaldefense wrote:Burgundy&Wha? wrote:This Iggles offense is making our D look good on this series.
Cover 3 making the rookie throw it into a window, he is not comfortable doing that it seems.
absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.
This post? Yes I agree.
Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?
Irn-Bru wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.
This post? Yes I agree.
Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?
Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.
In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.
I know he got a pretty good zip on the ball. He has a quick release. . . once I seen a coupla' throws, I was just like 'Yeah, he's that dude.'"
Irn-Bru wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.
This post? Yes I agree.
Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?
Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.
In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.
absinthe1023 wrote:Irn-Bru wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.
This post? Yes I agree.
Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?
Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.
In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.
I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call. Subsequent events have made this a moot point, thankfully. I was hoping for an edifying response from the first person to respond to my post, I can only presume that it must be hard to post with one's foot in one's mouth.
cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Paulsen... Isn't injured it appears
capitaldefense wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Irn-Bru wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.
This post? Yes I agree.
Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?
Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.
In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.
I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call. Subsequent events have made this a moot point, thankfully. I was hoping for an edifying response from the first person to respond to my post, I can only presume that it must be hard to post with one's foot in one's mouth.
We just scored again, moot point now.
absinthe1023 wrote:Irn-Bru wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.
This post? Yes I agree.
Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?
Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.
In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.
I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call. Subsequent events have made this a moot point, thankfully. I was hoping for an edifying response from the first person to respond to my post, I can only presume that it must be hard to post with one's foot in one's mouth.
absinthe1023 wrote:Irn-Bru wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.
This post? Yes I agree.
Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?
Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.
In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.
I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call. Subsequent events have made this a moot point, thankfully. I was hoping for an edifying response from the first person to respond to my post, I can only presume that it must be hard to post with one's foot in one's mouth.
absinthe1023 wrote:I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call.
Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Irn-Bru wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.
This post? Yes I agree.
Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?
Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.
In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.
I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call. Subsequent events have made this a moot point, thankfully. I was hoping for an edifying response from the first person to respond to my post, I can only presume that it must be hard to post with one's foot in one's mouth.
We have 30+ points. Thus making your crying pointless.
Irn-Bru wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call.
I disagree. We were up by 18 at the time. That's three scores no matter how you look at it. The only thing being up by 21 does is change three unanswered TDs by the Eagles from a win into a tie. We are talking a very unlikely scenario.
On the other hand, had we converted, we'd be threatening with the TD, eating up clock, and the FG would still be there in case the drive totally stalled.
The concrete benefits are much higher in the second scenario, which on a 4th and inches makes the risk worth it, IMO.
absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Irn-Bru wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.
This post? Yes I agree.
Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?
Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.
In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.
I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call. Subsequent events have made this a moot point, thankfully. I was hoping for an edifying response from the first person to respond to my post, I can only presume that it must be hard to post with one's foot in one's mouth.
We have 30+ points. Thus making your crying pointless.
Crying? My face is quite dry, sir. Please don't persist in thinking that your opinion of my posts on a message board makes any impact on either my thoughts or my future actions.