Time to Get Back on Track: Eagles Game Thread

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
User avatar
absinthe1023
Hog
Posts: 1983
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:29 pm

Post by absinthe1023 »

Burgundy&Wha? wrote:This Iggles offense is making our D look good on this series.


and that has been hard to do this season.


but seriously, glad to see the defense keeping the other O off the field
"No one played with more heart."

-Clinton Portis on Sean Taylor


As of 11/27/07, I resolve to never again read any version of the Washington Post.
capitaldefense
piggie
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:46 pm

Post by capitaldefense »

Burgundy&Wha? wrote:This Iggles offense is making our D look good on this series.


Cover 3 making the rookie throw it into a window, he is not comfortable doing that it seems.
User avatar
absinthe1023
Hog
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:29 pm

Post by absinthe1023 »

capitaldefense wrote:
Burgundy&Wha? wrote:This Iggles offense is making our D look good on this series.


Cover 3 making the rookie throw it into a window, he is not comfortable doing that it seems.


He doesn't seem to be too comfortable doing anything other than tossing it to wide-open backs and receivers on screens. Now that that's been taken away, he's got nothing left.
"No one played with more heart."

-Clinton Portis on Sean Taylor


As of 11/27/07, I resolve to never again read any version of the Washington Post.
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
FanFromAnnapolis
Posts: 12025
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
Location: on the bandwagon
Contact:

Post by Irn-Bru »

absinthe1023 wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.


This post? Yes I agree.


Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?


Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.

In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.
capitaldefense
piggie
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:46 pm

Post by capitaldefense »

Good hard count by Griffin and hard running by Morris, then Lichtensteiger holds.
User avatar
DaveD1420
Hog
Posts: 386
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 11:25 pm
Location: Grand Forks, ND

Post by DaveD1420 »

Great to see Paulson leading the way there.
User avatar
emoses14
Hog
Posts: 2320
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:36 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by emoses14 »

Irn-Bru wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.


This post? Yes I agree.


Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?


Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.

In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.


+4th down.

I agree and have been happy to see the Skins actually use their brains when it comes to going for it on 4th and not just when conventional "wisdom" tells them they should.
I know he got a pretty good zip on the ball. He has a quick release. . . once I seen a coupla' throws, I was just like 'Yeah, he's that dude.'"

-Santana Moss on Our QB
capitaldefense
piggie
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:46 pm

Post by capitaldefense »

Pounding them now, nice to see.
User avatar
absinthe1023
Hog
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:29 pm

Post by absinthe1023 »

Irn-Bru wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.


This post? Yes I agree.


Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?


Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.

In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.


I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call. Subsequent events have made this a moot point, thankfully. I was hoping for an edifying response from the first person to respond to my post, I can only presume that it must be hard to post with one's foot in one's mouth.
"No one played with more heart."

-Clinton Portis on Sean Taylor


As of 11/27/07, I resolve to never again read any version of the Washington Post.
User avatar
DaveD1420
Hog
Posts: 386
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 11:25 pm
Location: Grand Forks, ND

Post by DaveD1420 »

Wouldja look at that?!
User avatar
44diesel
Hog
Posts: 906
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:04 pm

Post by 44diesel »

Paulsen showing that extra effort! Touchdown!!!
"Givin'em the Business!"
User avatar
Burgundy&Wha?
Hog
Posts: 4610
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 6:13 pm
Location: Virginia

Post by Burgundy&Wha? »

Crushing them. If the Iggles had decent looking cheerleaders, our guys would take them too. 8)
capitaldefense
piggie
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:46 pm

Post by capitaldefense »

Mr Paulsen is a nice player, doesn't get enough touches if you ask me. RGIII is smoking them now.
cowboykillerzRGiii
CKRGiii
CKRGiii
Posts: 7010
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:56 pm
Location: 505 New Mexico repn

Post by cowboykillerzRGiii »

Paulsen... Isn't injured it appears
#21 forever in our hearts
“I wanted to just… put his lights out ….because, you know, …Dallas sucks…” - Dexter Manley
capitaldefense
piggie
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:46 pm

Post by capitaldefense »

absinthe1023 wrote:
Irn-Bru wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.


This post? Yes I agree.


Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?


Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.

In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.


I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call. Subsequent events have made this a moot point, thankfully. I was hoping for an edifying response from the first person to respond to my post, I can only presume that it must be hard to post with one's foot in one's mouth.


We just scored again, moot point now.
User avatar
absinthe1023
Hog
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:29 pm

Post by absinthe1023 »

cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Paulsen... Isn't injured it appears


good to see him bounce back and make a great play. Great to see RGIII's first (of hopefully many) 4 TD games come against Philthy.
"No one played with more heart."

-Clinton Portis on Sean Taylor


As of 11/27/07, I resolve to never again read any version of the Washington Post.
User avatar
absinthe1023
Hog
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:29 pm

Post by absinthe1023 »

capitaldefense wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:
Irn-Bru wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.


This post? Yes I agree.


Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?


Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.

In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.


I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call. Subsequent events have made this a moot point, thankfully. I was hoping for an edifying response from the first person to respond to my post, I can only presume that it must be hard to post with one's foot in one's mouth.


We just scored again, moot point now.


As I wrote, I thought it was a moot point BEFORE the score.
"No one played with more heart."

-Clinton Portis on Sean Taylor


As of 11/27/07, I resolve to never again read any version of the Washington Post.
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

absinthe1023 wrote:
Irn-Bru wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.


This post? Yes I agree.


Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?


Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.

In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.


I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call. Subsequent events have made this a moot point, thankfully. I was hoping for an edifying response from the first person to respond to my post, I can only presume that it must be hard to post with one's foot in one's mouth.


We have 30+ points. Thus making your crying pointless.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Post by 1niksder »

absinthe1023 wrote:
Irn-Bru wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.


This post? Yes I agree.


Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?


Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.

In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.


I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call. Subsequent events have made this a moot point, thankfully. I was hoping for an edifying response from the first person to respond to my post, I can only presume that it must be hard to post with one's foot in one's mouth.
:)
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
FanFromAnnapolis
Posts: 12025
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
Location: on the bandwagon
Contact:

Post by Irn-Bru »

absinthe1023 wrote:I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call.


I disagree. We were up by 18 at the time. That's three scores no matter how you look at it. The only thing being up by 21 does is change three unanswered TDs by the Eagles from a win into a tie. We are talking a very unlikely scenario.

On the other hand, had we converted, we'd be threatening with the TD, eating up clock, and the FG would still be there in case the drive totally stalled.

The concrete benefits are much higher in the second scenario, which on a 4th and inches makes the risk worth it, IMO.
User avatar
absinthe1023
Hog
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:29 pm

Post by absinthe1023 »

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:
Irn-Bru wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.


This post? Yes I agree.


Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?


Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.

In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.


I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call. Subsequent events have made this a moot point, thankfully. I was hoping for an edifying response from the first person to respond to my post, I can only presume that it must be hard to post with one's foot in one's mouth.


We have 30+ points. Thus making your crying pointless.


Crying? My face is quite dry, sir. Please don't persist in thinking that your opinion of my posts on a message board makes any impact on either my thoughts or my future actions.
"No one played with more heart."

-Clinton Portis on Sean Taylor


As of 11/27/07, I resolve to never again read any version of the Washington Post.
User avatar
absinthe1023
Hog
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:29 pm

Post by absinthe1023 »

Irn-Bru wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call.


I disagree. We were up by 18 at the time. That's three scores no matter how you look at it. The only thing being up by 21 does is change three unanswered TDs by the Eagles from a win into a tie. We are talking a very unlikely scenario.

On the other hand, had we converted, we'd be threatening with the TD, eating up clock, and the FG would still be there in case the drive totally stalled.

The concrete benefits are much higher in the second scenario, which on a 4th and inches makes the risk worth it, IMO.



Certainly, it can be argued both ways, and there isn't a clear-cut right and wrong. I also agree that attempting to justify the action in light of the result is faulty logic.
"No one played with more heart."

-Clinton Portis on Sean Taylor


As of 11/27/07, I resolve to never again read any version of the Washington Post.
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Post by 1niksder »

I think Shanny can say WTF he wants after this game, come back the next day day and tell everyone that he didn't say what we heard him say and blame the press as long as they play this way on Thursday
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

absinthe1023 wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:
Irn-Bru wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.


This post? Yes I agree.


Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?


Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.

In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.


I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call. Subsequent events have made this a moot point, thankfully. I was hoping for an edifying response from the first person to respond to my post, I can only presume that it must be hard to post with one's foot in one's mouth.


We have 30+ points. Thus making your crying pointless.


Crying? My face is quite dry, sir. Please don't persist in thinking that your opinion of my posts on a message board makes any impact on either my thoughts or my future actions.


:lol: :lol: if your going to be consistently negative. Don't cry when it's pointed out.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
cowboykillerzRGiii
CKRGiii
CKRGiii
Posts: 7010
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:56 pm
Location: 505 New Mexico repn

Post by cowboykillerzRGiii »

THERE'S the refs... Smfh
#21 forever in our hearts
“I wanted to just… put his lights out ….because, you know, …Dallas sucks…” - Dexter Manley
Post Reply