Page 10 of 11

Posted: Tue May 21, 2013 1:41 pm
by Deadskins
Cappster wrote:Try to marginalize the other person to help invalidate that persons argument instead of actually refuting said persons argument.

You mean like this?

Cappster wrote:I've got the answer: God is mysterious! Ahahahahaaaa

Assuming that god exists and is an omnipotent and omniscient being, I would say that god probably loves lil Wayne a little more than that innocent little girl who died a horrific death. See, this is where the apologists come in and truly do say that god is mysterious and he has a plan or her reward is in heaven, blah blah blah. If you had never heard of god and someone came to you, as an adult, speaking about the wonders of the sky deity, you would probably think they were crazy. I mean, imagine if someone came up to you claiming how awesome the flying spaghetti monster is and all the wonders that little meaty and delicious flying pasta has done in their life. Maybe if someone invented the FSM two thousand years ago, we all would be walking around wearing spaghetti strainers on our heads.

Posted: Tue May 21, 2013 2:48 pm
by Cappster
Deadskins wrote:
Cappster wrote:Try to marginalize the other person to help invalidate that persons argument instead of actually refuting said persons argument.

You mean like this?

Cappster wrote:I've got the answer: God is mysterious! Ahahahahaaaa

Assuming that god exists and is an omnipotent and omniscient being, I would say that god probably loves lil Wayne a little more than that innocent little girl who died a horrific death. See, this is where the apologists come in and truly do say that god is mysterious and he has a plan or her reward is in heaven, blah blah blah. If you had never heard of god and someone came to you, as an adult, speaking about the wonders of the sky deity, you would probably think they were crazy. I mean, imagine if someone came up to you claiming how awesome the flying spaghetti monster is and all the wonders that little meaty and delicious flying pasta has done in their life. Maybe if someone invented the FSM two thousand years ago, we all would be walking around wearing spaghetti strainers on our heads.


If you read my post within the intended context, you may see that it was satirical in its nature. However, the points about god's will being mysterious and if a religion is old then it is taken more seriously are accurate. I used the FSM, because there are people who actually do call themselves pastafarians and no one truly takes them seriously. You could almost insert any kind of religion, that's had a following for a couple thousand years, and just, because it is old it is given more clout over newer ideas. Don't be so sensitive.

Posted: Tue May 21, 2013 4:02 pm
by Deadskins
Uh huh. One man's satire is another's attempt at marginalization. I guess it's only satire when you do it. :roll: Funny, no one else was being "satirical" when answering LPJ's very serious question. I particularly liked the hysterical laughter in your first line. And telling me not to be so sensitive, when I pointed out your blatant hypocrisy, was a nice touch too. :wink:

Posted: Tue May 21, 2013 4:34 pm
by Cappster
Deadskins wrote:Uh huh. One man's satire is another's attempt at marginalization. I guess it's only satire when you do it. :roll: Funny, no one else was being "satirical" when answering LPJ's very serious question. I particularly liked the hysterical laughter in your first line. And telling me not to be so sensitive, when I pointed out your blatant hypocrisy, was a nice touch too. :wink:


No matter how I answered LPJ's question, you would still find fault with it as I am heretic that is bound on the southern train to hellllllll. The bottom line is you believe your religion is true based on old and flawed writings that have been written and rewritten many times over. I find not only your particular religion, but all religions to be falsely characterized as truly knowing and being the forth comer of knowledge about a higher power. I am not saying you are stupid or that I am smarter than anyone else (there are many smart people who believe in a deity), because I feel people are worshiping what essentially, to me, equates to worshiping thin air. Do people find value in religion? Yes, they do. That doesn't mean what they are getting value out of is true.

Not to mention I was addressing the question that LPJ posted without addressing any one person in particular. You addressed me directly in which you said my reasoning was fake, I made no logical sense, and that I have no evidence to support my claims. Yet, you are still responding to me which I guess is to tell me how hypocritical and nonsensical I truly am.

Posted: Tue May 21, 2013 6:52 pm
by Deadskins
Cappster wrote:
Deadskins wrote:Uh huh. One man's satire is another's attempt at marginalization. I guess it's only satire when you do it. :roll: Funny, no one else was being "satirical" when answering LPJ's very serious question. I particularly liked the hysterical laughter in your first line. And telling me not to be so sensitive, when I pointed out your blatant hypocrisy, was a nice touch too. :wink:


No matter how I answered LPJ's question, you would still find fault with it as I am heretic that is bound on the southern train to hellllllll.

I'm sure you probably believe that.

Cappster wrote:The bottom line is you believe your religion is true based on old and flawed writings that have been written and rewritten many times over.

You have absolutely no idea why I believe my religion is true. For the last three pages you've been telling me how I'm distancing myself from these same writings you now say I'm basing my religion on.

Cappster wrote:I find not only your particular religion, but all religions to be falsely characterized as truly knowing and being the forth comer of knowledge about a higher power.

And yet you still seem to think you know that they are wrong, without the least shred of evidence. Sounds like zealotry to me.

Cappster wrote:I am not saying you are stupid or that I am smarter than anyone else

I should hope not!

Cappster wrote:(there are many smart people who believe in a deity), because I feel people are worshiping what essentially, to me, equates to worshiping thin air. Do people find value in religion? Yes, they do. That doesn't mean what they are getting value out of is true.

What's your point? That there is no God? Yes, you've told us that. Yet you can't cite any evidence, either quantifiable or even anecdotal, to support this claim.

Cappster wrote:Not to mention I was addressing the question that LPJ posted without addressing any one person in particular.

Which is why you included:

Cappster wrote:See, this is where the apologists come in and truly do say that god is mysterious and he has a plan

in your response? You do realize this is a message board, right? When you post, not only are you addressing everyone (though the highlighted words sure make it seem otherwise), there is a record of what you wrote.

Cappster wrote:You addressed me directly in which you said my reasoning was fake, I made no logical sense, and that I have no evidence to support my claims.

Well, when I said that, I was responding directly to your assertions to the contrary. But, what I actually said was that your reasoning was specious and contrived, and that you hadn't used logic or provided any evidence to back your arguments. I stand by that.

Cappster wrote:Yet, you are still responding to me which I guess is to tell me how hypocritical and nonsensical I truly am.

I didn't say I wouldn't respond to you. I said I was done arguing with you about how your misguided notions that conflicting (in your mind) writings, and the actions of people who claim to be Christians somehow disproves that there is a God (this is some of that specious reasoning and illogic I cited). I always welcome interesting debate, if the other party can bring a reasoned and logical opposition to my viewpoint. So far, you've been sorely lacking. My 2 cents

Posted: Tue May 21, 2013 9:12 pm
by Cappster
Sigh... I have lost the zeal for responding to you, because you don't understand anything and I have gotten to the point where I am wasting too much of my time. I could go through and breakdown everything you said in the last post, but you are drunk on theism and there is not the slightest hint of you seeing past your jesus juice.

Posted: Tue May 21, 2013 9:48 pm
by Deadskins
:rock:

Posted: Wed May 22, 2013 4:02 pm
by HTTRRG3ALMO
Romans 1:18-32

18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles.

24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.

26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.

28 Furthermore, just as they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done. 29 They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, 30 slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; 31 they have no understanding, no fidelity, no love, no mercy. 32 Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.


Matthew 10:14-15

14 If anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, leave that home or town and shake the dust off your feet. 15 Truly I tell you, it will be more bearable for Sodom and Gomorrah on the day of judgment than for that town.



-------------

For now, I'm leaving this thread. Already gave the reasons for my hope and respectfully heard the reasoning of others.

Posted: Wed May 22, 2013 8:32 pm
by Cappster
Pope Francis Says Atheists Who Do Good Are Redeemed, Not Just Catholics

Pope Francis rocked some religious and atheist minds today when he declared that everyone was redeemed through Jesus, including atheists.

During his homily at Wednesday Mass in Rome, Francis emphasized the importance of "doing good" as a principle that unites all humanity, and a "culture of encounter" to support peace.

Using scripture from the Gospel of Mark, Pope Francis explained how upset Jesus' disciples were that someone outside their group was doing good, according to a report from Vatican Radio.

“They complain,” the Pope said in his homily, because they say, “If he is not one of us, he cannot do good. If he is not of our party, he cannot do good.” And Jesus corrects them: “Do not hinder him, he says, let him do good.” The disciples, Pope Francis explains, “were a little intolerant,” closed off by the idea of ​​possessing the truth, convinced that “those who do not have the truth, cannot do good.” “This was wrong . . . Jesus broadens the horizon.” Pope Francis said, “The root of this possibility of doing good – that we all have – is in creation”

Pope Francis went further in his sermon to say:

"The Lord created us in His image and likeness, and we are the image of the Lord, and He does good and all of us have this commandment at heart: do good and do not do evil. All of us. ‘But, Father, this is not Catholic! He cannot do good.’ Yes, he can... "The Lord has redeemed all of us, all of us, with the Blood of Christ: all of us, not just Catholics. Everyone! ‘Father, the atheists?’ Even the atheists. Everyone!".. We must meet one another doing good. ‘But I don’t believe, Father, I am an atheist!’ But do good: we will meet one another there.”

Responding to the leader of the Roman Catholic church's homily, Father James Martin, S.J. wrote in an email to The Huffington Post:

"Pope Francis is saying, more clearly than ever before, that Christ offered himself as a sacrifice for everyone. That's always been a Christian belief. You can find St. Paul saying in the First Letter to Timothy that Jesus gave himself as a "ransom for all." But rarely do you hear it said by Catholics so forcefully, and with such evident joy. And in this era of religious controversies, it's a timely reminder that God cannot be confined to our narrow categories."

Of course, not all Christians believe that those who don't believe will be redeemed, and the Pope's words may spark memories of the deep divisions from the Protestant reformation over the belief in redemption through grace versus redemption through works.

The pope's comment has also struck a chord on Reddit, where it is the second most-shared piece.

More from Reuters:

Atheists should be seen as good people if they do good, Pope Francis said on Wednesday in his latest urging that people of all religions - or no religion - work together.

The leader of the world's 1.2 billion Roman Catholics made his comments in the homily of his morning Mass in his residence, a daily event where he speaks without prepared comments.

He told the story of a Catholic who asked a priest if even atheists had been redeemed by Jesus.

"Even them, everyone," the pope answered, according to Vatican Radio. "We all have the duty to do good," he said.

"Just do good and we'll find a meeting point," the pope said in a hypothetical conversation in which someone told a priest: "But I don't believe. I'm an atheist."

Francis's reaching out to atheists and people who belong to no religion is a marked contrast to the attitude of former Pope Benedict, who sometimes left non-Catholics feeling that he saw them as second-class believers.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/2 ... 20757.html

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 8:52 am
by Deadskins
See, even the Pope says it's your actions that matter, not your religion.

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 1:48 pm
by DarthMonk
Cappster wrote:
Pope Francis Says Atheists Who Do Good Are Redeemed, Not Just Catholics

Pope Francis rocked some religious and atheist minds today when he declared that everyone was redeemed through Jesus, including atheists.

During his homily at Wednesday Mass in Rome, Francis emphasized the importance of "doing good" as a principle that unites all humanity, and a "culture of encounter" to support peace.

Using scripture from the Gospel of Mark, Pope Francis explained how upset Jesus' disciples were that someone outside their group was doing good, according to a report from Vatican Radio.

“They complain,” the Pope said in his homily, because they say, “If he is not one of us, he cannot do good. If he is not of our party, he cannot do good.” And Jesus corrects them: “Do not hinder him, he says, let him do good.” The disciples, Pope Francis explains, “were a little intolerant,” closed off by the idea of ​​possessing the truth, convinced that “those who do not have the truth, cannot do good.” “This was wrong . . . Jesus broadens the horizon.” Pope Francis said, “The root of this possibility of doing good – that we all have – is in creation”

Pope Francis went further in his sermon to say:

"The Lord created us in His image and likeness, and we are the image of the Lord, and He does good and all of us have this commandment at heart: do good and do not do evil. All of us. ‘But, Father, this is not Catholic! He cannot do good.’ Yes, he can... "The Lord has redeemed all of us, all of us, with the Blood of Christ: all of us, not just Catholics. Everyone! ‘Father, the atheists?’ Even the atheists. Everyone!".. We must meet one another doing good. ‘But I don’t believe, Father, I am an atheist!’ But do good: we will meet one another there.”

Responding to the leader of the Roman Catholic church's homily, Father James Martin, S.J. wrote in an email to The Huffington Post:

"Pope Francis is saying, more clearly than ever before, that Christ offered himself as a sacrifice for everyone. That's always been a Christian belief. You can find St. Paul saying in the First Letter to Timothy that Jesus gave himself as a "ransom for all." But rarely do you hear it said by Catholics so forcefully, and with such evident joy. And in this era of religious controversies, it's a timely reminder that God cannot be confined to our narrow categories."

Of course, not all Christians believe that those who don't believe will be redeemed, and the Pope's words may spark memories of the deep divisions from the Protestant reformation over the belief in redemption through grace versus redemption through works.

The pope's comment has also struck a chord on Reddit, where it is the second most-shared piece.

More from Reuters:

Atheists should be seen as good people if they do good, Pope Francis said on Wednesday in his latest urging that people of all religions - or no religion - work together.

The leader of the world's 1.2 billion Roman Catholics made his comments in the homily of his morning Mass in his residence, a daily event where he speaks without prepared comments.

He told the story of a Catholic who asked a priest if even atheists had been redeemed by Jesus.

"Even them, everyone," the pope answered, according to Vatican Radio. "We all have the duty to do good," he said.

"Just do good and we'll find a meeting point," the pope said in a hypothetical conversation in which someone told a priest: "But I don't believe. I'm an atheist."

Francis's reaching out to atheists and people who belong to no religion is a marked contrast to the attitude of former Pope Benedict, who sometimes left non-Catholics feeling that he saw them as second-class believers.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/2 ... 20757.html


First they approve the Big Bang ~ Pope Pius XII declared, at the November 22, 1951, opening meeting of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, that the Big Bang theory does not conflict with the Catholic concept of creation.

Then they admit they screwed Galileo ~ Thanks to his intuition as a brilliant physicist and by relying on different arguments, Galileo, who practically invented the experimental method, understood why only the sun could function as the centre of the world, as it was then known, that is to say, as a planetary system. The error of the theologians of the time, when they maintained the centrality of the Earth, was to think that our understanding of the physical world's structure was, in some way, imposed by the literal sense of Sacred Scripture ~ Pope John Paul II, L'Osservatore Romano N. 44 (1264) - November 4, 1992

Now this. Kewl.

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 2:03 pm
by Deadskins
Apparently religious doctrine can change and grow.

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 12:23 pm
by langleyparkjoe
Soooo.. to the simplest form of it all.

Don't kill people (unless self defense)
Don't hurt people (unless self defense)
Help people
Don't take what doesn't belong to you without asking
Don't commit sexual crimes (including children)
If your married, don't cheat
Be parents to your offspring and raise them

Totally my way of thinking and my life's been pretty awesome so far
:lol:

Anyways guys, this will be it for me in here.

God Bless you all whether you except it or not :wink:

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 8:49 pm
by Cappster
langleyparkjoe wrote:Soooo.. to the simplest form of it all.

Don't kill people (unless self defense)
Don't hurt people (unless self defense)
Help people
Don't take what doesn't belong to you without asking
Don't commit sexual crimes (including children)
If your married, don't cheat
Be parents to your offspring and raise them

Totally my way of thinking and my life's been pretty awesome so far
:lol:

Anyways guys, this will be it for me in here.

God Bless you all whether you except it or not :wink:


I think you forgot one love and smoke ganja hahaha

Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 3:35 pm
by Cappster
Vatican Clarifies Pope's 'Atheist' Remarks

Shortly after Pope Francis gave an homily in which he said even atheists who do good are redeemed, a statement from a Vatican spokesman clarified the pope's remarks.

Just one day after the pope's now famous words in Rome on May 22, a Vatican spokesman the Rev. Thomas Rosica released a statement quoting a section of the Catechism of the Catholic Church that says people who reject the teachings of Jesus Christ cannot attain salvation.

"All salvation comes from Christ, the Head, through the Church which is his body," Rosica wrote. "Hence they cannot be saved who, knowing the Church as founded by Christ and necessary for salvation, would refuse to enter her or remain in her."

However, Rosica wrote that it's not impossible for an atheist to eventually be saved by Christ.

“Rejection of Christianity may not mean the rejection of Christ,” he wrote. "We can never say with ultimate certainty whether a non-Christian who has rejected Christianity...is still following the temporary path mapped out for his own salvation which is leading him to an encounter with God.”

Rosica's statement was written in response to the many calls and messages he received after Francis' controversial homily.

The Catholic Church defines redemption and salvation differently: while everyone is redeemed through the death of Jesus Christ, salvation is offered by God and can be either accepted or rejected individually.

In his homily, the pope said everyone, "even the atheists," have been redeemed "with the Blood of Christ," according to Vatican Radio.

"If we, each doing our own part, if we do good to others, if we meet there, doing good, and we go slowly, gently, little by little, we will make that culture of encounter," Francis said. "We must meet one another doing good. 'But I don't believe, Father, I am an atheist!' But do good: we will meet one another there."

The Vatican's statement seemed to attempt to do damage control for Francis' remarks, emphasizing that his job is more to speak well than to provide an indisputable interpretation of the Bible.

"[Pope Francis] is first and foremost a seasoned pastor and preacher who has much experience in reaching people," the statement said. "His words are not spoken in the context of a theological faculty or academy nor in interreligious dialogue or debate."


Wow, what a shocker. Just one more reason why religion is a sham.

Edit: I forgot the link

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/2 ... ostpopular

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 1:39 pm
by Deadskins
That's actually pretty funny. "No no, the Pope doesn't speak for the Catholic church."

Cappster wrote:Just one more reason why religion is a sham.

Your comment shows you still don't grasp the concept of there being a difference between religion, and religious institutions.

Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 12:46 am
by tribeofjudah
Long time no POST. Hello Again Friends.

Did you know the USA is prophesied in the Bible.
I love this Country, but sadly, it will turn into the "Beast" told of in Revelations 13:11

History Recap:

As the Beast was wounded (pope was captured by Gen. Berthier and put in prison in France), during this same time period or century, another Beast was coming out of the earth (USA was being formed at this time)

Remember Rome's power was waning and going down while the USA was just beginning to become a nation.

Notice how this 2nd "beast" give homage to the 1st "beast"


New Century Version (NCV)

11 Then I saw another beast coming up out of the earth. It had two horns like a lamb, but it spoke like a dragon. 12 This beast stands before the first beast and uses the same power the first beast has. By this power it makes everyone living on earth worship the first beast, who had the death wound that was healed. 13 And the second beast does great miracles so that it even makes fire come down from heaven to earth while people are watching. 14 It fools those who live on earth by the miracles it has been given the power to do. It does these miracles to serve the first beast. The second beast orders people to make an idol to honor the first beast, the one that was wounded by the deadly sword but sprang to life again. 15 The second beast was given power to give life to the idol of the first one so that the idol could speak. And the second beast was given power to command all who will not worship the image of the beast to be killed. 16 The second beast also forced all people, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to have a mark on their right hand or on their forehead. 17 No one could buy or sell without this mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name. 18 This takes wisdom. Let the one who has understanding find the meaning of the number, which is the number of a person. Its number is 666.[a]

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 2:49 am
by welch
I think Revelations is (1) poetry. Hard to follow the metaphor, and (2) written against the Roman Empire but disguised because the Romans crucified anyone who opposed their rule.

Only Roman authorities could crucify someone, and they reserved it for people who tried to overthrow the Empire.

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 2:51 am
by welch
On the Pope: John XXIII said something like, "I'm only infallible when I speak ex cathdra, and I never speak ex-cathdra", where "ex cathdra" means, roughly, "from the chair of the Pope. "

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:13 am
by langleyparkjoe
GOD RULES !

Who else could create sharks that I just watched for a week on shark week.

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 2:55 pm
by DarthMonk
tribeofjudah wrote:Long time no POST. Hello Again Friends.

Did you know the USA is prophesied in the Bible.
I love this Country, but sadly, it will turn into the "Beast" told of in Revelations 13:11

History Recap:

As the Beast was wounded (pope was captured by Gen. Berthier and put in prison in France), during this same time period or century, another Beast was coming out of the earth (USA was being formed at this time)

Remember Rome's power was waning and going down while the USA was just beginning to become a nation.

Notice how this 2nd "beast" give homage to the 1st "beast"


New Century Version (NCV)

11 Then I saw another beast coming up out of the earth. It had two horns like a lamb, but it spoke like a dragon. 12 This beast stands before the first beast and uses the same power the first beast has. By this power it makes everyone living on earth worship the first beast, who had the death wound that was healed. 13 And the second beast does great miracles so that it even makes fire come down from heaven to earth while people are watching. 14 It fools those who live on earth by the miracles it has been given the power to do. It does these miracles to serve the first beast. The second beast orders people to make an idol to honor the first beast, the one that was wounded by the deadly sword but sprang to life again. 15 The second beast was given power to give life to the idol of the first one so that the idol could speak. And the second beast was given power to command all who will not worship the image of the beast to be killed. 16 The second beast also forced all people, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to have a mark on their right hand or on their forehead. 17 No one could buy or sell without this mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name. 18 This takes wisdom. Let the one who has understanding find the meaning of the number, which is the number of a person. Its number is 666.[a]


ROTFALMAO

Some snippets of another person's take:

4 big myths of Book of Revelation

1. It’s about the end of the world

Anyone who has read the popular “Left Behind” novels or listened to pastors preaching about the “rapture” might see Revelation as a blow-by-blow preview of how the world will end.

Pagels, however, says the writer of Revelation was actually describing the way his own world ended.

2. The numerals 666 stand for the devil

The 1976 horror film “The Omen” scared a lot of folks. It may have scared some theologians, too, who began encountering people whose view of Revelation comes from a Hollywood movie.

“The Omen” depicted the birth and rise of the “anti-Christ,” the cunning son of Satan who would be known by “the mark of the beast,” 666, on his body.

Pagels, however, says the writer of Revelation didn’t really intend 666 as the devil’s digits. He was describing another incarnation of evil: The Roman emperor, Nero.

But the author of Revelation couldn’t safely name Nero, so he used the Jewish numerology system to spell out Nero’s imperial name, Pagels says.

3. The writer of Revelation was a Christian

The author of Revelation hated Rome, but he also scorned another group – a group of people we would call Christians today, Pagels says.

There’s a common perception that there was a golden age of Christianity, when most Christians agreed on an uncontaminated version of the faith. Yet there was never one agreed-upon Christianity. There were always clashing visions.

Revelation reflects some of those early clashes in the church, Pagels says.

That idea isn’t new territory for Pagels. She won the National Book Award for “The Gnostic Gospels,” a 1979 book that examined a cache of newly discovered “secret” gospels of Jesus. The book, along with other work from Pagels, argues that there were other accounts of Jesus’ life that were suppressed by early church leaders because it didn’t fit with their agenda.

The author of Revelation was like an activist crusading for traditional values. In his case, he was a devout Jew who saw Jesus as the messiah. But he didn’t like the message that the apostle Paul and other followers of Jesus were preaching.

4. There is only one Book of Revelation

There’s no other book in the Bible quite like Revelation, but there are plenty of books like Revelation that didn’t make it into the Bible, Pagels says.

Early church leaders suppressed an “astonishing” range of books that claimed to be revelations from apostles such as Peter and James. Many of these books were read and treasured by Christians throughout the Roman Empire, she says.

There was even another “Secret Revelation of John.” In this one, Jesus wasn’t a divine warrior, but someone who first appeared to the apostle Paul as a blazing light, then as a child, an old man and, some scholars say, a woman.

So why did the revelation from John of Patmos make it into the Bible, but not the others?

Pagels traces that decision largely to Bishop Athanasius, a pugnacious church leader who championed Revelation about 360 years after the death of Jesus.

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 6:50 pm
by Cappster
I have a true disdain for the book of revelations as it is a perfect setup for self fulfilling prophecies. That and the "rapture" where all of the good little Christians go to heaven and leave us evil people behind on Earth. They are rather disturbing concepts that do harm and no good.

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 5:49 pm
by tribeofjudah
HERE'S A SHOCKER FOR SOME OF YOU:

God Loves US humans just as much as He loves Jesus His Son.

John 17:23

New Century Version (NCV)

23 I will be in them and you will be in me so that they will be completely one. Then the world will know that you sent me and that you loved them just as much as you loved me.

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 8:08 pm
by Deadskins
Why shouldn't He? Jesus was human too.

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2013 4:48 am
by tribeofjudah
Deadskins wrote:Why shouldn't He? Jesus was human too.


He was the Son of God first........who chose to become "sin" for us. Died as a man that WE MAY LIVE.

It's a mystery which you and I can never fathom UNTIL we receive the rewards of the Kingdom. Then all things shall be revealed.