Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:42 pm
Deadskins wrote:Yeah that Banks kid sucks...
One decent play! Four or five bad ones!
One decent play! Four or five bad ones!
The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
GAMEDAY THREAD: Skins vs Jets
Page 10 of 12
One decent play! Four or five bad ones!
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:42 pm
#27 nice job on the pickup.
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:42 pm
Larry Johnson looks really slow to me
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:42 pm
where's the shotgun~~~~
Duck duck duck
Duck duck duck
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:43 pm
Did that pass hit the Jerrahtron?
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:43 pm
frankcal20 wrote:why is Jason Taylor in there at the 4th QTR?
and he's not complaining like fat Al.
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:43 pm
Trent Cole - eagles getting an ankle xray
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:43 pm
Deadskins wrote:Yeah that Banks kid sucks...
He doesn't suck, he's just not good enough to be one of the 6 receivers on our roster.
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:44 pm
Missed the throw.
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:44 pm
lowtharofthehill wrote:Larry Johnson looks really slow to me
Yea he looks old and washed-up. Based on game performance, CP and Keiland Williams are the only that deserve to be on the team.
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:45 pm
CanesSkins26 wrote:Deadskins wrote:Yeah that Banks kid sucks...
He doesn't suck, he's just not good enough to be one of the 6 receivers on our roster.
He'll make the team as a STer, who just happens to be a WR.
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:45 pm
dang, I can see our "good natured" ribbing and poking is also practiced in the preseason. =)
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:45 pm
how about not a receiver but a ST specialist?
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:47 pm
frankcal20 wrote:how about not a receiver but a ST specialist?
If we have the roster space that's fine, but we need to keep 6 wide receivers not named Banks.
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:49 pm
With our TE's, I think we could keep 3 TE's and 5 WR's, 4 ST players
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:50 pm
LoL I HAVE THE BALL REF!
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:51 pm
Hell yeah. Lock this ugly ass game up.SKINFAN wrote:LoL I HAVE THE BALL REF!
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:52 pm
Did Fred Davis get any plays with the 1's?
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:52 pm
#51 knocked it out.
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:53 pm
BANKS!!!!
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:53 pm
Banks looking good again.......ya'll shut up about him for now.
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:53 pm
good play call
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:53 pm
NICE!
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:54 pm
Stay in bounds Larry. You're big enough to truck those guys.
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:54 pm
tribeofjudah wrote:Banks looking good again.......ya'll shut up about him for now.
LMAO