Page 10 of 24
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:25 pm
by spudstr04
SAints want the ball back to score before the half
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:25 pm
by spudstr04
RedskinsFreak wrote:spudstr04 wrote:J camp = over 60% & over 120 yards in the 1st half
He's completed 13 passes for 122 yards. < 10 yds per completion is a dreadful average.
yeah, but better than last week....
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:25 pm
by Champsturf
This blows
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:26 pm
by Hoss
here we go for the FG.......9-7 Skins
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:26 pm
by spudstr04
we've had some big plays to get us in the red zone, then we call stupid stuff and settle for fgs.
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:26 pm
by GSPODS
Why did the Skins draft Kelly, if not for this? Stick him out there and let him outreach a defender in the end zone.
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:26 pm
by DaSkins24
This team is infuriating to watch.
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:26 pm
by SCSkinsFan
Guess what's coming upagain?
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:26 pm
by RedskinsFreak
FIELD GOAL! 9-7 lead.
Leads = good.
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:27 pm
by gibbs4president
How is that the play you get on 3rd and 9 after NO called a timeout?
Have to get something better than that...
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:27 pm
by spudstr04
RedskinsFreak wrote:FIELD GOAL! 9-7 lead.
Leads = good.
FGs instead of TDs = bad!
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:27 pm
by SCSkinsFan
RedskinsFreak wrote:FIELD GOAL! 9-7 lead.
Leads = good.
You got it right.
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:27 pm
by Champsturf
RedskinsFreak wrote:FIELD GOAL! 9-7 lead.
Leads = good.
Only at the end of the game. These "leads" can be overcome very easily.
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:27 pm
by roybus14
DaSkins24 wrote:This team is infuriating to watch.
I know right!!!!
What in flying fu-schnickens was that last play. A bunch of FGs might now win it against a team like N.O....
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:28 pm
by RedskinsFreak
spudstr04 wrote:RedskinsFreak wrote:FIELD GOAL! 9-7 lead.
Leads = good.
FGs instead of TDs = bad!
Hey, you take what you can get.
Walk before run.
All that stuff.
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:28 pm
by SCSkinsFan
SCSkinsFan wrote:RedskinsFreak wrote:FIELD GOAL! 9-7 lead.
Leads = good.
You got it right.[/quoteed e]
But, TD's are better, and what we will need to beath the
Ain'ts
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:29 pm
by spudstr04
Well, the positives are :
we have the lead
ey is finally getting targeted
We scored more than last week already
Campbell is a little better
we've made a couple of big plays
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:29 pm
by frankcal20
The portis run play was actually a run pass option for portis. Rewind at half and you will tell.
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:29 pm
by GSPODS
RedskinsFreak wrote:spudstr04 wrote:RedskinsFreak wrote:FIELD GOAL! 9-7 lead.
Leads = good.
FGs instead of TDs = bad!
Hey, you take what you can get.
Walk before run.
All that stuff.
We have to believe Zorn won't try to sit on a two point lead for an entire half, like some other coach would have done.
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:30 pm
by spudstr04
GSPODS wrote:RedskinsFreak wrote:spudstr04 wrote:RedskinsFreak wrote:FIELD GOAL! 9-7 lead.
Leads = good.
FGs instead of TDs = bad!
Hey, you take what you can get.
Walk before run.
All that stuff.
We have to believe Zorn won't try to sit on a two point lead for an entire half, like some other coach would have done.
He sat on a 9 point loss with 10 mins to go in the 4th last week....why wouldn't we think that?
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:31 pm
by SCSkinsFan
Bush finally getting some garbage yards.
I hope will prevent that which we are supposed to prevent.
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:32 pm
by SCSkinsFan
Go clock!
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:32 pm
by Champsturf
BS coverage
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:32 pm
by frankcal20
Don't understand a lineman covering Reggie Bush....No sense at all.
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:32 pm
by RedskinsFreak
Did the Redskins just "prevent" the Saints into 3 points?