Page 9 of 21
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:40 pm
by Red_One43
Wheres the coverage?
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:40 pm
by welch
Well...I think RG3 has just passed Heath Shuler's first year yardage (well, close anyway)
We now have a QB
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:40 pm
by The Hogster
Paging Jim Haslett
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:40 pm
by Countertrey
Bradford is faster than I thought.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:40 pm
by grampi
Our D absolutely sucks in every aspect!
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:40 pm
by muktech
They are making the Rams look like the Patriots!! Trap game!
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:41 pm
by Red_One43
grampi wrote:This game is about to take an ugly turn...
Maybe the Skins will finally get fired up like the Rams.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:41 pm
by Burgundy&Wha?
grampi wrote:Our D absolutely sucks in every aspect!
Well, they did give us a TD.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:41 pm
by Red_One43
Zone Defense against Bradford? He's picking it apart!
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:42 pm
by Countertrey
muktech wrote:They are making the Rams look like the Patriots!! Trap game!
Caught by the cliche trap, I see...
Not a trap game.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:42 pm
by Redskins_Fanatic
If this Defense doesn't drag it's head out of its ass someone needs to lose their job tomorrow.... Win or Lose.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:42 pm
by Burgundy&Wha?
Holding!!!
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:44 pm
by Countertrey
ICING IS TOTALLY IDIOTIC... THAT will cost you 3 Shanahan.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:44 pm
by Red_One43
Burgundy&Wha? wrote:Holding!!!
About time, they called one on the Rams.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:44 pm
by Burgundy&Wha?
Shouldn't there have been a 10 secnd run-off?
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:44 pm
by Countertrey
Stupid... totally stupid.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:45 pm
by Red_One43
They got 3 back of the 7 they gave us.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:46 pm
by Red_One43
Burgundy&Wha? wrote:Shouldn't there have been a 10 secnd run-off?
No because the clock had stopped with the INC.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:46 pm
by RedskinjXd
rams 264 yards of total offense.... unacceptable.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:46 pm
by DaveD1420
Burgundy&Wha? wrote:Shouldn't there have been a 10 secnd run-off?
My feed went out so I couldn't hear anything, but that's what I thought. Do they have any timeouts remaining?
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:46 pm
by grampi
If our game plan was to come out and get thoroughly outplayed in every aspect of the game, but have the lead, then I guess they executed to the tee...
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:47 pm
by Red_One43
The D play is on Haz - that is a horrible game plan against an accurate and quick release QB
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:48 pm
by PAPDOG67
This defense gets an F for the first half. Throw DHall on Amendola and have him earn his money.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:48 pm
by NC43Hog
We are up 21-16 and get the ball first in the second half. Let's not lose all perspective just yet!
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:49 pm
by Red_One43
amendola 12 catches 133 yds and a TD at the half. That is ridiculous! No adjustments?!!!!