Page 9 of 25

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:32 pm
by spudstr04
WTF!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:32 pm
by VetSkinsFan
DaSkins24 wrote:Embarrassing.


OMFG. Tribulations of a new holder.....

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:32 pm
by 1niksder
WOW

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:32 pm
by Cappster
For goodness sake. This game sucks

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:32 pm
by tribeofjudah
Looked like it was the holders fault on that field goal attempt.

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:32 pm
by DaSkins24
What a joke. Zero points, at home, against one of the worst defenses in the league.

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:32 pm
by TeeterSalad
we cant even make a 36 yard field goal today?

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:32 pm
by Cappster
Somebody step up and make a play please

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:33 pm
by broomboy
pitiful...

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:33 pm
by frankcal20
timing was way off. Take it from someone who was a WR/Kicker/Punter.

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:33 pm
by VetSkinsFan
Remember, though, this guy's been out of football for awhile. Brooks needed a week to get acclimated to holding.

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:33 pm
by tribeofjudah
The wheels are coming off......... the sky is falling........the cup is 1/2 empty....... woe is me.

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:33 pm
by gibbs4president
At least the Redskins get the ball after the half. Open up the damn offense and stop messing around...

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:33 pm
by RedskinsFreak
This is a lot like the game last week -- just without the turnovers that led to points.

You know the defense is going to keep the other team contained -- just wondering what Witness Protection Program the offense went into.

It's like they'd never run a play together before.

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:34 pm
by DaSkins24
Collins should be the holder. He isn't going anywhere, which is more than can be said the for the punters on this team.

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:34 pm
by Smithian
SOB.

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:35 pm
by Cappster
gibbs4president wrote:At least the Redskins get the ball after the half. Open up the damn offense and stop messing around...

I now right. w needo get going like we want to win the freaking game. zORN NEEDS TO OPEN UP THE PLAYBOOK.

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:36 pm
by tribeofjudah
Plackermiester...whatever....he sucks as a holder..... PERIOD

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:37 pm
by VetSkinsFan
DaSkins24 wrote:Collins should be the holder. He isn't going anywhere, which is more than can be said the for the punters on this team.


I think that's a valid point with the punter situation we have.

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:38 pm
by VetSkinsFan
tribeofjudah wrote:Plackermiester...whatever....he sucks as a holder..... PERIOD


Dude's been on the team less than a week.

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:38 pm
by grampi
Once again the D looks good, and the O looks terrible (with the exception of CP of course). Is JC drunk? Sure looks like he is.

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:39 pm
by spudstr04
grampi wrote:Once again the D looks good, and the O looks terrible (with the exception of CP of course). Is JC drunk? Sure looks like he is.


I really think he tweaked his groin or hammy on that awkward throw to Fred Davis and he looks like he is a little sore

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:40 pm
by The Dancing Bear
I wonder if the conservative play calling has anything to do with the apparent discomfort JC is having?

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:41 pm
by broomboy
The Dancing Bear wrote:I wonder if the conservative play calling has anything to do with the apparent discomfort JC is having?


Thats what I was thinking too. It may be lots of running because Jc doesnt have two legs to stand on.

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:41 pm
by spudstr04
I think the conservative play-calling has to do with J-Camp being a little sore and also the Browns suck against the run and we want to exploit them early to open up the pass