Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:10 pm
I keep in good spirits about the Redskins...always have, always will, but if we are going to turn this thing around, we have to IMPROVE in certain aspects.
The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
Skins @ Bucs Gameday thread
Page 9 of 16
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:10 pm
Wynn playing some today... Working hard.
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:10 pm
NikiH wrote:Cleg you cannot attack someone here. If you'd like to be pissy because you're not getting everything exactly you're way, you may stomp your feet and pout all you like but calling someone a priss just proves that you cannot follow simple rules and that your posts are nothing but complaining at every possible chance you can get!
Whatever, dude.
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:11 pm
FiveWidez wrote:Everyone be careful. The happy police are patrolling....shhh rememeber everything is beautiful and rosey in Redskin land.
Yeah you're right, there's NOTHING to be happy about. There wasn't just a 3 and out. THe games not tied. We couldn't still win this game with a rookie QB.
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:11 pm
1niksder wrote:The Hogster wrote:NikiH wrote:No I'm against complaining while we are winning the game! WHich is exactly what you guys were doing. It's tied now. The game is not over. We could still win but you're going to take this opportunity to complain about every little thing that happens along the way. That's not being pesimestic, that's being unrealistic.
The only passes he completed were short passes Hogster, that's not very "Joe Montana" .
Whatever, I am one the most postive and/or optimistic posters on here. Save it for someone else. The defense looks bad...its reality..
You should know when to ignore it too
wise.
there is way too much back and forth crap because its real time. people type quick and respond to stuid stuff.
best ignore stupidity (feel free to ignore me
)Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:11 pm
NikiH wrote:Cleg you cannot attack someone here. If you'd like to be pissy because you're not getting everything exactly you're way, you may stomp your feet and pout all you like but calling someone a priss just proves that you cannot follow simple rules and that your posts are nothing but complaining at every possible chance you can get!
Anyone else notice how there were no arguments and we were all getting along fine until certain posts start "policing" our optimism
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:11 pm
Taylor was gonna kill Galloway.
Those are the kinds of plays he makes.
Those are the kinds of plays he makes.
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:12 pm
Tinco, even you have to agree there's positive here right?
The defense isn't looking stellar but did you expect Jason to be as good as he has??
The defense isn't looking stellar but did you expect Jason to be as good as he has??
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:12 pm
We've gotta get into a groove on offense...starts with the playcalling.
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:12 pm
FiveWidez wrote:NikiH wrote:Cleg you cannot attack someone here. If you'd like to be pissy because you're not getting everything exactly you're way, you may stomp your feet and pout all you like but calling someone a priss just proves that you cannot follow simple rules and that your posts are nothing but complaining at every possible chance you can get!
Anyone else notice how there were no arguments and we were all getting along fine until certain posts start "policing" our optimism
some people get off on argueing from behind a keyboard
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:13 pm
FiveWidez wrote:NikiH wrote:Cleg you cannot attack someone here. If you'd like to be pissy because you're not getting everything exactly you're way, you may stomp your feet and pout all you like but calling someone a priss just proves that you cannot follow simple rules and that your posts are nothing but complaining at every possible chance you can get!
Anyone else notice how there were no arguments and we were all getting along fine until certain posts start "policing" our optimism
I'm the only "policeman" here,
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:13 pm
Those of us not in love with Brunell did think J. Camp could play this well.NikiH wrote:Tinco, even you have to agree there's positive here right?
The defense isn't looking stellar but did you expect Jason to be as good as he has??
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:13 pm
FiveWidez, he attacked me, called me a name and you're going to blame that on me??? Get a freaking clue.
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:13 pm
NikiH wrote:FiveWidez wrote:Everyone be careful. The happy police are patrolling....shhh rememeber everything is beautiful and rosey in Redskin land.
Yeah you're right, there's NOTHING to be happy about. There wasn't just a 3 and out. THe games not tied. We couldn't still win this game with a rookie QB.
OMG!!! No one has said anything about us not being able to win the game. To be such a "positive" queen, your posts sure sound pretty negative toward what was a very calm game analysis going on here
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:14 pm
CAN WE GET BACK TO THE GAME
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:14 pm
1niksder wrote:CAN WE GET BACK TO THE GAME
Please
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:14 pm
Everybody quit bitching at each other.
Let's focus in and will the Redskins to victory.
Let's focus in and will the Redskins to victory.
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:15 pm
NikiH wrote:Tinco, even you have to agree there's positive here right?
The defense isn't looking stellar but did you expect Jason to be as good as he has??
here here... but dont hate for people calling out the D. it does stink. if you read the thread before the game tieing drive there is lots of optimisim. seems like you joined the thread during the drive where we looked like crap. i think we all need to chill out and talk football not, how we feel ... right? this is a skins site, not a, boohoo these people arnt in the same emotional state as i am
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:15 pm
1niksder wrote:CAN WE GET BACK TO THE GAME
Thank you..this spat is soo not football-like.
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:15 pm
NikiH wrote:FiveWidez, he attacked me, called me a name and you're going to blame that on me??? Get a freaking clue.
Are you serious? A little sensitve don't you think?
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:15 pm
Is Betts hurt? We were all Betts first quarter and now it's Duckett.
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:15 pm
Maas came fully prepared to attack the Skins. Ready with graphics and "witty" remarks! What about the amount of QBs the Bucs have had?
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:15 pm
1niksder wrote:CAN WE GET BACK TO THE GAME
Sure, but I want to point out that everything was fine until certain people started posting
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:16 pm
OH NO!!!
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:16 pm
NikiH wrote:Is Betts hurt? We were all Betts first quarter and now it's Duckett.
There's Betts