Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:26 pm
Anyone got a link to the game?
TD Browns
Easy 8 play 70 yard drive
The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
Redskins-Browns gameday thread
Page 8 of 17
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:27 pm
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:27 pm
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Anyone got a link to the game?
http://www.thefirstrow.eu/watch/159282/ ... rowns.html
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:27 pm
cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:welch wrote:Redskin Dan v1978 says Redskins are in Sirius channel 92...so I might just go quiet as I sit int the living room and listen to Sonny and the other guys.
Ah, that twang in Sonny's voice. Is Rick Walker filling in for Sam Huff?
Definitely my favorite crew to listen to!
Washington tradition, starting when Sonny retired, has been to turn off the TV sound and listen to Sonny, Sam, and {I forget his name...I think he died, but by then I was in NY}. Anyway, so says my Dad.
They used to blow a diesel horn when John Riggins carried the ball.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:28 pm
That SHOULD come back... but, it IS Mara's crew...
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:28 pm
Knee was down. No TD. Time for a false start. And then a holding. ANd them an INC. and then a missed FG.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:29 pm
emoses14 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:Anyone got a link to the game?
http://www.thefirstrow.eu/watch/159282/ ... rowns.html
Thanks sir.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:30 pm
Burgundy&Wha? wrote:Knee was down. No TD. Time for a false start. And then a holding. ANd them an INC. and then a missed FG.
Sort of like 1987?
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:33 pm
A time out for that effort?
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:34 pm
Bah.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:34 pm
Oh well we gave it a shot
Just not enough today
The real defense has shown up, exposed the rest of the day.
No RG3 to save the day, Kirk doesn't have enough to get us a win.
14-10 Browns they get the ball to start the 2nd half.
Ball game fellas, and the Giants are going to lose sigh.
Just not enough today
The real defense has shown up, exposed the rest of the day.
No RG3 to save the day, Kirk doesn't have enough to get us a win.
14-10 Browns they get the ball to start the 2nd half.
Ball game fellas, and the Giants are going to lose sigh.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:34 pm
So is this going to turn into a shootout... with the Browns?
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:35 pm
capitaldefense wrote:Oh well we gave it a shot
Just not enough today
The real defense has shown up, exposed the rest of the day.
No RG3 to save the day, Kirk doesn't have enough to get us a win.
14-10 Browns they get the ball to start the 2nd half.
Ball game fellas, and the Giants are going to lose sigh.
Go take a nap.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:36 pm
Kilmer72 wrote:Burgundy&Wha? wrote:Knee was down. No TD. Time for a false start. And then a holding. ANd them an INC. and then a missed FG.
Sort of like 1987?
In 1987 my friends and family were saying... What we need now is for this to happen. It did. The were were saying well now we need a TO and it did. One hell of a second quarter
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:38 pm
capitaldefense wrote:Oh well we gave it a shot
Just not enough today
The real defense has shown up, exposed the rest of the day.
No RG3 to save the day, Kirk doesn't have enough to get us a win.
14-10 Browns they get the ball to start the 2nd half.
Ball game fellas, and the Giants are going to lose sigh.
Really?
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:38 pm
I almost wish we didn't get the ball first in the first half
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:40 pm
Countertrey wrote:capitaldefense wrote:Oh well we gave it a shot
Just not enough today
The real defense has shown up, exposed the rest of the day.
No RG3 to save the day, Kirk doesn't have enough to get us a win.
14-10 Browns they get the ball to start the 2nd half.
Ball game fellas, and the Giants are going to lose sigh.
Really?
I think this is a banned poster trying to come back under a different name.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:41 pm
Redskin in Canada wrote:Countertrey wrote:capitaldefense wrote:Oh well we gave it a shot
Just not enough today
The real defense has shown up, exposed the rest of the day.
No RG3 to save the day, Kirk doesn't have enough to get us a win.
14-10 Browns they get the ball to start the 2nd half.
Ball game fellas, and the Giants are going to lose sigh.
Really?
I think this is a banned poster trying to come back under a different name.
It's not the only name he has but your right
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:41 pm
Well, ATL up by 20+. Don't blow it 'Skins!!!
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:41 pm
WE WILL WIN THIS GAME. BOOK IT.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:43 pm
Burgundy&Wha? wrote:WE WILL WIN THIS GAME. BOOK IT.
It feels that way, despite the score. Remember, the Skidmarks have gotten their "free" TD set up by the turnover, but the 'Skins have yet to get theirs. It's coming. Weeden has no confidence, and he will turn it over before this one's done.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:44 pm
absinthe1023 wrote:Burgundy&Wha? wrote:WE WILL WIN THIS GAME. BOOK IT.
It feels that way, despite the score. Remember, the Skidmarks have gotten their "free" TD set up by the turnover, but the 'Skins have yet to get theirs. It's coming. Weeden has no confidence, and he will turn it over before this one's done.
Time for a Kerrigan tip-int-TD.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:44 pm
Yea, gotta think we will get at least one turnover from Wheeden. He has not played that much better than Cousins.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:45 pm
Did we need the Rams to lose today?
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:47 pm
Kilmer72 wrote:Did we need the Rams to lose today?
who cares....we can take the division lead if we beat the browns....giants are getting creamed in atlanta 24-0