TincoSkin wrote:he is onyl to blame for handing control over to Al saunders
and for not taking it back
i dont think he can take it back.. i dont know if he has the power. hed have to talk to danny the guy paying Al millions of dollars, if it were up to gibbs then we'd be in a different situation right now
It IS up to Gibbs. He runs the show....Danny just signs the checks. Danny wants to win and thought bringing Gibbs back would do it.
you are nieve to think its that easy to hire a multimilliondollar coach to run an offfense then just toss him aside in an organization such as the redskins. a man so respected as Al who has accomplished so much is not thrown to the wayside because the coach(not a GM, not a man signing checks, not investers)wants to take back control the control he gave up just last year. thats not how it works.
TincoSkin wrote:he is onyl to blame for handing control over to Al saunders
and for not taking it back
i dont think he can take it back.. i dont know if he has the power. hed have to talk to danny the guy paying Al millions of dollars, if it were up to gibbs then we'd be in a different situation right now
It IS up to Gibbs. He runs the show....Danny just signs the checks. Danny wants to win and thought bringing Gibbs back would do it.
you are nieve to think its that easy to hire a multimilliondollar coach to run an offfense then just toss him aside in an organization such as the redskins. a man so respected as Al who has accomplished so much is not thrown to the wayside because the coach(not a GM, not a man signing checks, not investers)wants to take back control the control he gave up just last year. thats not how it works.
getemmj wrote:Everyone remember back in preseason when the players and coaches were telling us not to worry because they are running that "vanilla offense".
didnt fool me, check the posts
Nor me. It wasn't the vanilla offense that bothered me, it was that the Redskins couldn't execute the vanilla that was being called.
TincoSkin wrote:he is onyl to blame for handing control over to Al saunders
and for not taking it back
i dont think he can take it back.. i dont know if he has the power. hed have to talk to danny the guy paying Al millions of dollars, if it were up to gibbs then we'd be in a different situation right now
It IS up to Gibbs. He runs the show....Danny just signs the checks. Danny wants to win and thought bringing Gibbs back would do it.
you are nieve to think its that easy to hire a multimilliondollar coach to run an offfense then just toss him aside in an organization such as the redskins. a man so respected as Al who has accomplished so much is not thrown to the wayside because the coach(not a GM, not a man signing checks, not investers)wants to take back control the control he gave up just last year. thats not how it works.
very intellegent responce
so is you calling me nieve....I'm sorry but I didn't know you were an expert on "how it works." I also belive Gibbs is more than just a coach....team president, I believe.
Last edited by Champsturf on Sun Dec 10, 2006 3:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
getemmj wrote:Everyone remember back in preseason when the players and coaches were telling us not to worry because they are running that "vanilla offense".
didnt fool me, check the posts
Nor me. It wasn't the vanilla offense that bothered me, it was that the Redskins couldn't execute the vanilla that was being called.
The only people it fooled was the blind homers who see nothing wrong with this team EVER. Then when the rest of us call out bad plays or players or coaches out we have to hear them complain that we aren't supporting this team bla bla bla. Notice how those people don't post much anymore.
Without TV feed wondering just how empty the stadium is now that we are down 21 - 3? And all this with Betts nearing 100 yds in the 1st half. How can this be. It's unbelievable. It's inconcievable. But, it is what it is, 21 -3.
TincoSkin wrote:he is onyl to blame for handing control over to Al saunders
and for not taking it back
i dont think he can take it back.. i dont know if he has the power. hed have to talk to danny the guy paying Al millions of dollars, if it were up to gibbs then we'd be in a different situation right now
It IS up to Gibbs. He runs the show....Danny just signs the checks. Danny wants to win and thought bringing Gibbs back would do it.
you are nieve to think its that easy to hire a multimilliondollar coach to run an offfense then just toss him aside in an organization such as the redskins. a man so respected as Al who has accomplished so much is not thrown to the wayside because the coach(not a GM, not a man signing checks, not investers)wants to take back control the control he gave up just last year. thats not how it works.
very intellegent responce
so is you calling me nieve....I'm sorry but I didn't know you were an expert on "how it works." I also belive Gibbs is more than just a coach....team president, I believe.
so you really think gibbs has the ability to fire the offensive coordinator half way through a season?
SCSkinsFan wrote:Without TV feed wondering just how empty the stadium is now that we are down 21 - 3? And all this with Betts nearing 100 yds in the 1st half. How can this be. It's unbelievable. It's inconcievable. But, it is what it is, 21 -3.
Just be glad you're not watching it. As for the highlights you were hoping for earlier, we're still waiting to see them live.
SCSkinsFan wrote:Without TV feed wondering just how empty the stadium is now that we are down 21 - 3? And all this with Betts nearing 100 yds in the 1st half. How can this be. It's unbelievable. It's inconcievable. But, it is what it is, 21 -3.
TincoSkin wrote:he is onyl to blame for handing control over to Al saunders
and for not taking it back
i dont think he can take it back.. i dont know if he has the power. hed have to talk to danny the guy paying Al millions of dollars, if it were up to gibbs then we'd be in a different situation right now
It IS up to Gibbs. He runs the show....Danny just signs the checks. Danny wants to win and thought bringing Gibbs back would do it.
you are nieve to think its that easy to hire a multimilliondollar coach to run an offfense then just toss him aside in an organization such as the redskins. a man so respected as Al who has accomplished so much is not thrown to the wayside because the coach(not a GM, not a man signing checks, not investers)wants to take back control the control he gave up just last year. thats not how it works.
very intellegent responce
so is you calling me nieve....I'm sorry but I didn't know you were an expert on "how it works." I also belive Gibbs is more than just a coach....team president, I believe.
so you really think gibbs has the ability to fire the offensive coordinator half way through a season?
ABSOLUTELY. I think Gibbs has the power to do anything he wants with this team...some people (ahem) even think he's not washed up or to blame for anything. Hell, Gibbs even takes the blame every Monday. I'm not saying he's washed up, but the game has changed dramatically and he has yet to adjust completely.
TincoSkin wrote:a man so respected as Al who has accomplished so much is not thrown to the wayside because the coach . . . .
There's the biggest misconception ... Saunders HAS NOT accomplished nearly as much as everyone gives him credit for.
Before this season, he has been in charge of an NFL offense for 16 seasons. In those 16 seasons he's helped his team win four division titles and make all of EIGHT playoff appearances. (He wasn't OC for the 99 Rams when they won the Super Bowl)
That's no genius in my book.
I don't give a rat's behind about his offense being ranked #1. Show me T-shirts (the ones that say you won something), trophies and rings.
dnpmakkah wrote:This entire team needs to be blown up starting with the owner. Will he ever sell the team. The NFL should just buy it from him then re-sell it.
They still let Bill Bidwill own the Cardinals, and he's been fudging up that franchise for more than 40 years.
TincoSkin wrote:a man so respected as Al who has accomplished so much is not thrown to the wayside because the coach . . . .
There's the biggest misconception ... Saunders HAS NOT accomplished nearly as much as everyone gives him credit for.
Before this season, he has been in charge of an NFL offense for 16 seasons. In those 16 seasons he's helped his team win four division titles and make all of EIGHT playoff appearances. (He wasn't OC for the 99 Rams when they won the Super Bowl)
That's no genius in my book.
I don't give a rat's behind about his offense being ranked #1. Show me T-shirts (the ones that say you won something), trophies and rings.
And, in that regard, he's nothing.
you may be right but hes still respected in the leauge and its harder than we would like to get rid of him.. hes dragging down our O but its hard to get rid of him.. maybe next year we will have adjusted to his style of play but as of right now we still have a gibbs attitude in an Al offense. hes not going anywhere, so sorry to bring bad news
TincoSkin wrote:a man so respected as Al who has accomplished so much is not thrown to the wayside because the coach . . . .
There's the biggest misconception ... Saunders HAS NOT accomplished nearly as much as everyone gives him credit for.
Before this season, he has been in charge of an NFL offense for 16 seasons. In those 16 seasons he's helped his team win four division titles and make all of EIGHT playoff appearances. (He wasn't OC for the 99 Rams when they won the Super Bowl)
That's no genius in my book.
I don't give a rat's behind about his offense being ranked #1. Show me T-shirts (the ones that say you won something), trophies and rings.
And, in that regard, he's nothing.
you may be right but hes still respected in the leauge and its harder than we would like to get rid of him.. hes dragging down our O but its hard to get rid of him.. maybe next year we will have adjusted to his style of play but as of right now we still have a gibbs attitude in an Al offense. hes not going anywhere, so sorry to bring bad news
I'm glad you know "how it works." This inside information you have is invaluable.
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall")
.
