Re: Cousins Is The Best Redskin In Decades
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2016 11:45 am
hopefully, Cousins shows us all something special this week
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
He's been showing us something special all year on the way to breaking the franchise passing for the second year in a row, you've just decided not to notice.SkinsJock wrote:hopefully, Cousins shows us all something special this week
HOORAYOldSchool wrote:He's been showing us something special all year on the way to breaking the franchise passing for the second year in a rowSkinsJock wrote:hopefully, Cousins shows us all something special this week
OldSchool wrote:He's been showing us something special all year on the way to breaking the franchise passing for the second year in a row, you've just decided not to notice.SkinsJock wrote:hopefully, Cousins shows us all something special this week
Your boy held up for all of 7 quarters in Cleveland. The coaches, owner, teammates, hotdog vendors and fans let down him down again.
I'd take Drew Brees over Cousins. Brees has shown he can lead his team to the promised land, not just set records.HEROHAMO wrote:Drew Brees actually passed for more yards so far but is out of the playoffs. If that's magic you can keep it.
Drew Brees is about to turn 38 years old. Seems like that would be a really good plan to build a team around him.Deadskins wrote:I'd take Drew Brees over Cousins. Brees has shown he can lead his team to the promised land, not just set records.HEROHAMO wrote:Drew Brees actually passed for more yards so far but is out of the playoffs. If that's magic you can keep it.
I didn't mean I'd trade them straight up right now. What I meant was for this one game and the playoffs. I agree that Kirk might one day lead us to the promised land, if we ever get a defense that matches our offense, but so far he hasn't really performed well in big games, or on a national stage. I'm hoping he shows us some of that this year, but he hasn't so far.riggofan wrote:Drew Brees is about to turn 38 years old. Seems like that would be a really good plan to build a team around him.Deadskins wrote:I'd take Drew Brees over Cousins. Brees has shown he can lead his team to the promised land, not just set records.HEROHAMO wrote:Drew Brees actually passed for more yards so far but is out of the playoffs. If that's magic you can keep it.
Awesome that he won a super bowl. He's also shown he can lead his team to .500 or worse seasons in six of the last ten. Magic!
Not knocking Brees (or Cousins). But there's nothing inherently magic about him. He "lead his team to the promised land" because he's a great QB who was surrounded by enough talent to get there. No reason Kirk Cousins can't do the same.
All true! But these things are just true until they aren't. Think about this nugget from Peyton Manning's bio:Deadskins wrote:I didn't mean I'd trade them straight up right now. What I meant was for this one game and the playoffs. I agree that Kirk might one day lead us to the promised land, if we ever get a defense that matches our offense, but so far he hasn't really performed well in big games, or on a national stage. I'm hoping he shows us some of that this year, but he hasn't so far.
Cousins is the best Redskins in decades because he's easily the best QB in 30-40 years and quarterbacks are without question the most impactful and important players on a teammate, like a queen on a chess board.Smithian wrote:Just in the past 20 years the Redskins have had some players better at their position than Kirk Cousins. Trent Williams, Champ Bailey, Jordan Reed (assuming he keeps it up), and I think the argument can be made for Sean Taylor (he took a huge step his final season), Ken Harvey, and maybe London Fletcher. I'm not going to get in the "Would you trade Cousins for..." argument unless it's another QB.
If the Redskins win Sunday, Kirk Cousins will have been the first QB to take the Skins to back to back playoffs since Rypien. I'm like everyone on this board in the "It feels like he should be doing more" feeling but fact is he is knocking on the door of 5,000 yards on a playoff contender.
I feel that at times, too. Posting those kind of numbers, it does feel like "doing more" he should be completely dominating more games. I don't know if that's just a fact of the NFL that most games aren't like that or maybe because the defense has been so poor. Maybe not finishing more in the red zone too. Don't know, but I do get what you're saying and its a good observation.Smithian wrote: I'm like everyone on this board in the "It feels like he should be doing more" feeling but fact is he is knocking on the door of 5,000 yards on a playoff contender.
Kirk Cousins is not that much different than Jay Schroeder, Joe Theisman, Mark Rypien, or Doug Williams. Good, not great, quarterbacks who ran up the score with dominant offenses. Difference between Kirk and those guys is they had significantly better defenses and Monk/Clark/Sanders is better DJax/Garcon/Crowder/Reed. Redskins were, as we all know, much better running the ball then.SkinsJock wrote:I'm not accepting that Kirk Cousins is the best Redskin in decades at all - not even close - that is just a very biased statement
Kirk Cousins COULD become an elite QB but he's not even there yet - stupid claim and I'm sorry I kept responding ... done
I know no analogy is perfect so I don't want to harp on the queen thing - but all queens are created equal and all QBs are not.OldSchool wrote:Cousins is the best Redskins in decades because he's easily the best QB in 30-40 years and quarterbacks are without question the most impactful and important players on a teammate, like a queen on a chess board.
^^^ This.DarthMonk wrote:I know no analogy is perfect so I don't want to harp on the queen thing - but all queens are created equal and all QBs are not.OldSchool wrote:Cousins is the best Redskins in decades because he's easily the best QB in 30-40 years and quarterbacks are without question the most impactful and important players on a teammate, like a queen on a chess board.
By your logic a Cleveland fan in 1993 would say Bernie Kosar is the best Brown in decades and overlook Jim Brown.
Same goes for Detroit, Matt Stafford, and Barry Sanders.
Darrell Green made 7 Pro Bowls and was on the NFL 1990s All-Decade Team.
Art Monk was the NFL's all-time leading receiver and was on the NFL 1980s All-Decade Team.
Kirk may get there one day but he's not there yet.
Sorry, not buying.
I thought I was clear I said and believe Kirk is the best Redskin in decades at all positions. As of today Darryl Green is my view the best Redskin at his position since the 60's when I started watching but since a QB is far more valuable and impactful than a CB I believe Kirk is the best Redskin post Sonny. A number of past players with completed careers have accomplished more than Kirk with only 2 starting seasons under his belt but Kirk is the first true franchise QB since Thiesman and significantly better than Thiesman in my view. The Skins have had some 1-2 year contributors but no one since a Thiesman has seized the job and no one has been called on to carry the team like Kirk post Sonny.StorminMormon86 wrote:I mean if he clarified and said best QB in decades, I'd agree...but there's no way he's better or more impactful than Darrell Green.
I think we've all been clear. I happen to think you've overstated your case but that's cool.OldSchool wrote:I thought I was clear I said and believe Kirk is the best Redskin in decades at all positions.