Page 7 of 7
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 5:01 am
by SouthLondonRedskin
Countertrey wrote:Deadskins wrote:SouthLondonRedskin wrote:Countertrey wrote:Southlondonredskin broke my anagram generator... bastage.
I DID NOT!!!
I didn't even touch it. You shouldn't leave it
laying around anyway...
Who's butchering the language?
That's what I'm talkin' bout!
FFS!
I actually went with
laying rather than
lying as that's the popular version and I thought you'd all get hot under the collar thinking it was wrong if i went that way, and I couldn't be bothered explaining it all at 2am quite frankly!!!
I take my hat off to you and will treat you with the respect you clearly deserve from now on.

Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 8:17 am
by Deadskins
FFS?
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:49 am
by SouthLondonRedskin
Deadskins wrote:FFS?
For Fecks Sake.
Or something similar....

Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 12:14 pm
by Deadskins
SouthLondonRedskin wrote:Deadskins wrote:FFS?
For Feck
's Sake.

Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:15 pm
by Countertrey
Deadskins wrote:SouthLondonRedskin wrote:Deadskins wrote:FFS?
For Feck
's Sake.

DS... I think this is a completely uphill battle...
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:30 pm
by Mud-n-Cleats
RGIII could be the franchise QB the Skins have been searching for, a high price to pay though. Here's a quick read on it,
http://voices.yahoo.com/the-washington- ... tml?cat=14
If you took a look, thanks!
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 2:30 pm
by SouthLondonRedskin
Countertrey wrote:Deadskins wrote:SouthLondonRedskin wrote:Deadskins wrote:FFS?
For Feck
's Sake.

DS... I think this is a completely uphill battle...
I don't know what you mean by that exactly but I'm gonna take that as a compliment!

Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 4:19 pm
by Countertrey
Well... then...
You're welcome?

Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:07 pm
by redskinsflow
It was a lot to give up but RGIII is one for the future!
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:41 pm
by Mud-n-Cleats
redskinsflow wrote:It was a lot to give up but RGIII is one for the future!
If he does become the future of the NFL then Shanny and Snyder will look like a pair of brilliant minds!
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:01 pm
by 1niksder
Mud-n-Cleats wrote:redskinsflow wrote:It was a lot to give up but RGIII is one for the future!
If he does become the future of the NFL then Shanny and Snyder will look like a pair of brilliant minds!
+1
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:11 pm
by markshark84
Mud-n-Cleats wrote:redskinsflow wrote:It was a lot to give up but RGIII is one for the future!
If he does become the future of the NFL then Shanny and Snyder will look like a pair of brilliant minds!
And if it doesn't -- Shanny will be out on the street with Allen and the Skins won't have the ability to draft an adequate replacement until 2015. Meanwhile Snyder will just continue looking like the dumbest owner in the NFL........
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:24 pm
by SkinsJock
I thought it was going to cost more
and
I think that is part of the reason Mike Holmgren is upset about this deal - he knows it was a great deal and they should have made the deal
Great deal for the Redskins and hopefully the Rams can have the picks help them out too
There is NO WAY that the players that we might have drafted would have helped this franchise over the next 10 PLUS years like one of these 2 QBs will
this is going to go down as one of the great trades in NFL history
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:56 pm
by Countertrey
SkinsJock wrote:I thought it was going to cost more
and
I think that is part of the reason Mike Holmgren is upset about this deal - he knows it was a great deal and they should have made the deal
Great deal for the Redskins and hopefully the Rams can have the picks help them out too
There is NO WAY that the players that we might have drafted would have helped this franchise over the next 10 PLUS years like one of these 2 QBs will
this is going to go down as one of the great trades in NFL history
That's probably it, exactly... He blew it. The Rams asked teams for their best offer. The Redskins played it straight up, and made the offer. The Browns played it cute, and tried to guess the Redskins offer, instead of making their best offer. The Rams didn't play that... and dealt with the skins. Holmgren knows that it's a good deal... and wishes he could get a do-over, for that reason.
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:59 pm
by skinsfan#33
Paul Campbell can eat the corn out of my . "Worst owner in the NFL", yeah right. I get trired of hearing this but Snyder isn't even close! Even at his worst he was still better than many.
He doesn't even know that Gaffney is on the team. How can he say the team has no WRs then forget about the leading receiver. Trust me WR won't be a problem next year and the need for better WRs has overstated! How can you judge our WRs with Beck and Grossman throwing them passes?
He is the first that I have seen that had anything negative to say about RG3s play! His delivery hurts his accuracy. Really? Maybe if he had an "better delivery" he would have hit 80% of his passes.
What a tool!
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:13 pm
by Countertrey
skinsfan#33 wrote:Paul Campbell can eat the corn out of my . "Worst owner in the NFL", yeah right. I get trired of hearing this but Snyder isn't even close! Even at his worst he was still better than many.
He doesn't even know that Gaffney is on the team. How can he say the team has no WRs then forget about the leading receiver. Trust me WR won't be a problem next year and the need for better WRs has overstated! How can you judge our WRs with Beck and Grossman throwing them passes?
He is the first that I have seen that had anything negative to say about RG3s play! His delivery hurts his accuracy. Really? Maybe if he had an "better delivery" he would have hit 80% of his passes.
What a tool!
Per his "Yahoo" profile
36 year old Western PA native I'm a steel worker and a pro sports handicapper.
It's more likely that he's "pro sports handicapped"... Low IQ suggests he's a Steelers fan... He probably is convinced that Terry Bradshaw is the prototypical NFL quarterback.
Forgive him.

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:28 pm
by Irn-Bru
SF#33, please check your PMs.

Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:23 pm
by the poster
1niksder wrote:What part of cleared of any wrong doing is it that you don't get.
let me interrupt you with the latest.....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/foo ... ll-insider
wow....NFL is playing right along with exactly what I said. not a surprise, I'm always right.
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:37 pm
by SkinsJock
1niksder wrote:What part of cleared of any wrong doing is it that you don't get.
Thanks for bringing this up - AND - for trying to clear up the picture - again
some here just do not want to understand what is happening
we are not going to lose this draft pick and we are going to end up thinking this is one of the best trades/deals we ever made
what a steal

Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:41 pm
by the poster
we are not going to lose this draft pick and we are going to end up thinking this is one of the best trades/deals we ever made
what a steal

doesn't he have to throw a pass or two first? oh wait...I forget...redskin fan, it's march, I understand. I forgot what month it was for a minute. ha.
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:56 pm
by the poster
skinsfan#33 wrote:
"Worst owner in the NFL", yeah right. I get trired of hearing this
then win something for once.
but Snyder isn't even close! Even at his worst he was still better than many.
nope. no he's not. he's worst than almost anyone. I not gonna nitpick the order of worse owners in the sport with the other bottom of the barrel guys....all I know is he hangs out at the bottom too and he brought the whole franchise down with him.
He doesn't even know that Gaffney is on the team.
dude get a clue. he didn't mention gaffney because gaffney is a nobody. the very fact that he IS washington's best receiver would only make his point more.
Trust me WR won't be a problem next year and the need for better WRs has overstated!
wow, that's convincing. whered u get your law degree? hey I got a comeback for ya but try to follow it along..it's based on something called fact not the "trust me" argument.
whens the last time the redskins developed their own wide receiver? I'll give ya a decade or two to think about it.
He is the first that I have seen that had anything negative to say about RG3s play! His delivery hurts his accuracy. Really? Maybe if he had an "better delivery" he would have hit 80% of his passes.
I dunno how much this article writer actually saw griffin play..but that's his opinion. we'll see. as for his completion % , he coulda hit 80%....if they woulda called a few more bubble screens. I guess they couldn't call it EVERY play. kliff kingsbury also played in that wretched defensive conference known as the big 12. he threw for 5000 yards and 67% in this senior year. he threw two passes in his NFL career.
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:08 pm
by 1niksder
Hey pos er click ====>

<==== Yeah right there!
You're gonna hate it, but non-trolls won't

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 12:16 am
by cowboykillerzRGiii
At first poser would get under my skin... Now I see she is just something we need to get used to. Haters gonna hate so might as well get used to it sooner then later.
When we officially draft RGiii (or Luck) I suspect the trolls will come out of the wood works, so thanks for the early dose ha ha.
Sweet video 1sniksder btw- is it on the front page?
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 12:35 am
by 1niksder
cowboykillerzRED wrote:At first poser would get under my skin... Now I see she is just something we need to get used to. Haters gonna hate so might as well get used to it sooner then later.
When we officially draft RGiii (or Luck) I suspect the trolls will come out of the wood works, so thanks for the early dose ha ha.
Sweet video 1sniksder btw- is it on the front page?
Yep... Blog Section
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:20 am
by SkinsJock
Thanks 1niksder - great video
all Redskins fans should enjoy it
