Page 7 of 18
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 6:29 pm
by chiefhog44
The Hogster wrote:Okay, I'll try with crayons and hand puppets this time.
If Peyton Manning came to play for the Redskins, he would be vying with Eli for the division championship yearly, which DRASTICALLY decreases the likelihood of them both even making the playoffs in the same season.
I specialize in representing NFL players specifically in off-the-field transactions and business deals. And, I am telling you from experience that WINNING has a direct correlation with the ability to produce income. It's something that Peyton, Tom Condon and all of his advisors will consider whether you understand that or not. And, YES, the Manning's are a brand. Look up Brand then get back to me. Where were you when Archie steered Eli away from San Diego? Where were you when Archie came out earlier this offseason and said Peyton didn't want to play with Andrew Luck.
If you think that Peyton would come here without considering the fact that more than likely either he or Eli will be sitting at home every year, then you're just being stubborn.
As for Tom Moore, he has a relationship with the Jets. He signed a 1 year deal. Simply because the season is over doesn't mean that he would not be brought back IF the Jets land Manning. That's common sense. AND, it's a lot closer tie than he has to Kyle Shanahan, so I'm still in awe that you're continuing to make such a fruitless argument. Additionally, this is the NY JETS. They signed Brett Favre. They're trying to be the talk of Broadway. They'd move hell and earth to make Peyton comfortable in their offense. Oh, and let's not even get to the marketing machine that would exist with the Manning brothers competing ALL YEAR for supremacy in NYC. That is a 16 week long storyline that will generate money not only for the players, but the teams and the NFL as a whole. And, there's the possibility of them playing in the Manning Bowl. Dude, none of us knows for SURE, but I have made many more valid football and business points supporting my belief that he wouldn't come here if given the chance to join the Jets or even the Dolphins (where he has a home). All you're doing is getting mad that you can't quite understand a view contrary to yours and you're failing at making a valid argument in favor of that view. Have at it.
I could care less what you feel about my tone on this website. I am not here to make friends, and have no interest in making your acquaintance.
Few things.
Archie pushed Eli his rookie year, and as I alluded to earlier, your claim would be warranted if this was their rookie year. Archie hasn't done anything since except get on a talk show and spout off, which Peyton quickly shut him up. If there was a family brand he was concerned about, explain why Peyton is taking Eli's thunder these last two weeks?
Your posts are full of you know what, and I'm just pointing it out, and its funny how upsetting it is to you. You are now making up job descriptions, calling me names, getting froth around your mouth arguing. Its actually funny how upset you get calling me (or anyone that calls out your nonsense) names, or alluding to not being football, business smart, and having to use crayons. I'm just shooting holes in your claims because every post you make its something different such as
A) Tom Moore is still with the Jets because he flat out isn't. The Jets have brand new Offensive staff
B) that Peyton would have to learn a new offense Here, but NOT in NY with Sparano as the new OC?....
C) acting like there is some Manning brand when they are both established with huge contracts and Peyton is clearly not concerned with this branding over the past two weeks
D). Acting like the two of them in the same division it SO unfounded and wouldn't make any business sense. Even though the league would clearly make money on the match ups twice a year, and
E) realizing that most likely, both teams would make the playoffs, and
F) realizing THAT has EVERYTHING to do with his decision. What team will give him the best shot of getting to the playoffs and a Super Bowl. If the XYZ team gives him the best shot, he's going to go there, regardless if he has to run over his little brother to do it.
I never said he wouldn't go to the Jets or rather play there or even that it wouldn't be more lucrative. You are creating that argument. I'm simply stating that you clearly have one view on this, and not really thinking outside the box. He may ultimately go to NY but not for the reasons you state. He may not go to the Skins but not for the reasons you state. Wherever he goes will be for himself, and himself only. Not for some family brand name, not for Archie, not for Eli, not to the Jets for Tom Moore, not for anything but himself.
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 7:30 am
by The Hogster
chiefhog44 wrote:The Hogster wrote:Okay, I'll try with crayons and hand puppets this time.
If Peyton Manning came to play for the Redskins, he would be vying with Eli for the division championship yearly, which DRASTICALLY decreases the likelihood of them both even making the playoffs in the same season.
I specialize in representing NFL players specifically in off-the-field transactions and business deals. And, I am telling you from experience that WINNING has a direct correlation with the ability to produce income. It's something that Peyton, Tom Condon and all of his advisors will consider whether you understand that or not. And, YES, the Manning's are a brand. Look up Brand then get back to me. Where were you when Archie steered Eli away from San Diego? Where were you when Archie came out earlier this offseason and said Peyton didn't want to play with Andrew Luck.
If you think that Peyton would come here without considering the fact that more than likely either he or Eli will be sitting at home every year, then you're just being stubborn.
As for Tom Moore, he has a relationship with the Jets. He signed a 1 year deal. Simply because the season is over doesn't mean that he would not be brought back IF the Jets land Manning. That's common sense. AND, it's a lot closer tie than he has to Kyle Shanahan, so I'm still in awe that you're continuing to make such a fruitless argument. Additionally, this is the NY JETS. They signed Brett Favre. They're trying to be the talk of Broadway. They'd move hell and earth to make Peyton comfortable in their offense. Oh, and let's not even get to the marketing machine that would exist with the Manning brothers competing ALL YEAR for supremacy in NYC. That is a 16 week long storyline that will generate money not only for the players, but the teams and the NFL as a whole. And, there's the possibility of them playing in the Manning Bowl. Dude, none of us knows for SURE, but I have made many more valid football and business points supporting my belief that he wouldn't come here if given the chance to join the Jets or even the Dolphins (where he has a home). All you're doing is getting mad that you can't quite understand a view contrary to yours and you're failing at making a valid argument in favor of that view. Have at it.
I could care less what you feel about my tone on this website. I am not here to make friends, and have no interest in making your acquaintance.
Few things.
Archie pushed Eli his rookie year, and as I alluded to earlier, your claim would be warranted if this was their rookie year. Archie hasn't done anything since except get on a talk show and spout off, which Peyton quickly shut him up. If there was a family brand he was concerned about, explain why Peyton is taking Eli's thunder these last two weeks?
Your posts are full of you know what, and I'm just pointing it out, and its funny how upsetting it is to you. You are now making up job descriptions, calling me names, getting froth around your mouth arguing. Its actually funny how upset you get calling me (or anyone that calls out your nonsense) names, or alluding to not being football, business smart, and having to use crayons. I'm just shooting holes in your claims because every post you make its something different such as
A) Tom Moore is still with the Jets because he flat out isn't. The Jets have brand new Offensive staff
B) that Peyton would have to learn a new offense Here, but NOT in NY with Sparano as the new OC?....
C) acting like there is some Manning brand when they are both established with huge contracts and Peyton is clearly not concerned with this branding over the past two weeks
D). Acting like the two of them in the same division it SO unfounded and wouldn't make any business sense. Even though the league would clearly make money on the match ups twice a year, and
E) realizing that most likely, both teams would make the playoffs, and
F) realizing THAT has EVERYTHING to do with his decision. What team will give him the best shot of getting to the playoffs and a Super Bowl. If the XYZ team gives him the best shot, he's going to go there, regardless if he has to run over his little brother to do it.
I never said he wouldn't go to the Jets or rather play there or even that it wouldn't be more lucrative. You are creating that argument. I'm simply stating that you clearly have one view on this, and not really thinking outside the box. He may ultimately go to NY but not for the reasons you state. He may not go to the Skins but not for the reasons you state. Wherever he goes will be for himself, and himself only. Not for some family brand name, not for Archie, not for Eli, not to the Jets for Tom Moore, not for anything but himself.
The good thing about this is we will see who is right. In the meantime, stick to what you do, and I'll do the same.
I never said he wouldn't go to the Jets or rather play there or even that it wouldn't be more lucrative. You are creating that argument. I'm simply stating that you clearly have one view on this, and not really thinking outside the box. He may ultimately go to NY but not for the reasons you state. He may not go to the Skins but not for the reasons you state. Wherever he goes will be for himself, and himself only. Not for some family brand name, not for Archie, not for Eli, not to the Jets for Tom Moore, not for anything but himself.
Yeah, and you know that because you just do. Get a clue.
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 2:50 pm
by DarthMonk
Where will Manning go?
Odds I just saw from Vegas:
New York Jets +200 2/1 bet $100 to win $200
Miami Dolphins +300 3/1 bet $100 to win $300
Washington Redskins +400 4/1 bet $100 to win $400
Seattle Seahawks +500 5/1 bet $100 to win $500
Arizona Cardinals +600 6/1 bet $100 to win $600
Baltimore Ravens +700 7/1 bet $100 to win $700
Houston Texans +900 9/1 bet $100 to win $900
San Francisco 49ers +1000 10/1 bet $100 to win $1000
Field (any team not listed) +100 1/1 bet $100 to win $100
The even money favorite is The Field which includes the Colts. I wonder about the Cowboys.
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:43 pm
by chiefhog44
Two people "close" to the Manning family tell Howard Eskin of 94 WIP Philadelphia that Peyton Manning is "very likely" to be a Redskin in 2012.
Eskin is a Philly reporter with a relatively spotty reporting track record, but his information is at least interesting. He refers to the Redskins' interest in "other QBs" as a "smokescreen," and indicates that Mike Shanahan's priority will be to acquire Peyton Manning. On Sunday, ESPN's Adam Schefter reported that the Redskins have interest in both Matt Flynn and Kyle Orton. Feb 5 - 12:05 PM
http://rotoworld.com/player/nfl/1493/peyton-manning
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:58 pm
by KazooSkinsFan
DarthMonk wrote:Where will Manning go?
Odds I just saw from Vegas:
New York Jets +200 2/1 bet $100 to win $200
Miami Dolphins +300 3/1 bet $100 to win $300
Washington Redskins +400 4/1 bet $100 to win $400
Seattle Seahawks +500 5/1 bet $100 to win $500
Arizona Cardinals +600 6/1 bet $100 to win $600
Baltimore Ravens +700 7/1 bet $100 to win $700
Houston Texans +900 9/1 bet $100 to win $900
San Francisco 49ers +1000 10/1 bet $100 to win $1000
Field (any team not listed) +100 1/1 bet $100 to win $100
The even money favorite is The Field which includes the Colts. I wonder about the Cowboys.
If I were Manning and my priority was to find a good team with a mediocre to poor QB situation and my priority was to win another Super Bowl, I'd be thinking Ravens
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 4:02 pm
by The Hogster
KazooSkinsFan wrote:DarthMonk wrote:Where will Manning go?
Odds I just saw from Vegas:
New York Jets +200 2/1 bet $100 to win $200
Miami Dolphins +300 3/1 bet $100 to win $300
Washington Redskins +400 4/1 bet $100 to win $400
Seattle Seahawks +500 5/1 bet $100 to win $500
Arizona Cardinals +600 6/1 bet $100 to win $600
Baltimore Ravens +700 7/1 bet $100 to win $700
Houston Texans +900 9/1 bet $100 to win $900
San Francisco 49ers +1000 10/1 bet $100 to win $1000
Field (any team not listed) +100 1/1 bet $100 to win $100
The even money favorite is The Field which includes the Colts. I wonder about the Cowboys.
If I were Manning and my priority was to find a good team with a mediocre to poor QB situation and my priority was to win another Super Bowl, I'd be thinking Ravens
Or Jets. Ozzie Newsome et al came out and said they are working on an extension for Flacco. Peyton Manning at his best would elevate the Skins to perennial contenders. I just don't think it's going to happen for various reasons. If you Google Peyton Manning and Redskins, you'll get several hits linked to "sources." Means nothing.
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 4:42 pm
by chiefhog44
chiefhog44 wrote:Two people "close" to the Manning family tell Howard Eskin of 94 WIP Philadelphia that Peyton Manning is "very likely" to be a Redskin in 2012.
Eskin is a Philly reporter with a relatively spotty reporting track record, but his information is at least interesting. He refers to the Redskins' interest in "other QBs" as a "smokescreen," and indicates that Mike Shanahan's priority will be to acquire Peyton Manning. On Sunday, ESPN's Adam Schefter reported that the Redskins have interest in both Matt Flynn and Kyle Orton. Feb 5 - 12:05 PM
http://rotoworld.com/player/nfl/1493/peyton-manning
Not sure this would be a good thing. Could be but also could be a disaster
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 5:22 pm
by crazyhorse1
chiefhog44 wrote:chiefhog44 wrote:Two people "close" to the Manning family tell Howard Eskin of 94 WIP Philadelphia that Peyton Manning is "very likely" to be a Redskin in 2012.
Eskin is a Philly reporter with a relatively spotty reporting track record, but his information is at least interesting. He refers to the Redskins' interest in "other QBs" as a "smokescreen," and indicates that Mike Shanahan's priority will be to acquire Peyton Manning. On Sunday, ESPN's Adam Schefter reported that the Redskins have interest in both Matt Flynn and Kyle Orton. Feb 5 - 12:05 PM
http://rotoworld.com/player/nfl/1493/peyton-manning
Not sure this would be a good thing. Could be but also could be a disaster
Please, Orton and Flynn will take us no where. Manning probably won't either, ever if we get him. Even though he's healthy, there's a great chance he might not get back enough arm strength to play in the NFL.
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 11:15 pm
by DarthMonk
Now that Eli has 2 rings, who thinks his older brother wants another one?

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 11:35 pm
by welch
I think we cannot predict the future.
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 8:33 am
by Deadskins
DarthMonk wrote:Where will Manning go?
Odds I just saw from Vegas:
New York Jets +200 2/1 bet $100 to win $200
Miami Dolphins +300 3/1 bet $100 to win $300
Washington Redskins +400 4/1 bet $100 to win $400
Seattle Seahawks +500 5/1 bet $100 to win $500
Arizona Cardinals +600 6/1 bet $100 to win $600
Baltimore Ravens +700 7/1 bet $100 to win $700
Houston Texans +900 9/1 bet $100 to win $900
San Francisco 49ers +1000 10/1 bet $100 to win $1000
Field (any team not listed) +100 1/1 bet $100 to win $100
The even money favorite is The Field which includes the Colts. I wonder about the Cowboys.
Why would the field be even money, but they are giving odds on what have to be the favorites?
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:03 am
by tribeofjudah
welch wrote:I think we cannot predict the future.
Tru-Dat..... unless you are Prophet of God....hahaha
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 11:01 am
by StorminMormon86
welch wrote:I think we cannot predict the future.
This is the best post in this thread.
I for one think that acquiring a FA (Flynn, even Orton) AND drafting a QB (RGIII, or possibly a Tannehill type) would be our best outcome.
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 11:16 am
by StorminMormon86
KazooSkinsFan wrote:If I were Manning and my priority was to find a good team with a mediocre to poor QB situation and my priority was to win another Super Bowl, I'd be thinking Ravens
And you'd be wrong. Under no circumstances would the Ravens sit a QB that's taken them to the playoffs four years in a row.
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 11:20 am
by Chris Luva Luva
KazooSkinsFan wrote:If I were Manning and my priority was to find a good team with a mediocre to poor QB situation and my priority was to win another Super Bowl, I'd be thinking Ravens
While Flacco looks like a doofus, he plays pretty well. He's an above average QB who they're going to resign, so you can mark them off of your list.
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 12:26 pm
by KazooSkinsFan
StorminMormon86 wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:If I were Manning and my priority was to find a good team with a mediocre to poor QB situation and my priority was to win another Super Bowl, I'd be thinking Ravens
And you'd be wrong. Under no circumstances would the Ravens sit a QB that's taken them to the playoffs four years in a row.
Please. If Peyton were interested they'd say no, they're sticking with Flacco. Sure they would.
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:02 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
KazooSkinsFan wrote:Please. If Peyton were interested they'd say no, they're sticking with Flacco. Sure they would.
I understand what you're saying but I can't agree. They wouldn't do it because it's too short-sighted of a goal. They have a franchise QB that is a bit underrated and doesn't have good WR's. They've been to the playoff's and knocked on the door 4 times in a row. So they get QB, lose their franchise guy and possibly get nothing in return but the heartache of having to find a new QB.... Plus, you put a guy with a fragile neck in that division?
Naw, not gonna happen. That's Redskins type move.
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:20 pm
by CanesSkins26
Chris Luva Luva wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:Please. If Peyton were interested they'd say no, they're sticking with Flacco. Sure they would.
I understand what you're saying but I can't agree. They wouldn't do it because it's too short-sighted of a goal. They have a franchise QB that is a bit underrated and doesn't have good WR's. They've been to the playoff's and knocked on the door 4 times in a row. So they get QB, lose their franchise guy and possibly get nothing in return but the heartache of having to find a new QB.... Plus, you put a guy with a fragile neck in that division?
Naw, not gonna happen. That's Redskins type move.
+1 The Ravens are too smart for a move like that. They've shown that they look at the long-term picture, not just short-term. Evans catches that pass from Flacco in the end zone and it would've been the Ravens in the SB instead of the Pats. They'd be much better off improving their wide receivers than going after Manning.
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:00 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
CanesSkins26 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:Please. If Peyton were interested they'd say no, they're sticking with Flacco. Sure they would.
I understand what you're saying but I can't agree. They wouldn't do it because it's too short-sighted of a goal. They have a franchise QB that is a bit underrated and doesn't have good WR's. They've been to the playoff's and knocked on the door 4 times in a row. So they get QB, lose their franchise guy and possibly get nothing in return but the heartache of having to find a new QB.... Plus, you put a guy with a fragile neck in that division?
Naw, not gonna happen. That's Redskins type move.
+1 The Ravens are too smart for a move like that. They've shown that they look at the long-term picture, not just short-term. Evans catches that pass from Flacco in the end zone and it would've been the Ravens in the SB instead of the Pats. They'd be much better off improving their wide receivers than going after Manning.
In addition, if Housh or Boldin make the catch in 2010 they're in the SuperBowl against the Packers.
2 years, the WR's drop the ball (pun intended). LOLOL Last I checked, Flacco doesn't catch the ball.
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:48 pm
by KazooSkinsFan
To be clear, I didn't argue the Ravens were the one who I said would go after Peyton, I said which team he would be interested in if his goal was a good team to win a Super Bowl with. He's a lot better then Flacco. Flacco may be an OK starter, but I have a hard time with him being a "franchise" QB. When Short Term means serious run at the Super Bowl that's a lot different then short term meaning a shot at the playoffs. They may have been one play twice from the Super Bowl with him, but with Peyton (if healthy) it wouldn't have come down to one play.
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:55 pm
by jr_uscg
We are going to get Peyton,you watch we havent gone after a big time player for a while. Dennis Green the president of operations for the Redskins was over heard by some people at a luncheon. That the Redskins have chosen a QB and the fans will be elated. Gotta be Peyton.
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:52 am
by tribeofjudah
jr_uscg wrote:We are going to get Peyton,you watch we havent gone after a big time player for a while. Dennis Green the president of operations for the Redskins was over heard by some people at a luncheon. That the Redskins have chosen a QB and the fans will be elated. Gotta be Peyton.
Dennis "meltdown" Green...???
....the Bears are WHO WE THOUGHT....they were....!!! That guy...???
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:58 am
by StorminMormon86
KazooSkinsFan wrote:StorminMormon86 wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:If I were Manning and my priority was to find a good team with a mediocre to poor QB situation and my priority was to win another Super Bowl, I'd be thinking Ravens
And you'd be wrong. Under no circumstances would the Ravens sit a QB that's taken them to the playoffs four years in a row.
Please. If Peyton were interested they'd say no, they're sticking with Flacco. Sure they would.
Yes they would. The Ravens are NOT going to sign Peyton (who would be classified as a "quick fix QB solution" because of his age) when they don't need a quick fix. They've been to the playoffs with Flacco for 4 straight years now, no need to change. Enough with the condenscending posts.
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:04 pm
by CanesSkins26
Theisman is dead on in his assessment....
Sure, Joe Theismann is often a bit of a blind homer when it comes to the Redskins, but his quarterbacking intuition was not bad this past season.
“I just don’t agree with the decision to start John Beck,” he said shortly after the switch was made, when virtually all Redskins fans were still on board with the Beck Era.
“I think that if John struggles in this game, I think Mike’s almost obligated to go back to Rex,” he said two weeks later, before Beck’s final start.
Now we’re into the busy part of the year, when the Redskins will be linked with every available quarterback on the market, and especially with Peyton Manning.
“If Peyton Manning is released, Redskins are expected to pursue him,” Adam Schefter wrote over the weekend.
“Told by 2 people close to Mannings that Peyton very likely to be a Redskin despite smokescreen being put of their by Skins to seek other QBs,” Philly talk-radio legend Howard Eskin wrote on Twitter .
And what of Theismann? Not having it.
“It’s not a good idea, it’s not a bad idea — It’s a horrific idea,” he told 106.7 The Fan’s Mike Wise and Holden Kushner last week. “It would be one of the poorest things that we could do as a franchise. Are we gonna go find another guy for just a couple of years again? Haven’t we done this before? Haven’t we seen this act before? And by the way, if you get Peyton Manning, don’t you have a concern about protecting him? Don’t you have a concern about who he throws the football to?...
“We’re tired of looking for stop gaps,” Theismann continued. “It’s time to draft one of your own, or make a deal for a young one of your own, and nurture him, and then put the players around him. If we’re gonna be 5-11, if we’re gonna be 6-10, let’s do it with somebody who’s [learning as he goes], instead of guys that have been here, making mistakes.”
And Theismann, at least, seems convinced that the team’s decision-makers agree with him.
“I believe this is the year they’ll find somebody that you’ll hope will quarterback this football team for the next five to seven years, and put the pieces together around him,” he said. “We need to be able to find somebody who can step up and make plays.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/dc-sports-bog/post/theismann-peyton-manning-to-redskins-horrific-idea/2012/02/07/gIQAfDHewQ_blog.html
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:33 pm
by Jeremy81
I dont understand why the redskins can't do both...chances are a quarterback worthy of a to ten pick will be gone by the time we pick sixth...so if we still go after a quarterback, with maybe a second or third round pick, theres no real pressure to start him right away. A third round qb is usually a project. Wouldn't you rather have him learn from peyton manning than from rex grossman? Plus peyton had already stated that he's open to an incentive laden contract, so he might actually come at a fair price. Just because peyton manning is on our roster, doesnt mean the redskins cant get a young quarter back in this draft