Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:37 pm
I try to....lolfrankcal20 wrote:I fall asleep listening to those guys.
The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
Official Redskins Vs. Vikings Gameday Thread
Page 7 of 21
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:38 pm
What happened to re-establishing in the field of play? Is that only on kickoffs or what?
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:38 pm
Champsturf wrote:I disagree...I think more like getting an undrated speedster from a tiny little college that can catch. Moss is just too valuable to the O.dlc wrote:Champsturf wrote:We really do need someone that can return punts. Randle El just doesn't do what he did in Pittsburgh.
I say we put in someone like Moss in key situations like Philly does with Westbrook. Otherwise, let's try Thrash.
He's definitely very important. But Westbrook is just as valuable to the Iggles. That's why I say have someone who's done it before and doesn't like to dance to do it. Thrash would be good. I'm not sure how Rock is off of punts.
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:39 pm
It would sure be good to be up 23-0 at the half.
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:39 pm
Did you see Portis push #69 down....his own man
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:39 pm
What a Crock! The defenser pushes Moss out of bounds after grabbing his jersey and Moss gets called for illegal touching?
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:39 pm
Countertrey wrote:It would sure be good to be up 23-0 at the half.
word
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:39 pm
dlc wrote:Champsturf wrote:I disagree...I think more like getting an undrated speedster from a tiny little college that can catch. Moss is just too valuable to the O.dlc wrote:Champsturf wrote:We really do need someone that can return punts. Randle El just doesn't do what he did in Pittsburgh.
I say we put in someone like Moss in key situations like Philly does with Westbrook. Otherwise, let's try Thrash.
He's definitely very important. But Westbrook is just as valuable to the Iggles. That's why I say have someone who's done it before and doesn't like to dance to do it. Thrash would be good. I'm not sure how Rock is off of punts.
I'm guessing someone like the Beerman down in New Orleans? What ever happened to him?
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:40 pm
Went OB a little early El
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:40 pm
I'm not sure of ARE's contract but I wonder if he'll be on the team next year.
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:41 pm
Delivering BEER....loldlc wrote:dlc wrote:Champsturf wrote:I disagree...I think more like getting an undrated speedster from a tiny little college that can catch. Moss is just too valuable to the O.dlc wrote:Champsturf wrote:We really do need someone that can return punts. Randle El just doesn't do what he did in Pittsburgh.
I say we put in someone like Moss in key situations like Philly does with Westbrook. Otherwise, let's try Thrash.
He's definitely very important. But Westbrook is just as valuable to the Iggles. That's why I say have someone who's done it before and doesn't like to dance to do it. Thrash would be good. I'm not sure how Rock is off of punts.
I'm guessing someone like the Beerman down in New Orleans? What ever happened to him?
I really don't know, but yes, that's what I was thinking
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:41 pm
run, clinton, run
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:41 pm
Nice block by Moss!!!!
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:41 pm
I'm afraid to say anthing about the Vikes D so I wont.
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:42 pm
What's the deal? Good clock management?
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:42 pm
TD!!!
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:42 pm
OPEN IT UP, JOE!!!!!!!
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:42 pm
Portis to El......TD
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:42 pm
Countertrey wrote:It would sure be good to be up 23-0 at the half.
Keep Talking. They appear to be listening.
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:42 pm
This is too good to be true, TD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:42 pm
hell yeahs
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:44 pm
Bummer on the two-points.
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:44 pm
ey should have had that one.Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:44 pm
Not a fan of going for 2
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:44 pm
why go for 2?....what's the point at this point in the game...oh well....shows stones