Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:19 pm
Sir_Monk wrote:Gosh, what a heck of a catch 22, Mark Brunell or Todd Collins...
Yeah, that's a CATCH 22, not a THROW 22 for sure.
Yeah, that's a CATCH 22, not a THROW 22 for sure.
The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
Players playing tonight..gameday thread
Page 7 of 23
Yeah, that's a CATCH 22, not a THROW 22 for sure.
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:19 pm
Man that was helmet on bone... not good.
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:19 pm
TRO is causing this. LOL.
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:19 pm
Sir_Monk wrote:Gosh, what a heck of a catch 22, Mark Brunell or Todd Collins...
my understanding is that collins is the only back up qb
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:19 pm
Sir_Monk wrote:Gosh, what a heck of a catch 22, Mark Brunell or Todd Collins...
I scanned your post quickly and got excited when I thought "number 22" was coming in to play QB instead of Brunell or Collins.....
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:20 pm
Get ready for a whole lot of screen passes.
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:20 pm
bears ball .(<@3 left.
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:20 pm
Hell, how about #82?absinthe1023 wrote:Sir_Monk wrote:Gosh, what a heck of a catch 22, Mark Brunell or Todd Collins...
I scanned your post quickly and got excited when I thought "number 22" was coming in to play QB instead of Brunell or Collins.....
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:21 pm
Brunell is 'inactive' as the designated third QB. He comes in only by injury to the other two -- or by choice in garbage time, but the other two cannot return.Hoss wrote:Sir_Monk wrote:Gosh, what a heck of a catch 22, Mark Brunell or Todd Collins...
my understanding is that collins is the only back up qb
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:21 pm
Did JC really get hurt badly?
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:21 pm
Redskin in Canada wrote:Irn-Bru wrote:Well, I never thought that I could live less than 30 miles from FedEx field and not get the game on TV.
THANKS, NFL!!!
Watch here:
http://www.nfl.com/live/viewer
Thanks for the link. We tried that for about 20 minutes but nearly puked at the NFL's attempt at a game center. I'd rather just listen to the radio feed than watch 2 plays in between 15 minutes of pontificating.
I guess I'll just have to put up with Larry.
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:22 pm
He was carrying the ball in his right hand as he was running OB, ant took a helmet square-on somewhere between the elbow and wrist.Redskin in Canada wrote:Did JC really get hurt badly?
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:22 pm
Redskin in Canada wrote:Did JC really get hurt badly?
no worries,
our d will make us proud
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:24 pm
PUNT......bears
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:26 pm
THEY SHOULD ALSO NOTE THAT JC IS \BACK IN
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:26 pm
ey hurt, NOOOOOOOPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:26 pm
The offensive linemen should be embarrassed at their play of late.
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:26 pm
Not good, ey appears dinged up.
ey appears dinged up.Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:26 pm
What a sloppy game we have here.......
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:27 pm
iS THIS THE 85 BEARS d OR ARE HTE sKINS JUST THIS BAD?
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Say goodbye to Campbell's knee.
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Now Cambell looks in real bad shape!
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:27 pm
ok this is just silly Campbell's knee looks BAD
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Samuels needs to refuse his paycheck.
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:27 pm
JC out again