Same Position, but Different Jobs

[The Hogster]

It's the Giggle Girls!!

Hey, did you guys get the PM about how pathetic your posts on this have gotten?? Oh, nevermind.

[KazooSkinsFan]

It's the Giggle Girls!!

Hey, did you guys get the PM about how pathetic your posts on this have gotten?? Oh, nevermind.

Wow, this might have worked, when I was eight. Probably not.

[The Hogster]

It's the Giggle Girls!!

Hey, did you guys get the PM about how pathetic your posts on this have gotten?? Oh, nevermind.

Wow, this might have worked, when I was eight. Probably not.

So, you didn't get it!

[Irn-Bru]

This is a second public warning for all engaged parties to take the non-football trash talk, the flames, and the sarcasm/personal attacks to the Smack Forum. You are perfectly welcome to be off topic over there. Thanks.

[1niksder]

This is a second public warning for all engaged parties to take the non-football trash talk, the flames, and the sarcasm/personal attacks to the Smack Forum. You are perfectly welcome to be off topic over there. Thanks.

This thread was started about six years ago....

In case the topic was forgotten

Here it is

I actually read this twice looking for a point. I guess that was my fault assuming that you were capable of making one. This is typical of someone in defeat. When you have nowhere else to turn, resort to blather.

Pot meet Kettle

Oh you want my point. Okay.

1niksider wrote & chastized those who disagreed:

Prioleau came into the year as the starter alongside Taylor with Springs and Rogers on the corners. AA would be like a nickle or dime S. Peirson went down and Archuleta was bumped up to a spot that he hadn't signed to play and probably got little work at in the off-season.

Show me where I chastized anyone, I stated a opinion and you came back with what you called facts, I pointed out you were wrong and you tried to change your argument; prove that incorrect too and you've been crying and making no sense.

Prioleau was the starter? Where's this info from? Skins don't publish depth chart in the offseason. Unanswered questions. But proclaims he uses 'facts'. There's more.

1niksider wrote:

Just like he wasn't brought in to play a pure safety he wasn't brought in to play a true LB. The team saw something that they thought would work but due to injuries haven't be able to implement it. Troy Vincent's signing but the staff back on course to what they wanted to do. Having a AA down in the box or out on the edge while still having the regular back 7 will be something offenses will have to take into consideration,

That's your problem right there because you say something you want everyone to take as fact I put something out there in hopes it will make people thing and dig for more info on there team. You just yell that's not right I heard this and that instead of listening or looking to see what you have read could be true. You yelling there is no depth chart out in the pre-season should have been a hint at if it was a opinion or not.

Wow...sounds like someone has a line into Greg Williams. A lot of definitive statements. If anyone disagrees, he just tells you his opinion is fact, and you don't know what you're talking about...sorta like this.

1niksider wrote:

My story are the facts you are guessing and making it up as you go.

Really? What facts? That we always planned to use Arch as a situational Nickle or dime guy? Now we can implement it since we signed Vincent? Facts?

If you look at the players on the team and how GW uses them, you'd have known that PP played on most obvious passing downs last year.
The one link you provided in all the non-sense you stuck in this thread even pointed to the fact that the Team had no concerns about Arch playing in the box or his blizting skills the ONE WORRY thay had was his PASS COVERAGE, but that told you nothing, you didn't even get a hint

1niksider wrote

And you can still listen to the radio and mis-interpet what you thought you heard

Wow, not only can I not read, I can't hear either. Who should I believe, Niks or my lying eyes and ears.

I'd have to go with 1niksder based on you interpertation of what you read and heard

[
1niksider wrote:

Stick to english because you don't know much about the team you root for at least not when you try to talk about what you don't see on the field

More pompus banter, unsupported by any facts. We're all beneath Niks becase we think the Skins would not sign Arch to a 30 million dollar deal to be a situational backup, hybrid guy.

Most of what you post is all the support anyone would need on subject, I stand by your rants.

[1niksider wrote:

I'm saying the same thing I said back in March, he wasn't brought in to be a cover guy, but to knock heads near the LOS.

Once again, telling us what Arch was signed for. More opinion that he calls "fact". Hmm Greg Williams said otherwise.

Greg Williams Said:
"

We don't have any worry about him in the run front,"
assistant coach Gregg Williams said. "We don't have any worry
about him blitzing. We know he'll fit in good with that. The next
thing for him to do is to get more comfortable in our coverage
concepts."

Williams said Archuleta is having to learn new techniques,
including footwork, that weren't taught in St. Louis.

So where does it say he was brought in to start? How many teams have you heard of bringing in a guy they know lacks coverage skills to start in cover packages

Okay, so I'm open minded, called truce and watched the game. And what do you know. Archuletta was not on ANY defensive plays. We now have Vincent. I thought that was the missing piece to Niks' argument? He essentially called me a fool, who didn't know anything for disagreeing. What happened to the hybrid role he was ORIGINALLY signed to play. Vernon Fox took snaps but Arch didn't. But we don't know what we're talking about. Maybe he'll come back and say that was the plan all along.

I didn't call you a fool you get off calling people fools, what I said was to look in the mirror when you want to call me a name. I guess we know what you saw when you looked.

[Then here comes Kazoo:

Dude, you just got taken apart. 1niksder discected your arguments and picked them apart

Really? With that vision, you should apply to be an NFL referee. You'll fit right in.

Nice argument - Par for the course though

[Ah well, reasonable folks can decide for themselves. It all really speaks for itself. Now here comes the childish "you're dumb" comments. It's really pathetic. But funny too.

Your right is all out here for everyone to see

[This thread exposed you as a guy who tries hard, but has a tenuous grasp of the salary cap. A guy who lacks the ability to agree to disagree. A guy who thinks he knows way more than he does. It also is a shining example of how two people yelling bogus garbage can be outlasted by one person qhispering the truth. Life lessons. Now move on.

Looking in the mirror again ? So now you're two people? Two brains might have been a good idea, guess it's too late for that now

[The Hogster]

Yep. Remember how you said we basically brought in Adam Archuletta to be a hybrid safety-linebacker and never intended to start him?? Yep, that was you.

Remember how you told everyone we were silly to question your conclusion? Yep. right here.

Remember how member after member pointed out that your argument didn't make sense? All here.

In short, nothing has changed.

[The Hogster]

5 mil a a year for a role player?? You'll never convince me that the Skins brought in AA and paid him that kind of cash to be a role player...think about how many role players 30 mil can buy!

And, it's not just ME. Members like DEHog called you out. You couldn't listen. Stubborn. And, turned out to be wrong as usual.

[The Hogster]

Honestly, who would play worse? Rocky or AA?

AA being in the game is almost an admission of stupidity for getting him.

Just like he wasn't brought in to play a pure safety he wasn't brought in to play a true LB. The team saw something that they thought would work but due to injuries haven't be able to implement it. Troy Vincent's signing but the staff back on course to what they wanted to do. Having a AA down in the box or out on the edge while still having the regular back 7 will be something offenses will have to take into consideration, even if it's leaving the back in to block - it's one less man in the patteren and nine times out of 10 that back would have been a outlet that won't be in the flat to be of help.

Don't knock it until we have seen it.

Remember this??

And, when people said, dude, you don't pay a guy the way Arch was paid for him to be a situational guy that you defended the way you did.

[The Hogster]

It's not a matter of fooling them thay have to account for him, and he'll still have to cover guys but as a hybrid it would be RBs and TEs as oppose to wideouts.

But he can't cover them. He put the cowboys in FG position last week. He's a bum its plain and simple. RW can't cover either but everyone likes to rag on him. If you are a safety and you can't cover, you suck. You dont have to be a Champ Bailey but at least be a Ryan Clark.

And to be honest his run stopping isnt jaw dropping either. Taylor is better at what our specialist supposedly was brought in to specialize in.

Even CLL found you way off base.

[The Hogster]

Let's not even discuss how you called a "slot receiver" a "situational player" based on this!!!

1niksder wrote:

Slot recievers aren't always on the field they play in certain situations, kind of like a kick-returner

Dude stop. I could go on. You've been doing this for YEARS. SAYING ANYTHING TO appear like your argument is right, even when it's utterly unfounded.

[1niksder]

Let's not even discuss how you called a "slot receiver" a "situational player" based on this!!!

1niksder wrote:

Slot recievers aren't always on the field they play in certain situations, kind of like a kick-returner

Dude stop. I could go on. You've been doing this for YEARS. SAYING ANYTHING TO appear like your argument is right, even when it's utterly unfounded.

The point that went way over your head then and still does is ARE was paid the same amount by Dumb and Dumber.