Who's getting kicked off the bandwagon?

[The Hogster]

My point??? That you have your nostrils pressed against every post I write, you are playing "chase the opinion". You won't let it go.

Get over Ramsey...better yet, now he's on the bench you can get a better look at him...with his helmet off.

[cvillehog]

That you have your nostrils pressed against every post I write, you are playing "chase the opinion".

Get over Ramsey...better yet, now he's on the bench you can get a better look at him...with his helmet off.

Ok, now who brought up Ramsey?

I think you have a complex.

[The Hogster]

So what are you chasing me around the board for??

[The Hogster]

That's BS. No one has ever posted anything that even remotely supported the contention that Ramsey is an "interception machine," and at the same time, many, many people have posted many, many times concretely refutting that fact.

Was this not you? Or do you change your mind as often as you lose faith in the Redskins?

[cvillehog]

So what are you chasin me around this board for???

Stalker.

I'm not allowed to post here?

Is that because you haven't deemed me a "real fan?"

EDIT:
I see you edited your post. Just to clarify, I know that was a joke and not "name calling."

[cvillehog]

That's BS. No one has ever posted anything that even remotely supported the contention that Ramsey is an "interception machine," and at the same time, many, many people have posted many, many times concretely refutting that fact.

Was this not you? Or do you change your mind as often as you lose faith in the Redskins?

Work on your reading comprehension.

You quoted a post where I did not mention the name Ramsey, and then pretended to refute an argument that I didn't even make about Ramsey.

[The Hogster]

So what are you chasin me around this board for???

Stalker.

I'm not allowed to post here?

Is that because you haven't deemed me a "real fan?"

You can post all you want...free country....but don't quote me and demand that I support my opinions with facts and expect me not to.

I think before I speak..forgive me.

You are a real fan alright...'real fickle'... lighten up buddy...you asked me to support my comments and I did. Either respond or leave it alone.

[The Hogster]

That's BS. No one has ever posted anything that even remotely supported the contention that Ramsey is an "interception machine," and at the same time, many, many people have posted many, many times concretely refutting that fact.

Was this not you? Or do you change your mind as often as you lose faith in the Redskins?

Work on your reading comprehension.

You quoted a post where I did not mention the name Ramsey, and then pretended to refute an argument that I didn't even make about Ramsey.

Are you on crack??? The post You wrote "right above" does just what you said you didn't do.

I'll work on reading comp, if you promise to work on thinking before you type

[cvillehog]

So what are you chasin me around this board for???

Stalker.

I'm not allowed to post here?

Is that because you haven't deemed me a "real fan?"

You can post all you want...free country....but don't quote me and demand that I support my opinions with facts and expect me not to.

I think before I speak..forgive me.

You are a real fan alright...'real fickle'... lighten up buddy...you asked me to support my comments and I did. Either respond or leave it alone.

I never said you shouldn't respond when someone calls you out. You are big on the straw man arguments, aren't you?

I also think before I speak.

I am also not fickle! When have I not supported this team?

[The Hogster]

I'm not personally attacking you. Just drop it. Read the thread over again and then judge for yourself.

Don't be so sensitive.

[Scooter]

You did too CVILLE! It was about Ramsey, space aliens and I think you insulted some small animals in it too CVILLE! You know, the one!

J/K -

Hey, there's nobody here big enough to boot me off the bandwagon - I'm not worried about it! I'll always be a Skins fan - 35 years and counting...

[cvillehog]

That's BS. No one has ever posted anything that even remotely supported the contention that Ramsey is an "interception machine," and at the same time, many, many people have posted many, many times concretely refutting that fact.

Was this not you? Or do you change your mind as often as you lose faith in the Redskins?

Work on your reading comprehension.

You quoted a post where I did not mention the name Ramsey, and then pretended to refute an argument that I didn't even make about Ramsey.

Are you on crack??? The post You wrote "right above" does just what you said you didn't do.

I'll work on reading comp, if you promise to work on thinking before you type

Are you seriously going to make me rehash the entire conversation just to proove what is plainly visible to anyone with a set of eyes?

The post you quoted wasn't even from today!

You said you've been "trying to encourage people" to let go of the Ramsey issue. The post of MINE that you quoted above was in response to YOU posting about Ramsey! Then, I called you on it, you said that was your point, which made no sense at all. When I called you on THAT, you launched back into your anti-Ramsey tirade, accusing me of bringing it up. When I called you on THAT, you quoted an old post of mine responding to YOUR post about Ramsey.

Clear enough?

[cvillehog]

I'm not personally attacking you. Just drop it. Read the thread over again and then judge for yourself.

Don't be so sensitive.

Ok, once again, slow down and read. I SAID you weren't attacking me. I only even mentioned it because your post was quoted pre-edit, and I dind't want the mods worrying about it.

[The Hogster]

Absolutely not. Pardon me for not forgiving your Tuesday comment on Wednesday.

You give the term flip-flopper new meaning buddy. And you say you aren't fickle but you are whining that "you quoted what I said yesterday!"

Either 1) you are fickle or 2) you type before you think. Which is it?

[The Hogster]

Just read the thread.

[cvillehog]

Absolutely not. Pardon me for not forgiving your Tuesday comment on Wednesday.

You give the term flip-flopper new meaning buddy. And you say you aren't fickle but you are whining that "you quoted what I said yesterday!"

Either 1) you are fickle or 2) you type before you think. Which is it?

I didn't flip-flop, fella.

I called you on the carpet for making a BS post as if you are some supreme good guy going around trying to put out fires. When you can't counter it, you go for a classic straw-man argument by pretending my post that called you out had anything to do with Ramsey.

Furthermore, that undercuts your whole statement that you are trying to get people to "let go" of the Ramsey issue, because that post of mine was a response to your post.

[The Hogster]

Absolutely not. Pardon me for not forgiving your Tuesday comment on Wednesday.

You give the term flip-flopper new meaning buddy. And you say you aren't fickle but you are whining that "you quoted what I said yesterday!"

Either 1) you are fickle or 2) you type before you think. Which is it?

I didn't flip-flop, fella.

I called you on the carpet for making a BS post as if you are some supreme good guy going around trying to put out fires. When you can't counter it, you go for a classic straw-man argument by pretending my post that called you out had anything to do with Ramsey.

Furthermore, that undercuts your whole statement that you are trying to get people to "let go" of the Ramsey issue, because that post of mine was a response to your post.

What came first the chicken or the egg? Why respond if you had 'let it go?" Hmmm your reasoning is circular, and basically illogical.

I again ask you to read the thread before you further ruin your reputation. First you said you didn't mention him at all, now you qualify that statement and say..."uh, well I was just responding to you!"

So which is it flipper, you on board or off?

[cvillehog]

Absolutely not. Pardon me for not forgiving your Tuesday comment on Wednesday.

You give the term flip-flopper new meaning buddy. And you say you aren't fickle but you are whining that "you quoted what I said yesterday!"

Either 1) you are fickle or 2) you type before you think. Which is it?

I didn't flip-flop, fella.

I called you on the carpet for making a BS post as if you are some supreme good guy going around trying to put out fires. When you can't counter it, you go for a classic straw-man argument by pretending my post that called you out had anything to do with Ramsey.

Furthermore, that undercuts your whole statement that you are trying to get people to "let go" of the Ramsey issue, because that post of mine was a response to your post.

What came first the chicken or the egg? Why respond if you had 'let it go?" Hmmm your reasoning is circular, and basically illogical.

I again ask you to read the thread before you further ruin your reputation. First you said you didn't mention him at all, now you qualify that statement and say..."uh, well I was just responding to you!"

So which is it flipper, you on board or off?

Oh, you must be psychic. Because, while I said I didn't bring ramsey up when calling you on the carpet for trying to misrepresent yourself as a voice of reason, you started "refuting" and argument I didn't even make when I did bring Ramsey up 24 hours ago! Then, when I said as much, you decided that i said I had never-ever brought up Ramsey. Which I also never said.

By the way, what are the numbers I need to win the next lottery?

[The Hogster]

Sorry for hurting your feelings. I am also sorry for reading a thread as a continuum of a conversation, instead of separating it by the days of the week.

I am also sorry for assuming that your opinion on Tuesday would be your opinion on Wednesday. Appartenly it is not.

Everyone's entitled to change their mind, just say so so you avoid wasting bandwidth.

[cvillehog]

Sorry for hurting your feelings. I am also sorry for reading a thread as a continuum of a conversation, instead of separating it by the days of the week.

I am also sorry for assuming that your opinion on Tuesday would be your opinion on Wednesday. Appartenly it is not.

Everyone's entitled to change their mind, just say so so you avoid wasting bandwidth.

I have not changed my mind. I called BS on your post. Then I called BS on another one of your posts. Then I called BS on another one of your posts. And now I'm calling BS on this one.

Honestly, my 2-year-olds provide more coherent conversation than you are tonight. Whatever you are drinking, pass me some!

[The Hogster]

For the record you called BS on my assertion that Ramsey was an "interception machine"...I completely articulated my argument with facts that no one, not even you have disputed.

You still haven't. It is quite embarrassing that you are carrying on with this in this manner, and you haven't even addressed the points that you so eagerly asked for.

Also keep in mind, that there is a record. Everything you are writing has been duly recorded and can and will be used against you. You can't hide the truth.

Don't make me re post your original post...you can hide now.

[Redskin in Canada]

cvillehog,

Two threads and two fights with several different posters?

I do not know what you ate this week man. Maybe it is the adrenaline after a win. Maybe the air is fresher over your place. I do not know.

But ... take a deep breath!

And if that fails, there is always the SMACK forum.

[The Hogster]

Nobody I've seen has been "anti" Redskin here - except for the trolls. Last night didn't prove anything about Brunell to me. If it did for you - congratulations. To me, he's still the 3rd best QB on the team. I'll take a win any way I can get it. We got this one because the defense knocked snot bubbles outta the Boys all night long to keep us in the game. We made a couple of plays at the end...and THAT'S GREAT! Fan and butt-kisser are two entirely different things.

Butt kissers are those of you who have a man crush on Ramsey...otherwise you wouldn't have your feelings hurt about him being benched.

I don't care if we put Brian Mitchell at QB if we win that is all that matters. Ramsey benched himself. He is an interception machine. He has to be the most loved, bad quarterback in history.

That's BS. No one has ever posted anything that even remotely supported the contention that Ramsey is an "interception machine," and at the same time, many, many people have posted many, many times concretely refutting that fact.

I posted my facts that support my contention that Ramsey is an interception machine. Where's the support for your fledgling argument?

I really don't wanna hear it, but since you insist on using bandwidth, we might as well talk about something meaningful.

My opinion in a nutshell:
-Ramsey had a fair shot.
-He was turnover prone and that is why he is on the bench.
-I won't call Gibbs a "fool" or demand his "job" because I have faith that he made the right decision, and if he didn't, it remains to be seen.

[cvillehog]

For the record you called BS on my assertion that Ramsey was an "interception machine"...I completely articulated my argument with facts that no one, not even you have disputed.

You still haven't. It is quite embarrassing that you are carrying on with this in this manner, and you haven't even addressed the points that you so eagerly asked for.

Also keep in mind, that there is a record. Everything you are writing has been duly recorded and can and will be used against you. You can't hide the truth.

Don't make me re post your original post...you can hide now.

You are correct, I have not bothered to reply to your post. I called BS on your assertions, and you did nothing to change that point of view.

You should also keep in mind that there is a record, so when you go around claiming to be the great pacifier, we can all look and see that you are constantly stoking the flames on the "Ramsey issue."

There is nothing I can say that will help you restore an accurate memory of the situation. You've revised your history so that Brunell is awesome and Ramsey sucks. We get it!

Maybe you should let it go?

[The Hogster]

I appreciate it. C-Ville. Congratulations, you let yourself off the hook for actually supporting your argument.