Page 53 of 54
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:44 pm
by redskingush
dnpmakkah wrote:The only playbook we have is the "post game" interview playbook. Gibbs always says the same thing.
If he says the guys played their guts out, somebody might want to get him thicker lenses.!!!!!!
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:44 pm
by Champsturf
old-timer wrote:even Madden said we had the wrong guy playing quarterback...what's it gonna take here?
Brunell getting hurt...severely. Gibbs still played him at the end of last year when he was hurt, so it has to be major. Anyone havae Tonya Harding's rolodex?
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:44 pm
by The Hogster
old-timer wrote:even Madden said we had the wrong guy playing quarterback...what's it gonna take here?
One hall of famer to another...please bench your sorry quarterback...thanks-Madden.
I guess thats what the Busts say to each other when they turn off the lights in Canton.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:45 pm
by dnpmakkah
I wish Gibbs would just have a spasm and blurt out "Brunell suck". That would make me happy.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:45 pm
by The Hogster
redskingush wrote:dnpmakkah wrote:The only playbook we have is the "post game" interview playbook. Gibbs always says the same thing.
If he says the guys played their guts out, somebody might want to get him thicker lenses.!!!!!!
If he says that, I will vomit my guts out.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:47 pm
by thaiphoon
If he says that, I will vomit my guts out.
I was just going to say that... guess now it will sound trite...
Oh shoot ... here goes ...
If I hear those words I will also puke ...
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:48 pm
by redskingush
Well saying goodnight to you all would be impossible, so I will just say see you all on the boards tommarrow, were somemore disecting can be done.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:48 pm
by Braden
frankcal20 wrote:My player of the game is Rock Cartright and Derrick Frost for 2nd. He was the only person who did his job effectively.
I can't believe I'm agreeing on Frost, especially after I called for his job last week, but I do. I still think he's not the long-term answer to our punting/kickoff issues, but he didn't do horrible. Danny Smith gets another week, and can go into Houston knowing that, for once, it wasn't his guys (Hall, Frost, the special teams coverage guys) that lost this game.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:48 pm
by dnpmakkah
We can possibly make the playoffs if we go at least 9-7. But that means we can only lose 5 more games the rest of the year.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:48 pm
by Champsturf
thaiphoon wrote:If he says that, I will vomit my guts out.
I was just going to say that... guess now it will sound trite...
Oh shoot ... here goes ...
If I hear those words I will also puke ...
Where can i see it? I'm in ohio
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:51 pm
by crazyhorse1
I was too negative about Brunell (thus our prospects) before the game and predicted we'd lose 35 to 13. I was wrong. I'll be more optimistic next time.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:51 pm
by skinsfanno9
dnpmakkah wrote:We can possibly make the playoffs if we go at least 9-7. But that means we can only lose 5 more games the rest of the year.
Heck, I'll just be thrilled if we can pull out a close one against Houston at this point.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:51 pm
by SCSkinsFan
Well I feel about as negative right now as anyone, and hanging in here just keeps the feeling going. So, in light of having to go to work tomorrow, It's time to go for one last beer to try to cool off and let the simmering anger about the way they played go away. Let's all hope for a bette outcome next week against Houston.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:52 pm
by Champsturf
crazyhorse1 wrote:I was too negative about Brunell (thus our prospects) before the game and predicted we'd lose 35 to 13. I was wrong. I'll be more optimistic next time.
LOL...that was worth saying twice.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:56 pm
by MonkInHOF
The only awesome point in tha game is when Sean Taylor stuck ol T.O. a few times. O
On tha good note at least T.O. didnt get his infamous touchdown celebration on our defense.
COLD
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:56 pm
by skinsfano28
i'm absolutely sick of this same old crap. mark brunell is ineffective, he's old, and he's washed up. i don't want to spend a lot of time or effort on the subject because its like beating a dead horse, but then again that's what the cowboys did to mark brunell tonight. his performance was nothing short of dreadful tonight, as we all know. However, one thing happened tonight that was positive. Al Michaels said something that got me: "Al Saunders said he [Jason Campbell] will go from 3 to 1, not from 3 to 2 to 1, 3 to 1." The future is now guys, and it doesn't take a frickin hall of fame coach to see that. Let Campbell play against the Texans, a team that is woeful in their own right, but will make Mark Brunell look like a chump any day. Let the kid get in there, throw the ball around, and see if he can't make a play. Mark got up slow after a few of those sacks, and its only a matter of time before he doesn't get up at all. He's better off as a backup for us, so i'm not saying to get rid of him entirely, just demote him on the depth chart.
Some of you may disagree with me and say that its only been 2 games and we need to give him a chance to show that he can carry us. I say F-that. He's old. He's hurting. He's ineffective. Game over Mark, its been a good run.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:57 pm
by old-timer
My prediction for next week - JC or Collins starts.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:57 pm
by ii7-V7
old-timer wrote:My prediction for next week - JC or Collins starts.
How much of an old timer are you? Gibbs won't bench Brunell unless he has five more weeks like this!
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:59 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
chaddukes wrote:old-timer wrote:My prediction for next week - JC or Collins starts.
How much of an old timer are you? Gibbs won't bench Brunell unless he has five more weeks like this!
Im 22 and I know JC wont see the field till Brunell breaks both arms off.
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 12:00 am
by MonkInHOF
Please not Collins if he starts then maybe the coaches feel J.C. is not tha Future!
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 12:00 am
by old-timer
chaddukes wrote:old-timer wrote:My prediction for next week - JC or Collins starts.
How much of an old timer are you? Gibbs won't bench Brunell unless he has five more weeks like this!
I'm hoping Gibbs isn't senile. If he starts Brunell again, I'll start to wonder. Michaels and Madden were practically wondering out loud why Brunell was playing, especially after the 6 for 20 passing stat graphic. This is getting past the point of ridiculousness.
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 12:00 am
by dnpmakkah
We have given up on some good players over the years that we should have kept.
1. Smoot (he was a very good CB)
2. Pierce (smart and sound)
3. Arrington (heart and soul of D)
dont think these guys would of made a difference
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 12:03 am
by MonkInHOF
dnpmakkah wrote:We have given up on some good players over the years that we should have kept.
1. Smoot (he was a very good CB)
2. Pierce (smart and sound)
3. Arrington (heart and soul of D)
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 12:04 am
by old-timer
dnpmakkah wrote:We have given up on some good players over the years that we should have kept.
1. Smoot (he was a very good CB)
2. Pierce (smart and sound)
3. Arrington (heart and soul of D)
Good points, but our problems tonight weren't defense. It was an offense that was totally missing in action. It's astounding that a QB that is as unproductive as MB is still playing. Bizarre, really.
Re: dont think these guys would of made a difference
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 12:05 am
by Chris Luva Luva
MonkInHOF wrote:dnpmakkah wrote:We have given up on some good players over the years that we should have kept.
1. Smoot (he was a very good CB)
2. Pierce (smart and sound)
3. Arrington (heart and soul of D)
Last time I checked none of the play offense and THATS WHY WE LOST.