Re: Redskins at Falcons - Game Day Thread
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 6:39 pm
Post game http://streema.com/radios/ESPN_980_WWXX
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
Kilmer72 wrote:I certainly never said Mike should be fired last Sunday. Instead I said Mike needs to be a man and finish the year. He can quit, get fired or get laid off for all I care. Just not during the season. Last Sunday was the last straw. I was a supporter of Mike even though I didn't believe in his finesse offense. If you think he shouldn't be accountable for his coaches then I have no response.SkinsJock wrote:There's no doubt now that Mike will be fired tonight ….can't wait to hear from all the Mike haters …
SkinsJock wrote:Kilmer72 wrote:I certainly never said Mike should be fired last Sunday. Instead I said Mike needs to be a man and finish the year. He can quit, get fired or get laid off for all I care. Just not during the season. Last Sunday was the last straw. I was a supporter of Mike even though I didn't believe in his finesse offense. If you think he shouldn't be accountable for his coaches then I have no response.SkinsJock wrote:There's no doubt now that Mike will be fired tonight ….can't wait to hear from all the Mike haters …
I certainly never said or implied that you said that either![]()
I am just tired of anyone that thinks that Mike is to 'blame' for everything wrong here and are not willing to give him any credit at all
I also think that most all the reports about Mike from the past 2 weeks are flat out wrong
Countertrey wrote:2 point conversion... The ball's on the 2... why the hell don't you have Alf in... either for the real deal... or for play action???? 2 yards is damned close to automatic for this kid. The D has to take him seriously. Excellent chance that a TE will be open in play action...
I loved going for 2 in that situation, though... no reason to take the game into OT.
Ryp was a deep ball specialist on a team that could pass protect (one of the best ever), AND had embarrassing wealth at the skill positions... When you have an incredible arm, all day in the pocket, and receivers who will make up for any variances... you're going to hit a lot of deep passes.Neo wrote:Countertrey wrote:2 point conversion... The ball's on the 2... why the hell don't you have Alf in... either for the real deal... or for play action???? 2 yards is damned close to automatic for this kid. The D has to take him seriously. Excellent chance that a TE will be open in play action...
I loved going for 2 in that situation, though... no reason to take the game into OT.
I felt the same way. Going into OT and risk a player getting injured is pointless (the season is already lost, might as well test out some plays for future use).
On another note, Cousins had great deep pass accuracy today. That's been one of RG3's weaknesses from my viewpoint. Fixable, but a weakness none the less.
Back in 91, Rypien could hit a gnat from 50 yards away. Odd thing was watching him warm up before games overthrowing guys from 10 yards away lol. Guess everyone needs a weakness.
Countertrey wrote:Ryp was a deep ball specialist on a team that could pass protect (one of the best ever), AND had embarrassing wealth at the skill positions... When you have an incredible arm, all day in the pocket, and receivers who will make up for any variances... you're going to hit a lot of deep passes.Neo wrote:Countertrey wrote:2 point conversion... The ball's on the 2... why the hell don't you have Alf in... either for the real deal... or for play action???? 2 yards is damned close to automatic for this kid. The D has to take him seriously. Excellent chance that a TE will be open in play action...
I loved going for 2 in that situation, though... no reason to take the game into OT.
I felt the same way. Going into OT and risk a player getting injured is pointless (the season is already lost, might as well test out some plays for future use).
On another note, Cousins had great deep pass accuracy today. That's been one of RG3's weaknesses from my viewpoint. Fixable, but a weakness none the less.
Back in 91, Rypien could hit a gnat from 50 yards away. Odd thing was watching him warm up before games overthrowing guys from 10 yards away lol. Guess everyone needs a weakness.
Won't happen... you much first start by building "The Hogs"... Shanahan is wed to his zone blocking scheme, with light, athletic linemen... The Hogs will never be reproduced under his watch...Neo wrote: Well I'm sold, lets just mirror a similar scheme.
I think we will pick up a great WR or two next year, but if Shanahan is still our HC, I'm not too sure he will do anything about the line. That's what I can't get my head around about MS...he doesn't see the line as being a major issue.
Countertrey wrote:Won't happen... you much first start by building "The Hogs"... Shanahan is wed to his zone blocking scheme, with light, athletic linemen... The Hogs will never be reproduced under his watch...Neo wrote: Well I'm sold, lets just mirror a similar scheme.
I think we will pick up a great WR or two next year, but if Shanahan is still our HC, I'm not too sure he will do anything about the line. That's what I can't get my head around about MS...he doesn't see the line as being a major issue.
Unfortunately, it is exactly that kind of OL that would give Bob the confidence to work on his pocket skills: work on reading his progressions... read defenses... set blocking assignments... focus on unfamiliar mechanics... and, most importantly, to slow the game down.
Redskin in Canada wrote:This game was about showcasing Kirk Cousins. From that perspective, it was a success
SkinsJock wrote:to have a chance to win the game at the end after all those turnovers was a good thing ….