Page 6 of 12
Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2013 11:29 am
by Deadskins
KazooSkinsFan wrote:Deadskins wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:Not my view, but I like the way I stated yours.
Of course you do!

I can always count on you to spell check and catch typos, thanks!
And I can always count on you for a narcissistic, Freudian slip to make that task so much fun. Thanks!
Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2013 11:55 am
by KazooSkinsFan
Deadskins wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:Deadskins wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:Not my view, but I like the way I stated yours.
Of course you do!

I can always count on you to spell check and catch typos, thanks!
And I can always count on you for a narcissistic, Freudian slip to make that task so much fun. Thanks!
That used to work on me. When I was 12...
Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2013 1:19 pm
by Hooligan
People are making millions selling rap albums with copious use of the N-word. I think "Redskins", used with no negative intention whatsoever, is a drop in the bucket.
Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:14 pm
by welch
I have always backed the name because I am a liberal and a history major and I suspect that the name was chosen to suggest the Boston Braves baseball team (then Milwaukee, now Atlanta), and I think "Braves" was meant to remind people of the Liberty Boys who dressed as Indians when they dumped tea in Boston Harbor.
However, I had a jolt about a month ago when I looked through you-tube for old episodes of The Lone Ranger. I grew up with that show, and remember the 90-minute "pilot" episode. I found it. At one point, the Lone Ranger sends Tonto into town to get help from the deputies. The deputies refuse, saying, aproximately, "Get out of here, you redskin".
The deputies (plot spoiler) are working for the bad guy, and I realized that the script-writers had given them that line -- "redskin" as a term of abuse -- as a tipoff.
I can't imagine another name for the team, but I'm not as comfortable as I was.
Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:34 pm
by DarthMonk
welch wrote:I have always backed the name because I am a liberal and a history major and I suspect that the name was chosen to suggest the Boston Braves baseball team (then Milwaukee, now Atlanta), and I think "Braves" was meant to remind people of the Liberty Boys who dressed as Indians when they dumped tea in Boston Harbor.
However, I had a jolt about a month ago when I looked through you-tube for old episodes of The Lone Ranger. I grew up with that show, and remember the 90-minute "pilot" episode. I found it. At one point, the Lone Ranger sends Tonto into town to get help from the deputies. The deputies refuse, saying, aproximately, "Get out of here, you redskin".
The deputies (plot spoiler) are working for the bad guy, and I realized that the script-writers had given them that line -- "redskin" as a term of abuse -- as a tipoff.
I can't imagine another name for the team, but I'm not as comfortable as I was.
Not saying we should change the name but I have pretty much always had the same discomfort. I grew up hearing it as a perjorative in many westerns and that is pretty much how I've always heard it used outside the context of our team.
For example, I don't think I've ever heard a newscaster use the term except when talking about our team - not in over 50 years of watching.
Thanks, Welch.
Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:15 pm
by HTTRRG3ALMO
I'm against the name change, but I certainly hope that if we MUST change it, that we're not stuck with some idiotic name that we'll be ashamed of.
If they called the team the "Senators" or any DC politics I'm going to get sick...then buy a jersey LOL
Bright side, call them the Washington Hogs and you guys can sell this site for a small fortune...retire early and buy your own island. Compliments of Mr. Snyder
Let the fans decide the name.
Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:25 pm
by yupchagee
If Dan gets to choose, it will be the "Snyders".
Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:28 pm
by HTTRRG3ALMO
yupchagee wrote:If Dan gets to choose, it will be the "Snyders".
I'll behave; so many inappropriate logo ideas

Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 2:35 pm
by mastdark81
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/09/07/king-drops-use-of-redskins-name/
If he feels that our name is offensive I cannot be mad at him for taking this stance even though I do not agree with our name being offensive. Wish folks, however would do more research before they make actions like this. There is nothing negative in the color "red". If we were named the stinkskins or the dirtyskins that is another story but "Red"Skins?
What is offensive are the terms you use before or after the adjective Redskins to describe an individual or in this case our team.
It bothers me to know that some people will think that the name Redskins is the same as calling a black person a N****. Thats ridiculous.
As far as the Native Americans that are sensitive towards the name, I believe it's the same as when a group of black activists wanted blacks to be labeled as African Americans instead of "black." You will always have a small group that disagree because of their very strong views, but in reality blacks from a full scope of things didn't care whether or not "black" was used because for the most part it wasn't used in a negative sense.
The issue should die down now that the season has started, however I believe Redskin pr team should be more pro-active in the future educating fans and groups how our name became, how our logo was designed and approved by a Native American.
Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 2:59 pm
by The Hogster
Now that the season is officially underway, can we let this crap topic die? Let the non-fans, politicians etc discuss this moot point in the offseason. HAIL
BEAT PHILLY
REDSKINS FOR LIFE
Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 3:13 pm
by DaveD1420
Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 3:33 pm
by skinsfan#33
The Hogster wrote:Now that the season is officially underway, can we let this crap topic die? Let the non-fans, politicians etc discuss this moot point in the offseason. HAIL
BEAT PHILLY
REDSKINS FOR LIFE
It will be interesting to see if PFT does, because they have a major woody to get the name changed! Mike Florio ACTS (and yes Mike it is a BS act) like the team name personally offends him like the team is named the Washington FlorioMom'saWhore!
Just Beat the EGirls! Like the bad, bad EGirls they are!
Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 3:45 pm
by riggofan
Ugh. I can't believe we're still discussing this. WE'RE PLAYING OUR FIRST GAME OF THE SEASON IN 3 HOURS!!!

Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 9:55 pm
by Burgundy&Wha?
Here's a surprisingly different perspective from someone at ESPN. Nice to see someone taking our side in this.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/96892 ... asy-sounds
Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 11:38 am
by Deadskins
The word 'Oklahoma' itself is Choctaw for 'red people.'
Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:29 pm
by StorminMormon86
Deadskins wrote:The word 'Oklahoma' itself is Choctaw for 'red people.'
This should settle the debate but it won't.
Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 10:08 pm
by DarthMonk
StorminMormon86 wrote:Deadskins wrote:The word 'Oklahoma' itself is Choctaw for 'red people.'
This should settle the debate but it won't.
Which debate??

Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 10:15 am
by SkinsJock
I understand that the 'name' for our team could be misconstrued but, as they say, beauty is in the eye of the beholder ... when I refer to the Redskins, I have no thoughts of malice or degradation and I really doubt that most Native Americans are really upset at the name

Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 11:20 am
by DarthMonk
StorminMormon86 wrote:Deadskins wrote:The word 'Oklahoma' itself is Choctaw for 'red people.'
This should settle the debate but it won't.
This is from wiki. It does not refute the point I think the Deadman is trying to make but there is something to be learned. The word below simply meant black skinned and was not originally perjorative. Same goes for Redskin and no single group, Indian or otherwise, cornered the market for the term.
Among Anglophones, the word nigger was not always considered derogatory, because it then denoted "black-skinned", a common Anglophone usage. Nineteenth-century English (language) literature features usages of nigger without racist connotation, e.g. the Joseph Conrad novella The Nigger of the 'Narcissus' (1897). Moreover, Charles Dickens and Mark Twain created characters who used the word as contemporary usage. Twain, in the autobiographic book Life on the Mississippi (1883), used the term within quotes, indicating reported usage, but used the term "negro" when speaking in his own narrative persona.
During the fur trade of the early 1800s to the late 1840s in the Western United States, the word was spelled "niggur", and is often recorded in literature of the time. George Fredrick Ruxton often included the word as part of the "mountain man" lexicon, did not indicate that the word was pejorative at the time. "Niggur" was evidently similar to the modern use of dude, or guy. This passage from Ruxton's Life in the Far West illustrates a common use of the word in spoken form—the speaker here referring to himself: "Travler, marm, this niggur's no travler; I ar' a trapper, marm, a mountain-man, wagh!" It was not used as a term exclusively for blacks among mountain men during this period, as Indians, Mexicans, and Frenchmen and Anglos alike could be a "niggur".
By the 1900s, nigger had become a pejorative word. In its stead, the term colored became the mainstream alternative to negro and its derived terms. Abolitionists in Boston, Massachusetts, posted warnings to the Colored People of Boston and vicinity. Writing in 1904, journalist Clifton Johnson documented the "opprobrious" character of the word nigger, emphasizing that it was chosen in the South precisely because it was more offensive than "colored." Established as mainstream American English usage, the word colored features in the organizational title of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, reflecting the members' racial identity preference at the 1909 foundation. In the Southern United States, the local American English dialect changes the pronunciation of negro to nigra. Linguistically, in developing American English, in the early editions of A Compendious Dictionary of the English Language (1806), lexicographer Noah Webster suggested the neger new spelling in place of negro.
By the late 1960s, the social progress achieved by groups in the United States such as the Black Civil Rights Movement [1955–68], had legitimized the racial identity word black as mainstream American English usage to denote black-skinned Americans of African ancestry. In the 90's, "Black" was later displaced in favor of the compound blanket term African American. Moreover, as a compound word, African American resembles the vogue word Afro-American, an early-1970s popular usage. Currently, some black Americans continue to use the word nigger, often spelled as nigga and niggah, without irony, either to neutralize the word's impact or as a sign of solidarity.
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 11:37 am
by gushogs
Next in line: the Mets, derogatory name used by people that live in the suburbs or the country side.....
HaiL,
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 5:53 pm
by Bishop Hammer
The Hogster wrote:The name will always be the Washington Redskins. Native Americans don't even find it offensive. Fake outrage and the team should never cave.
HAIL TO THE REDSKINS
I think its more offensive that people are telling Native Americans who aren't offended they know what's better for them than them.
And when someone points out they have NA blood in them and they're not offended. Often they're told "that doesn't count. You're not full NA." So I guess they only want "pure blooded" people, huh. Who else has said that.

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 11:45 am
by SkinsJock
I voted for Obama in the first election and then realized that he was just another politician that made promises he had ZERO intention of keeping
and now this
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-foo ... nging-name
what a waste this man is proving to be as a politician and as a president
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 12:51 pm
by riggofan
SkinsJock wrote:what a waste this man is proving to be as a politician and as a president
Yeah what a jerk. I can't believe he said he would actually **think** about changing the name. Shame on a politician for actually considering both sides of an issue.
On the plus side, he didn't threaten to shut down the government if he doesn't get his way. So I guess he can't be all bad.
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 1:04 pm
by rskin72
Not suprising to me as to where a fairly liberal democratic president falls on this subject. If I were the President, I would "think" about our national debt/deficit, and maybe getting a signed budget would be nice as well.
Some of the more major media sports outlets seem to be pushing this agenda....right or wrong....and I think it is wrong. I would say that the more the media latches onto this like a flea-bitten mutt latches onto a steakbone, then the more likely that eventually the owner may be compelled to change the name. Also, this is a politically correct era that we live in, and (right or wrong) it does not take a majority to be offended at any particular issue for change to occur/be forced upon us.
I wear, and have, a lot of Redskin-centric stuff.....This year, for the first time since I have been a fan, I have heard other folks comment about this subject outside of the DMV. Not a lot, but just the fact that it is now on some folks radar.
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 1:06 pm
by Deadskins
Barack Obama told the AP that if he were the Redskins owner, he would "think about changing" the name because the moniker offends “a sizeable group of people.”
Yeah, white, PC nazi's who have nothing better to do. You would think the President has more pressing issues on his plate right now.
