Page 6 of 17
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 3:09 pm
by KazooSkinsFan
Deadskins wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:Deadskins wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:I haven't voted Republican since 1988. I will pull the red lever this time without flinching because the Democrats have stopped toying with Marxism and are now the real thing.
If you had the strength of your libertarian convictions, then voting for Romney would be just as abhorent.
Wow, you know what my convictions are better then I do. Next time I won't tell you what I think, I'll ask the expert...
Well you certainly state them often enough.
Hypocrisy aside, how did you get them so completely wrong then? I personally don't see how anyone who considers themselves a libertarian could not vote to remove a Marxist from power. If you have cancer and someone pointing a gun at you, you deal with the guy pointing the gun at you first. You don't just sit there and refuse to act saying the consequence of both is death anyway.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 3:52 pm
by Bob 0119
cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:All you need to do is turn on gma every day to see the latest retard remark ya boy twit Romney has said to shoot his campaign in the foot... Again.
The airplane window ish? "id win if I were Hispanic" rant... WOW. SNL couldn't burn him more then he does himself.
Could you imagine if they paid the same scrutiny to a guy who pronounces corpsman "corpse man", or who referred to the death of his ambassador as a "bump in the road", or the fact that the guy is "too busy" to meet with the world leaders in those "bumpy road" areas but never too busy for Letterman or The View.
SNL could have a field day with that! "Can't talk now Ahmedinijad, Jay-Z and Beyoncé are waiting..."
His campaign is already putting out word that Obama may not do well in the upcoming debates because he has been so busy being President.
At least we know his opinion on the Green Bay/Seattle game
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:27 pm
by Deadskins
KazooSkinsFan wrote:Deadskins wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:Deadskins wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:I haven't voted Republican since 1988. I will pull the red lever this time without flinching because the Democrats have stopped toying with Marxism and are now the real thing.
If you had the strength of your libertarian convictions, then voting for Romney would be just as abhorent.
Wow, you know what my convictions are better then I do. Next time I won't tell you what I think, I'll ask the expert...
Well you certainly state them often enough.
Hypocrisy aside, how did you get them so completely wrong then? I personally don't see how anyone who considers themselves a libertarian could not vote to remove a Marxist from power. If you have cancer and someone pointing a gun at you, you deal with the guy pointing the gun at you first. You don't just sit there and refuse to act saying the consequence of both is death anyway.
Sure you can say that, but it's not like you really have the power to stop the gunman from pulling the trigger, any more than you have the power to stop the installment of the next president. It's also not as if Obama getting (s)elected to a second term, is going to mean the instantaneous death of America.
I am going to write in Ron Paul's name if he's not on the ballot. At least I can say I have a clear conscience.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:50 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
Bob 0119 wrote:cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:All you need to do is turn on gma every day to see the latest retard remark ya boy twit Romney has said to shoot his campaign in the foot... Again.
The airplane window ish? "id win if I were Hispanic" rant... WOW. SNL couldn't burn him more then he does himself.
Could you imagine if they paid the same scrutiny to a guy who pronounces corpsman "corpse man", or who referred to the death of his ambassador as a "bump in the road", or the fact that the guy is "too busy" to meet with the world leaders in those "bumpy road" areas but never too busy for Letterman or The View.
SNL could have a field day with that! "Can't talk now Ahmedinijad, Jay-Z and Beyoncé are waiting..."
His campaign is already putting out word that Obama may not do well in the upcoming debates because he has been so busy being President.
At least we know his opinion on the Green Bay/Seattle game
What do u got against the jiggaman hova?? Lol n I doubt the president of the united states is under less scrutiny then his challenger.. either way I think you missed the sense of humor tone through out all my posts in this thread.
Bring up football, what's more American then the NFL? I'm glad Obama hoops it up, makes bracket picks, and hates crap refs in the NFL. Twomney prolly can't even golf despite being a golden spoon country club brat...
I also would have much preferred a Ron Paul option
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:52 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
Bob 0119 wrote:cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:All you need to do is turn on gma every day to see the latest retard remark ya boy twit Romney has said to shoot his campaign in the foot... Again.
The airplane window ish? "id win if I were Hispanic" rant... WOW. SNL couldn't burn him more then he does himself.
Could you imagine if they paid the same scrutiny to a guy who pronounces corpsman "corpse man", or who referred to the death of his ambassador as a "bump in the road", or the fact that the guy is "too busy" to meet with the world leaders in those "bumpy road" areas but never too busy for Letterman or The View.
SNL could have a field day with that! "Can't talk now Ahmedinijad, Jay-Z and Beyoncé are waiting..."
His campaign is already putting out word that Obama may not do well in the upcoming debates because he has been so busy being President.
At least we know his opinion on the Green Bay/Seattle game
What do u got against the jiggaman hova?? Lol n I doubt the president of the united states is under less scrutiny then his challenger.. either way I think you missed the sense of humor tone through out all my posts in this thread.
Bring up football, what's more American then the NFL? I'm glad Obama hoops it up, makes bracket picks, and hates crap refs in the NFL. Twomney prolly can't even golf despite being a golden spoon country club brat...
I also would have much preferred a Ron Paul option
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 8:52 pm
by tribeofjudah
Question: Are we all better off than 4 years ago? Hardly
Question: do you want 4 more years? Hardly
my airline ticket to the island is looking pretty good. I truly hope this GOV (dems or reps) for the next term.....TURNS THINGS AROUND.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 9:28 pm
by Deadskins
tribeofjudah wrote:Question: Are we all better off than 4 years ago? Hardly
Glad we've got you to answer for us.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 10:33 pm
by tribeofjudah
Hey DS....your new name is: eyeroller.....
get it? play on words? (high roller)
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 2:58 am
by tribeofjudah
USA is waning as a SuperPower. 7 decades of dominance is slowing declining.....and it seems to be no ones fault, really. That's just how the cookie crumbles.
This is a good read but kinda lengthy - ok for you avid readers.
The signs of the emerging new world order are many. First, there is China's astonishingly rapid rise to great-power status, both militarily and economically. In the economic realm, the International Monetary Fund forecasts that China's share of world GDP (15 percent) will draw nearly even with the U.S. share (18 percent) by 2014. (The U.S. share at the end of World War II was nearly 50 percent.) This is particularly startling given that China's share of world GDP was only 2 percent in 1980 and 6 percent as recently as 1995. Moreover, China is on course to overtake the United States as the world's largest economy (measured by market exchange rate) sometime this decade. And, as argued by economists like Arvind Subramanian, measured by purchasing-power parity, China's GDP may already be greater than that of the United States.
Until the late 1960s, the United States was the world's dominant manufacturing power. Today, it has become essentially a rentier economy, while China is the world's leading manufacturing nation. A study recently reported in the Financial Times indicates that 58 percent of total income in America now comes from dividends and interest payments.
http://www.theatlantic.com/internationa ... _page=true
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:42 am
by KazooSkinsFan
tribeofjudah wrote:USA is waning as a SuperPower. 7 decades of dominance is slowing declining.....and it seems to be no ones fault, really. That's just how the cookie crumbles.
Actually it's a result of the greed and wealth envy which has caused a shift in focus from producers to parasites. There is no shame in living on the government dole, but there is shame in running for President on your ... success ...
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 1:09 pm
by crazyhorse1
KazooSkinsFan wrote:I haven't voted Republican since 1988. I will pull the red lever this time without flinching because the Democrats have stopped toying with Marxism and are now the real thing.
You don't have to know you're a Marxist to be one. My standard would be the planks of the Manifesto, which is the planks of the Democratic party platform.
Winston Churchill: The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries. Obama's certainly shown the equal sharing of miseries. That would be except of course the political elites. Obama, Pelosi, Reid, they aren't suffering at all.
Romney is a plutocrat, pure and simple. He believes in government of the rich, by the rich, and for the rich. A vote for the Republican party is a vote against equality and democracy, for reasons I'm sure are clear and numerous. I have no choice but to vote for Obama, like him or not. However, your idea that he is a communist or socialist is semi-insane. He's slightly right of center and has far too many Wall Street contacts, as well as a willingness to compromise with tickle-down criminals and nut cases (Tea Party) who advocate austerity nonsense in spite of all evidence that "austerity" creates depressed markets and, consequently, unemployment and recession. Try reading Keynes.
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:12 pm
by KazooSkinsFan
crazyhorse1 wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:I haven't voted Republican since 1988. I will pull the red lever this time without flinching because the Democrats have stopped toying with Marxism and are now the real thing.
You don't have to know you're a Marxist to be one. My standard would be the planks of the Manifesto, which is the planks of the Democratic party platform.
Winston Churchill: The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries. Obama's certainly shown the equal sharing of miseries. That would be except of course the political elites. Obama, Pelosi, Reid, they aren't suffering at all.
Romney is a plutocrat, pure and simple. He believes in government of the rich, by the rich, and for the rich. A vote for the Republican party is a vote against equality and democracy, for reasons I'm sure are clear and numerous. I have no choice but to vote for Obama, like him or not. However, your idea that he is a communist or socialist is semi-insane. He's slightly right of center and has far too many Wall Street contacts, as well as a willingness to compromise with tickle-down criminals and nut cases (Tea Party) who advocate austerity nonsense in spite of all evidence that "austerity" creates depressed markets and, consequently, unemployment and recession. Try reading Keynes.
When Obama hunts he only kills mother deer so the fawns will starve to death. When he sees a Salvation Army Santa, he takes out a $100 bill to see them all excited, then sets it on fire and drops it in their can so that and the money they collected burn. Obama slits the throats of homeless, but not too deep so they bleed out and die slowly. And he's trying to tip the balance of power by arranging the murder of Republican school children. He spreads them out so no one connects them.
Romney's so nice to his wife, she wishes he would get made at her once just so she knows he's a real person. He goes through the phonebook and sends everyone in poor zip codes $100 bills. He also tracks the firemen's scanner and runs into burning buildings to save people when he gets there before the firemen. He can just whisper to angry dogs and they not only stop growling but they never bite again. Mother Theresa once told him that he is her idol, even if she knows she can never be him.
Seriously, you want a deranged murder to be President over a living saint?
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:36 pm
by Deadskins
KazooSkinsFan wrote:Romney's so nice to his wife, she wishes he would get made
I'm pretty sure he was made many years ago.
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 2:11 am
by crazyhorse1
UK Skins Fan wrote:Lol. And the US authorities did nothing to check any of that out? The "establishment" in the US has been completely duped/hoodwinked/deceived by a man who isn't who he says he is, hasn't been where he said he has, and wasn't born in the US, or possibly wasn't even born at all?
I love a good conspiracy
The above opinions are pathetic.
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 2:15 am
by crazyhorse1
tribeofjudah wrote:I ask you:
Is this president "asleep at the wheel"...? While the globe is in crisis and unrest in diverse places, he chooses to go on Letterman, Today show, party with Beyonce, etc.... instead of Addressing the nation and the troublemakers.
Is this social engineering of some sort? Is there something more insidious at play here? New World Order? Illuminati?
God Save Us....!!!
He's trying to win an election--hence the appearances. He addresses the nation almost everyday . Who are the troublemakers?
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 2:28 am
by crazyhorse1
KazooSkinsFan wrote:tribeofjudah wrote:I ask you:
Is this president "asleep at the wheel"...? While the globe is in crisis and unrest in diverse places, he chooses to go on Letterman, Today show, party with Beyonce, etc.... instead of Addressing the nation and the troublemakers.
Is this social engineering of some sort? Is there something more insidious at play here? New World Order? Illuminati?
God Save Us....!!!
He's not asleep at the wheel. He's just on a mission to transform us into a workers paradise. Can't you tell with all the jobs he's created???
Get up to date. Obama has now gotten back more jobs than were lost to the recession. Also, there are now three million full-time job openings for skilled
workers. Trouble is, we don't have skilled people to fill them.
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 2:59 am
by crazyhorse1
Countertrey wrote:When GWB added 4 trillion to the Deficit, Obama declared that he was unpatriotic, unAmerican as a result... Obama is currently reigning over a 16 Trillion deficit. Can he explain why he is not unpatriotic and unAmerican?
Obama didn't say Bush was unpatriotic or unAmerican. Of that 16 million debt, Bush ran up ten trillion while in office and also left Obama with 3.5 million ongoing commitments, including his tax cuts for the rich and increased Medicare costs (payoff to drug companies.) Obama-initiated programs consisted of only 1.5 trillion, much less than either of our last four presidents
(adjusted for inflation). You've been getting too many "facts" from Fox. You conservatives live in a bubble.
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 4:38 am
by tribeofjudah
crazyhorse1 wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:I haven't voted Republican since 1988. I will pull the red lever this time without flinching because the Democrats have stopped toying with Marxism and are now the real thing.
You don't have to know you're a Marxist to be one. My standard would be the planks of the Manifesto, which is the planks of the Democratic party platform.
Winston Churchill: The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries. Obama's certainly shown the equal sharing of miseries. That would be except of course the political elites. Obama, Pelosi, Reid, they aren't suffering at all.
Romney is a plutocrat, pure and simple. He believes in government of the rich, by the rich, and for the rich. A vote for the Republican party is a vote against equality and democracy, for reasons I'm sure are clear and numerous. I have no choice but to vote for Obama, like him or not. However, your idea that he is a communist or socialist is semi-insane. He's slightly right of center and has far too many Wall Street contacts, as well as a willingness to compromise with tickle-down criminals and nut cases (Tea Party) who advocate austerity nonsense in spite of all evidence that "austerity" creates depressed markets and, consequently, unemployment and recession. Try reading Keynes.
Obama is a Muslim masquerading to be a Christian....imo
Nothing wrong with Muslims or whatever religion or faith. JUST be real and don't front, don't pretend to be something/someone you are not.
We're on to this guy........Barry Soetoro aka Obama. I cannot trust a PHONEY in the white house.
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 4:51 am
by tribeofjudah
Osama is dead and GM is alive....blah blah blah
Osama may indeed to be dead - but not the WAR by terrorist. This Admin thinks they've dealt the death-blow to OBL and his group - WRONG, hence the cover up of the fiasco of 4 dead Americans in Libya.
I've heard some say this event is WORSE than Watergate, yet no one is stepping down...!!!
4 dead Americans and NO ANSWERS yet - investigation on going, blah blah blah...........it's a STALL TACTIC, until after the elections.
Where does the BUCK STOP....???
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:07 am
by KazooSkinsFan
crazyhorse1 wrote:Obama didn't say Bush was unpatriotic or unAmerican
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kuTG19Cu_QListening to him and replacing his far bigger numbers with the ones he mocked Bush for just once again shows what an empty suit and a joke Obama is.
crazyhorse1 wrote:You've been getting too many "facts" from Fox. You conservatives live in a bubble.
Yes, hearing two sides just confuses people. Why should the liberal media present the wrong side? There is nothing served by that.
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:12 am
by Deadskins
He says unpatriotic and irresponsible, not unpatriotic and unAmerican.
Really, it's totally American.
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:13 am
by KazooSkinsFan
Deadskins wrote:He says unpatriotic and irresponsible, not unpatriotic and unAmerican.
Really, it's totally American.
Crazyhorse used "or" dude
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:17 am
by KazooSkinsFan
Barack Hussein Obama: "You Know What's Unpatriotric? Sorta... Unamerican? Racking Up $4 Trillion in Debt In Seven and a Half Years, That's What"
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:28 am
by Deadskins
KazooSkinsFan wrote:Deadskins wrote:He says unpatriotic and irresponsible, not unpatriotic and unAmerican.
Really, it's totally American.
Crazyhorse used "or" dude
CounterTrey used "and" dude
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:29 am
by Deadskins
KazooSkinsFan wrote:Barack Hussein Obama: "You Know What's Unpatriotric? Sorta... Unamerican? Racking Up $4 Trillion in Debt In Seven and a Half Years, That's What"
Maybe, but not in the video you provided.