What the Redskins gave up to get RGIII

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
the poster
Hog
Posts: 389
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:21 am

Re: RGIII

Post by the poster »

rskin72 wrote:First, I concur that The Poster is a bit off on the amount of talent we need to replace/fill this season. Depth is more of a concern for me (especially O Line).....and, of course, secondary help.


Finally, as I have mentioned in other posts, I am all in on RGIII......maybe I have skewed wrong, but in seeing him play vice Luck, I far and away prefer RGIII......regardless of the system.

The problem that Cunningham, Vick, and others had in the NFL was that they were run first QB's....heck, Vick admitted that until this past season, he had not really studied defenses that well. I do NOT think that RGIII is in that


well I do have to admit to understanding the excitement in drafting either one of these quarterbacks. it is a lot of draft picks to give up but both of these qbs have the chance to not just be good but to be great. so I can see why redskin fans can be excited about the possibilities of the great plays from behind center.

talent wise around whoever the qb is? my position hasn't changed on that. still somewhere between weak and mediocre. I for one believe stats are garbage and I don't use them. there's a few sites out there that I'm sure you're aware of like proffootballfocus that concentrate not on the marketable stats that you put on the back of a bubble gum card but those that matter when truly evaluating a player, rank the redskins offensive Line 27th out of 32 teams with a right side grade of below professional quality linemen. that's not good. unfortunately, Chad Reinhart , a former redskins draft offensive lineman of all things who is now a buffalo bill graded out as one of the top right guards in football last year. what a loss that is.

so, bottom line is yes I think it's great they're getting their guy behind center. but rookie qbs need a lot of help. take the high draft pick qbs (the guys like Eli manning) who were considered can't miss and look at their rookie seasons. I'll tell u this, because I'm kinda close to it, he was into his 4th season and people were ready to give up on him..that's how long it took. of course, the giants are outstanding and finding talent. the redskins are going to have to be as well. their gonna have to find their victor cruzs too.
skinsfan#33
#33
#33
Posts: 4084
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:44 am

Re: RGIII expectations

Post by skinsfan#33 »

rskin72 wrote:Am trying to keep in perspective that pundits have often been wrong before, and we have been horribly wrong on QB draft choices in the past (see Heath Shuler).
HTTR


I can't ever remember two QBs coming out at the same time where no one has really found anything bad to say about either. When Heath and Dilfer were coming out I can remember feeling the same way about them as I have about the past five or six Presidential Elections. I felt are you serious? This is it? This is the best we have to choose from? We're screwed! There were holes in both of there games and some serious red flags (How about Heath's wonderlic score matching his jersey number :shock: ).

From everything I have seen and heard about Luck and Griffin is good to great! If we had choices like this in our next general election, maybe the future of our country would have a rosier view, but instead we have Obama and whatever donk the GOP decides to roll out! It is enough to make you want to :puke:

I am much more confident in the future of the Skins (and Colts) than I am in the future of our country. Makes me happy and furious all at the same time!
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren

"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier

RIP James Oliver Rigney, Jr. 1948-2007
User avatar
markshark84
Hog
Posts: 2642
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 12:44 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Post by markshark84 »

Countertrey wrote:rskin72 said:
I percive that RGIII could potentially be the next S Young, F. Tarkenton or D. Brees. I am not concerned that he is two whole inches shorter than Luck. Again, check physical stats for players mentioned above....


I get your point... the only problem is, I think RGIII is not of that mold... I think he is a new kind of quarterback. Similar to those you mention above, but his incredible athleticism puts him in a new level... Watching him, I see athleticism that far exceeds those you mentioned... much more like those run first quarterbacks you also described... at the same time, he has a cannon arm that may be able to accurately place the ball 65 yards downfield. He has beautiful footwork, and balls leap from his hand in the medium game, with nice touch in the short and fade game. He is super smart, and likes to study.

It's early... but I won't be surprised if, in 4 years, we struggle to find a quarterback to compare him with. I think he's walking in virgin soil. He is the first of a kind. The perfect WCO quarterback. Defensive tactics that work with Mike Vick will result in lethal downfield strikes because of his real desire to complete passes. Defensive tactics that give Tom Brady a headache will simply give him a reason to go somewhere else on the field to throw his pass.

He is super confident, and consumately humble. He is a clever innovator, and a master of the tried and true. He is Superman... but drives a Chrysler Pacifica. Sir and Ma'am are among the most frequently words in his vocabulary, but he's not going to forget about celebrating a big play.

I just hope Jim Irsay keeps true to form, and does not take the relatively small risk involved in taking on this young man. I think he knows that the tried and true offensive philosophy that he prefers cannot possibly take advantage of the opportunities that an RGIII provides.

People, I am absolutely hyping this kid, because he has me completely hyped. I admit, I am over the edge. I don't ever recall seeing the offensive potential this player represents in Burgundy and Gold... and I have seen some damned fine players. Yes... I think he may be Sonny Jurgenson with dreds and legs... and, I think he was born to quarterback Mike Shanahan's offense.

... and, Mr Irsay... How about that Andrew Luck! Looked pretty darned good today, huh?


I think you make very good points here -- some of the best I have heard thus far. That said, I tend to also agree with another poster that stated the "new era" of QB has been over-played.

Year after year SBs are won by similar style QBs. Manning, Rodgers, Brees, Roth, Manning, Brady, etc. You would have to go back close to 20 years to Steve Young to find a QB that was not a pocket-QB. That is the main reason I do not buy into the "new breed of QB" -- because the old breed is the one that consistently wins SBs.

That said, I believe that RGIII can be a QB very similar to a Steve Young. Luck, though, fits right in with the other SBs QBs in terms of style.
RIP Sean Taylor. You will be missed.
the poster
Hog
Posts: 389
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:21 am

Post by the poster »

SkinsJock wrote:Some fans are going to be VERY surprised when they see the difference between what RG3 was like in November of 2011 and September of 2012



Well, Redskins don't have RG3 or Andrew Luck for that matter, just yet. Gregg Williams involvments during his time with the Redskins is about to become a huge story. Might be bigger than his time with the Saints.

Stories are coming out , as you read this, that may very well prompt the NFL to re-open their investigation of the team. In fact, these allegations are serious enough where they could be stripped of draft picks this season if not next season as well.

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2012/03/ ... ashington/
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

Countertrey wrote: is a new kind of quarterback. Similar to those you mention above, but his incredible athleticism puts him in a new level... Watching him, I see athleticism that far exceeds those you mentioned... much more like those run first quarterbacks you also described... at the same time, he has a cannon arm that may be able to accurately place the ball 65 yards downfield. He has beautiful footwork, and balls leap from his hand in the medium game, with nice touch in the short and fade game. He is super smart, and likes to study.



I agree. I tried to express this a few weeks ago, but I wasn't able to describe it as eloquently. In all fairness to Cam, he may have been the first of this mold... A more "complete", Mike Vick.

For those of you can put your feelings in your purses for a second. Vick is/was an amazing talent. It's taken him years to improve his QB'S skills, these new kids are coming in with arms, legs, vision and comprehension. That's going to be dangerous!
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Posts: 7047
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:58 pm

Post by DarthMonk »

the poster wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:Some fans are going to be VERY surprised when they see the difference between what RG3 was like in November of 2011 and September of 2012



Well, Redskins don't have RG3 or Andrew Luck for that matter, just yet. Gregg Williams involvments during his time with the Redskins is about to become a huge story. Might be bigger than his time with the Saints.

Stories are coming out , as you read this, that may very well prompt the NFL to re-open their investigation of the team. In fact, these allegations are serious enough where they could be stripped of draft picks this season if not next season as well.

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2012/03/ ... ashington/


If the commish were to take our 1st rounder this year he would be taking his life in his hands.

He didn't even do that to the Saints.

DarthMonk
Hog Bowl III, V, X Champion (2011, 2013, 2018)

Hognostication Champion (2011, 2013, 2016)

Hognostibowl XII Champion (2017, 2018)


Scalp 'em, Swamp 'em,
We will take 'em big score!
Read 'em, Weep 'em Touchdown,
We want heap more!
User avatar
Mississippiskinsfan2
Hog
Posts: 291
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:51 pm

Post by Mississippiskinsfan2 »

DarthMonk wrote:
the poster wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:Some fans are going to be VERY surprised when they see the difference between what RG3 was like in November of 2011 and September of 2012



Well, Redskins don't have RG3 or Andrew Luck for that matter, just yet. Gregg Williams involvments during his time with the Redskins is about to become a huge story. Might be bigger than his time with the Saints.

Stories are coming out , as you read this, that may very well prompt the NFL to re-open their investigation of the team. In fact, these allegations are serious enough where they could be stripped of draft picks this season if not next season as well.

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2012/03/ ... ashington/


If the commish were to take our 1st rounder this year he would be taking his life in his hands.

He didn't even do that to the Saints.

DarthMonk


For one we dont know if the NFL knew about these "stories" or not and it really doesnt matter if the redskins didnt know anything about all of this
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

The Commissioner's office has already stated that they have cleared the Redskins. It's also pretty clear, at this point, that Gibbs knew nothing (I have been convinced of that, btw).

Of course, this all depends upon what that thug Mara sees as to his advantage. the NFL clearly has no problem with creating and enforceing expost facto rules.

Beyond that, any such action by the league would be guaranteed to push Snyder to court. Goodbye antitrust exemption... goodbye labor agreement... hello to a future of the Danny and Jerruh buying all of the talent available.

Not a chance the league does anything here.
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
User avatar
markshark84
Hog
Posts: 2642
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 12:44 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Post by markshark84 »

Yes. It is ridiculous to even think they are coming after the skins. Obviously Williams has been reprimanded and he (and most of the players) is too far removed from Washington to implicate the organization.
RIP Sean Taylor. You will be missed.
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Posts: 7047
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:58 pm

Post by DarthMonk »

Countertrey wrote:The Commissioner's office has already stated that they have cleared the Redskins. It's also pretty clear, at this point, that Gibbs knew nothing (I have been convinced of that, btw).

Of course, this all depends upon what that thug Mara sees as to his advantage. the NFL clearly has no problem with creating and enforceing expost facto rules.

Beyond that, any such action by the league would be guaranteed to push Snyder to court. Goodbye antitrust exemption... goodbye labor agreement... hello to a future of the Danny and Jerruh buying all of the talent available.

Not a chance the league does anything here.


I hope you're right, Trey. Could you imagine?

DarthMonk
Hog Bowl III, V, X Champion (2011, 2013, 2018)

Hognostication Champion (2011, 2013, 2016)

Hognostibowl XII Champion (2017, 2018)


Scalp 'em, Swamp 'em,
We will take 'em big score!
Read 'em, Weep 'em Touchdown,
We want heap more!
the poster
Hog
Posts: 389
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:21 am

Post by the poster »

Countertrey wrote:The Commissioner's office has already stated that they have cleared the Redskins.


AS I understand it, the Commissioner's office also stated that they will reopen the case involving any team if new "information" surfaces.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/text/2017810710.html


"While some players who played for Williams elsewhere said he oversaw bounty systems there, too, the league said its didn't find evidence that "programs at other clubs involved targeting opposing players or rewarding players for injuring an opponent." But Goodell could reopen the case if new information emerges."



THIS....is not just new information. It's new and it's a bombshell. Here you got a couple of ex redskins (presumably ex players) saying they were getting a reward to knock a player out.


This is actually exactly what the NFL would be looking for to reopen an invesigation because the language in the story is even more damaging and explicit than the original lanaguage I heard in stories involving the Saints.

This could result in major punishment. To me, its not even a question that this results in an investigation of the Washington Redskins. The NFL, which is under extreme pressure to address the health of their players cannot just overlook this story.

Redskins will find themselves in the crosshairs on this one. The question is......would the team be punished.

(The reality is, the Saints fans were punished with those draft pick losses. They should have just fined the culprits. And fine them heavy. But since the NFL has set the precedent on punishment, it cannot be just shrugged off that they wouldnt go after Redskin draft picks including any used to secure their top draft pick this season if they find enough reason to.)

This is going to get interesting in Washington. If you think this is over, you didnt get the message that Goodell slammed across every fan's face last week.
cowboykillerzRGiii
CKRGiii
CKRGiii
Posts: 7010
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:56 pm
Location: 505 New Mexico repn

Post by cowboykillerzRGiii »

Good thing the whole front office has been changed and therefore can NOT be held accountable for previous coaching controversies. If by some magical reason Goodell tried to take draft picks- I'd find it impossible for him to take any involved in our trade a third this year second next and that's going out on a limb and saying he utterly hates us..
If he was bold enough to.kill our trade (music to cowgirl fans ears) I suspect the redskins would sue the piss out.of the NFL or do something drastic like join the arena league. It's just impossible to get shafted so hard and make THIS front office pay so much for never violating any rules- cap punishments included.
#21 forever in our hearts
“I wanted to just… put his lights out ….because, you know, …Dallas sucks…” - Dexter Manley
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

The problem with the Saints was they covered it up, lied to the league, and then continued the bounty system. None of that happened here. Poser, go try your BS elsewhere, there's no story here.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
User avatar
SouthLondonRedskin
Hog
Posts: 1217
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 7:02 pm
Location: Co. Cavan, Ireland
Contact:

Post by SouthLondonRedskin »

Man, it's gonna be so sweet watching the play-action fake from RG3, as he then rolls to the right and loops a 20 yard pass over the static Browns secondary to Garcon who turns into the end zone to round off a comprehensive Redskins victory of hapless Cleveland.

The camera then focuses in on the crowd, where a celebrating skins fan reveals his t-shirt with the slogan 'Here's What You Could Have Won Cleveland' alongside a photo of RG3.

I know who I'll be thinking of when that happens....
In Scot We Trust!
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Post by 1niksder »

the poster wrote:
Countertrey wrote:The Commissioner's office has already stated that they have cleared the Redskins.


AS I understand it, the Commissioner's office also stated that they will reopen the case involving any team if new "information" surfaces.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/text/2017810710.html


"While some players who played for Williams elsewhere said he oversaw bounty systems there, too, the league said its didn't find evidence that "programs at other clubs involved targeting opposing players or rewarding players for injuring an opponent." But Goodell could reopen the case if new information emerges."



THIS....is not just new information. It's new and it's a bombshell. Here you got a couple of ex redskins (presumably ex players) saying they were getting a reward to knock a player out.


This is actually exactly what the NFL would be looking for to reopen an invesigation because the language in the story is even more damaging and explicit than the original lanaguage I heard in stories involving the Saints.

This could result in major punishment. To me, its not even a question that this results in an investigation of the Washington Redskins. The NFL, which is under extreme pressure to address the health of their players cannot just overlook this story.

Redskins will find themselves in the crosshairs on this one. The question is......would the team be punished.

(The reality is, the Saints fans were punished with those draft pick losses. They should have just fined the culprits. And fine them heavy. But since the NFL has set the precedent on punishment, it cannot be just shrugged off that they wouldnt go after Redskin draft picks including any used to secure their top draft pick this season if they find enough reason to.)

This is going to get interesting in Washington. If you think this is over, you didnt get the message that Goodell slammed across every fan's face last week.

Not only is it not new, it's of no consequent, if true there would have been evidence of players trying to collect that bounty. There's no proof that any one tried to collect it based on the outcome of the game (Johnson played the hold game) and no unnecessary roughness based on hit delivered to Johnson. If anything it's on Williams for making the offer, end off story. No matter how hard you try to rewrite it.
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

the poster wrote:
Countertrey wrote:The Commissioner's office has already stated that they have cleared the Redskins.


AS I understand it, the Commissioner's office also stated that they will reopen the case involving any team if new "information" surfaces.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/text/2017810710.html


"While some players who played for Williams elsewhere said he oversaw bounty systems there, too, the league said its didn't find evidence that "programs at other clubs involved targeting opposing players or rewarding players for injuring an opponent." But Goodell could reopen the case if new information emerges."



THIS....is not just new information. It's new and it's a bombshell. Here you got a couple of ex redskins (presumably ex players) saying they were getting a reward to knock a player out.


This is actually exactly what the NFL would be looking for to reopen an invesigation because the language in the story is even more damaging and explicit than the original lanaguage I heard in stories involving the Saints.

This could result in major punishment. To me, its not even a question that this results in an investigation of the Washington Redskins. The NFL, which is under extreme pressure to address the health of their players cannot just overlook this story.

Redskins will find themselves in the crosshairs on this one. The question is......would the team be punished.

(The reality is, the Saints fans were punished with those draft pick losses. They should have just fined the culprits. And fine them heavy. But since the NFL has set the precedent on punishment, it cannot be just shrugged off that they wouldnt go after Redskin draft picks including any used to secure their top draft pick this season if they find enough reason to.)

This is going to get interesting in Washington. If you think this is over, you didnt get the message that Goodell slammed across every fan's face last week.
and, as I also noted, any effort to punish the team for actions taken by an individual, without authorization by management, will, almost certainly, provoke an already agrieved Snyder to take the league to court... an action that would risk dire consequences for the league. The NFL Management equivalent of the nuclear option. So, go ahead, pretend the league does not know this... but, it's certainly their call... and they clearly had no problem fabricating a reason to benefit the Giants, at the expense of the Redskins and Dallas, with their earlier, fabricated "violation" of a "gentleman's agreement" to collude against labor.

Boom...
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Posts: 7047
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:58 pm

Post by DarthMonk »

SouthLondonRedskin wrote:Man, it's gonna be so sweet watching the play-action fake from RG3, as he then rolls to the right and loops a 20 yard pass over the static Browns secondary to Garcon who turns into the end zone to round off a comprehensive Redskins victory of hapless Cleveland.

The camera then focuses in on the crowd, where a celebrating skins fan reveals his t-shirt with the slogan 'Here's What You Could Have Won Cleveland' alongside a photo of RG3.

I know who I'll be thinking of when that happens....


I simply must make a shirt that says

EVER BLAND CLOWNS

for such a game.

DarthMonk
Hog Bowl III, V, X Champion (2011, 2013, 2018)

Hognostication Champion (2011, 2013, 2016)

Hognostibowl XII Champion (2017, 2018)


Scalp 'em, Swamp 'em,
We will take 'em big score!
Read 'em, Weep 'em Touchdown,
We want heap more!
User avatar
SouthLondonRedskin
Hog
Posts: 1217
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 7:02 pm
Location: Co. Cavan, Ireland
Contact:

Post by SouthLondonRedskin »

I'll take two!

ROTFALMAO
In Scot We Trust!
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

I don't much care for clowns... but the ever bland ones are just disturbing.
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

Southlondonredskin broke my anagram generator... bastage.
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
User avatar
SouthLondonRedskin
Hog
Posts: 1217
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 7:02 pm
Location: Co. Cavan, Ireland
Contact:

Post by SouthLondonRedskin »

Countertrey wrote:Southlondonredskin broke my anagram generator... bastage.


I DID NOT!!!

I didn't even touch it. You shouldn't leave it laying around anyway...
In Scot We Trust!
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

SouthLondonRedskin wrote:
Countertrey wrote:Southlondonredskin broke my anagram generator... bastage.


I DID NOT!!!

I didn't even touch it. You shouldn't leave it laying around anyway...

Who's butchering the language?
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

Deadskins wrote:
SouthLondonRedskin wrote:
Countertrey wrote:Southlondonredskin broke my anagram generator... bastage.


I DID NOT!!!

I didn't even touch it. You shouldn't leave it laying around anyway...

Who's butchering the language?

That's what I'm talkin' bout!
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
the poster
Hog
Posts: 389
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:21 am

Post by the poster »

Countertrey wrote:Commissioner's office has already stated that they have cleared the Redskins.

reply:

AS I understand it, the Commissioner's office also stated that they will reopen the case involving any team if new "information" surfaces.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/text/2017810710.html


"While some players who played for Williams elsewhere said he oversaw bounty systems there, too, the league said its didn't find evidence that "programs at other clubs involved targeting opposing players or rewarding players for injuring an opponent." But Goodell could reopen the case if new information emerges."


so, your first pitch back at me was a softball and I put it back from where it came from. I gotta warn ya, Moderator, if you're gonna throw meatball responses at me like that first one, they're gonna get hit hard.

and, as I also noted, any effort to punish the team for actions taken by an individual, without authorization by management, will, almost certainly, provoke an already agrieved Snyder to take the league to court...


i've got an extremely cogent response to that: so what.

I think it's time you all look outside the team for once. Stop looking at everything as us versus them. And we'll start at square one. You obviously are not understanding the seriousness of the issues.

Let me remind you that the NFL has been under attack for two years now regarding the health of its former and current players. I remember watching Roger Goodell testifying during a suposition just last summer. The safety of the game is sport's #1 issue right now. Every play is being inspected for illegal hits. A senator from Illinois has just launched his own investigation into the matter. do u have any idea where that could lead? I can tell you this, it put guys like Roger Clemens in front of the Supreme Court. There is a marketing war going on right now involving the players, owners, commissioner, lawyers, fans, and everyone in between and that war is about one thing: the safety of its players. Gregg Williams couldnt have come at a worse time for the Saints. 5 years ago this wouldnt be quite as bad as it is now.

This is the NFL's *WAR* right now. The story that came out today involving Williams when he was in Washington was the worst I had heard to date. In fact, to me, its beyond football. Its downright CRIMINAL.
Where else can you get away with laying 15 grand on a table in front of a bunch of 240 lb crazy people and tell them the guy who knocks this person out gets the money?

So I think the NFL *HAS* to start with an investigation. In light of the league's perception problem, I dont even think they can get away with NOT investigating this story (as they said they would if new information became available) and Williams' whole tenure with the Redskins.

What they find now that there are two witnesses (former players) where there was none a few weeks ago will determine if they do anything to washington or individuals within that they can tie blame to. i dont know that they can find that though, so you guys reading this can all put your guns down.

they didnt have anything on the saints, at first What they had was leaked stories ( a rat, as Warren Sapp said) That "rat" led to the investigation which then led to the publishing of a 50,000 page summary of wrong doings. And the investigation didnt take long.

So, with this story today, you got step one again. A "rat" or two, in DC have come forward (Sapp's description, not mine). And now, step two ought to commence with a full D.C. investigation and only then will you know where it leads to.

Yes, there are precious few redskins remaining from williams' time in DC. But be that as it may, do you think *I* know what that means in terms of punishment if they found agregious sins in DC? No! The NFL again is fighting their own reputation war right now and anything is possible. Right now, the nfl be trippin! And their punishment to New Orleans isnt JUST about sending a message to that one football team. It was also to send a message to Congress, to the President, and to the world that watches the National Football League.

Is it impossible to think Dan Snyder knew about bounties? Dude...cmon...dont even give me this holier than thou garbage that everyone is a "Saint" (solid pun, right there) in burgandy and gold. You dont know what you dont know. And either do I. You would never convince me that Sean Payton had knowledge of illegal bounties happening on his football team a month ago. Not until, step one, a story broke, and step two, an investigation followed.

Today was step one in Washington.
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Post by 1niksder »

What part of cleared of any wrong doing is it that you don't get. The NFL has Gregg Williams dotting the I's and crossing the T's on this investigation in the hopes that he will be allowed back in the league. If he omitted something and it comes out later what's that going to do for Gregg considering above all the harshness of the penalties were for lying and had nothing to do with safety
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
Post Reply