Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:48 pm
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 1:26 pm Post subject:
Gnome wrote: Are you seriously questioning the best young QB we've had on this team since . . . who? You name me a better young Redskins quarterback over the last 15 years. Name for me a better young quarterback on any team with three years or less of experience right now?
OK, this one works if you post it in the right thread. I won't chase you around and count 'em.
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:27 pm Post subject:
fleetus wrote:
Campbell will be a brilliant QB as soon as we give him some dependable WR's.
This is a stretch for the claims you made but OK, it's close enough. Post it in the right thread and I'll count it.
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 4:30 pm Post subject:
Grampi wrote: There's no way JC stays with Skins. He's got way too much potential to go down with this sinking ship.
This one works.
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 6:51 pmCaneSkins26 wrote:
Wonderful idea. Yea lets bench our qb of the future after 8 games. So that Brunell or Collins can lead us to a Super Bowl??? Hahaha
Not to the level of your claims, but OK I'll count it if you post it in the right thread. You can complain when I say things aren't to the level of the challenge, but the whole point of my challenge was the ridiculous absurdity of exaggerating what people said. I wasn't mocking "qb of the future" which lots of people said. I was mocking "tremendous talent" and references to perennial pro-bowls, which you're struggling to find quotes to that level.
Think about that. You make hyperbole statements. I don't say no one supported JC, I say they didn't make statements like your exaggerations. That you keep finding quotes that people thought he had a bright future which SUPPORTS and doesn't actually contradict my claims. You did find a couple that I agree were to the level of your claims, like the one by Gnome above and the one by Pulp earlier. But the couple quotes by a couple people doesn't justify your rants about what a bunch of saps we all were.
and
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 4:27 pm Post subject: Jason Campbell
skins2357 wrote: hats off to him. great game, good poise, bright future. he might as well hold out and demand a trade to a team who has a future
Again fine even though this says and doesn't contradict my point that it's your exaggerations of these positions I'm mocking, not that people had these positions.
This is just a small sample of the long held claims of Jason Campbell's tremendous talent ... which include the idea that Jason is soooo good, he ought to demand a trade to a team that deserves him HAHAHAHAHA.
[b]Oh man, there are so many of these ... you best stop bringing this bet up or I'm going to take the time out to cost you a couple hundred bucks!!![b]
Do it, I double dog sugar in your beer dare you.
Well so far you're at two bucks. If you post this one in the right place you're still under 10. So the guntlet is thrown again, make me pay "a couple hundred" Ray. Do it. I repeat the challenge and I'll gladly pay.
BTW, I was giving $50 anyway for the 2 quoters you'd found so far because $2 seemed too cheep to bother with. You have a long way to go to bother me with how much money it is. You have 40 some to go before even breaking the $50.
In disclosure I've tried to give the $50 several times and JansenFan's told me the link still isn't working. I'll start with that when it is and when you blow by the 50 we'll keep going from there.
Gnome wrote: Are you seriously questioning the best young QB we've had on this team since . . . who? You name me a better young Redskins quarterback over the last 15 years. Name for me a better young quarterback on any team with three years or less of experience right now?
OK, this one works if you post it in the right thread. I won't chase you around and count 'em.
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:27 pm Post subject:
fleetus wrote:
Campbell will be a brilliant QB as soon as we give him some dependable WR's.
This is a stretch for the claims you made but OK, it's close enough. Post it in the right thread and I'll count it.
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 4:30 pm Post subject:
Grampi wrote: There's no way JC stays with Skins. He's got way too much potential to go down with this sinking ship.
This one works.
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 6:51 pmCaneSkins26 wrote:
Wonderful idea. Yea lets bench our qb of the future after 8 games. So that Brunell or Collins can lead us to a Super Bowl??? Hahaha
Not to the level of your claims, but OK I'll count it if you post it in the right thread. You can complain when I say things aren't to the level of the challenge, but the whole point of my challenge was the ridiculous absurdity of exaggerating what people said. I wasn't mocking "qb of the future" which lots of people said. I was mocking "tremendous talent" and references to perennial pro-bowls, which you're struggling to find quotes to that level.
Think about that. You make hyperbole statements. I don't say no one supported JC, I say they didn't make statements like your exaggerations. That you keep finding quotes that people thought he had a bright future which SUPPORTS and doesn't actually contradict my claims. You did find a couple that I agree were to the level of your claims, like the one by Gnome above and the one by Pulp earlier. But the couple quotes by a couple people doesn't justify your rants about what a bunch of saps we all were.
and
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 4:27 pm Post subject: Jason Campbell
skins2357 wrote: hats off to him. great game, good poise, bright future. he might as well hold out and demand a trade to a team who has a future
Again fine even though this says and doesn't contradict my point that it's your exaggerations of these positions I'm mocking, not that people had these positions.
This is just a small sample of the long held claims of Jason Campbell's tremendous talent ... which include the idea that Jason is soooo good, he ought to demand a trade to a team that deserves him HAHAHAHAHA.
[b]Oh man, there are so many of these ... you best stop bringing this bet up or I'm going to take the time out to cost you a couple hundred bucks!!![b]
Do it, I double dog sugar in your beer dare you.
Well so far you're at two bucks. If you post this one in the right place you're still under 10. So the guntlet is thrown again, make me pay "a couple hundred" Ray. Do it. I repeat the challenge and I'll gladly pay.
BTW, I was giving $50 anyway for the 2 quoters you'd found so far because $2 seemed too cheep to bother with. You have a long way to go to bother me with how much money it is. You have 40 some to go before even breaking the $50.
In disclosure I've tried to give the $50 several times and JansenFan's told me the link still isn't working. I'll start with that when it is and when you blow by the 50 we'll keep going from there.