The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Countertrey wrote:
Y'all were loud as heck, too. The "COOOOOOLEY" chant could be clearly heard every time he got involved in a play! Y'all were Awesome!

Gotta think that could be heard from the field... 'turds players must have been going "What the heck?"

I agree

Chris Luva Luva wrote:For those who care, we're ranked at #4 by SI. 1. Giants 2. Pukes 4. Skins 6. Iggles

I'm shocked we're up that high to be honest.

Sounds bogus to me. Pukes drop 1 place ?? Ludicrous.

Hoss wrote:Howie,"many people don't understand but unless you live in the Washington area...Washington HATES the cowboys."

and we hate them just as bad here in chocowinity nc too,

Great game, HAIL TO THE REDSKINS!!!

5 out of the last 7, I am on cloud nine today, that was the most complete game I have seen the Redskins play on both sides of the ball in a long long time. Zorn play calling was superb, we had a balanced attack, we took it Dallas by dominating time of possession and running all over them. Once again Santana Moss destroyed the Cowpukes and exposed Terrance Newman as being an overrated fraud. Jim Zorn has done wonders for Jason Campbell, he continues to improve week to week as does our whole team. I am very impressed with how well are secondary played and stepped up especially after Springs and then Smoot got hurt! TO "Team Obliterator needs to shut up. Here is to hoping he spreads that cancer around his team. I am celebrating this huge Win on the road over the rival Pukes all week! It feels great to close down there dump of a stadium with a big Win! Lets take of business Sunday at Philly. Hail to the Redskins!!

cleg wrote:It is a beautiful fall day here in the City of Brotherly Love on this fine, fine morning. As I walked the streets downtown to my office this morning with a little bounce in my step I could not help but reflect on the sad, confused and hung over faces of the Iggle faitful as they trudged to work. Seeing their sad fat faces made me think that today is going to be a great day.

Classic. Just classic. My hatred for the Eagles is just one hair under the pukes. Wish I was there to see their "sad fat faces" too...

Chris Luva Luva wrote:For those who care, we're ranked at #4 by SI. 1. Giants 2. Pukes 4. Skins 6. Iggles

I'm shocked we're up that high to be honest.

Where are you finding SI's rankings so fast?

We jumped from 14 to #1 in the Sagarin Ratings. It also says we have the toughest schedule.

JSPB22 wrote:

Chris Luva Luva wrote:For those who care, we're ranked at #4 by SI. 1. Giants 2. Pukes 4. Skins 6. Iggles

I'm shocked we're up that high to be honest.

Where are you finding SI's rankings so fast?

We jumped from 14 to #1 in the Sagarin Ratings

CLL is just quoting Peter King's personal rankings, not the "official" SI Power Rankings. Those come out on Wednesday, I believe.

Mursilis wrote:

JSPB22 wrote:

Chris Luva Luva wrote:For those who care, we're ranked at #4 by SI. 1. Giants 2. Pukes 4. Skins 6. Iggles

I'm shocked we're up that high to be honest.

Where are you finding SI's rankings so fast?

We jumped from 14 to #1 in the Sagarin Ratings

CLL is just quoting Peter King's personal rankings, not the "official" SI Power Rankings. Those come out on Wednesday, I believe.

Mursilis, is correct. Sorry guys. My apologies.

Chris Luva Luva wrote:

Mursilis wrote:

JSPB22 wrote:

Chris Luva Luva wrote:For those who care, we're ranked at #4 by SI. 1. Giants 2. Pukes 4. Skins 6. Iggles

I'm shocked we're up that high to be honest.

Where are you finding SI's rankings so fast?

We jumped from 14 to #1 in the Sagarin Ratings

CLL is just quoting Peter King's personal rankings, not the "official" SI Power Rankings. Those come out on Wednesday, I believe.

Mursilis, is correct. Sorry guys. My apologies.

No biggie. The "official" SI rankings are just Dr. Z's opinion anyway, so they're about as meaningful as PK's. No "ranking" matters except the official NFL rankings based on W/L, so that's what I care about. Media respect will follow Ws eventually.

does anyone else see Rocky McIntosh getting better and better each game? Especially in this game. It just seemed like he was soo pumped to be playing and it showed in his play i think.

There was really no excuse for the way the Dallas secondary performed on Sunday's game. The Redskin's west coast offense and superior running game picked Dallas defense apart by having good rythm, timing, and finding receivers on islands with no coverage. Dallas' Defense ultimately lost the game.

The offense played like they usually do except for the fact they failed to run the ball. The Barbarian only has 8 carries for 24 yards.

Other than the running failure, Romo passed for 300 yards and 3 touchdowns, most of which were passed to Jason Witten.

All and All, the vicious redskin fans can always say they beat Dallas in there final match up in Texas stadium. Ultimately, both teams need to work on their secondary. If the skins play philly with as much enthusiasm as Dallas, they have a good chance of winning the ball game and creating some breathing room for them in the competative NFC East.

-RaH-

whatever- go home puke!

just kidding...........just could not give you an initial positive post after viewing your avatar..........you make good points........a good win for the skins.

What scares me is that we played out of our head and you guys played well......poorly and we only won by two.

There was really no excuse for the way the Dallas secondary performed on Sunday's game.

I think running into a snotknocker from a better team is all the excuse they need.

Countertrey wrote:

There was really no excuse for the way the Dallas secondary performed on Sunday's game.

I think running into a snotknocker from a better team is all the excuse they need.

Thank you. Why is it impossible to believe we are just the better team? Why are people thinking we lose that game 9 out of 10 times? I say it's the other way around. We dominated them from start to finish. I just wish we had hit Romo some more, but Jason Taylor was out, and they do have a pretty good O-line.

We were the better team Sunday. But overall Dallas is the more finely tuned team.

If we really wanna be honest about this, Dallas helped us beat them. They didn't give us the win and we still had to execute but they did help us by removing an entire component of their offense from the game. If they had run MB and Felix like they should have the time of possession would have been different and possibly the score.

Does that mean we would have lost? No. We were going up and down the field at will also and left a good deal of points on the field.

Im just stating that they weren't at optimal speed due to poor play calling.

Just a side note here, and not directed at anyone in particular, Jason Garrett did admit publicly that our defense and defensive scheme dictated his play calling of less runs and more passes, so we did have a hand in that. Dallas just calling more runs doesn't necessarily mean they would've won. When they did try to run, we stuffed that as well.

Ironically, it was reported that many Dallas players and coaches did eventually develop the runs immediately following the game.

Rent-a-Hero wrote:The offense played like they usually do except for the fact they failed to run the ball. The Barbarian only has 8 carries for 24 yards.

So other than HALF of their offense being shut down, it was the same. Got it.

Rent-a-Hero wrote:Other than the running failure, Romo passed for 300 yards and 3 touchdowns, most of which were passed to Jason Witten.

... and 1/4 of which came on their last drive when we were in a prevent defense. (82 0f 300 yards)

Rent-a-Hero wrote:All and All, the vicious redskin fans can always say they beat Dallas in there final match up in Texas stadium. Ultimately, both teams need to work on their secondary. If the skins play philly with as much enthusiasm as Dallas, they have a good chance of winning the ball game and creating some breathing room for them in the competative NFC East.

... we need to work on our secondary? Springs pwned T.O. and were it not for him getting injured and sitting out most of the second half - there's every reason to believe that T.O. would have done just as little in the second half as he did in the first. We out-worked, out-hustled and out-muscled your receivers all day long. Period.

I appreciate your enthusiasm, but you got it handed to you in your own yard.

SkinsFreak wrote:Just a side note here, and not directed at anyone in particular, Jason Garrett did admit publicly that our defense and defensive scheme dictated his play calling of less runs and more passes, so we did have a hand in that. Dallas just calling more runs doesn't necessarily mean they would've won. When they did try to run, we stuffed that as well.

Ironically, it was reported that many Dallas players and coaches did eventually develop the runs immediately following the game.

I think what he said was a load of bull. How many touches did MB have throughout the game? They were catering to TO. TO had 3 consecutive passes thrown to him in a series. 1/3 of the offense went his way.

We did stuff them when they run. But MB broke off at least 2 decent sized runs in that game and people are fooling themselves if they think he wouldn't have kept our defense more honest. Even if he wasn't successful you gotta keep running just to keep the defense aware that he's there.

Heck! I don't even think they run a draw.

In addition there was no felix jones. I would tossed many passes to Felix in the flats on Marcus's side.

I'm not saying we didn't control the game or even dictate some things but lets not get too big headed and think that Dallas gave us all that they had. Cus they didn't... The bright spot is that I believe we could handle them defensively at full tilt and be able to keep up with them on offense too.

I don’t care how anyone tries to spin it…plan and simple we kick the *^$!#*& out of Dallas on Sunday!!! I was sitting in the second row behind the Skins, never have I seen them so pumped, focused and prepared as they were on Sunday. The boyz fans try to point to a few things that they think would have change the game…FG not called right, not running MB more, the refs…blah, blah.

I can that game too…this game was few steps and penalties from being a blowout!
On the opening drive we had third and short…false start.
The boyz first TD drive was aided by a de holding penalty.
How bout the two TD’s called back ?
If Campbell has his legs under him, Moss scores on the double move ( Newman have you found your jock yet?)

Chris Luva Luva wrote:We were the better team Sunday. But overall Dallas is the more finely tuned team.

If we really wanna be honest about this, Dallas helped us beat them. They didn't give us the win and we still had to execute but they did help us by removing an entire component of their offense from the game. If they had run MB and Felix like they should have the time of possession would have been different and possibly the score.

Does that mean we would have lost? No. We were going up and down the field at will also and left a good deal of points on the field.

Im just stating that they weren't at optimal speed due to poor play calling.

I thought we took the run away from them. They gave up on it because it was unsuccessful.

They had to give it up because we were moving up and down the field and if they continued to throw drives away by trying to run they would have been out of the game, imo.

Maybe it's just me but I would not have given up on the run game altogether like they did. MB did break one or two decent sized runs. Even if they weren't successful, it'd keep the defense honest and set up the play action.

Chris Luva Luva wrote:Maybe it's just me but I would not have given up on the run game altogether like they did. MB did break one or two decent sized runs. Even if they weren't successful, it'd keep the defense honest and set up the play action.

ITE YOUR TONGUE!

j/k..



We beat their arse fair and square. If their dude caught that on side kick they would've had a chance, coz ey just stood there and watched. THat was their only chance to win IMO, whenever they started to get something going our D took it away. I LOVE IT.

Chris Luva Luva wrote:Maybe it's just me but I would not have given up on the run game altogether like they did. MB did break one or two decent sized runs. Even if they weren't successful, it'd keep the defense honest and set up the play action.

5
0
-1
1
3
3
15
0

He had one good run.

It doesn't really matter whether you, me, or anyone else here 'would have given up the run'... the Redskins did enough to make Garrett give it up.