Page 6 of 7

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:02 pm
by capetide
[quote
If I were a Patriots fan, I'd be concerned about how long Tom Brady will be healthy. Every team in the league took notice and not every team in the league is against taking a player out, penalties and fines be damned. The Patriots go nowhere without Brady and everyone knows it. Don't be surprised if every team the Patriots play the rest of the season try to take him out. That's the price of showing no mercy. You get none in return.[/quote]

So you respond to a team playing by the rules (Scoring is in the rulebook last i looked) by breaking the rules and intentionally attempt to injure? And you talk about class? You shouldn't be allowed to comment upon anything having to do with class. You have none.

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:09 pm
by Countertrey
capetide wrote:
Countertrey wrote:HitDoctor!

:up:


So, next time the teams that the Patriots beat will really, really, really try? Maybe that's what's wrong with the Skins. They just don;t play hard enough without extra motivation. :wink:


Did you bother to read the post the blue thumb guy was in response to? Didn't think so... :roll:

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:16 pm
by Bob 0119
langleyparkjoe wrote:
jmooney wrote:I for one am glad that this happened, maybe now, some players will realize what kind of dicipline and sacrifice it takes to be a champion of this caliber in the NFL. Thank the New England patriots for raising the bar. Who on their roster took pre-season off? How many 'easy practices" did they have? There is a DEMAND for excellence associated with the players and coaches of that franchise and it shows.

Example: They lead by 38 points and one of their O-Line gets flagged for a formation penalty, Brady jumped down his throat.

Where is that attitude around here?


Excellent Point!!!!! :idea:


As much as I love my team, I am unfortunately also inclined to agree...

The closest thing we've seen to emotion on this offense was when Santana Moss was nearly crying after the Packers game.

You don't have to be an ogre as a coach, just treat it like a military campaign. Right now it looks like we are running Cee-Pee's Playhouse (anyone seen the "Players Club" hosted by Clinton Portis)

There is a certain sense of "mailing it in" on the offensive side of the ball. A "We'll get 'em next time" kind of attitude. Even though nobody's (the players) really saying it's due to the injuries on the O-line, it's as if they are playing like they get a pass.

Maybe it's because they figure the coaches will turn it around, or that they won't get too much slack because the O-line has been decimated, or that they have lingering injuries, or what, but they aren't playing with any kind of focus or intensity on offense.

Did anybody see that kid from Denver last night on MNF? He juked something like 6 defenders to gain 9 yards at the end of the game. This kid is not even the regular starter, but he was running like he's Barry Sanders.

CP and LB run like they are on rails this year. They hit a defender and fall down. Sometimes they hit their own guys and fall down.

Recievers that can't catch, halfbacks that can't run, players that can't stay healthy; we are lucky to be 4-3. We've got 2 1/2 weeks to make some serious attitude adjustments on that side of the ball or we are going to get embarassed by Dallas.

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:17 pm
by Countertrey
capetide wrote:
PODman wrote:If I were a Patriots fan, I'd be concerned about how long Tom Brady will be healthy. Every team in the league took notice and not every team in the league is against taking a player out, penalties and fines be damned. The Patriots go nowhere without Brady and everyone knows it. Don't be surprised if every team the Patriots play the rest of the season try to take him out. That's the price of showing no mercy. You get none in return.


So you respond to a team playing by the rules (Scoring is in the rulebook last i looked) by breaking the rules and intentionally attempt to injure? And you talk about class? You shouldn't be allowed to comment upon anything having to do with class. You have none.


He's just stating a fact. Heck, his post isn't even nuanced... Brady is wearing a target, which gets bigger with every game. It's not PODman's fault if you can't see that. Players will start seeking to "assist" karma as it makes it's rounds through the league...

Not saying it's right... it just is.

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:25 pm
by Fios
capetide wrote:
GSPODS wrote:If I were a Patriots fan, I'd be concerned about how long Tom Brady will be healthy. Every team in the league took notice and not every team in the league is against taking a player out, penalties and fines be damned. The Patriots go nowhere without Brady and everyone knows it. Don't be surprised if every team the Patriots play the rest of the season try to take him out. That's the price of showing no mercy. You get none in return.


So you respond to a team playing by the rules (Scoring is in the rulebook last i looked) by breaking the rules and intentionally attempt to injure? And you talk about class? You shouldn't be allowed to comment upon anything having to do with class. You have none.


I've heard Pats fans express the same sentiment/worry, that teams with nothing to lose will just try to take Brady out. I've said repeatedly that I don't have an issue with the way the Pats play but that's far from universal.

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:26 pm
by GSPODS
Countertrey wrote:
capetide wrote:
PODman wrote:If I were a Patriots fan, I'd be concerned about how long Tom Brady will be healthy. Every team in the league took notice and not every team in the league is against taking a player out, penalties and fines be damned. The Patriots go nowhere without Brady and everyone knows it. Don't be surprised if every team the Patriots play the rest of the season try to take him out. That's the price of showing no mercy. You get none in return.


So you respond to a team playing by the rules (Scoring is in the rulebook last i looked) by breaking the rules and intentionally attempt to injure? And you talk about class? You shouldn't be allowed to comment upon anything having to do with class. You have none.


He's just stating a fact. Heck, his post isn't even nuanced... Brady is wearing a target, which gets bigger with every game. It's not PODman's fault if you can't see that. Players will start seeking to "assist" karma as it makes it's rounds through the league...

Not saying it's right... it just is.


But I shouldn't be allowed to comment on this issue because I have no class ... :lol: Hell, if that were the criteria Emmitt Smith and several of his colleagues would have to resign their jobs.

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:30 pm
by Countertrey
I have no class


Master of the obvious... :wink:

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:00 pm
by langleyparkjoe
I hate Emmit Smith and I hate Troy Aikman, I'd love it very much if they didn't comment on Our Skins... Yes, I know, I'm a dumazz for the comment.. LOL. .just thought I'd throw some ice in the fire

GO SKINS!!! SHOOT DOWN DA JETS!!!

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:10 pm
by Bob 0119
langleyparkjoe wrote:I hate Emmit Smith and I hate Troy Aikman, I'd love it very much if they didn't comment on Our Skins... Yes, I know, I'm a dumazz for the comment.. LOL. .just thought I'd throw some ice in the fire

GO SKINS!!! SHOOT DOWN DA JETS!!!


You know there are 13-16 games played each week, why do we always seem to draw a former cowgirl (or two with Aikman and Johnston) as the broadcasters?

Doesn't that seem wrong to anyone else?

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:19 pm
by langleyparkjoe
Exactly Bob!!! While Jurgenson and local guys can only be 'heard' on local radio stations. Gosh I hate dallass, why couldn't Katrina make a u-turn?

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:34 pm
by Bob 0119
langleyparkjoe wrote:Exactly Bob!!! While Jurgenson and local guys can only be 'heard' on local radio stations. Gosh I hate dallass, why couldn't Katrina make a u-turn?


That's why I watch on TV while listening to the radio. It can be a little annoying when the radio is a second or so ahead of the play (it's like they are predicting the future), but it's still less annoying than listening to Joe Buck and Troy Aikman's drivel...

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 3:23 pm
by skinsfan#33
langleyparkjoe wrote:I hate Emmit Smith and I hate Troy Aikman, I'd love it very much if they didn't comment on Our Skins... Yes, I know, I'm a dumazz for the comment.. LOL. .just thought I'd throw some ice in the fire

GO SKINS!!! SHOOT DOWN DA JETS!!!


Speaking of Troy Gaikman. When he covers a Skins game we are 0-3. When he doesn't cover a Skins game we are 4-0.

Just another reason not to like his sausage slurping self.

By the way, Patric Crayton was on the Colan Cowturd show today and he was commenting on how there are NFL rules and then there are Patriot rules. After wanking about a couple of calls in the Cowturd/Patsy game he said "I was watching the Redskins game. Let me ask you. Did he push off on that TD catch?" It was obvious who the "he" was and what Crayton thought of it.

A couple of thing strike me as funny about that. First, why any WR would point out offensive PI is beyond me and second, how ANY Cowgirls WR could even contimplate discussing someone getting away with offensive PI when Irvin wouldn't have even made the cut down to 100 players in the HoF selection process if the NFL didn't constantly ignore his "Seperation Stride"!

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 3:41 pm
by skinsfan#33
HitDoctor wrote:Here is what really pisses me off (I need to get this off of my chest)!! How some players are bitchin about this! This is the only thing that embarrasses me is how some of these players responded. They were punked and crying about what the other team did instead of what they didn't do. Heck, patriot fans have a right to gloat......I did in '91!


WE DIDN"T RUN UP THE SCORE IN 91! In many of the blow outs all we did was run EB and Riggs for almost the entire 4th qtr and sometimes most of the second half! Heck we even took a knee at the Lions 1 yard line three plays in a row to run out the clock when we could have scored another TD or kicked a FG that was shorter than an extra point.

Most teams don't run up the score when they have the chance. It isn't sportsman like, it can get players hurt, and it can come back to haunt you the next time you play that team!

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 10:06 pm
by NE P
Howdy, as a new Patriots fan I initially didn't want to comment lest I be accused of bias but having seen most of the comments here I decided to add my $0.02.

Firstly let me say I don't know about wanting to run up the score but I do know the NE team was playing without any mercy. Good or bad it's open to conjecture. As for the issue of running up the score, well I dunno about you lot but speaking for myself, something I find very difficult to reconcile is this: as an adult professional player, being paid millions to do a job I know I would feel like pig vomit if a team is practically handing the ball over to me out of pity because they know (or feel) I'm not good enough to do anything with it. The fact that they respect me well enough not to give me any room whatsoever to even think of mounting any comeback is small consolation...and in my opinion, contrary to what Godfrey says (and I may be the only one who actually thinks this way) but I actually think it is showing disrespect to the game (and paying fans) by not continuing "to play" simply because the game is believed to be won. But hey, that's just me.

People forget that this is the same team that blew leads against Indy at the AFC Championship game last January; blew a late 2 score lead against Miami on MNF a couple of years ago. Yeah this was the Skins but hey, you cannot start deciding which team can come back and which can't. Who knew the Dolphins could've come back two years ago? They were only marginally better than the Dolphins of today but a worse team than the Skins so you never can tell.

I have a philosophy in life in that I always put myself in other people's situations before passing judgement. All you complaining, search your consciences and ask yourselves if you would've been upset had the situation been reversed and the Skins beat up on NE 52-7 in the exact same way? Would any of you be calling them classless for doing their job or would you all be celebrating like NE fans are now? It's a rhetorical question so no need to answer. Just ask yourselves honestly.

As for those talking about karma I would say indeed you have a point. However if there is one thing about the New England team that I give them credit for, it is that they give as good as they take. The will take their defeat like men if karma does pay them back. During the seaon they had secondary issues, they have been blown out at home by teams like Indy and San Diego with those team's starters playing to the end despite nursing 3 score leads. In fact on one occasion Marty Schottleheimer tried to show sympathy by acknowledging their injury woes but they were having none of it saying they need not be pitied despite the fact that the defeat definitely hurt them. They do not whine like what I see these players do. Funny thing is these players (like Godfrey, Crayton and Terrel Owens) now talk smack about hoping to see them again in the Superbowl right after being smacked around...then when they get blitzed again without mercy they will turn around and complain. People always expect the Pats players to be the bigger men...I ask why? They're human too with feelings and read and hear all the smack against them even if they don't respond verbally, they certainly respond on the pitch and take no prisoners there. Most of you have called them cheats and all sorts so why should they ease up? If people diss you this much and you had the opportunity to show them up, will you forgo it?

I've heard all sorts of excuses about the Skins game from oh they should've taken a knee. Well, there was 11 minutes still left in the fourth. Wouldn't that just be the worst form of disrespect? Others said well they should've handed it to their full back instead of throwing...well they did that against Dallas a couple of weeks ago, the guy ran it in for a TD and guess what, people still complained like he should've just deliberately fumbled the ball or handed it over. Now this time they pass and people still have a problem. They said oh they should've removed Brady...well they did and guess what again, the backup QB comes in and torches Washington...again a problem; then they finally bring in the third QB. Like Bill Parcells said, damned if you do; damned if you don't. Personally I'd have removed Brady if not for anything but the risk of injury...howevber I wont be doing it to show mercy to anyone...certainly no a bunch of overpaid cry babies. And guess what, the backups I send in I will instruct to also play hard so I can assess how good they are in game situations. People forget that these backups too are playing to retain their jobs or even impress and become starters so to tell them to go in and not play is doing them a disservice. Left to me if I'm Belichick and NE, I'll just do what I have to do and leave the rest cos if you start trying to pelase everyone, you'll fail then you'll lose focus and hinder yout team.

Like I said, damned if you do, damned if you don't.

There are tons of examples where other teams have played with the same ruthlessness yet they never got this much grief. Hence I think there is more to it than meets the eye. Even this same Washington Skins team had run up the score on lots of teams in the past dating back to the mid 80s. The Indy Colts team on 04 beat up a lot of teams, most of them badly. I especially remember manning, Harrison, Wayne and Stokley still in the game late in a number of those game throwing for TDs. I can provide the links but I don't think it's necessary because it is out there for anyone who cares to look it up. Yet the only talk back then then was about how Manning's march to breaking the TD record. Dungy was never accused of running up the score. Perhaps because he is a more likeable person than BB. No one was talking about taking out Manning. I think you all are doing a huge disservice to the feat this team is accomplishing by this pettiness cos to be honest that's what it is from where I'm standing. All the aforementioned hypocrisies prove this.

Personally I think it's even more classless for adult professional players being paid a lot of money to do a job to chastise another adult for doing his own job very well. But then again, what do I know.

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 10:44 pm
by welch
NE P, the professional just runs the ball with a big lead in the 4th quarter. See, for example, SB 22, the astounding game when the Redskins scored 5 TD's in the second quarter, after trailing Denver 0 -10. Gibbs pressed hard in the second half, but called fewer passes. The Redskins scored their last TD when Tim Smith broke free on a counter-trey.

Examples are numerous...the Redskins have been on both ends of blowout games. In all cases but a couple, the team with the big lead ran up the middle...just to finish the game without injuries. That is customary.

The Patriots want to spit on the custom. So be it. NFL players are very big and fast and it is dangerous to insult them. Consider, more recently Terrell Owens. He spiked a ball on the Dallas Cowboys logo, mid-field, after scoring. A few years later, a safety snatched him by the collar and dragged him down...spraining his knee. These things happen.

Players make "cheap shot" hits every week in the NFL. The Patriots have given every team a grudge, every opposing player a reason to take any kind of shot...clean or cheap.

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 11:04 pm
by NE P
welch wrote:NE P, the professional just runs the ball with a big lead in the 4th quarter. See, for example, SB 22, the astounding game when the Redskins scored 5 TD's in the second quarter, after trailing Denver 0 -10. Gibbs pressed hard in the second half, but called fewer passes. The Redskins scored their last TD when Tim Smith broke free on a counter-trey.

Examples are numerous...the Redskins have been on both ends of blowout games. In all cases but a couple, the team with the big lead ran up the middle...just to finish the game without injuries. That is customary.

The Patriots want to spit on the custom. So be it. NFL players are very big and fast and it is dangerous to insult them. Consider, more recently Terrell Owens. He spiked a ball on the Dallas Cowboys logo, mid-field, after scoring. A few years later, a safety snatched him by the collar and dragged him down...spraining his knee. These things happen.

Players make "cheap shot" hits every week in the NFL. The Patriots have given every team a grudge, every opposing player a reason to take any kind of shot...clean or cheap.

Sorry but all that is just semantics and theory. I am willing to bet not one of you complained when NE mauled Dallas a few weeks ago; I'm also sure none of you complained when the Skins beat down on teams like this in the past...and I am pretty certain not one of you would've complained had the scoreline been reversed. Just take a minute and think about it...had the situation been totally reversed team performance-wise and score-wise, would you be saying the same thing about the Redskins?

"Run the ball, don't pass the ball"...heck like I said I personally would consider it more of an insult if my opponent stopped playing out of pity for me. If I know they could've scored a TD by passing and they deliberately opted not to just to give me a chance to stop them, I'd feel like total crap. Let them play me hard like a man. I play sports and I take (and will continue to prefer to take) my beatings like a man...just as well as I issue them.

But hey, that's just me.

Besides have you considered the fact that Belichick and NE have been good for this long because he keeps them this focused and ruthless? You need to understand the Belichick, love him or hate him built his success around that aura of cold, calculating, cutthroat ruthlessness. Belichick don't do nice...win or lose. It's not being a bully or bad sport; that's probably how he keeps his team competitive. Not saying this is the case but it's just a theory. Perhaps if more teams of supposed men adopted this instead of whining like little girls, the league would be more competitive. They call themselves men and cant take a beatdown like men?

You may not like BB's style fair enough, but it's within the rules and it certainly works for him. And thus should not be held against him. It's totally unfair. The people you lot should be pissed off at is the well paid Redskins players and coaches...most of whom are better paid than the NE players.

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 11:06 pm
by Mursilis
NE P wrote:Howdy, as a new Patriots fan I initially didn't want to comment lest I be accused of bias but having seen most of the comments here I decided to add my $0.02.

Firstly let me say I don't know about wanting to run up the score but I do know the NE team was playing without any mercy.


Good thing the rest of the league doesn't play like that. A coach like Gibbs, with more class than Belicheat will ever have, wasn't tempted to send one of his hard-hitting safeties on a blitz to clock Pretty Boy Brady. After all, no mercy, right? You guys better hope the rest of the league is as forgiving of your arrogance. I'm hoping Ray Lewis and Ed Reed won't be later this year.

Good or bad it's open to conjecture. As for the issue of running up the score, well I dunno about you lot but speaking for myself, something I find very difficult to reconcile is this: as an adult professional player, being paid millions to do a job I know I would feel like pig vomit if a team is practically handing the ball over to me out of pity because they know (or feel) I'm not good enough to do anything with it. The fact that they respect me well enough not to give me any room whatsoever to even think of mounting any comeback is small consolation...and in my opinion, contrary to what Godfrey says (and I may be the only one who actually thinks this way) but I actually think it is showing disrespect to the game (and paying fans) by not continuing "to play" simply because the game is believed to be won. But hey, that's just me.


If Belicheat had any respect for the league, he wouldn't have cheated, would he? Don't give me those 'respect' lies.

People forget that this is the same team that blew leads against Indy at the AFC Championship game last January; blew a late 2 score lead against Miami on MNF a couple of years ago. Yeah this was the Skins but hey, you cannot start deciding which team can come back and which can't. Who knew the Dolphins could've come back two years ago? They were only marginally better than the Dolphins of today but a worse team than the Skins so you never can tell.


Please. The 'skins had no offense all day, and were well beyond the largest 4th quarter comeback margin in league history. No way they were coming back. Belicheat just wanted to spit in the face of a Hall of Fame coach. Again, no class.

I have a philosophy in life in that I always put myself in other people's situations before passing judgement. All you complaining, search your consciences and ask yourselves if you would've been upset had the situation been reversed and the Skins beat up on NE 52-7 in the exact same way? Would any of you be calling them classless for doing their job or would you all be celebrating like NE fans are now? It's a rhetorical question so no need to answer. Just ask yourselves honestly.


Darn right it's rhetorical question, because Gibbs never would've done that. Look at the '91 season opener vs. Detroit. He ordered the QB to take a knee on the opponent's 1!! That was a sure score, yet a coach with class decided not to be a bully about it. There's been games where the 'skins offense did nothing but runs by the middle of the third quarter, because Gibbs didn't want to run up the score. But your boys were still passing well into the 4th.

As for those talking about karma I would say indeed you have a point. However if there is one thing about the New England team that I give them credit for, it is that they give as good as they take. The will take their defeat like men if karma does pay them back. During the seaon they had secondary issues, they have been blown out at home by teams like Indy and San Diego with those team's starters playing to the end despite nursing 3 score leads.


What BS. Indy's beaten you guys by 19 and 7 in the regular season - hardly blow-outs!

Even this same Washington Skins team had run up the score on lots of teams in the past dating back to the mid 80s.


Find one game where Gibbs was still calling bombs down the field up by 30+. ONE GAME.

The Indy Colts team on 04 beat up a lot of teams, most of them badly.


Not most - only 3. They only blew out 3 teams by more than 30 points. They actually won 8 games decided by two scores or less.

I especially remember manning, Harrison, Wayne and Stokley still in the game late in a number of those game throwing for TDs.


See above. You remember them in games because the games were close to the end. Indy had a weak defense that year, and had to score lots of points to offset their D.

Yet the only talk back then then was about how Manning's march to breaking the TD record. Dungy was never accused of running up the score.


Because Dungy almost never did. How many games did he win by 40+? Less than Belicheat.

Perhaps because he is a more likeable person than BB. No one was talking about taking out Manning.


Because Manning respected the league more than he respected his personal glory, unlike Pretty Boy. The last game of the 2004 season, instead of padding his TD record, Manning sat 90% of the game, only taking two attempts, for 6 yards and 0 TDs. Manning wasn't looking to spit on the rest of the NFL, unlike Brady.

I think you all are doing a huge disservice to the feat this team is accomplishing by this pettiness cos to be honest that's what it is from where I'm standing. All the aforementioned hypocrisies prove this.

Personally I think it's even more classless for adult professional players being paid a lot of money to do a job to chastise another adult for doing his own job very well. But then again, what do I know.


What's classless is cheating, and which team used cheating to win? New England, the same team currently mocking the rest of the league. If Pretty Boy is carried out on a stretcher some game, don't bother asking why. You can tell yourself whatever you like, but the facts are the facts. Belicheat got busted breaking the rules, and instead of apologizing like a real man when he makes a mistake, he throws a childish temper-tantrum for a whole season. Karma's going to hit you guys like a brick wall. It's sad there's even fans still willing to be associated with that organization.

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 12:08 am
by Bob 0119
NE P wrote:Howdy, as a new Patriots fan I initially didn't want to comment lest I be accused of bias but having seen most of the comments here I decided to add my $0.02.


I'm not sure what your definition of a "new" Patriots fan is, but google your own team's history. I'm thinking you'll find that until relatively recently they had troubles of their own.


Firstly let me say I don't know about wanting to run up the score but I do know the NE team was playing without any mercy. Good or bad it's open to conjecture. As for the issue of running up the score, well I dunno about you lot but speaking for myself, something I find very difficult to reconcile is this: as an adult professional player, being paid millions to do a job I know I would feel like pig vomit if a team is practically handing the ball over to me out of pity because they know (or feel) I'm not good enough to do anything with it.


Well, look into your own team's history and tell me what they're opinion was when they weren't who they are today.

The fact that they respect me well enough not to give me any room whatsoever to even think of mounting any comeback is small consolation...and in my opinion, contrary to what Godfrey says (and I may be the only one who actually thinks this way) but I actually think it is showing disrespect to the game (and paying fans) by not continuing "to play" simply because the game is believed to be won. But hey, that's just me.


Nobody's advocating that they punt on first down here, but going for it on fourth down when you've got nothing left to prove is quite the other.

People forget that this is the same team that blew leads against Indy at the AFC Championship game last January; blew a late 2 score lead against Miami on MNF a couple of years ago. Yeah this was the Skins but hey, you cannot start deciding which team can come back and which can't. Who knew the Dolphins could've come back two years ago? They were only marginally better than the Dolphins of today but a worse team than the Skins so you never can tell.


hmmm, yes blowing a two score lead certainly sucks, we've been there and done that, but google me this Batman, who's blown a 38 point lead entering the fourth quarter? Were they doing that to be insulting to their own defense? I somehow doubt that.

I have a philosophy in life in that I always put myself in other people's situations before passing judgement. All you complaining, search your consciences and ask yourselves if you would've been upset had the situation been reversed and the Skins beat up on NE 52-7 in the exact same way? Would any of you be calling them classless for doing their job or would you all be celebrating like NE fans are now? It's a rhetorical question so no need to answer. Just ask yourselves honestly.


It's really easy to "put yourself in someone else's shoes" when you don't have to wear them. I can't recall a time when I saw us throw out the deep ball while we were up 38 points. I can't recall us going for it on fourth and 2 while holding 5+ touchdown lead...ever. When we beat San Fran a few years ago with our 52 point score we had pulled the gameplan back as far as we could. We went to running plays, and our defense continued to put points up. If a defender returns a ball that's much different than saying let's go with a deep route and see how many touchdowns we can put up on these guys.

As for those talking about karma I would say indeed you have a point. However if there is one thing about the New England team that I give them credit for, it is that they give as good as they take. The will take their defeat like men if karma does pay them back.


Ah, but it probably won't be versus "these guys", let's see what happens when Brady has his leg snapped like a twig, BB retires and the Krafts sell the team. Will those guys still take it like a man when they are suffering for the held over anger left by these guys?

During the seaon they had secondary issues, they have been blown out at home by teams like Indy and San Diego with those team's starters playing to the end despite nursing 3 score leads.


Wow three scores? That's like 21 points right? That is so much like 38 points.

In fact on one occasion Marty Schottleheimer tried to show sympathy by acknowledging their injury woes but they were having none of it saying they need not be pitied despite the fact that the defeat definitely hurt them.


That's funny 'cuz it sound almost like what Gibbs said. What did the Pats fans have to say? I wouldn't know because I wouldn't be caught dead on another team's board, even if I only was there just to gloat.

They do not whine like what I see these players do.


Just wait until they have a reason to

Funny thing is these players (like Godfrey, Crayton and Terrel Owens) now talk smack about hoping to see them again in the Superbowl right after being smacked around...then when they get blitzed again without mercy they will turn around and complain. People always expect the Pats players to be the bigger men...I ask why?


So, you're saying they shouldn't be the bigger men? That not only should they win but they should humiliate their opponents? Why bother acknowledging the other team after the game then? Why shake hands with your defeated opponent and patronize him with an insincere "good game"? Funny how flexing your arm towards your opponents bench nets you a 15-yard unsportsman-like penalty for "taunting" but driving for two more touchdowns while ahead by 38 points should be okay.

They're human too with feelings and read and hear all the smack against them even if they don't respond verbally, they certainly respond on the pitch and take no prisoners there. Most of you have called them cheats and all sorts so why should they ease up? If people diss you this much and you had the opportunity to show them up, will you forgo it?


So, the plan is "we'll make people forget about hating us for being cheats by making them hate us for running the score up on them?" So, not only are they cheats, they are unsportsman-like cheats!


I've heard all sorts of excuses about the Skins game from oh they should've taken a knee. Well, there was 11 minutes still left in the fourth.


Actually I believe the overall opinion at that point in the game was punt on fourth down. You mean to tell me BB was afraid we might score 45 points in 11 minutes? Perhaps he did over-estimate us just a tad...


Wouldn't that just be the worst form of disrespect? Others said well they should've handed it to their full back instead of throwing...well they did that against Dallas a couple of weeks ago, the guy ran it in for a TD and guess what, people still complained like he should've just deliberately fumbled the ball or handed it over.


Actually, I watched that game, and was thrilled about you guys beating the cowgirls...until that play. You forgot to mention that they ran it in with less than a minute to go, Dallas had no time outs and they could have simply knelt on the ball. Game over; Patriots still win. They however decided to push it in one more time, making the game last 10 more minutes than it should have.

Now this time they pass and people still have a problem. They said oh they should've removed Brady...well they did and guess what again, the backup QB comes in and torches Washington...again a problem; then they finally bring in the third QB. Like Bill Parcells said, damned if you do; damned if you don't. Personally I'd have removed Brady if not for anything but the risk of injury...howevber I wont be doing it to show mercy to anyone...certainly no a bunch of overpaid cry babies. And guess what, the backups I send in I will instruct to also play hard so I can assess how good they are in game situations. People forget that these backups too are playing to retain their jobs or even impress and become starters so to tell them to go in and not play is doing them a disservice. Left to me if I'm Belichick and NE, I'll just do what I have to do and leave the rest cos if you start trying to pelase everyone, you'll fail then you'll lose focus and hinder yout team.

Like I said, damned if you do, damned if you don't.


Well, the damned if you do bit is about accurate. Listen, nobody is saying the Patriots didn't deserve to win, they were the better team that day, but by the time I walked away from the TV, Brady had just personally made it 45-0.

Then you expect our players to be happy about it? You expect them to just go "Aw, you guys....". Personally, I want them to be angry, specifically at the Patriots. Your whole argument is very similar to Nelson from the Simpsons and his "Why're you hittin' yourself" schtick.

There are tons of examples where other teams have played with the same ruthlessness yet they never got this much grief. Hence I think there is more to it than meets the eye. Even this same Washington Skins team had run up the score on lots of teams in the past dating back to the mid 80s.


Data please. The closest I can recall was the Superbowl versus the Broncos where we scored 35 points in the second quarter, to make the game 35-10 at the half. We went on to win 42-10 only because we backed off so as not to embarrass them any further. I don't even think there was a single pass thrown by us in that second half.

The Indy Colts team on 04 beat up a lot of teams, most of them badly. I especially remember manning, Harrison, Wayne and Stokley still in the game late in a number of those game throwing for TDs. I can provide the links but I don't think it's necessary because it is out there for anyone who cares to look it up. Yet the only talk back then then was about how Manning's march to breaking the TD record. Dungy was never accused of running up the score. Perhaps because he is a more likeable person than BB. No one was talking about taking out Manning. I think you all are doing a huge disservice to the feat this team is accomplishing by this pettiness cos to be honest that's what it is from where I'm standing. All the aforementioned hypocrisies prove this.


Some of that could be true, but they didn't "run the score up" on us that I recall, and I could care less about Peyton and Dungy.

Personally I think it's even more classless for adult professional players being paid a lot of money to do a job to chastise another adult for doing his own job very well. But then again, what do I know.


Actually very few of our players and none of our coaches feel the same way I do. If they do, they aren't voicing it to the public.

Godfrey being your only example.

Had this game ended 38-0, or even 38-7 I don't think your beloved Patriots would be facing all of this criticism, but you know as well as anybody that they were throwing deep in the fourth with a 38 point lead (and I'll save you the googling time; no one has ever come back from more than 27 points down in the fourth quarter) going for a touchdown when they could have made an easy FG, and going for it again on fourth down to keep a drive alive so they could get yet another touchdown.

Enjoy your team doing well while it lasts. If there is anything that is definately true in this league it's that all glory is fleeting.

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 12:37 am
by NE P
Mursilis wrote:Find one game where Gibbs was still calling bombs down the field up by 30+. ONE GAME.

http://redskinsgames.com/blog2/?p=43
After the game, Gibbs said that he had no problem at all with what the Patriots did. He shouldn’t. In 1991, Gibbs’ Redskins had a comfortable 35-17 lead over the Falcons going into the fourth quarter. Rather than call running plays to kill the clock, Gibbs had Mark Rypien throw the ball. He threw touchdown passes of 82 yards to Gary Clark and of 64 yards to Art Monk. And these weren’t dinky passes with a lot of missed tackles and YAC. They were bombs away. That made it 49-17 and Andre Collins finished off the scoring with a touchdown on a return of Bret Favre’s first NFL pass. Nobody clad in burgundy and gold complained about the score being run up.

You can go back further in the history of the franchise to find more examples of running it up. In 1966 the Redskins held a 69-42 lead over the New York Giants in the last minute of the game. The Giants threw an incomplete pass on fourth down. Someone on the Redskins sideline—legend says it was bitter ex-Giant Sam Huff—wasn’t happy with 69 points and sent in the field goal team to push the score over 70. The Redskins and their fans celebrated being on the winning end of the highest scoring NFL game ever; nobody pointed out the cheap score at the end.


Also:

Washington 45, St. Louis 7 -- 11/6/1983; Coach: Joe Gibbs
http://www.nfl.com/teams/schedule?team= ... onType=REG

Washington 51, Rams 7 -- 1/1/1984; Coach: Joe Gibbs here http://www.nfl.com/teams/schedule?team= ... onType=REG

Washington 45, Detroit 0 -- 9/1/1991; Coach: Joe Gibbs
http://www.nfl.com/teams/schedule?team= ... onType=REG

Washington 41, Phoenix 3 -- 11/29/1992; Coach: Joe Gibbs
http://www.nfl.com/teams/schedule?team= ... onType=REG

So since Indy did it only 3 times,. it's okay right? And how many times has this NE team done it...Dallas, Miami, and Washington? 30+ points is okay abut 40+ isn't right? And whose rule is that? Who has the right to set the limit...you, Gibbs, the team being clobbered?

Please sorry but I'm just not buying any of this. It sounds like noting both sour grapes. I guess I can't change your opinion so I won't bother. I have no problem with it. I'm also a Red Sox fan and Celtics fan and the Yankees beat up on Boston 19-1 a couple of yars ago and I had no problem with it. A bunch of teams blew out the Celtics (Indiana Pacers I remember particularly) and never stopped until the final whistle and yet I had no problem with it too...well aside from being upset they lost obviously. These guys are paid millions yet you all sit there and cry for them that they are thoroughly beaten.

Funny.

You cannot sit there and tell a pro team when it is okay to stop playing/scoring. Are you their coach? Are you the one paying their check? For you to sit there and say well if they had stopped at 38? What right have you to say that really I'm curious?

Ah well to each his own. They're bullies, their classless, they run up the score. Would I want them to ease up?...quite possibly. Would I have a problem if they didn't?...not really. But to most neutrals it's sour grapes really.

Word of advice - suck it up; take the beat down like men, move on and hope that your team learns from it and grows into a team good enough to be able to beat an oppnent that badly even if they choose not to.

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:05 am
by HEROHAMO
NE P wrote:
Mursilis wrote:Find one game where Gibbs was still calling bombs down the field up by 30+. ONE GAME.

http://redskinsgames.com/blog2/?p=43
After the game, Gibbs said that he had no problem at all with what the Patriots did. He shouldn’t. In 1991, Gibbs’ Redskins had a comfortable 35-17 lead over the Falcons going into the fourth quarter. Rather than call running plays to kill the clock, Gibbs had Mark Rypien throw the ball. He threw touchdown passes of 82 yards to Gary Clark and of 64 yards to Art Monk. And these weren’t dinky passes with a lot of missed tackles and YAC. They were bombs away. That made it 49-17 and Andre Collins finished off the scoring with a touchdown on a return of Bret Favre’s first NFL pass. Nobody clad in burgundy and gold complained about the score being run up.

You can go back further in the history of the franchise to find more examples of running it up. In 1966 the Redskins held a 69-42 lead over the New York Giants in the last minute of the game. The Giants threw an incomplete pass on fourth down. Someone on the Redskins sideline—legend says it was bitter ex-Giant Sam Huff—wasn’t happy with 69 points and sent in the field goal team to push the score over 70. The Redskins and their fans celebrated being on the winning end of the highest scoring NFL game ever; nobody pointed out the cheap score at the end.


Also:

Washington 45, St. Louis 7 -- 11/6/1983; Coach: Joe Gibbs
http://www.nfl.com/teams/schedule?team= ... onType=REG

Washington 51, Rams 7 -- 1/1/1984; Coach: Joe Gibbs here http://www.nfl.com/teams/schedule?team= ... onType=REG

Washington 45, Detroit 0 -- 9/1/1991; Coach: Joe Gibbs
http://www.nfl.com/teams/schedule?team= ... onType=REG

Washington 41, Phoenix 3 -- 11/29/1992; Coach: Joe Gibbs
http://www.nfl.com/teams/schedule?team= ... onType=REG

So since Indy did it only 3 times,. it's okay right? And how many times has this NE team done it...Dallas, Miami, and Washington? 30+ points is okay abut 40+ isn't right? And whose rule is that? Who has the right to set the limit...you, Gibbs, the team being clobbered?

Please sorry but I'm just not buying any of this. It sounds like noting both sour grapes. I guess I can't change your opinion so I won't bother. I have no problem with it. I'm also a Red Sox fan and Celtics fan and the Yankees beat up on Boston 19-1 a couple of yars ago and I had no problem with it. A bunch of teams blew out the Celtics (Indiana Pacers I remember particularly) and never stopped until the final whistle and yet I had no problem with it too...well aside from being upset they lost obviously. These guys are paid millions yet you all sit there and cry for them that they are thoroughly beaten.

Funny.

You cannot sit there and tell a pro team when it is okay to stop playing/scoring. Are you their coach? Are you the one paying their check? For you to sit there and say well if they had stopped at 38? What right have you to say that really I'm curious?

Ah well to each his own. They're bullies, their classless, they run up the score. Would I want them to ease up?...quite possibly. Would I have a problem if they didn't?...not really. But to most neutrals it's sour grapes really.

Word of advice - suck it up; take the beat down like men, move on and hope that your team learns from it and grows into a team good enough to be able to beat an oppnent that badly even if they choose not to.


At least Gibbs never had to film the opposing teams signals.

Gibbs Superbowls were all fairly won. Bellicheck will always be questioned for whether he cheated or not.

Yes the Pats are good. Yes Brady is Hall of fame material.

We will never know how much the cheating helped Bellicheck.

Also the AFC championship game at Foxboro? The infamous tuck play?

Why on earth did no one ever hear of the tuck rule until the closing moments of the Raiders and Patriots AFC championship?

ITs funny how after seventy years of football the league introduces a new call , called the tuck rule in the middle of a critical AFC championship game? Any real football player knows that was a fumble.

Another coincidence is that the PAts win the Superbowl after the tragedy 9-11.

I never wanted to believe that Sports could be fixed. After the Raiders and Pats AFC championship game, my worst fears were confirmed. Indeed that any sporting event could be fixed.

I mean heck if it helped the whole Country and the morale of the citizens of the U.S.A then it was for the greater good. I was all for it.

Fast forward to present day. Now these Pats prance around like there poop dont stink. I tell you if it was me calling the defense for Washington on Sunday, I would have sent in non stop blitzing, hitting Brady regardless if the whistle was blown, the play was over, the ball was thrown already.
You see the old school teams would have punished a player for running up the score. I would have just taken the penalties and keep sending in the doggs hitting Brady with no mercy, regardless if he had the ball or not, or if the whistle blew.

I used to like the Pats , not anymore. The way they went about there selves on Sunday , I totally lost all respect for the Patriots and Bellicheck.

The nerve of these guys, after they were handed a fixed AFC championship, after the league found out that they had been cheating all these years.

Keep cheering for that fixed championship team.

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:27 am
by NE P
There you go reeling off uncomplimentary remarks then when the team uses it as motivation to be ruthless more folks will come back and whine.

It's all good though. The Patriots definitely cannot remain this good forever. Someday they will eventually get their asses handed to them badly (just like Indy and San Diego did in the recent past) and when they do they should have no complaints cos no one and that includes myself would listen to them.

I can understand you all feeling bad I really do. But I won't lie and say I understand why the hostility towards NE.

Why hasn't anyone answered...how many of you complained like this after the NE vs Dallas game? :lol:

Anyways I think I'm done here. Seems some of the arguments have become juvenile and makes no sense to me. Good luck with the skins. The good thing is NE still has to play Philly and the Giants so the skins should make the playoffs if they handle their business.

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 7:58 am
by welch
I don't have time to look up all the games NE P has mentioned, but here's the first:

Mursilis wrote:

Find one game where Gibbs was still calling bombs down the field up by 30+. ONE GAME.

http://redskinsgames.com/blog2/?p=43


"Tandler", the blogger, claims that Gibbs had Rypien throwing deep to run up the score on the swaggering Jerry Glanville Falcons. I don't think Tandler remembers that game.

In fact:

- Falcons kept calling blitz all day, and the Redskins squashed every one

- Rypien took himself out of the game about seven to ten minutes into the third quarter because the game was finished. He was within about ten yards of Sammy Baugh's all-time single game yardage record, but decided to stay out because the record wasn't important

- Jeff Rutledge replaced Rypien and completed the several TD passes on medium-to-short routes after the Falcons had thrown everyone into the blitz.

- Jerry Glanville, the idiot, ran up the score on his own team.

On the other '91 games, Gibbs went to the run. The point, of course, is that the clock stops after an incomplete pass, but keeps going on a run. Gibbs ran down the clock, controlled possession, got the game finished, limited the chance for Redskin injuries (fewer plays), and avoided humilating the opponent.

The common understanding in the NFL is that you always play someone again, and they remember.

I can't remember specifics of the '83 game, but someone with access to the Washington Post archives could explain what happened in each.

Would Redskin fans be bothered if the team ran up the score? George Allen did it in 1972 against the Giants, calling time out with about 30 seconds left and a first down inside the Giants 5. He ordered a Larry Brown run. Anyone watching on TV could see Billy Kilmer, the QB, saying "what???" as he trotted over to the sidelines -- QB's wore only one bar on their face mask then. Kilmer shook his head all the way back to the huddle. No, fans were not pleased to win by an extra 7 points.

On Belicheck: people know him. He was Parcells defensive coordinator in the mid-80's, then with the Patriots and Jets in the '90s. He is not a surprise. Yes, the video thing was a surprise, but otherwise there is nothing for anyone to learn.

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 9:29 am
by NE P
You're a funny guy. Yeah you do not have to look up all the games I mentioned. How convenient. These are just with the Skins. There are tons of other games with other teams. It's funny how you make all these conditions...yeah do this but don't do that. Anyone reading would think you're discussing pee wee football and not the grid iron. These guys claim to be men yet can't take a beat down like men? How many times have we seen these players choose to make a big hit when they could also just have easily tackled the opponent down? Is that classless too?

Did the Patriots not run the ball using a 4th string running back against Dallas in the previous game? Yet the same complaint. Besides in this game there was over 11 minutes remaining. Week 7, Cinci scored 21 points in the fourth quarter; Houston came back from almost 30 points by scoring 29 in the fourth also. NE took their foot off the pedal against Miami the previous week and they scored 14 late points. Yeah folks will say there was no coming back for Washington...perhaps but no one knows. As far as the Pats know, they cannot and do not have to take that risk if they don't want to. The same people condemning them now for not easing up will be the first to slam them for blowing the lead just like they did at Indy during the AFC title game.

Like I said you can never please everyone so why bother. If it were me coaching I'd do what I want and think is best for my team and not care about what anyone thinks...probably pull Brady earlier but definitely not ease up. Belichick has a responsibility to his team and chooses to keep them sharp, focused and ruthless leading up to its most challenging opponent who ironically had also just blown out its opponent on the road. Psychological warfare...perhaps, who knows. Folks may not like it but they have no right to chastise him for it. It's part of the rules. You may have a problem with it, others don't. It's relative. To each their own.

I'm not going to convince you guys to change your opinion but at the same time you have to understand the other side of things.

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 9:46 am
by BnGhog
NE P wrote: Let them play me hard like a man. I play sports and I take (and will continue to prefer to take) my beatings like a man...just as well as I issue them.

But hey, that's just me.

You may not like BB's style fair enough, but it's within the rules and it certainly works for him. And thus should not be held against him. It's totally unfair.



You're posts are total contradictions. I agree with what you say to let them play us hard and we will take it like men. But there is a big difference in the examples you are giving here.

Yes, thats what Gibbs has done before, calling for the long balls and playing them hard in the fourth. Put playing them hard is one thing, calling trick plays and doing everything you can to run up the score IS TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. Most of the time a three and out is a three and out but not to the Pats with a lead and in the fourth. Find me a time that Gibbs went for on fourth and 2 in the fourth.... He might have gone fourth and one in the fourth but games like against the eagles after the well known "Body Bag" game they played us was well deserved.

Your saying you think nothing is wrong with playing a team hard in the fourth and I agree. But I do think going that extra step to run up the score, is the same as having no dignity. Not only did they go for it in situations that (even if playing them hard and with the idea of they should just stop us) our D stoped them from converting on 3rd down and they had a fourth and 2. Any person with pride (even Gibbs in the games you mentioned) would have punted.

As if that wasnt enough the Pats used trickery on some BS play. Im talking about the fake kneel TD pass. Thats the cheapest thing I've ever seen. I have only seen a replay of another team doing this in the past, and in the interview with QB that did it, he said his coach called for the knee the QB changed the play out of spite for the other team. Thats pure disrespect, and surely something you would only see in Pee-Wee football now days. Why not do the old "wrong ball coach" play this week. You seen that one? Where the QB starts screeming "wrong ball coach", and center does a "side snap" to hand the ball to the QB, while the QB starts walking to sidelines telling the coach he needs a different ball. But before he gets their and when the other team is not paying attention, he takes off down field for a TD. I've only seen that one in Pee-wee also, and it too is cheap and a great play for Pats.

You use these plays when you can't find a way to score and nothing else has worked, its not staight up football and its not playing hard like men.

And yet you sit here and you call it "playing us straight up" and "playing us hard like men". I would have much more respect for the PATs and the Coach and Pats fans like you IF that were truly the case, but is not.

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 12:28 pm
by NE P
BnGhog wrote:
NE P wrote: Let them play me hard like a man. I play sports and I take (and will continue to prefer to take) my beatings like a man...just as well as I issue them.

But hey, that's just me.

You may not like BB's style fair enough, but it's within the rules and it certainly works for him. And thus should not be held against him. It's totally unfair.



You're posts are total contradictions. I agree with what you say to let them play us hard and we will take it like men. But there is a big difference in the examples you are giving here.

Yes, thats what Gibbs has done before, calling for the long balls and playing them hard in the fourth. Put playing them hard is one thing, calling trick plays and doing everything you can to run up the score IS TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. Most of the time a three and out is a three and out but not to the Pats with a lead and in the fourth. Find me a time that Gibbs went for on fourth and 2 in the fourth.... He might have gone fourth and one in the fourth but games like against the eagles after the well known "Body Bag" game they played us was well deserved.

Your saying you think nothing is wrong with playing a team hard in the fourth and I agree. But I do think going that extra step to run up the score, is the same as having no dignity. Not only did they go for it in situations that (even if playing them hard and with the idea of they should just stop us) our D stoped them from converting on 3rd down and they had a fourth and 2. Any person with pride (even Gibbs in the games you mentioned) would have punted.

As if that wasnt enough the Pats used trickery on some BS play. Im talking about the fake kneel TD pass. Thats the cheapest thing I've ever seen. I have only seen a replay of another team doing this in the past, and in the interview with QB that did it, he said his coach called for the knee the QB changed the play out of spite for the other team. Thats pure disrespect, and surely something you would only see in Pee-Wee football now days. Why not do the old "wrong ball coach" play this week. You seen that one? Where the QB starts screeming "wrong ball coach", and center does a "side snap" to hand the ball to the QB, while the QB starts walking to sidelines telling the coach he needs a different ball. But before he gets their and when the other team is not paying attention, he takes off down field for a TD. I've only seen that one in Pee-wee also, and it too is cheap and a great play for Pats.

You use these plays when you can't find a way to score and nothing else has worked, its not staight up football and its not playing hard like men.

And yet you sit here and you call it "playing us straight up" and "playing us hard like men". I would have much more respect for the PATs and the Coach and Pats fans like you IF that were truly the case, but is not.

Sorry not buying it. Trick plays are part of the game and exactly what it is - TRICK. Meaning a team uses it whenever they want to to fool their opponents. If they choose to use it when they're up, or when tir trailing it's their business. The essence of trick plays is to use it when least expected to improve our chances of them working. As a pro team out there playing, you should be expecting anything - that includes the expected and the unexpected.

Yeah Gibbs may have punted, that's his style which he is entitled to. Doesn't mean it's the right call; doesn't mean it's the wrong call either; and it certainly doesn't mean everyone including Belichick has to have the same style and do it that way. All the options within the rules are there for coaches and teams and players, and it is left for them to choose the one they prefer. That's the beauty of sports. Each coach/team/player has its style...and the person whose style works the best is left standing at the end. Now you say he should've punted; someone else said he should've ran the ball; another says he should've kicked a field goal; others said he should've taken a knee. See like I said, damned if you do; damned if you don't. personally I feel no matter what Belichick had done there, he would've gotten grief cos he isn't very well licked. That's why he shouldn't and probably didn't give a damn and just played.

It's fine if you prefer a different tactic when comfortably ahead...not every team has to play that way and I don't believe they should be criticized for it either. It's within the rules and fair.

Sorry but it is what it is. All I see here is sour grapes. One excuse after another.

Personally I think NE did the skins a favor. Now next time they step on the field they would be as best prepared as they can ever be and be prepared for anything from their opponents including what they don't expect them to do. That's football...in fact, that's sports.