Page 45 of 54
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:10 pm
by skinsfanno9
Hey wow! What an idea! Pass to the WRs!
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:10 pm
by cvillehog
Why can't we do this in the first 6 minutes instead of the last?
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:11 pm
by Skinsfan55
18, I say again, 18 yards.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:11 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
Skinsfan55 wrote:Guys, Brunell just threw for 10 yards... let's show some goddang respect.

U guys are making this game a lot easier to bear.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:11 pm
by vtfootball07
GibbSkins wrote:i cant remember when ive watched such a poor purformance from this team
It feels like it hasn't been since the Spurrier days. Heck, the defense is the only reason why we are only losing by 17 right now.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:11 pm
by Champsturf
GibbSkins wrote:i cant remember when ive watched such a poor purformance from this team
Last year, same time and place. But we made a miraculous comeback.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:11 pm
by Mursilis
Good night all, although who can sleep at 0-2?!?
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:11 pm
by thaiphoon
Why can't we do this in the first 6 minutes instead of the last?
Garbage time ... they are giving us the short stuff
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:11 pm
by spenser
So now we're going on SEVEN straight LOSSES! Last year in seattle, 4 preseason games and 2 games this year. IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE!
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:11 pm
by RedskinsFreak
Brunell's in triple digits -- 107 yards
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:11 pm
by jnywlkrvt
alright so sitting here i will look at things from both sides. Skins line has not been able to hold up thus giving brunell little time to throw. however, when brunell has had time he still goes quick to that short dump or swing pass, or throws it into the ground yards short of a receiver or behind. o-line or a cry for campbell
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:11 pm
by skinsfanno9
Chris Luva Luva wrote:HAHA, our offense can't even hold.

No kidding. This is pretty damn poor when our Oline has to work on holding drills!
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:11 pm
by SCSkinsFan
Are the Pukes just playing soft now?
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:11 pm
by Smithian
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Smithian wrote:Great job Brunell.
You're worse than I ever even dreamed.
I seriously miss Shane Matthews and Danny Wuerfell.
LOL, thats a new low.
Is Tony Banks available?
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:11 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
We have to score and go for 2. And try to get the ball back and score for 2 mre...
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:12 pm
by HitDoctor
Here is a dose of truth: We can't win with Brunell (Everyone knows that now, I hope) so why not prep the rookie?
Better yet, how about Gibbs dusting off the gameplan that was used during the winning streak last year?
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:12 pm
by thaiphoon
Last year, same time and place. But we made a miraculous comeback.
We also were only down 2 scores ... not 3... our Defense was palying better and so was our O-line ...
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:12 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
Smithian wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:Smithian wrote:Great job Brunell.
You're worse than I ever even dreamed.
I seriously miss Shane Matthews and Danny Wuerfell.
LOL, thats a new low.
Is Tony Banks available?
..you can do better.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:12 pm
by Steve Spurrier III
Chris Luva Luva wrote:We have to score and go for 2. And try to get the ball back and score for 2 mre...
Wow.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:12 pm
by RedskinsFreak
Chris Luva Luva wrote:We have to score and go for 2. And try to get the ball back and score for 2 mre...
And still kick a field goal
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:12 pm
by Champsturf
RedskinsFreak wrote:Brunell's in triple digits -- 107 yards
Thanks to Moss and his YAC.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:12 pm
by vtfootball07
what are we doing running the ball? Also, why do we seldom seem to use more than a 2 WR set during the rest of the game?
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:12 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
thaiphoon wrote:Last year, same time and place. But we made a miraculous comeback.
We also were only down 2 scores ... not 3... our Defense was palying better and so was our O-line ...
Explain this 2 me.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:13 pm
by Smithian
Loser QB.
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:13 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
THEY TOOK A TIME OUTT!!!!! A TIME OUT!!!!! THE DEFENSE NEEDS THAT TIME OUIT!!!!!!! OMG