Page 42 of 54

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:59 pm
by CPallDAY08
getemmj wrote:
The Hogster wrote:Can't blame the playcalling.....Brunell is the evil doer.


Im blaming everything. The whole team looked sorry except for Scott Frost lol. Thats how terrible this game has been.


whos scott?

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:59 pm
by dnpmakkah
getemmj wrote:Man im really glad we didn't show all the teams our real offense in preseason
I know. Just imagine how much they would have sucked if they did. Yikes.

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:00 pm
by Champsturf
The Hogster wrote:Mark Brunell....is making me eat all of my support for him...he looks terrible.


Where is Redeemedskin? He's completely behind Brunell. He can help you hold on to your FAITH. LOL

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:00 pm
by thaiphoon
It takes time to learn saunders playbook. 1-2 isnt a terrible start look at last year.


While I agree it takes time ot learn it... isn't that what offseason activities and minicamps are supposed to do ??? Additionally, we won our first two games last year

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:00 pm
by Steve Spurrier III
getemmj wrote: The whole team looked sorry except for Scott Frost lol.


Scott Frost! I bet he's available to play quarterback.

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:00 pm
by dnpmakkah
thaiphoon wrote:I vote for 82
Like the show Price is Right I will say 83.01 please.

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:00 pm
by Champsturf
fleetus wrote:Yeah, well, when we start taking defensive advice from Chris Wussman Collinsworth, we really will suck.


And it's going to be any worse than this?

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:01 pm
by spenser
CPallDAY08 wrote:It takes time to learn saunders playbook. 1-2 isnt a terrible start look at last year.


Yes new OC and system does take time.... so if we are going to suck while we learn it, why suck with a 36 year old, tired legged, weak armed QB instead of the guy we gave up PICKS in the draft to get and who in Joe Gibbs own words "is ready to play". If hes ready to play.. then play him!

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:01 pm
by snyder_is_the_devil
YOU CAN'T WIN WHEN YOU CHANGE YOUR COACHING STAFF, OFFENSIVE SYSTEM, AND SKILL PLAYERS EVERY YEAR. HISTORY IS CLEAR ON THIS. THE BEST TEAMS ARE THE ONES WHO HAVE BEEN TOGETHER THE LONGEST UNDER THE SAME SYSTEM. WITH SNYDER AS THE OWNER, WE HAVE NO CHANCE AT GOING TO THE NEXT LEVEL.

BUT I STILL LOVE THE REDSKINS!!!!

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:01 pm
by thaiphoon
Ok I realize the D is tired ...but no reason to tackle so poorly like that

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:01 pm
by The Hogster
Champsturf wrote:
The Hogster wrote:Mark Brunell....is making me eat all of my support for him...he looks terrible.


Where is Redeemedskin? He's completely behind Brunell. He can help you hold on to your FAITH. LOL


I held on for as long as I could.....still support him because he's our QB...but he is showing signs of sucking really bad. Over the hill type performance.

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:01 pm
by vtfootball07
air_hog wrote:
vtfootball07 wrote:
air_hog wrote:Um, okay our O-Line is getting Dominated.


Period.

The line isn't even close to getting dominated. Brunell easily had three seconds there to get the pass off. 3 seconds in the NFL is about as good as you will get. Unfortunately, their d-line doesn't give 7 seconds like ours does.


What, first off Samules is scared of DeMarcus Ware

Second, Dallas just rushed 4 linemne to our 5, and Mark got sandwhiched.

First, I could care less if they are only rushing 3 lineman. What do you say when we blitz 6 and can't get a sack. Why didn't we just get a sack on Bledsoe? Bledsoe ran backwards. Did Brunell, or did he not step up on every single sack from today. He is stepping into the sandwich. I am not saying that Samuels is playing well, but you can't tell me that Brunell is putting on a show.

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:01 pm
by cvillehog
Two late bombs won't save us today, guys.

Over a beer, would Joe explain his committment to Brunell?

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:01 pm
by davidrainboy
What does he see in the fellow to justify 3 years of immobility? This cannot be blamed on learning the new offense.

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:01 pm
by Mursilis
Champsturf wrote:
The Hogster wrote:Mark Brunell....is making me eat all of my support for him...he looks terrible.


Where is Redeemedskin? He's completely behind Brunell. He can help you hold on to your FAITH. LOL


BossHog was also on Brunell's payroll. Guess he likes losing. Maybe he's a closet Cowboys fan?!?

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:01 pm
by SCSkinsFan
Guess our D has quit playing too. No heartbeat visible tonight.

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:01 pm
by ryanw7196
I find it extremely hard to believe that our recievers have NOT been getting open at all this entire game... i know brunell hasnt had a ton of time but isnt saunders offense supposed to incorporate lots of quick passes... i dont think any of us have a clue whats going on right now

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:02 pm
by Donkey McDonkerton
ARE is probably our best option at Qb right now....haha

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:02 pm
by Steve Spurrier III
Man, they have a real kicker and everything!

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:02 pm
by thaiphoon
Like the show Price is Right I will say 83.01 please.


Curses ... foiled again !!!

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:02 pm
by CPallDAY08
icing on the cake.

Oh well, atleast we have Houston next week.

gg all

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:02 pm
by ii7-V7
We are being outcoached, and outplayed in every aspect of this game!

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:03 pm
by Smithian
My hate for Brunell and everything assosciated for him is sick. I am seriously so sick of him it makes me at times not want to watch the Redskins. Were going down flopping.

I love Gibbs, but until Gibbs is retired, Brunell will start.

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:03 pm
by thaiphoon
Oh well, atleast we have Houston next week.


At this rate .. don't bet the house on the Skins ...

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:03 pm
by vtfootball07
snyder_is_the_devil wrote:YOU CAN'T WIN WHEN YOU CHANGE YOUR COACHING STAFF, OFFENSIVE SYSTEM, AND SKILL PLAYERS EVERY YEAR. HISTORY IS CLEAR ON THIS. THE BEST TEAMS ARE THE ONES WHO HAVE BEEN TOGETHER THE LONGEST UNDER THE SAME SYSTEM. WITH SNYDER AS THE OWNER, WE HAVE NO CHANCE AT GOING TO THE NEXT LEVEL.

BUT I STILL LOVE THE REDSKINS!!!!


Get over yourself, dude. Snyder is not the problem at the current time. He didn't turn to Gibbs and say "these are the players on my wish list". It was the exact opposite arrangement. Snyder's willingness to spend is the reason why hopes get so high. But still, please at least make the effort to note that Gibbs wanted to bring all these people in.