Page 5 of 17
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 7:35 am
by Deadskins
But Darth, hyperbole is so much more fun than statistics like those.

Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:37 am
by tribeofjudah
Countertrey wrote:
TREY...........love it....!!! That's going on facebook
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 11:12 pm
by DarthMonk
Deadskins wrote:But Darth, hyperbole is so much more fun than statistics like those.

True. So is gambling on onside kicks with too much time, huh bro?
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 9:54 pm
by tribeofjudah
We know about the current class warfare in this country: rich vs. poor..........young vs. old.........next: children vs. parents....??? (it happens now)
This was the same RIPE recipe that supported Chairman Mao as he turned China upside down. As it happened: no school for months, death to the teachers, professors, doctors, the educated.....country and economy in ruins....WAKE UP FOLKS...!!!
I hope that this great country WILL REBOUND from this disastrous direction - off the cliff. May God save us all....!!!
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:17 pm
by Countertrey
When GWB added 4 trillion to the Deficit, Obama declared that he was unpatriotic, unAmerican as a result... Obama is currently reigning over a 16 Trillion deficit. Can he explain why he is not unpatriotic and unAmerican?
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:18 pm
by Countertrey
Why does Obama have time for his rumpswabs at the View... but not for Bebe Netanyahu?
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:03 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
Can anyone explain to me whytf Romney is the republican candidate? I don't think trump would be much better, but ya he would have been an upgrade... The best choice imo was Paul. Glad the reps shot their hopes in the foot by electing the worst debator, least likeable, most out of touch, foolish millionaire of the whole lot. Hating gays, lower class, and hispanics (along with the democrats and Obama supporters) should make this election a landslide....
Of course, I'm not so naive to think the Florida scandal of bush2s first term isn't a possibility.. and the good ol trusty electoral college aught to keep things interesting
2400!!!

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 10:33 am
by Cappster
tribeofjudah wrote:We know about the current class warfare in this country: rich vs. poor..........young vs. old.........next: children vs. parents....??? (it happens now)
This was the same RIPE recipe that supported Chairman Mao as he turned China upside down. As it happened: no school for months, death to the teachers, professors, doctors, the educated.....country and economy in ruins....WAKE UP FOLKS...!!!
I hope that this great country WILL REBOUND from this disastrous direction - off the cliff. May God save us all....!!!
If God will save us all then why worry? In essence, if God is in control, it doesn't matter who is elected as the entity will fix all problems within our country. Bahahaha. Anyway, Romney would be wise just to shut up as he is making himself look really foolish here lately. Well, more foolish than usual, but he is the one doing the most damage to his campaign. Not that I am complaining.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 2:16 pm
by Bob 0119
Let's see;
We elected a "community organizer" from one of the most corrupt cities in the western world with no business experience, very little political experience, who made ridiculous promises that most people should have known weren't possible. A man who was supposed to be "post partisan" when his record showed him to be radically partisan even by democrat standards. A man that was supposed to be "post-racial" but in nearly everything he's done he's only flamed racial tensions; not eased them (the police acted stupidly, my son would look like Treyvon, etc.). We ignored his comments about "wealth redistribution" and his plan that would make energy prices "necessarily skyrocket" because (and I'm quoting a friend here) "it would be cool to finally have a black president".
Then you have Romney. While most Republicans are concerned about "Romneycare" there are many differences in the man. He's a Successful Republican Governor in a largely democrat State. He has had to work with a democrat controlled state legislature which already shows he is more bi-partisan than Obama. He understands business and how businesses work and think because he's run them, and really, what is the President if not the CEO of our country? He may not be as Right wing as some would like, and he may be too extreme for others, but the fact is he has had FAR more experience being a leader. For nearly every bad thing you can say about Romney, you can say the same (and in many cases worse) things about Obama.
But what do I know, I'm just a racist
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 5:39 pm
by SkinsJock
I live in RI and even though this is a "Democrat" state like MA, I will be voting for Romney
I did vote for Obama in 2008 - I thought he would do what he said - HE DID NOT - mainly because of the idiots that make up his oarty
I remember guys like Tip O'neill and politicians on both sides making things happen - I really think the trouble in Washington started when a few Democratic leaders (Pelosi & co) stated that "the 'people' have spoken and they want us to take over here and we are going to do that ... "
This country ONLY has to look at what has happened and what was promised - we are NOT better off
simple really - Romney might not be a better President than Obama but I really doubt that we'll be better off staying with the group that is behind Obama for 4 more years - those idiot politicians are the reason that Obama should go
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 12:12 am
by tribeofjudah
Again I want to ask, is this the TRUTH about Obama...???
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-HqHSkY ... re=related
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 1:17 am
by Bob 0119
I don't know how much of that video is Obama (I've heard a lot of those)
Here's some that I know are him
Obama: I believe in redistribution of Wealth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0PUUpa5X4E&sns=em
Obama: spread the wealth around
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoqI5PSRcXM&sns=em
Obama: Under my plan, electricity prices would necessarily skyrocket
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlTxGHn4sH4&sns=em
Obama: making some kind of vague promise to the Russians of "doing more" after this his "last election". The only reason I can come up with for this is because he knows that whatever he is offering to do will be wildly unpopular with the American public, but after he no longer has to care what we think, he can"do more".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNxEDomUlXw&sns=em
Obama: you didn't build that
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKjPI6no5ng&sns=em
I didn't even post his 57-states video or the "uh" press conference
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 3:17 am
by Deadskins
To be fair, most of those are misleading, Bob.
Obama: I believe in redistribution of Wealth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0PUUpa5X4E&sns=em
This was in '98. He was talking about Chicago public housing and schools, and he never actually says those words. He says "I believe in a redistribution at some level." It's never clear from the snippet, that he is talking about wealth.
Obama: spread the wealth around
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoqI5PSRcXM&sns=em
This is the most damning, but you don't hear the whole conversation. He does say "It's not that I want to punish your success, I just want to make sure that everyone who is behind you, that they've got a chance at success too." While he's saying this, the camera is on him, and you can see that the words are synced with his jaw and lip movement. But when the line "I think, when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody" comes, the camera is not on him. When it comes back to focus on him at the tail end of the sentence, the same thing is not true. The words, and his jaw/lip movement are nowhere close to being in sync.
Obama: Under my plan, electricity prices would necessarily skyrocket
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlTxGHn4sH4&sns=em
Yes, he says those words, but the context is everything. He says power plants will have to make changes to cap carbon emissions and that they would pass those costs on to consumers.
Obama: making some kind of vague promise to the Russians of "doing more" after this his "last election". The only reason I can come up with for this is because he knows that whatever he is offering to do will be wildly unpopular with the American public, but after he no longer has to care what we think, he can"do more".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNxEDomUlXw&sns=em
He says he will have "more flexibility" after his last election. I don't see how this is any different than any other 2nd term president.
Obama: you didn't build that
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKjPI6no5ng&sns=em
Again, out of context. He's saying that if you are successful, you had help somewhere along the way. He even talks about some teacher from your childhood, maybe being that help.
I'm no Obama fan, and I think he's a puppet of the same people who pull the strings for presidents of both parties, but none of those are the damning evidence you're making them out to be.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 11:50 am
by cowboykillerzRGiii
All you need to do is turn on gma every day to see the latest retard remark ya boy twit Romney has said to shoot his campaign in the foot... Again.
The airplane window ish? "id win if I were Hispanic" rant... WOW. SNL couldn't burn him more then he does himself.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 12:14 pm
by Deadskins
Not sure this country is ready for a Mormon president.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 12:48 pm
by KazooSkinsFan
I haven't voted Republican since 1988. I will pull the red lever this time without flinching because the Democrats have stopped toying with Marxism and are now the real thing.
You don't have to know you're a Marxist to be one. My standard would be the planks of the Manifesto, which is the planks of the Democratic party platform.
Winston Churchill: The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries. Obama's certainly shown the equal sharing of miseries. That would be except of course the political elites. Obama, Pelosi, Reid, they aren't suffering at all.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 12:49 pm
by KazooSkinsFan
Deadskins wrote:Not sure this country is ready for a Mormon president.
Funny how the only ones who bring up this point are the tolerant left, isn't it?
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 1:40 pm
by Deadskins
KazooSkinsFan wrote:Deadskins wrote:Not sure this country is ready for a Mormon president.
Funny how the only ones who bring up this point are the tolerant left, isn't it?
It's an observation, not a critique.
BTW, I didn't vote for Obama in 2008, and I don't plan to this year either. I know that doesn't fit with your misperceptions of me, but you will believe what you want anyway, just like you always have.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 2:02 pm
by langleyparkjoe
Deadskins wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:Deadskins wrote:Not sure this country is ready for a Mormon president.
Funny how the only ones who bring up this point are the tolerant left, isn't it?
It's an observation, not a critique.

BTW, I didn't vote for Obama in 2008, and I don't plan to this year either. I know that doesn't fit with your misperceptions of me, but you will believe what you want anyway, just like you always have.
Smack Section looks very promising again.

Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 2:03 pm
by langleyparkjoe
SPAM MOMENT- Haaaail to the Redskiiiinnnnss.. haaaail victorrrryyyyy...
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 2:08 pm
by Deadskins
KazooSkinsFan wrote:I haven't voted Republican since 1988. I will pull the red lever this time without flinching because the Democrats have stopped toying with Marxism and are now the real thing.
If you had the strength of your libertarian convictions, then voting for Romney would be just as abhorent.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 2:25 pm
by KazooSkinsFan
Deadskins wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:I haven't voted Republican since 1988. I will pull the red lever this time without flinching because the Democrats have stopped toying with Marxism and are now the real thing.
If you had the strength of your libertarian convictions, then voting for Romney would be just as abhorent.
Wow, you know what my convictions are better then I do. Next time I won't tell you what I think, I'll ask the expert...
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 2:25 pm
by KazooSkinsFan
langleyparkjoe wrote:SPAM MOMENT- Haaaail to the Redskiiiinnnnss.. haaaail victorrrryyyyy...
Nobody cracks me up as frequently as you do, Langley
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 2:41 pm
by Deadskins
KazooSkinsFan wrote:Deadskins wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:I haven't voted Republican since 1988. I will pull the red lever this time without flinching because the Democrats have stopped toying with Marxism and are now the real thing.
If you had the strength of your libertarian convictions, then voting for Romney would be just as abhorent.
Wow, you know what my convictions are better then I do. Next time I won't tell you what I think, I'll ask the expert...
Well you certainly state them often enough.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 2:51 pm
by langleyparkjoe
KazooSkinsFan wrote:langleyparkjoe wrote:SPAM MOMENT- Haaaail to the Redskiiiinnnnss.. haaaail victorrrryyyyy...
Nobody cracks me up as frequently as you do, Langley

I just try to do my part Kazo...remember, we're all Skins fans 1st