ATX_Skins wrote:The difference between Campbell and McNabb is McNabb can win this game from 14 down...
The difference between Campbell and McNabb is that the former is not a redskin and the latter is. Again, Campbell wasn't the answer for sure, but he sure as hell wasn't the problem around here.
Oakland seems to think he is the problem bacause his ass got benched.
ATX_Skins wrote:The difference between Campbell and McNabb is McNabb can win this game from 14 down...
The difference between Campbell and McNabb is that the former is not a redskin and the latter is. Again, Campbell wasn't the answer for sure, but he sure as hell wasn't the problem around here.
Oakland seems to think he is the problem bacause his ass got benched.
Good point. Oakland has been such a high caliber team for so long, until Campbell got under center and screwed up their superbowl run this year. What was I thinking?
"That's a clown question, bro" - - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman "But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man That he didn't, didn't already have" - - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
ATX_Skins wrote:The difference between Campbell and McNabb is McNabb can win this game from 14 down...
The difference between Campbell and McNabb is that the former is not a redskin and the latter is. Again, Campbell wasn't the answer for sure, but he sure as hell wasn't the problem around here.
Oakland seems to think he is the problem bacause his ass got benched.
Good point. Oakland has been such a high caliber team for so long, until Campbell got under center and screwed up their superbowl run this year. What was I thinking?
I apologize, I didn't realize I was speaking with an apparent die hard Auburn fan. The only feasible excuse for coming to that losers defense.
I never said he was THE problem, you assumed. What I said was Campbell could not lead this team from 14 back, or make that throw to Santana because it was more than 20 yards. If you want to discuss this further open a thread in smack talk after the game.