Page 5 of 11

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:44 pm
by brad7686
well that one was ok lol

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:44 pm
by DaSkins24
These officials are blatantly cheating.

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:45 pm
by 1niksder
brad7686 wrote:
Champsturf wrote:
brad7686 wrote:this is why you can't throw to moss
:roll:


What? You think his hands are good?

What do you think

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:45 pm
by Champsturf
brad7686 wrote:
Champsturf wrote:
brad7686 wrote:this is why you can't throw to moss
:roll:


What? You think his hands are good?
To say you can't throw to your #1 receiver is flat out moronic. I don't care if you think he's worthy of being a #1 or not.

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:46 pm
by RedskinsFreak
Nice to Caldwell!

:16 and a time out ..... at least two shots to the end zone here.

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:46 pm
by Countertrey
Reche Caldwell needs to remain a 'skin

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:47 pm
by RedskinsFreak
Well, a big Betts run forces the time out and forces a pass call from the 3 with :09 left.

Cooley will be covered. I'm going for Sellers.

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:47 pm
by 1niksder
Countertrey wrote:Reche Caldwell needs to remain a 'skin

Yes he does

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:47 pm
by RedskinsFreak
Betts would have been toast

Bad play call. That one had to be straight into the end zone.

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:48 pm
by Champsturf
Is Collins so immobile that he can't even roll out? Not calling rollouts hurts this team.

Wow...stupid play call there. Glad Betts dropped it.

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:48 pm
by brad7686
Champsturf wrote:
brad7686 wrote:
Champsturf wrote:
brad7686 wrote:this is why you can't throw to moss
:roll:


What? You think his hands are good?
To say you can't throw to your #1 receiver is flat out moronic. I don't care if you think he's worthy of being a #1 or not.


I don't even consider him the #1, so i don't see how its moronic to say that.

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:49 pm
by NYFINESTSKINSFAN
Will Dallas pull out their 1st string?

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:49 pm
by Champsturf
brad7686 wrote:
Champsturf wrote:
brad7686 wrote:
Champsturf wrote:
brad7686 wrote:this is why you can't throw to moss
:roll:


What? You think his hands are good?
To say you can't throw to your #1 receiver is flat out moronic. I don't care if you think he's worthy of being a #1 or not.


I don't even consider him the #1, so i don't see how its moronic to say that.
Try looking at the depth chart Coach :wink: Also, nice to see you weren't even able to READ my entire post.

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:49 pm
by brad7686
I love how TO's injury proved my romo hype bashing to all my friends

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:50 pm
by Countertrey
brad7686 wrote:
Champsturf wrote:
brad7686 wrote:
Champsturf wrote:
brad7686 wrote:this is why you can't throw to moss
:roll:


What? You think his hands are good?
To say you can't throw to your #1 receiver is flat out moronic. I don't care if you think he's worthy of being a #1 or not.


I don't even consider him the #1, so i don't see how its moronic to say that.


Guess that's why Gibbs doesn't consult you. :roll:

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:50 pm
by brad7686
Champsturf wrote:
brad7686 wrote:
Champsturf wrote:
brad7686 wrote:
Champsturf wrote:
brad7686 wrote:this is why you can't throw to moss
:roll:


What? You think his hands are good?
To say you can't throw to your #1 receiver is flat out moronic. I don't care if you think he's worthy of being a #1 or not.


I don't even consider him the #1, so i don't see how its moronic to say that.
Try looking at the depth chart Coach :wink: Also, nice to see you weren't even able to READ my entire post.


No you said he is the number 1, I said I don't consider him that, so in my case it would not be moronic.

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:51 pm
by Champsturf
LOL...again you can't read the entire post...I give up ](*,) ](*,)

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:52 pm
by brad7686
Champsturf wrote:LOL...again you can't read the entire post...I give up


No I read your post, I just don't think you get what i'm saying.

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:52 pm
by Countertrey
Didn't Dallas already decline???

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:52 pm
by RedskinsFreak
brad7686 wrote:No you said he is the number 1, I said I don't consider him that, so in my case it would not be moronic.
It's hardly open to your -- or anyone's -- consideration.

The team says he's #1, so he is.

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:52 pm
by please_remain_calm
Countertrey wrote:Didn't Dallas already decline???


Yep.

Phillips is such an ass.

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:53 pm
by RedskinsFreak
This is bizarre ....

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:53 pm
by DaSkins24
Only Dallas can decline a penalty then reverse their call.

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:53 pm
by brad7686
haha

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:54 pm
by Countertrey
That was complete bull... Where is the explanation???