Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:56 pm
welch wrote:TO GB
Hoss, you just scared me. First glance, and I thought "TD"...wew!!!
Sorry, next time I'll wrirte T/O
Sorry, next time I'll wrirte T/O
The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
Official Packers @ Redskins Gameday Thread
Page 5 of 23
Sorry, next time I'll wrirte T/O
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:56 pm
How do they not give possesion to EL?
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:57 pm
They need to review the last play, looks like ARE had equal possion of the ball.
Damn
Damn
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:57 pm
How does Moss not catch that ball?? No excuse for that on his part.
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:57 pm
I know the ball is wet, but what's happened to Moss?
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:57 pm
When did Moss get hands of stone?
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:57 pm
I thought ARE had poession as they went down
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:58 pm
That official was a little quick in giving possesion to GB. He didnt even look twice.
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:58 pm
Since I cant watch the game... it seems that Moss is dropping balls... what the hell is that about?
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:59 pm
Hoss wrote:They need to review the last play, looks like ARE had equal possion of the ball.
Damn
Not a reviewable play
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:59 pm
I call Shenanagins
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:00 pm
good job d
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:00 pm
Nice job of the defense by forcing a 3 and out after the turnover
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:00 pm
GB to punt...comon skins get fired up!
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:00 pm
DaSkins24 wrote:That official was a little quick in giving possesion to GB. He didnt even look twice.
That bites my arse! The officals need to look at the play especially TOs.
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:01 pm
prior to kick, holding on GB, ball on roughly the 46
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:01 pm
Are running game looks good so far right?
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:01 pm
Looks like Lloyd may be coming in after the timeout
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:02 pm
Nice field postition
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:02 pm
dmwc wrote:Are running game looks good so far right?
Looks ok. Running outside is working better than inside. Portis has gotten almost all of the touches so far. Perhaps Gibbs finally realized that CP and Betts aren't interchangeable.
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:03 pm
dmwc wrote:Are running game looks good so far right?
Not bad....40 yds so far and 97 passing
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:03 pm
CanesSkins26 wrote:dmwc wrote:Are running game looks good so far right?
Looks ok. Running outside is working better than inside. Portis has gotten almost all of the touches so far. Perhaps Gibbs finally realized that CP and Betts aren't interchangeable.
I guess not but it is still good to have both... Betts more of the between the tackles guy, I think
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:03 pm
Campbell sacked
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:04 pm
Time for the offensive line to step up
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:04 pm
Wade is having all sorts of problems with Campman.