The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Posted: **Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:21 pm**

ATTENTION!

My spelling sucks.

Anyone know where I can get some red squiggly lines?

:feedback;

Posted: **Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:25 pm**

Download Firefox from mozilla.com. It has tabbed browsing like IE7. Fios was correct in that it's a FF thing and not a Windoez thing. Although Im not sure if IE7 offers it or not. I know IE6 doesn't.

Posted: **Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:48 pm**

Chris Luva Luva wrote:Download Firefox from mozilla.com. It has tabbed browsing like IE7. Fios was correct in that it's a FF thing and not a Windoez thing. Although Im not sure if IE7 offers it or not. I know IE6 doesn't.

Regardless, no one should use IE as it is. Too much spyware, viruses, popups, etc. gets through. Firefox is far more secure, especially if you download a few of the extensions for it.

And, as Chris and Fios have pointed out, Firefox will put the red 'misspelled' line under words in dialogue boxes. A right click and it will give you correction options. Very handy.

Posted: **Fri Jun 22, 2007 4:23 pm**

You give me a bunch of crap for mispelling a word, yet you've all been cheating the whole time. I see how it is.

:lol:

I installed Firefox. Thanks guys!

BTW - Vista does have some nice features to it, once you get familiar with it.

Posted: **Fri Jun 22, 2007 4:30 pm**

Fios wrote:WE MUST SIGN THIS GUY GIVE HIM ELEVENTY BILLION DOLLARS

QFT

Posted: **Mon Jul 09, 2007 1:20 pm**

What's the latest on Keenan? Is he still up in the air about choosing between skins and texans??

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2007 6:08 am**

Keenan is old. We don't need another old fart past his prime. We are going to build what we have.

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:05 am**

If we need Keenan because he is a Vet then why didn't we hold on to David Patton?

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:58 am**

BnGhog wrote:If we need Keenan because he is a Vet then why didn't we hold on to David Patton?

Do you really not know the answer to that question?

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2007 11:08 am**

Fios wrote:
BnGhog wrote:If we need Keenan because he is a Vet then why didn't we hold on to David Patton?

Do you really not know the answer to that question?

Do YOU really not know the answer to that question? :lol:

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2007 11:16 am**

Countertrey wrote:
Fios wrote:
BnGhog wrote:If we need Keenan because he is a Vet then why didn't we hold on to David Patton?

Do you really not know the answer to that question?

Do YOU really not know the answer to that question?

Er .... of course I know ... it's ... I gotta go!

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:19 pm**

I repeat. This is a "makeup" for drafting Desmond Who and dropping McCardell way, way back when Sammy Baugh was QB and players wore leather helmets. Isn't it?

Anybody remember the guy we drafted...Desmond Who...looked like the Heisman statue...couldn't remember pass routes...Baugh told Cliff Battles to kick his head in until he learned to play...came and went ...in and out of the NFL...long, long ago.

(Or am I just stubbornly refusing to remember Desmond because it's too painful?? :wink:

)

Posted: **Mon Jul 23, 2007 8:03 pm**

Keenan McCardell/LaRon Landry Update

Heard the veteran WR has agreed to terms with Houston, as expected. The Skins had some serious interest in him, but only at the right price - the vet. min. He lives in Houston and if he was going to sign anywhere for that kind of money it was going to be there.

The Redskins WR group, to me, leaves much to be desired despite all the money they have spent at that position. There isn't much size there and we'll see if Lloyd or Randle El can be anything close to a productive No. 2 WR this season. Nothing in the past production says they can.

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/redskins ... v=rss_blog

Posted: **Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:59 am**

Keenan McCardell denied reports Monday that he was joining the Texans. McCardell said he hasn't agreed to terms with the Texans or any other team. He said he hasn't even spoken to the Texans in a week. While McCardell continues weighing offers from several teams, Texans coach Gary Kubiak said he remains hopeful that eventually the veteran wide receiver will choose the Texans.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/spo ... 92530.html

Posted: **Tue Jul 24, 2007 10:33 pm**

1- Should have never gotten rid of him in the first place.

2- We have veteran leadership at the WR position.

3- Mike "WHY DON'T THEY RESPECT MY SKILLS" Espy!!!!!!!!!

P.S. If we need a body so bad...where did we send that nasty white boy Jimmy Farris?

Posted: **Wed Jul 25, 2007 4:27 pm**

Houston Texans: Keenan McCardell signed

http://nfl.com/transactions

Posted: **Wed Jul 25, 2007 9:00 pm**

Now begins the ripping of the Redskins for even considering this signing

Posted: **Wed Jul 25, 2007 9:05 pm**

Fios wrote:Now begins the ripping of the Redskins for even considering this signing

Let them hate. Who cares? We are critcised if we do and we are if we dont. I, for one, am happy with our WR group. If Campbell is fine, our receivers will be too.

The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Keenan McCardell?