Cooley

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
skinsfan#33
#33
#33
Posts: 4084
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:44 am

Post by skinsfan#33 »

Red_One43 wrote:This is what trade rumors can do to a players concentration

—Chris Cooley caught a pass, took a few steps, and got the ball stripped away. That’s two fumbles in two days for him.


For whatever the reason, that doesn't look good for Cooley.


I wouldn't say so. It isn't like he has had fumble issues in the past. He has put the ball on the ground 11 years in his eight years, but only lost 4 fumbles. That is pretty incredible considering how hard he fights for yards.
Last edited by skinsfan#33 on Wed Aug 01, 2012 2:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren

"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier

RIP James Oliver Rigney, Jr. 1948-2007
cowboykillerzRGiii
CKRGiii
CKRGiii
Posts: 7010
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:56 pm
Location: 505 New Mexico repn

Post by cowboykillerzRGiii »

That is one helluva stat... So long as his knee legs etc are working up to par the other football stuff will fall into place imo
#21 forever in our hearts
“I wanted to just… put his lights out ….because, you know, …Dallas sucks…” - Dexter Manley
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

Someone posted yesterday that Cooley got stripped twice but no one should read into that.

If a lesser player like Byrd or Quinn get stripped, then they have a problem b/c they're trying to make the roster.

No way we cut Cooley. Just doesn't make sense as a football team unless his knees are SHOT.
User avatar
Red_One43
Hog
Posts: 4609
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:31 pm
Location: D.C.

Post by Red_One43 »

frankcal20 wrote:Someone posted yesterday that Cooley got stripped twice but no one should read into that.

If a lesser player like Byrd or Quinn get stripped, then they have a problem b/c they're trying to make the roster.

No way we cut Cooley. Just doesn't make sense as a football team unless his knees are SHOT.


I agree that no way Cooley gets cut, but do they ask him to take a pay cut?
User avatar
Red_One43
Hog
Posts: 4609
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:31 pm
Location: D.C.

Post by Red_One43 »

Healthwise, Cooley looking good!

John Keim‏@john_keim

Shanahan on cooley: I don't see any signs of the hamstring, the groin, the knee. #redskins
User avatar
Red_One43
Hog
Posts: 4609
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:31 pm
Location: D.C.

Post by Red_One43 »

Positves on Cooley are starting to roll out.

TE Chris Cooley on a running play sealed LOLB Rob Jackson out to the right. He blocked Jackson with his right shoulder and sealed the running lane inside.. Little things like that are the marks of a veteran. Coaches continue to say he looks like the old Chris. He has to hold up physically through the preseason games, though. If he does that, then there are good reasons to be optimistic about his season.


http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/red ... report-81/
User avatar
Red_One43
Hog
Posts: 4609
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:31 pm
Location: D.C.

Post by Red_One43 »

8/2

Grant Paulsen‏@granthpaulsen

Chris Cooley just had a phenomenal diving catch, fully extended with Keenan Robinson draped on him. #Redskins
cowboykillerzRGiii
CKRGiii
CKRGiii
Posts: 7010
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:56 pm
Location: 505 New Mexico repn

Post by cowboykillerzRGiii »

My dawg!
#21 forever in our hearts
“I wanted to just… put his lights out ….because, you know, …Dallas sucks…” - Dexter Manley
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Posts: 7047
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:58 pm

Post by DarthMonk »

Red_One43 wrote:8/2

Grant Paulsen‏@granthpaulsen

Chris Cooley just had a phenomenal diving catch, fully extended with Keenan Robinson draped on him. #Redskins


Gonna play a llittle Devil's Advocate here. Keep in mind I love Cooley and want him to have a great year.

Catches like this can be a sign of a guy who can't separate any more. See Desmond Howard. He made all these great catches in college with guys draped on him. Turns out it was because he couldn't separate. Great return guy though.

I'm hoping this was just simply a great catch. I hear he's looking healthy.

DarthMonk
Hog Bowl III, V, X Champion (2011, 2013, 2018)

Hognostication Champion (2011, 2013, 2016)

Hognostibowl XII Champion (2017, 2018)


Scalp 'em, Swamp 'em,
We will take 'em big score!
Read 'em, Weep 'em Touchdown,
We want heap more!
User avatar
Red_One43
Hog
Posts: 4609
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:31 pm
Location: D.C.

Post by Red_One43 »

DarthMonk wrote:
Red_One43 wrote:8/2

Grant Paulsen‏@granthpaulsen

Chris Cooley just had a phenomenal diving catch, fully extended with Keenan Robinson draped on him. #Redskins


Gonna play a llittle Devil's Advocate here. Keep in mind I love Cooley and want him to have a great year.

Catches like this can be a sign of a guy who can't separate any more. See Desmond Howard. He made all these great catches in college with guys draped on him. Turns out it was because he couldn't separate. Great return guy though.

I'm hoping this was just simply a great catch. I hear he's looking healthy.

DarthMonk


A few of the beat writers have commented that Cooley is looking slower this year. You might have a point here especially keeping in mind that he is working with mostly with the second team.
User avatar
Red_One43
Hog
Posts: 4609
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:31 pm
Location: D.C.

Post by Red_One43 »

TE Chris Cooley lined up at fullback during one play on which the Redskins practiced third-and-1 situations. Cooley took the handoff and got a first down. We saw that last year in the Monday night game against Dallas, too.

Cooley’s versatility as a fullback is a significant asset in his push to make the team. If the Redskins keep one fullback, Darrel Young, Cooley could be the backup, just as Mike Sellers was last year. It gives Cooley an edge over all the other tight ends.


This is why I think we keep 4 TEs. Cooley is kind of in the role of Sellers for last year - the versatile guy. Don't know if he can keep his salary in this role.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/red ... report-83/
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Posts: 7047
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:58 pm

Post by DarthMonk »

Red_One43 wrote:
TE Chris Cooley lined up at fullback during one play on which the Redskins practiced third-and-1 situations. Cooley took the handoff and got a first down. We saw that last year in the Monday night game against Dallas, too.

Cooley’s versatility as a fullback is a significant asset in his push to make the team. If the Redskins keep one fullback, Darrel Young, Cooley could be the backup, just as Mike Sellers was last year. It gives Cooley an edge over all the other tight ends.


This is why I think we keep 4 TEs. Cooley is kind of in the role of Sellers for last year - the versatile guy. Don't know if he can keep his salary in this role.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/red ... report-83/


^This is easy to forget.

I'm sure Gibbs drafted CC as a classic H-back. It's also a way to run a 3 or 4-TE set that actually has 4 or 3 pretty fast pass catchers that would have to be defended by a base defense.

DarthMonk
Hog Bowl III, V, X Champion (2011, 2013, 2018)

Hognostication Champion (2011, 2013, 2016)

Hognostibowl XII Champion (2017, 2018)


Scalp 'em, Swamp 'em,
We will take 'em big score!
Read 'em, Weep 'em Touchdown,
We want heap more!
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

It's important for folks who worry about going into the season with only 1 FB... Cooley is a pretty darned good backup...
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
cowboykillerzRGiii
CKRGiii
CKRGiii
Posts: 7010
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:56 pm
Location: 505 New Mexico repn

Post by cowboykillerzRGiii »

4 te? I see Morris making the team over Logan Paulson..
#21 forever in our hearts
“I wanted to just… put his lights out ….because, you know, …Dallas sucks…” - Dexter Manley
skinsfan#33
#33
#33
Posts: 4084
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:44 am

Post by skinsfan#33 »

Red_One43 wrote:
TE Chris Cooley lined up at fullback during one play on which the Redskins practiced third-and-1 situations. Cooley took the handoff and got a first down. We saw that last year in the Monday night game against Dallas, too.

Cooley’s versatility as a fullback is a significant asset in his push to make the team. If the Redskins keep one fullback, Darrel Young, Cooley could be the backup, just as Mike Sellers was last year. It gives Cooley an edge over all the other tight ends.


This is why I think we keep 4 TEs. Cooley is kind of in the role of Sellers for last year - the versatile guy. Don't know if he can keep his salary in this role.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/red ... report-83/

Sellers was never a 60-70 catch guy, but Chris will be (AT WORST) a 60 catch guy if he plays all 16 games. He will have more catches than Paulsen, Paul, Armstrang, Banks, Austiin, and Robinson combined.

There is no eveidence that he will be anything other than a 60-80 catch guy. Everyone is ASSuming that he will have a significantly reduced role... he won't! He will prove, like he always has, that he is better than Davis and all but a few TEs in the NFL.
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren

"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier

RIP James Oliver Rigney, Jr. 1948-2007
ATX_Skins
ATX
ATX
Posts: 3386
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:59 am
Location: NOVA
Contact:

Post by ATX_Skins »

skinsfan#33 wrote:
Red_One43 wrote:
TE Chris Cooley lined up at fullback during one play on which the Redskins practiced third-and-1 situations. Cooley took the handoff and got a first down. We saw that last year in the Monday night game against Dallas, too.

Cooley’s versatility as a fullback is a significant asset in his push to make the team. If the Redskins keep one fullback, Darrel Young, Cooley could be the backup, just as Mike Sellers was last year. It gives Cooley an edge over all the other tight ends.


This is why I think we keep 4 TEs. Cooley is kind of in the role of Sellers for last year - the versatile guy. Don't know if he can keep his salary in this role.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/red ... report-83/

Sellers was never a 60-70 catch guy, but Chris will be (AT WORST) a 60 catch guy if he plays all 16 games. He will have more catches than Paulsen, Paul, Armstrang, Banks, Austiin, and Robinson combined.

There is no eveidence that he will be anything other than a 60-80 catch guy. Everyone is ASSuming that he will have a significantly reduced role... he won't! He will prove, like he always has, that he is better than Davis and all but a few TEs in the NFL.



-drinking

Get serious...
Support the troops, especially our snipers.
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

skinsfan#33 wrote: Sellers was never a 60-70 catch guy, but Chris will be (AT WORST) a 60 catch guy if he plays all 16 games. He will have more catches than Paulsen, Paul, Armstrong, Banks, Austiin, and Robinson combined.

There is no evidence that he will be anything other than a 60-80 catch guy. Everyone is ASSuming that he will have a significantly reduced role... he won't! He will prove, like he always has, that he is better than Davis and all but a few TEs in the NFL.


:shock: are you serious ... or a close relative

I'm a Cooley fan and I hope that he's able to show that he can still help the offense

AND

that he'll take less money

but ... :wink:
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
User avatar
Red_One43
Hog
Posts: 4609
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:31 pm
Location: D.C.

Post by Red_One43 »

skinsfan#33 wrote:
Red_One43 wrote:
TE Chris Cooley lined up at fullback during one play on which the Redskins practiced third-and-1 situations. Cooley took the handoff and got a first down. We saw that last year in the Monday night game against Dallas, too.

Cooley’s versatility as a fullback is a significant asset in his push to make the team. If the Redskins keep one fullback, Darrel Young, Cooley could be the backup, just as Mike Sellers was last year. It gives Cooley an edge over all the other tight ends.


This is why I think we keep 4 TEs. Cooley is kind of in the role of Sellers for last year - the versatile guy. Don't know if he can keep his salary in this role.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/red ... report-83/

Sellers was never a 60-70 catch guy, but Chris will be (AT WORST) a 60 catch guy if he plays all 16 games. He will have more catches than Paulsen, Paul, Armstrang, Banks, Austiin, and Robinson combined.

There is no eveidence that he will be anything other than a 60-80 catch guy. Everyone is ASSuming that he will have a significantly reduced role... he won't! He will prove, like he always has, that he is better than Davis and all but a few TEs in the NFL.


No Evidence?
Allow me to introduce Exhibits::

1. Fred Davis
2. Pierre Garcon
3. Santana Moss
4. Leonard Hankerson
5. Niles Paul
6. Josh Morgan

Now, I am not saying that all of these guys will catch more footballs than Cooley. I am saying that there are no where near enough footballs to go around for Cooley to get 60 balls.

Exhibit 7: This isn't Gronk and Hernanez! Even with a healthy Davis and Cooley, the Skins have never successfully run the two TE set that everyone has talked about since they became teammates. The Two TE set will be Davis and Paul. That TE Tandem fits the Shanny O.
User avatar
Red_One43
Hog
Posts: 4609
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:31 pm
Location: D.C.

Post by Red_One43 »

cowboykillerzRED wrote:4 te? I see Morris making the team over Logan Paulson..


To me, Morris has the ability to create the biggest surprise roster decision for Shanny.

I see Cooley as the back up fullback, but with a strong showing by Alfred Morris, is Cooley in trouble or Hightower, as a running back?

Paulsen? Most reports I read, saw Paulsen is the best blocking TE on the roster. I don't think that Paulsen is effected by Morris. Paulsen has yet to play fullback and Morris has yet to play TE.
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Post by 1niksder »

IMO The only way Paulsen makes the team is if Cooley doesn't. If Cooley doesn't make the team I don't see Morris not making it. With Hightower still limited I see him missing out regardless of Cooley, Paulsen or Morris

Dorson Boyce may play a roll in the FB mix but I doubt it.
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

Red_One43 wrote:I am saying that there are no where near enough footballs to go around for Cooley to get 60 balls.

That's absurd. There's easily enough for Cooley to get 60 with the WRs getting theirs. The only player who might limit Cooley's catches is Fred Davis. IF Cooley can't get in the game, he can't catch the ball.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

I wouldn't be shocked to see Cooley with more receptions than Davis.

However, Davis will have more yards, YAC and possibly TD's. But don't count out Cooley in the redzone, a big body that can shield the ball is a great thing.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
User avatar
Red_One43
Hog
Posts: 4609
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:31 pm
Location: D.C.

Post by Red_One43 »

Deadskins wrote:
Red_One43 wrote:I am saying that there are no where near enough footballs to go around for Cooley to get 60 balls.

That's absurd. There's easily enough for Cooley to get 60 with the WRs getting theirs. The only player who might limit Cooley's catches is Fred Davis. IF Cooley can't get in the game, he can't catch the ball.


Oh, don't forget the backs getting theirs. Helu had, if not 50 catches, close to it.

So tell me how easily it is for a second string TE who is reportedly slower this year is going to get his 60.

Footballs to receivers, TEs, backs - Garcon? Davis? Moss? Morgan? Hank? How many footballs for the rest of them?

How may times to you think RGIII is going to crank it up next year?
Will Shanny finally emphasize the run which is his MO?
How effective will the offense control the ball? Are we with the Patriots in offensive plays/

Why did Shanny emphasize getting receiver in FA?
Why did Shanny switch Paul to TE?
Shanny is gearing up for Shanny ball this year.

Now, add all those balls up and the emphasis on the offense this year and tell how a second string TE/FB is going to get 60 catches.
Tel your rationale.

Here's the stats for the Redskins for the last two season to see how the has been distributed the last couple of years.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/stats/_/name/wsh/year/2010
http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/stats/_/nam ... n-redskins
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

Red_One43 wrote:
Deadskins wrote:
Red_One43 wrote:I am saying that there are no where near enough footballs to go around for Cooley to get 60 balls.

That's absurd. There's easily enough for Cooley to get 60 with the WRs getting theirs. The only player who might limit Cooley's catches is Fred Davis. IF Cooley can't get in the game, he can't catch the ball.


Oh, don't forget the backs getting theirs. Helu had, if not 50 catches, close to it.

So tell me how easily it is for a second string TE who is reportedly slower this year is going to get his 60.

Footballs to receivers, TEs, backs - Garcon? Davis? Moss? Morgan? Hank? How many footballs for the rest of them?

How may times to you think RGIII is going to crank it up next year?
Will Shanny finally emphasize the run which is his MO?
How effective will the offense control the ball? Are we with the Patriots in offensive plays/

Why did Shanny emphasize getting receiver in FA?
Why did Shanny switch Paul to TE?
Shanny is gearing up for Shanny ball this year.

Now, add all those balls up and the emphasis on the offense this year and tell how a second string TE/FB is going to get 60 catches.
Tel your rationale.

Here's the stats for the Redskins for the last two season to see how the has been distributed the last couple of years.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/stats/_/name/wsh/year/2010
http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/stats/_/nam ... n-redskins

Don't forget Cooley also lines up as a fullback, and like I said, it really depends on Fred Davis more than the WRs as to how many touches Cooley gets. That and how many two TE sets we run.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

I thought it was reported he looks faster this year than the last couple due to his loss of weight and conditioning.
Post Reply